欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 499-505.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00499

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

生长秀节对糯玉米淀粉晶体结构和糊化特性的影响

陆大雷1;王德成1;赵久然2;陆卫平1*   

  1. 1扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室/农业部长江中下游作物生理生态与栽培重点开放实验室,江苏扬州225009;2北京市农林科学院玉米研究中心,北京100097
  • 收稿日期:2008-08-14 修回日期:2008-10-06 出版日期:2009-03-12 网络出版日期:2009-01-16
  • 通讯作者: 陆卫平
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30270831),北京市自然科学基金项目(YZPT02-06)资助

Crystalline Structure and Pasting Properties of Starch in Eight Waxy Corn Cultivars Grown in Spring and Autumn

LU Da-Lei1;WANG De-Cheng1;ZHAO Jiu-Ran2;LU Wei-Ping1*   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Cultivation in Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River of Ministry of Agriculture, Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225009,China;2Maize Research Center, Beijing Academy of  Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
  • Received:2008-08-14 Revised:2008-10-06 Published:2009-03-12 Published online:2009-01-16
  • Contact: LIU Wei-Ping

PDF

2194

被引次数

30

摘要：

以8个糯玉米品种为材料，利用X-射线衍射仪(X-Ray)和快速黏度分析仪(RVA)分析了淀粉在春季和秋季的晶体结构和糊化特性。结果表明，生长季节不影响淀粉的结晶类型，供试糯玉米淀粉样品的X-射线衍射图谱均表现出典型的“A”型衍射特征。然而，淀粉的晶体结构和糊化特性在生长季节间存在显著差异。和春季糯玉米淀粉相比，秋季糯玉米淀粉具有较高的结晶度、尖峰强度、峰值黏度、谷值黏度、终值黏度和崩解值。糯玉米淀粉的回复值较低，且秋季糯玉米淀粉显著低于春季糯玉米淀粉。淀粉的结晶度、尖峰强度和糊化特征值存在显著的基因型差异。相关分析表明，结晶度和各尖峰强度呈两两显著正相关。结晶度和峰值黏度、崩解值极显著正相关(相关系数分别为0.72和0.85)，和谷值黏度、糊化温度显著正相关(相关系数分别为0.52和0.55)，和回复值显著负相关(相关系数-0.49)。糯玉米淀粉糊化特性在不同生长季节中的变化主要由淀粉晶体结构(结晶度和尖峰强度)变化所致。

关键词: 糯玉米, 淀粉, 生长季节, 晶体结构, 糊化特性

Abstract:

X-ray diffraction technique is widely used in the study of crystal characteristics of starch granule. Waxy corn (Zea mays L.) has a higher crystallinity and better pasting properties than other kinds of corn, which is of good value in industry. The pasting properties of corn are affected by genotypes and growing conditions, and even regulated by the cultivation to some extent. Currently, there is rare knowledge on the differences of starch in waxy corn cultivars grown in different seasons. In this study, starch isolated from eight Chinese waxy corn cultivars grown in spring and autumn, were evaluated for crystalline structure and pasting properties using the X-ray Diffraction and Rapid Visco Analyzer, respectively. All starch samples showed a typical A-type diffraction pattern, indicating the growing season had no effect on it. However, the growing season significantly influenced the starch crystallinity and pasting properties. Starch from autumn-sown plant, compared with that from spring-sown plant, showed higher values in crystallinity, peak intensities (2θ = 15°, 17°, 18°, 20°, and 23°, respectively), peak viscosity, trough viscosity, final viscosity, and breakdown. The setback of starch of waxy corn was low, and that grown in autumn was significantly lower than that in spring. The crystallinity, peak intensity, and pasting characteristics were significantly different among the eight waxy corn cultivars. The crystallinity was positively correlated with the peak viscosity (r = 0.72, P < 0.01), breakdown (r = 0.85, P < 0.01), trough viscosity (r = 0.52, P < 0.05), pasting temperature (r = 0.55, P < 0.05), and negatively correlated to setback (r = -0.49, P < 0.05). The differences of pasting properties between growing seasons were mainly caused by the changed of crystallinity and peak intensity of starch in waxy corn.

Key words: Waxy corn, Starch, Growing season, Crystalline structure, Pasting properties

[1]Zobel H F. Starch crystal transformations and their industrial importance. Starch, 1988, 40: 1–7
[2]Singh N, Singh J, Kaur L, Sodhi N S, Gill B S. Morphological, thermal and rheological properties of starches from different botanical sources. Food Chem, 2003, 81: 219–231
[3]Tester R F, Karkalas J, Qi X. Starch-composition, fine structure and architecture. J Cereal Sci, 2004, 39: 151–165
[4]Hoover R. Composition, molecular structure, and physicochemical properties of tuber and root starches: a review. Carbohyd Polym, 2001, 45: 253–267
[5]Cheetham N W H, Tao L. Variation in crystalline type with amylose content in maize starch granules: an X-ray powder diffraction study. Carbohyd Polym, 1998, 36: 277–284
[6]Perera C, Lu Z, Sell J, Jane J. Comparison of physicochemical properties and structures of sugary-2 cornstarch with normal and waxy cultivars. Cereal Chem, 2001, 78: 249–256
[7]Tziotis A, Seetharaman K, Klucinec J D, Keeling P, White P J. Functional properties of starch from normal and mutant corn genotypes. Carbohyd Polym, 2005, 61: 238–247
[8]Singh N, Inouchi N, Nishinari K. Structure, thermal and viscoelastic characteristics of starches separated from normal, sugary and waxy maize. Food Hydrocolloid, 2006, 20: 923–935
[9]Singh N, Sandhu K S, Kaur M. Physicochemical properties including granular morphology, amylose content, swelling and solubility, thermal and pasting properties of starches from normal, waxy, high amylose and sugary corn. Prog Food Biopolymer Res, 2005, 1: 43–54
[10]Duxbury D D. Modified starch functionalities-no chemicals or enzymes. Food Proc, 1989, 50: 35–37
[11]Zaidul I S M, Yamauchi H, Takigawa S, Matsuura-Endo C, Suzuki T, Noda T. Correlation between the compositional and pasting properties of various potato starches. Food Chem, 2007, 105: 164–172
[12]Wilkins M R, Wang P, Xu L, Niu Y, Tumbleson M E, Rausch K D. Variability in starch acetylation efficiency from commercial waxy corn hybrids. Cereal Chem, 2003, 80: 72–75
[13]Lu F-F(陆芳芳), Lu W-P(陆卫平), Liu P(刘萍), Shen X-P(沈新平), Wang J-F(王继丰), Liu X-B(刘小兵). Heterosis analysis of starch RVA viscosity in waxy corn. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(4): 503–508 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Lu D-L(陆大雷), Lu W-P(陆卫平), Zhao J-R(赵久然), Wang D-C(王德成). Effects of basic fertilizer treatments and nitrogen topdressing at jointing stage on starch RVA characteristics of waxy maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 34(7): 1253–1258 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Hayakawa K, Tanaka K, Nakamura T, Endo S, Hoshino T. Quality characteristics of waxy hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Properties of starch gelatinization and retrogradation. Cereal Chem, 1997, 74: 576–580
[16]Chang Y, Lin J, Lii C. Effect of ethanol concentration on the physicochemical properties of waxy corn starch treated by hydrochloric acid. Carbohyd polym, 2004, 57: 89–96
[17]Myers A M, Morrel M K, James M G, Ball S G. Recent progress toward understanding biosynthesis of amylopectin crystal. Plant Physiol, 2000, 122: 989–997
[18]Cheng F-M(程方民), Zhong L-J(钟连进), Sun Z-X(孙宗修). Effect of temperature at grain filling stage on starch DSC and crystallinity properties of early indica rice. Prog Nat Sci (自然科学进展), 2003, 13(5): 490–494 (in Chinese)
[19]Wang J(王珏), Feng C-N(封超年), Guo W-S(郭文善), Zhu X-K(朱新开), Li C-Y(李春燕), Peng Y-X(彭永欣). Effects of high temperature after anthesis on starch traits of grain in wheat. J. Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2008, 28(2): 260–265 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]Massaux C, Sindic M, Lenartz J, Sinnaeve G, Bodson B, Falisse A, Dardenne P, Deroanne C. Variations in physicochemical and functional properties of starches extracted from European soft wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): The importance to preserve the varietal identity. Carbohyd Polym, 2008, 71: 32–41
[21]Liu Q, Tarn R, Lynch D, Skjodt N M. Physicochemical properties of dry matter and starch from potatoes grown in Canada. Food Chem, 2007, 105: 897–907
[22]Miles M J, Morris V J, Orford R D, Ring S G. The roles of amylose and amylopectin in the gelation and retrogradation of starch. Carbohyd Res, 1985, 135: 271–281
[23]Sandhu K S, Singh N. Some properties of corn starches: II. Physicochemical, gelatinization, retrogradation, pasting and gel textural properties. Food Chem, 2007, 101: 1499–1507
[24]Ji Y, Wong K, Hasjim J, Pollak L M, Duvick S, Jane J, White P J. Structure and function of starch from advanced generations of new corn lines. Carbohyd Polym, 2003, 54: 305–319
[1] 卓峰琦, 唐振三, 雷雨俊, 程李香, 赵甜甜, 吕汰, 杨晨, 张峰. 基于烹饪方式及回生温度筛选低升糖马铃薯品种(系)[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2538-2546.
[2] 朱维佳, 王蕊, 薛英杰, 田红丽, 范亚明, 王璐, 李松, 徐丽, 卢柏山, 史亚兴, 易红梅, 陆大雷, 杨扬, 王凤格. 兼容双平台的玉米糯质基因InDel功能标记开发与应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2330-2340.
[3] 杨颖聪, 张俊豪, 唐一哲, 乔唱唱, 王鹏博, 黄明, 徐国伟, 王贺正. 秸秆还田和施磷量对旱地小麦籽粒淀粉及其合成相关酶活性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2467-2484.
[4] 杨婷婷, 陈娟, ABDUL Rehman, 李婧, 闫素辉, 汪建来, 李文阳. 花后弱光对软质小麦干物质积累转运、籽粒产量和淀粉品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2204-2219.
[5] 宋改利, 王璐倩, 屈柯飞, 唐建卫, 董纯豪, 黄振朴, 高艳, 牛吉山, 殷贵鸿, 李巧云. Bipolaris sorokiniana黑胚病对中筋小麦淀粉含量、粒度分布与糊化特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2164-2175.
[6] 王若楠, 张颖星, 于筱菡, 刘少雄, 王跃, 薛亚鹏, 辛旭霞, 张莉, 刘敏轩. 基于近红外快速检测技术的谷子淀粉多样性分析及模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1757-1768.
[7] 吴美娟, 张寅辉, 李元昊, 刘海霞, 黄以琳, 李甜, 刘红霞, 张学勇, 郝晨阳, 郭杰, 侯健. 小麦蔗糖合酶基因TaSUS2调控籽粒淀粉合成及品质的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1514-1525.
[8] 朱建平, 李文奇, 许扬, 王芳权, 李霞, 蒋彦婕, 范方军, 陶亚军, 陈智慧, 吴莹莹, 杨杰. 水稻粉质胚乳突变体we2的表型分析与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1110-1117.
[9] 肖正午, 张珂骞, 曹放波, 陈佳娜, 郑华斌, 王慰亲, 黄敏. 糙米粉蒸煮食味品质与糙米淀粉组分含量和糊化特性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1102-1109.
[10] 苏明, 吴佳瑞, 洪自强, 李翻过, 周甜, 吴宏亮, 康建宏. 西北半干旱区马铃薯块茎淀粉形成及产量对磷肥减量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 713-727.
[11] 闫秉春, 万雪, 钟敏, 刘宇奇, 赵艳泽, 姜红芳, 刘雅, 刘惠玲, 马沁春, 高继平, 张文忠. 氮素水平对北方优良食味粳米品质及精碾磨粉颗粒特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 503-515.
[12] 辛雨宁, 任昊, 王洪章, 梁明磊, 于涛, 刘鹏. 喷施6-苄氨基腺嘌呤(6-BA)对授粉后高温胁迫下夏玉米籽粒灌浆及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 418-431.
[13] 刘佳荟, 李雨龙, 王雅茹, 贺宏, 张云书, 吴郁, 曾秀丽, 刘廷辉, 陈国跃, 祁鹏飞, 魏育明, 江千涛. 西藏大麦SSIIa基因自然变异对淀粉组成及特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3144-3156.
[14] 张顺杰, 吴维泰, 冉禧玥, 赵梓含, 韩永辉, 吴正丹, 张凯. 甘薯β淀粉酶基因IbBAM48829的功能解析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3096-3104.
[15] 王媛, 许佳茵, 董二伟, 王劲松, 刘秋霞, 黄晓磊, 焦晓燕. 有机肥替代化肥氮对谷子氮素累积、产量及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 149-160.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2