欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 1364-1368.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01364

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

耕作深度对烤烟生长、养分吸收及产量、质量的影响

徐天养1,赵正雄1,*,李忠环2,陈荣平2,许龙2,王胱霖2,金霞1   

  1. 1云南农业大学烟草学院，云南昆明650201；2云南省烟草公司昆明市公司，云南昆明650051
  • 收稿日期:2008-11-03 修回日期:2009-03-18 出版日期:2009-07-12 网络出版日期:2009-05-19
  • 通讯作者: 赵正雄, E-mail: zhaozx0801@163.com; Tel: 0871-5220536
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由云南省烟草公司科技项目计划（06A12）资助。

Effect of tilling Depth on Growth,Nutrient Uptake,Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco Plant

XU Tian-Yang1,ZHAO Zheng-Xiong1,*,LI Zhong-Huan2,CHEN Rong-Ping2,XU Long2,WANG Guang-Lin2,JIN Xia1   

  1. 1College of Tobacco Sciences,Yunnan Agricultural University,Kunming 650201,China;2Kunming Tobacco Company,Yunnan Tobacco Company,Kunming 650051,China
  • Received:2008-11-03 Revised:2009-03-18 Published:2009-07-12 Published online:2009-05-19
  • Contact: ZHAO Zheng-Xiong, E-mail: zhaozx0801@163.com; Tel: 0871-5220536

PDF

1387

被引次数

30

摘要：

通过田间试验研究了移栽前不同耕作深度(20、30和40 cm)对烟株农艺性状、根系发育及分布、干物质累积和养分吸收以及烟叶产量、产值和品质的影响。结果表明，不同耕作深度处理烟株前期生长无明显差异，但到打顶时烟株根系发育和分布则有显著差异。在0~10 cm土层内, 根系数量及根干重均随耕作深度增加而下降；而10~20 cm、20~30 cm两土层内根系数量及干重与耕作深度间的关系则与0~10 cm相反，20 cm处理与其余两处理间差异显著，耕作深度为40 cm处理明显有更多的根系。各处理烟株烟叶叶面积系数及最大叶面积、整株干物质累积和氮磷钾养分吸收均随耕作深度增加而增大, 且这种趋势随生育期发展而愈加明显。烤后烟叶产量、产值以耕作深度为40 cm处理最高, 30 cm处理次之, 20 cm处理最低, 前者与后两者间有显著差异；而评吸质量以耕作深度为30 cm处理各部位和40 cm处理上部叶相对更好。综合考虑, 建议烤烟生产中土壤耕作深度以30~40 cm为宜。

关键词: 烤烟, 甘蔗深度, 根系, 干物质积累, 养分吸收, 产量, 质量

Abstract:

Deeper tillage has been commonly thought having positive effect on plant growth, but what depth for tillage is better is not clearly in tobacco production. A field experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of tilling depth (20, 30, and 40 cm, respectively) on the growth, root distribution, dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, yield and quality of flue–cured tobacco plant in Shilin county, Yunnan. The results showed that tobacco plant growth was significantly affected by the tilling depth from topping to harvesting except the early stage. The number and dry weight of roots decreased with increasing tilling depth at the 0–10 cm soil layer, but increased at the 10–20 cm and 20–30 cm soil layers, and more roots were found for the treatment with tilling depth at 40 cm. Leaf area index, maximum leaf area, dry matter accumulation and uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium increased in the plant with deepening tilling depth. The highest yield and economic value of flue-cured tobacco leaves were obtained at 40 cm of tilling depth. Moreover, the 30 cm of tilling depth was also better for higher yield and higher quality of leaf. It suggested that 30 to 40 cm was the optimum tilling depth for flue-cured tobacco.

Key words: Flue-cured tobacco, Tilling depth, Root, Dry matter accumulation, Nutrient uptake, Yield, Quality

[1] Collins W K, Hawks Jr S N. Principles of Flue-cured Tobacco Production. Raleigh, North Carolina: North Carolina State University, 1993. pp 23-98

[2] Xu D(许迪), Schmid R, Mermoud A. Effects of tillage practices on temporal variations of soil surface properties. J Soil Water Conserv (水土保持学报), 2000, 14(1): 64-70 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3] Zhang H-L(张海林), Qin Y-D(秦耀东), Zhu W-S(朱文珊). Effects of tillage on soil physical properties. Soils (土壤), 2003, (2): 140-144 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[4] Zhang J(张洁), Yao Y-Q(姚宇卿), Lü J-J(吕军杰), Wang Y-H(王育红), Jin K(金轲), Wang C-H(王聪慧), Hu B-W(胡博文), Li J-H(李俊红), Ding Z-Q(丁志强). Effects of different tillages on soil organic carbon, soil microbial biomass carbon and water use efficiency in the slopping field of arid areas.Chin J Soil Sci (土壤通报), 2007, 38(5): 882-886 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5] Tian X-P(田秀平), Tao Y-X(陶永香), Wang L-J(王立军), Ji J-H(姬景红). The effect of different cultivation on nutrient and crop yield in Albic soils. J Heilongjiang August First Land Reclamation Univ (黑龙江八一农垦大学学报), 2002, 14(3): 9-11 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6] Martin-Rueda I, Munoz-Guerra L M, Yunta F, Esteban E, Tenorio J L, Lucena J J. Tillage and crop rotation effects on barley yield and soil nutrients on a Calciortidic Haploxeralf. Soil Till Res, 2007, 92: 1-9

[7] Ding K-L(丁昆仑), Hann M J. Effects of soil management on soil properties and crop yield. Transact CSAE (农业工程学报), 2000, 16(3): 28-31 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8] Han B(韩宾), Li Z-J(李增嘉), Wang Y(王芸), Ning T-Y(宁堂原), Zheng Y-H(郑延海), Shi Z-Q(史忠强). Effects of soil tillage and returning straw to soil on wheat growth status and yield. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2007, 23(2): 48-53 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9] Liu C-J(刘长江), Li Q-S(李取生), Li X-J(李秀军). Utilization of different tillage models for improvement of soda-alkaline glebe in Songnen Plain. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2005, 23(5): 13-16 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10] Xu D(许迪), Schmid R, Mermoud A. Effects of tillage practices on the variation of soil moisture and the yield of summer maize. Trans CSAE(农业工程学报), 1999, 15(3): 101-106 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11] Wang R-X(王瑞新), Han F-G(韩富根). Analysis for Chemical Assessment of Tobacco (烟草化学品质分析). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2003. pp 66-186 (in Chinese)
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] 孙思敏, 韩贝, 陈林, 孙伟男, 张献龙, 杨细燕. 棉花苗期根系分型及根系性状的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1081-1090.
[9] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[10] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[11] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[14] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2