欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (05): 895-902.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.00895

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

湖南省季节性干旱对双季稻生长及产量影响的模拟研究

冯利平1,*,莫志鸿1,2,黄晚华3,杨晓光1,潘学标1   

  1. 1中国农业大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100193; 2中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所, 北京 100081; 3湖南省气象科学研究所, 湖南长沙 410007
  • 收稿日期:2010-09-15 修回日期:2011-03-08 出版日期:2011-05-12 网络出版日期:2011-03-24
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由教育部高等学校科技创新工程重大项目培育资金项目(708013), 国家自然科学基金项目(30771249)和国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD04B07)资助。

A Simulated Study on the Effects of Seasonal Drought on Growth and Yield of Double Cropping Rice in Hunan Province

FENG Li-Ping1,*,MO Zhi-Hong1,2,HUANG Wan-Hua3,YANG Xiao-Guang1,PAN Xue-Biao1   

  1. 1 College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 2 Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 3 Hunan Institute of Meteorology, Changsha 410007, China
  • Received:2010-09-15 Revised:2011-03-08 Published:2011-05-12 Published online:2011-03-24

PDF

2140

被引次数

21

摘要： 湖南省季节性干旱是水稻生产的主要灾害之一。在对水稻模型ORYZA2000校准验证基础上，模拟分析了1960—2007年不同水分管理方式(持续灌溉、间歇灌溉和雨养)下双季稻生育期间季节性干旱特点及其对水稻生长与产量的影响。结果表明，(1) 在间歇灌溉和雨养条件下，双季稻自幼穗分化前逐渐表现出稻田土壤季节性干旱特征，随着生育进程干旱不断加重，在雨养条件下，干旱特征随发育进程愈加明显；晚稻比早稻易受季节性干旱影响，生长后期较前期加重；双季稻开花期前后出现的干旱胁迫对生物量、产量影响最大；土壤干旱与作物干旱特征表现不同。(2) 早稻与晚稻在平水年型及干旱年型下均表现出干旱现象；在干旱年型下，早稻自穗分化至成熟期干旱都较为严重，且强度与持续时间要大于平水年型；晚稻干旱的频率和强度都大于早稻，尤其是从穗分化到成熟阶段。(3) 季节性干旱可造成不同程度的产量损失，间歇灌溉方式能够获得较高的产量，雨养水稻产量最低；雨养条件下晚稻产量普遍低于早稻产量。研究结果可为减轻季节性干旱的影响和合理水稻管理措施提供科学依据。

关键词: 双季稻, 季节性干旱, 产量, ORYZA2000, 湖南

Abstract: Seasonal drought is one of the most serious disasters in rice production in Hunan province of China. On the basis of calibration and validation of rice model ORYZA2000, the characteristics of seasonal drought and its effect on growth and yield of double cropping rice under three types of water management with continued flooding (CF), alternative wet and dry (AWD), and rainfed (RF) conditions were simulated and analyzed with history weather data from 1960 to 2007. The results was as follows, (1) The soil seasonal drought of double rice gradually occurred from panicle initiation (PI) under AWD and RF conditions, and got more serious in the process of growth, especially under rainfed condition. The late rice tended to be more easily affected by seasonal drought than early rice, and the seasonal drought was more serious at late stage than early stage. The effect of drought on biomass and yield of rice was the severest at flowering stage. The characteristics between soil drought and crop drought showed differently. (2) There appeared seasonal drought for both early and late rice under the year types of normal and dry. The drought was serious for early rice from early PI to maturity under dry year type, and its strength and duration surpassed that of normal year type. The frequency and strength of drought for late rice excessed that of early rice under dry year type, especially from PI to maturity. (3) The seasonal drought caused different losses of yield in double rice. Higher yield of rice occurred under AWD, while the lowest yield occurred under RF. The yield of late rice was lower than that of early rice under rainfed condition. This quantitative study could provide a theoretical basis for the disaster mitigation of seasonal drought and sustainable water management in double rice production in Hunan.

Key words: Double cropping rice, Seasonal drought, Yield, ORYZA2000, Hunan Province

[1]Hunan Provincial Bureau of Statistics (湖南统计局). Hunan Statistical Yearbook 1987-2007 (湖南统计年鉴). Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)
[2]Huang D-Y(黄道友), Peng T-B(彭廷柏), Wang K-L(王克林), Chen G-Q(陈桂秋). Analysis of seasonal drought applying Z-index method in south China. Chin J Agrometeorol (中国农业气象), 2003, 24(4): 12–15 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Li J-B(李景保), Zheng Y-Y(郑云有), Gao C-H(高昌海), Yang Y(杨燕). A discussion on geographical regularity of flood and drought in Hunan province. J Nat Disasters (自然灾害学报), 2000, 9(4): 115–120 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]He J-L(贺建林). Flood and drought disasters and the spatial and temporal distributions in Hunan province. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Valley (长江流域资源与环境), 1997, 6(2):187–192 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Bouman B A M, Kropff M J, Tuong T P, Wopereis M C S, Ten Berge H F M, Van Laar H H. ORYZA2000: Modelling Lowland Rice. Los Banos (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute, and Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research Centre, Netherlands, 2001. p 235
[6]Editorial Committee in National Survey of Soil (全国土壤普查办公室编). The Native Soil of China (中国土种志). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1994, Volume III (in Chinese)
[7]Feng L P, Bouman B A M, Tuong T P. Exploring options to grow rice using less water in northern China using a modelling approachⅠ. Field experiments and model evaluation. Agric Water Manag, 2007, 88: 1–13
[8]Wu Y-C(吴义城), Yuan Y-C(袁业畅), Ren Y-W(任耀武), Zhang Z(张震), Feng M(冯明), Li G-H(李国华). Assessment of agroclimate impact: classification method of annual crop climate types (农业气候影响评价: 农作物气候年型划分方法) (GB/T 21986-2008). Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2008 (in Chinese)
[9]Yu S-W(余叔文), Chen J-Z(陈景治), Gong C-X(龚燦霞). Effects of soil drought on rice in different growth stage. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1962, 1(4): 399–409 (in Chinese)
[10]Chen J-H(陈进红). Study of indices of yield loss caused by drought in different growth stages of rice. Acta Agric Zhejiangenesis (浙江农业学报), 1998, 10(2): 101–103 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Wang C-A(王成瑷), Wang B-L(王伯伦), Zhang W-X(张文香), Zhao L(赵磊), Zhao X-Z(赵秀哲), Gao L-W(高连文). Effects of water stress of soil on rice yield and quality. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(1): 131–137 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[6] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[7] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[8] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[9] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[10] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[11] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[12] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[13] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2