欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12): 2139-2149.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.02139

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 •    下一篇

大豆蛋白质有关性状的QTL定位

刘顺湖1,4，周瑞宝2,*，喻德跃1，陈受宜3，盖钧镒1,*   

  1. 1南京农业大学大豆研究所/国家大豆改良中心/作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室，江苏南京210095；2河南工业大学大豆精深加工研究所，河南郑州450052；3中国科学院遗传与发育生物学研究所，北京100101；4山东济宁学院，山东曲阜273155
  • 收稿日期:2009-05-07 修回日期:2009-09-24 出版日期:2009-12-10 网络出版日期:2009-10-13
  • 通讯作者: 盖钧镒，E-mail: sri@njau.edu.cn; Tel: 025-84395405; 周瑞宝，E-mail: rbzhou0615@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展规划（973计划）项目(2004CB7206,2006CB101708,2009CB118404)，国家自然科学基金项目（30671266），国家高新技术研究发展计划（863计划）项目（2006AA100104），教育部高等学校学科创新引智计划项目（B08025），农业部公益性行业专项（200803060）资助。

  QTL Mapping of Protein Related Traits in Soybean[Glycine max (L.) Merr.]

LIU Shun-Hu1,4,ZHOU Rui-Bao2,*, YU De-Yue1,CHEN Shou-Yi3,GAI Jun-Yi1,*   

  1. 1Soybean Research Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University,National Center for Soybean Improvement,and National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement,Nanjing 210095,China;2Soybean Processing Research Institute,Henan University of Technology,zhengzhou 450012,China,3Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101;4Shandong Jining College,Qufu 273155,China
  • Received:2009-05-07 Revised:2009-09-24 Published:2009-12-10 Published online:2009-10-13
  • Contact: GAI Jun-Yi，E-mail: sri@njau.edu.cn; Tel: 025-84395405;ZHOU Rui-Bao，E-mail: rbzhou0615@163.com

PDF

1909

被引次数

33

摘要：

以科丰1号×南农1138-2组合衍生的184个重组自交家系(简称RIKY)和(Essex×ZDD2315)×ZDD2315衍生的114个BC1F2家系(简称BIEX)为材料，对蛋白质含量、蛋油总量与油脂含量，11S、7S、11S/7S，11S-1~11S-4, 7S-1~7S-6等4组16个性状利用WinQTL Cartographer Ver.2.5的复合区间作图法(CIM)、多区间作图法(MIM)和IciMapping Ver.2.0的完备区间作图法(ICIM)进行QTL分析, 结果表明：(1) 在RIKY和BIEX群体分别定位到17+个和21+个QTL，合计38+个QTL；在RIKY有蛋白、油脂、蛋油总量QTL11个，在11S和7S亚基组上分别只有1+和3+个；在BIEX有前性状QTL2+个，有后性状QTL分别9+和6+个；(2) 两群体16个性状上均没有检测到共享的QTL，说明两群体的蛋白质有关性状具有完全不同的遗传基础；RIKY的两个亲本间蛋白、油脂和蛋油总量有明显遗传差异，但在亚基组上遗传差异不大，而BIEX则反之；(3) 4组总、分性状中，两群体一致表现出蛋白、油脂和蛋油总量和11S、7S和11S/7S比值两组在总、分性状间共享QTL(共同遗传基础), 而11S亚基组和7S亚基组两组性状在总、分性状间无共享的QTL；(4) 蛋白质有关性状QTL定位结果和分离分析结果共同表明这类性状主效基因和微效基因均占较大比重，要考虑两者兼用的育种方法。

关键词: 大豆, 蛋白质含量, 蛋油总量, 11S, 7S, 11S/7S, 亚基组, QTL定位

Abstract:

Soybean processing industry places emphasis on the quality of soybean protein which is related to the protein components, mainly 11S, 7S and 11S/7S, and their subunit constituents. In the improvement of soybean protein quality, the knowledge of genetic structure of the traits related to protein quality is of great importance. Therefore, the present paper was aimed at mapping QTLs of 16 traits, including protein content, protein plus fat content, fat content, 11S, 7S, 11S/7S, and subunit groups. Two populations, RIKY population with 184 recombinant inbred lines derived from Kefeng 1×Nannong 1138-2 and BIEX population with 114 BC1F2 lines derived from (Essex×ZDD2315) ×ZDD2315, were used to map QTLs with the softwares of composite interval mapping (CIM), multiple interval mapping (MIM) of WinQTL Cartographer Ver. 2.5 and the inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) of IciMapping. The results showed that there were totally 17+ QTLs detected with 11 for protein content, fat content and total content of protein and fat, and 1+ and 3+ for 11S subunit groups and 7S subunit groups, respectively, in RIKY, as well as totally 21+ detected with only 2+ for protein content, fat content and protein plus fat content, but 9+ and 6+ for 11S subunit groups and 7S subunit groups, respectively, in BIEX. There was no shared QTL detected for all 16 traits in both populations, indicating that the 16 traits between RIKY and BIEX have completely different genetic systems, and there existed obvious genetic differences between two parents of RIKY in protein content, fat content and protein plus fat content but less genetic differences in 11S subunit groups and 7S subunit groups, and those of BIEX were on the contrary. The group of protein content, fat content and protein plus fat content and the group of 11S, 7S and 11S/7S had common QTLs, showing their common genetic base, but there were no common QTLs in the groups of 11S subunit and 7S subunit. The results from QTL mapping and segregation analysis showed jointly that both major genes and minor genes contributed a large part of phenotypic variations for all 16 traits, suggesting that both major genes and minor genes should be considered in the breeding for protein-related traits.

Key words: Soybean, Protein content, Protein plus fat content, 11S, 7S, 11S/7S, Subunit group, QTL mapping

[1] Diers B W, Shoemaker R C. Restriction fragment length polymorphismanalysis of soybean fatty acid content. JAOCS, 1992, 69: 1242-1244
[2] Chapman A, Pantalone V R, Ustun A. Quantitative trait loci for agronomic and seed quality traits in an F2 and F4:6 soybean population. Euphytica, 2003, 129: 387-393
[3] Hyten D L, Pantalone V R, Sams C E, Saxton A M, Landau-Ellis D, Stefaniak T R, Schmidt M E. Seed quality QTL in a prominent soybean population. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 109: 552-561
[4] Panthee D R, Pantalone V R, West D R, Saxton A M, Sams C E. Quantitative trait loci for seed protein and oil concentration, and seed size in soybean. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 2015-2022
[5] Zhu X-L(朱晓丽). Constructing of Genetic Linkage Map and QTL Mapping of Important Agronomic Traits in Two Soybean Populations. MS Dissertation of Northeast Agricultural University, 2006 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] Lü Z-Z(吕祝章). Construction of Soybean Genetic Map, QTL Mapping of Agronomic Traits, and Identification on Excellent Gene. PhD Dissertation of Shandong Agricultural University, 2006 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] Chen Q-S(陈庆山), Zhang Z-C(张忠臣), Liu C-Y(刘春燕), Xin D-W(辛大伟), Shan D-P(单大鹏), Qiu H-M(邱红梅), Shan C-Y(单彩云). QTL analysis of major agronomic traits in soybean. Sci Agric Sin, 2007, 40(1): 41-47 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] Nielsen N C, Dickinson C D, Cho T J, Thanh V H, Scallon B J, Fischer R L, Sims T L,Drews G N, Goldberg R B. Characterization of the glycinin gene family. Plant Cell, 1989, 1: 313-328
[9] Chen Z, Shoemaker R C. Four genes affecting seed traits in soybean map to linkage group F. J Hered, 1998, 89: 211-215
[10] Beilinson V, Chen Z, Shoemaker R C, Fischer R L, Goldberg R B, Nielsen N C. Genomic organization of glycinin genes in soybean. Theor Appl Genet, 2002, 104: 1132-1140
[11] Panthee D R, Kwanyuen P, Sams C E, West D R, Saxton A M, Pantalone V R. Quantitative trait loci for β-conglycinin (7S) and glycinin (11S) fractions of soybean storage protein. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 2004, 81: 1558-9331
[12] Liu S H, Zhou R B, Tian S J, Gai J Y. A Study on subunit groups of soybean protein extracts under SDS-PAGE. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 2007, 84: 793-801
[13] Wang S C, Basten C J, Zeng Z B. Cartographer Ver.2.5.
[2005]
[2009] http://statgen.ncsu.edu/ qtlcart/WQTLCart.htm

[14] Li H H, Ye G Y, Wang J K. A modi?ed algorithm for the improvement of composite interval mapping. Genetics, 2007, 175: 361-374

[15] Churchill G A, Doerge R W. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics, 1994, 138: 963-971

[16] Doerge R W, Churchill G A. Permutation tests for multiple loci affecting a quantitative character. Genetics, 1996, 142: 285-294

[17] Collard B C Y, Jahufer M Z Z, Brouwer J B, Pang E C K. An introduction to markers, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping and marker assisted selection for crop improvement: The basic concepts. Euphytica, 2005, 142: 169-196

[18] Liu S-H(刘顺湖), Zhou R-B(周瑞宝), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Segregation Analysis for Inheritance of Protein Related Traits in Soybean
[Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(11)(in press) (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19] Liu Y(刘莹). Identification of tolerance to rhizosperical stresses and inheritance and QTL locating of related root traits in soybean
[Glycine max (L) Merr.]. PhD Dissertation of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2005

[20] Luo W-G(卢为国). Soybean Cyst Nematode (Heterodera glycines Ichinohe) Races and Inheritance and Gene Mapping of Resistance of Soybean to the Disease in Huang-Huai Valley. PhD Dissertation of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2005(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] Zheng Y-Z(郑永战). Variability, Inheritance, and QTL Mapping of Fatty Traits in Chinese Germplasm of Soybean. PhD Dissertation of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2006 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[2] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[3] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[4] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[5] 刘长友, 王珅, 时会影, 沈颖超, 孙蕾, 王彦, 张志肖, 苏秋竹, 田静, 范保杰. 基于饭豆基因资源的小豆远缘杂交群体抗豆象QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 936-944.
[6] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[7] 贺红利, 张雨涵, 杨静, 程云清, 赵杨, 李星诺, 司洪亮, 张兴政, 杨向东. 大豆e1-as基因突变体的创制及生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
[8] 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[9] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[10] 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[11] 邵顺伟, 陈卓, 兰振东, 蔡兴奎, 邹华芬, 李晨曦, 唐景华, 朱熙, 张彧, 董建科, 金辉, 宋波涛. 基于BSA-seq技术的块茎芽眼深度QTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1725-1735.
[12] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[13] 王琼, 邹丹霞, 陈兴运, 张威, 张红梅, 刘晓庆, 贾倩茹, 魏利斌, 崔晓艳, 陈新, 王学军, 陈华涛. 大豆开花时间和成熟期性状全基因组关联分析与候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1558-1568.
[14] 殷丛丛, 李睿琦, 岳霈尧, 李晨, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 基于闭合哑铃介导等温扩增可视化检测大豆花叶病毒SC15方法的建立及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1248-1260.
[15] 张金泽, 周庆国, 肖莉晶, 金海润, 欧阳青静, 龙旭, 晏中彬, 田恩堂. 芥菜型油菜不同组织硫苷含量的QTL定位与候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1166-1177.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2