欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (05): 895-902.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.00895

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

湖南省季节性干旱对双季稻生长及产量影响的模拟研究

冯利平1,*,莫志鸿1,2,黄晚华3,杨晓光1,潘学标1   

  1. 1中国农业大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100193; 2中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所, 北京 100081; 3湖南省气象科学研究所, 湖南长沙 410007
  • 收稿日期:2010-09-15 修回日期:2011-03-08 出版日期:2011-05-12 网络出版日期:2011-03-24
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由教育部高等学校科技创新工程重大项目培育资金项目(708013), 国家自然科学基金项目(30771249)和国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD04B07)资助。

A Simulated Study on the Effects of Seasonal Drought on Growth and Yield of Double Cropping Rice in Hunan Province

FENG Li-Ping1,*,MO Zhi-Hong1,2,HUANG Wan-Hua3,YANG Xiao-Guang1,PAN Xue-Biao1   

  1. 1 College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 2 Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 3 Hunan Institute of Meteorology, Changsha 410007, China
  • Received:2010-09-15 Revised:2011-03-08 Published:2011-05-12 Published online:2011-03-24

PDF

1491

被引次数

21

摘要： 湖南省季节性干旱是水稻生产的主要灾害之一。在对水稻模型ORYZA2000校准验证基础上，模拟分析了1960—2007年不同水分管理方式(持续灌溉、间歇灌溉和雨养)下双季稻生育期间季节性干旱特点及其对水稻生长与产量的影响。结果表明，(1) 在间歇灌溉和雨养条件下，双季稻自幼穗分化前逐渐表现出稻田土壤季节性干旱特征，随着生育进程干旱不断加重，在雨养条件下，干旱特征随发育进程愈加明显；晚稻比早稻易受季节性干旱影响，生长后期较前期加重；双季稻开花期前后出现的干旱胁迫对生物量、产量影响最大；土壤干旱与作物干旱特征表现不同。(2) 早稻与晚稻在平水年型及干旱年型下均表现出干旱现象；在干旱年型下，早稻自穗分化至成熟期干旱都较为严重，且强度与持续时间要大于平水年型；晚稻干旱的频率和强度都大于早稻，尤其是从穗分化到成熟阶段。(3) 季节性干旱可造成不同程度的产量损失，间歇灌溉方式能够获得较高的产量，雨养水稻产量最低；雨养条件下晚稻产量普遍低于早稻产量。研究结果可为减轻季节性干旱的影响和合理水稻管理措施提供科学依据。

关键词: 双季稻, 季节性干旱, 产量, ORYZA2000, 湖南

Abstract: Seasonal drought is one of the most serious disasters in rice production in Hunan province of China. On the basis of calibration and validation of rice model ORYZA2000, the characteristics of seasonal drought and its effect on growth and yield of double cropping rice under three types of water management with continued flooding (CF), alternative wet and dry (AWD), and rainfed (RF) conditions were simulated and analyzed with history weather data from 1960 to 2007. The results was as follows, (1) The soil seasonal drought of double rice gradually occurred from panicle initiation (PI) under AWD and RF conditions, and got more serious in the process of growth, especially under rainfed condition. The late rice tended to be more easily affected by seasonal drought than early rice, and the seasonal drought was more serious at late stage than early stage. The effect of drought on biomass and yield of rice was the severest at flowering stage. The characteristics between soil drought and crop drought showed differently. (2) There appeared seasonal drought for both early and late rice under the year types of normal and dry. The drought was serious for early rice from early PI to maturity under dry year type, and its strength and duration surpassed that of normal year type. The frequency and strength of drought for late rice excessed that of early rice under dry year type, especially from PI to maturity. (3) The seasonal drought caused different losses of yield in double rice. Higher yield of rice occurred under AWD, while the lowest yield occurred under RF. The yield of late rice was lower than that of early rice under rainfed condition. This quantitative study could provide a theoretical basis for the disaster mitigation of seasonal drought and sustainable water management in double rice production in Hunan.

Key words: Double cropping rice, Seasonal drought, Yield, ORYZA2000, Hunan Province

[1]Hunan Provincial Bureau of Statistics (湖南统计局). Hunan Statistical Yearbook 1987-2007 (湖南统计年鉴). Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)
[2]Huang D-Y(黄道友), Peng T-B(彭廷柏), Wang K-L(王克林), Chen G-Q(陈桂秋). Analysis of seasonal drought applying Z-index method in south China. Chin J Agrometeorol (中国农业气象), 2003, 24(4): 12–15 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Li J-B(李景保), Zheng Y-Y(郑云有), Gao C-H(高昌海), Yang Y(杨燕). A discussion on geographical regularity of flood and drought in Hunan province. J Nat Disasters (自然灾害学报), 2000, 9(4): 115–120 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]He J-L(贺建林). Flood and drought disasters and the spatial and temporal distributions in Hunan province. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Valley (长江流域资源与环境), 1997, 6(2):187–192 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Bouman B A M, Kropff M J, Tuong T P, Wopereis M C S, Ten Berge H F M, Van Laar H H. ORYZA2000: Modelling Lowland Rice. Los Banos (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute, and Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research Centre, Netherlands, 2001. p 235
[6]Editorial Committee in National Survey of Soil (全国土壤普查办公室编). The Native Soil of China (中国土种志). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1994, Volume III (in Chinese)
[7]Feng L P, Bouman B A M, Tuong T P. Exploring options to grow rice using less water in northern China using a modelling approachⅠ. Field experiments and model evaluation. Agric Water Manag, 2007, 88: 1–13
[8]Wu Y-C(吴义城), Yuan Y-C(袁业畅), Ren Y-W(任耀武), Zhang Z(张震), Feng M(冯明), Li G-H(李国华). Assessment of agroclimate impact: classification method of annual crop climate types (农业气候影响评价: 农作物气候年型划分方法) (GB/T 21986-2008). Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2008 (in Chinese)
[9]Yu S-W(余叔文), Chen J-Z(陈景治), Gong C-X(龚燦霞). Effects of soil drought on rice in different growth stage. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1962, 1(4): 399–409 (in Chinese)
[10]Chen J-H(陈进红). Study of indices of yield loss caused by drought in different growth stages of rice. Acta Agric Zhejiangenesis (浙江农业学报), 1998, 10(2): 101–103 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Wang C-A(王成瑷), Wang B-L(王伯伦), Zhang W-X(张文香), Zhao L(赵磊), Zhao X-Z(赵秀哲), Gao L-W(高连文). Effects of water stress of soil on rice yield and quality. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(1): 131–137 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[9] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[10] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[11] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[12] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[13] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[14] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[15] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2