欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 256-260.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00256

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

一个新矮生玉米种质资源矮生性状QTL的定位

石云素,于永涛,宋燕春,刘志斋,黎裕,王天宇   

  1. 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 / 农作物基因资源与基因改良国家重大科学工程,北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2009-06-29 修回日期:2009-09-09 出版日期:2010-02-10 网络出版日期:2009-12-21
  • 通讯作者: shiyunsu@mail.caas.net.cn; Tel: 010-62186647
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD13B03),北京市自然科学基金项目(6071003)和农作物种质资源保护与利用项目(NB06-070401-22-27-04)资助。

QTL Identification for Plant Height in a New Dwarf Germplasm of Maize

SHI Yun-Su,YU Yong-Tao,SONG Yan-Chun,LIU Zhi-Zhai, LI Yu,WANG Tian-Yu   

  1. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2009-06-29 Revised:2009-09-09 Published:2010-02-10 Published online:2009-12-21
  • Contact: shiyunsu@mail.caas.net.cn; Tel: 010-62186647

摘要:

用新发现的玉米矮生种质资源矮2003×冀257构建的255个F2:3家系为作图群体, 利用114个覆盖玉米全基因组的SSR标记构建连锁图谱, 图谱总长度2 852.1 cM, 标记间平均距离为27.42 cM。2006年在北京与海南进行随机区组试验, 鉴定了255个F2:3家系成株期株高。用复合区间作图法(composite interval mapping, CIM), 对控制玉米株高性状的遗传位点进行QTL检测。在两个不同环境下均检测到相同的控制玉米株高的QTL位点3个, 分别位于第1和第2条染色体。其中在第1染色体上的1.10~1.11区段存在一个控制株高的主效QTL, 与dwarf plant8 (d8)位置相近, 在北京和海南环境下分别能够解释株高表型变异的50.5%和37.5%, 作用方式表现为显性效应。深入的序列分析结果显示, 该基因/QTL位于已知的d8基因下游20~30 cM的染色体区间, 这可能是玉米中控制株高的一个新基因。

关键词: 玉米, 矮生资源, SSR, 株高, QTL

Abstract:

Dwarf germplasm is important for both breeding programs and basic researches in maize (Zea mays L.). Previously we found a naturally occurred dwarf mutant from the inbred “K36” and developed a new dwarf germplasm, “Ai 2003”, with good agronomical performance. Classical genetic analysis showed that this dwarfing character was controlled by a major single recessive nuclear gene. However, the character of plant height in the germplasm is also likely associated with other genetic loci. Therefore, quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis was conducted to elucidate the genetic basis of plant height of this dwarf germplasm by using a segregating population consisting of 255 F2:3 lines derived from a cross between Ai 2003 and a normal inbred, Ji 257. A genetic linkage map was constructed by 114 polymorphism simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers covering the entire maize genome. The total map length was 2 852.1 cM, with an average distance of 27.4 cM between markers. Composite interval mapping (CIM) was used to identify the genes/QTLs controlled plant height based on the phenotypic characterization of 255 F2:3 families in Beijing and Hainan in 2006. The same three QTLs located on chromosomes 1 and 2 were identified under both environments, explaining 4.8% to 50.5% of the phenotypic variances, among which, one major QTL located in the region of bin 1.10–1.11 explained 50.5% and 37.5% of the phenotypic variation in Beijing and Hainan, respectively. A further sequences analysis revealed that the QTL is located in the 20–30 cM interval downstream of dwarf plant8 (d8), a well-known maize dwarf gene, implying that the locus is a gene newly discovered for controlling plant height in maize.

Key words: Maize, Dwarf germplasm, SSR, Plant height, QTL


[1]    
Khush G S. Green revolution: the way forward. Nat Rev Genet, 2001, 2: 815–822

[2]    
Peng J, Richards D E, Hartley N M, Murphy G P, Devos K M, Flintham J E, Deales J, Fish L J, Worland A J, Pelica F, Sudhakar D, Christou P, Snape J W, Gale M D, Harberd N P. Green revolution′ genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature, 1999, 400: 256–261

[3]    
Harberd N P, Freeling M.Genetics of dominant gibberellin-insensitive dwarfism in maize. Genetics, 1989, 121: 827–838

[4]    
Thornsberry J M, Goodman M M, Doebley J, Kresovich S, Nielsen D, Buckler IV E S. Dwarf8 polymorphisms associate with variation in flowering time. Nat Genet, 2001, 28: 286–289

[5]    
Winkler R G, Freeling M. Physiological genetics of the dominant gibberellin non-responsive maize dwarfs, Dwarf8 and Dwarf9. Planta, 1994, 193: 341–348

[6]    
Dai J-R(戴景瑞). Dwarf genes and their genetic effect in maize. Hereditas (遗传), 1979, 1(5): 40–43 (in Chinese)

[7]    
Austin D F, Lee M, Veldboom L R. Genetic mapping in maize with hybrid progeny across testers and generations: plant height and flowering. Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 102: 163–176

[8]    
Beavis W D, Grant D, Albertsen D, Fincher R. Quantitative trait loci for plant height in four maize populations and their associations with quantitative genetic loci. Theor Appl Genet, 1991, 83: 141–145

[9]    
Sari-Gorla M, Krajewski M, Di Fonzo N , Villa M, Frova C. Genetic analysis of drought tolerance in maize by molecular markers: II. Plant height and flowering. Theor Appl Genet, 1999, 99: 289–295

[10] 
Zhang Z M, Zhao M J, Ding H P, Rong T Z, Pan G T. Quantitative trait loci analysis of plant height and ear height in maize (Zea mays L.). Russian J Genet, 2006, 42: 306−310

[11] 
Shi Y-S(石云素), Yu Y-T(于永涛), Song Y-C(宋燕春), Wang T-Y(王天宇), Li Y(黎裕). Discovery and genetic characterization of a new dwarf germplasm in maize. J Plant Genet Resour (植物遗传资源学报), 2008, 9(4): 521–524 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12] 
Saghai-Maroof M A, Soliman K L, Jorgensen R A, Allard R W. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1984, 81: 8014–8018

[13] 
Utz H F, Melchinger A E. PlabQTL: A program for composite interval mapping of QTL. J Agric Genomics, 1996, 2: 1–5

[14] 
Wang S, Basten C J, Zeng Z B. Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 2007 (http://statgen.ncsu.edu/qtlcart/WQTLCart.htm)

[15] 
Edwards M D, Stuber C W, Wendel J F. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize: I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics, 1987, 116: 113–125

[16] 
Cui S-P(崔绍平), Sun S-Z(孙世珍), Xu Y(徐有), Zheng J-D(郑积德), Li H-J(李洪杰). Utilization of brachetic gene br-2 in maize breeding. In: Li J-X(李竞雄) ed. Progress in Maize Breeding Research(玉米育种研究进展). Beijing: Science Press, 1992, 4: 31–36 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17] 
Agric-Sci Research Institute of Nanchong, Sichuan. Dwarf maize hybrids. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1978, 11(2): 21–25 (in Chinese)

[18] 
He C(何川) , Zheng Z-P(郑祖平), Xie S-G(谢树果), Li Z(李钟), Liu D-H(刘代惠). Breeding of the maize monogenic br-2 dwarf lines. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2009, 42(8): 2978–2981 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[4] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[5] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[6] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[7] 张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[8] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[9] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[10] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[11] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[12] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[13] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[14] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[15] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!