欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 1888-1896.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01888

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

氮肥运筹方式对孕穗期受渍冬小麦穗部结实特性与产量的影响

武文明1,2,李金才1,*,陈洪俭2,魏凤珍1,王世济2   

  1. 1安徽农业大学农学院, 安徽合肥 230036; 2安徽省农业科学院烟草研究所, 安徽合肥 230031
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-04 修回日期:2011-04-27 出版日期:2011-10-12 网络出版日期:2011-06-28
  • 通讯作者: 李金才, E-mail: ljc5122423@126.com, Tel: 0551-5786980
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31071356)和国家科技支撑计划项目(2009BADA6B02, 2009BADA6B03)资助。

Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Seed-setting Characteristics of Spike and Grain Yield in Winter Wheat under Waterlogging at Booting Stage

U Wen-Ming1,2,LI Jin-Cai1,*,CHEN Hong-Jian2,WEI Feng-Zhen1,WANG Shi-Ji2   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China; 2 Tobacco Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
  • Received:2011-01-04 Revised:2011-04-27 Published:2011-10-12 Published online:2011-06-28
  • Contact: 李金才, E-mail: ljc5122423@126.com, Tel: 0551-5786980

摘要: 以小麦品种皖麦54为试验材料,连续两个生长季进行了氮肥运筹方式对孕穗期渍水冬小麦不同小穗位、粒位的结实粒数和粒重影响的观测。结果表明,不同氮肥运筹方式显著影响穗部结实特性,主茎穗结实特性优于分蘖穗。全部基施的氮肥运筹方式较基肥50%+拔节肥50%和基肥30%+拔节肥50%+孕穗肥20%的运筹方式显著增加了不孕小穗数,降低结实小穗数和结实粒数,2008—2010两年度全部基肥运筹方式较基肥30%+拔节肥50%+孕穗肥20%氮肥运筹方式处理不孕小穗数分别增加25.5%和29.8%,结实小穗数均降低5.7%。孕穗期渍水逆境对分蘖穗结实特性影响大于主茎穗,渍水逆境显著增加不孕小穗数,较对照处理,2008—2010两年度,不孕小穗数分别增加10.6%和4.6%;结实小穗数分别降低2.8%和1.4%。孕穗期渍水降低主茎穗结实4粒的小穗数比例和分蘖穗结实3、4粒小穗数的比例及第3、第4粒位籽粒粒重和第3、第4粒位粒重对单穗粒重的贡献率。氮肥后移运筹方式显著提高孕穗期受渍小麦主茎、分蘖穗结实小穗数和粒重,增加主茎和分蘖穗结实3、4粒小穗的比例和结实小穗第3、4粒位的粒重,提高第3、4粒位粒重对单穗粒重的贡献率,减少不孕小穗数,进而较氮肥前移处理显著提高经济产量。氮肥后移运筹方式有利于减轻孕穗期渍害对小麦穗部结实特性的影响。

关键词: 渍害, 氮肥运筹方式, 冬小麦, 结实特性, 产量

Abstract: Waterlogging has great influence on yield reduction in winter wheat production in some areas of China. Nitrogen (N) application is believed to be able to improve dry matter translocation in wheat, as a result to increase final yield. In a field experiment across two growing seasons, we used winter wheat cultivar “Wanmai 54” to investigate the effect of waterlogging at booting stage and N fertilizing strategy on number and weight of grain at different spikelet positions and grain positions. Under both waterlogging and control (normal watering) conditions, we implemented four N application treatments with different N application ratios (total N amount of 240 kg ha-1 in all treatments) at land preparation, jointing, and booting stages (10:0:0 for N1, 7:3:0 for N2, 5:5:0 for N3, and 3:5:2 for N4). The results showed that seed-setting characteristics of main stem were superior to tiller spike. In the N1 treatment, the sterile spikelet per spike was significantly increased, and the grain number per spike was significantly decreased. Compared with N4 treatment, sterile spikelet per spike of N1 treatment increased by 25.5% and 29.8% in 2008–2009 and 2009–2010 growing seasons, respectively. The grain number per spike of N1 treatment decreased by 5.7%. Waterlogging had greater effect on the tiller spike than the main stem spike. Waterlogging at booting stage significantly increased sterile spikelet per spike by 10.6% and 4.5%, and the grain number per spike decreased by 2.8% and 1.4% in the two growing seasons, especially for spike with four grains on main stem and three grains per spike of tiller spike, the grain weight in the third and the fourth grain positions, the contribution rate of the third and the fourth grain weights to the grain weight per spike. With the delay of N fertilization, spikelet per spike, single weight per spike increased significantly, the sterile spikelet per spike decreased compared to the prior N fertilization treatments. Postponed N fertilization could compensate the decrease of spike with three and four grains and increase the grain weight in third and the fourth grain positions under waterlogged environment at booting stage, increase the contribution rate of the third and the fourth grains weight to the grain weight per spike. Therefore, with the postponed N fertilization, grain yield and spikelet grain number and grain weight at different spikelet of wheat were enhanced. Results indicate that postponed N fertilization alleviates the effect of waterlogging at booting stage on the seed-setting characterisitics of spike and single grain weight.

Key words: Waterlogging, Nitrogen fertilization, Winter wheat, Seed-setting characteristics, Grain yield

[1]Li J-C(李金才), Chang J(常江), Wei F-Z(魏凤珍). Relationship between waterlogging physiology and production in winter wheat. Phant Physiol Comm (植物生理学通讯), 1997, 33(4): 304–312 (in Chinese)
[2]Li J-C(李金才), Wei F-Z(魏凤珍), Yu S-L(余松烈), Yu Z-W(于振文). Effect of waterlogging on senescence of winter wheat root system at booting stage. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2000, 11(5): 723–726 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Xiang H-W(向厚文), Chu Y-S(褚瑶顺), Liang S-C(梁少川), Zhuang Z-Y(庄宗英), Li M-F(李梅芳). Identification of tolerance to waterlogging and the injury control in wheat. Hubei Agric Sci (湖北农业科学), 1993, (5): 10–16 (in Chinese)
[4]Yu J-C(郁家成), Huang X-Y(黄小燕), Yu Y(郁阳), Chen X-H(陈晓红), Wang H(王华). Characteristics of agricultural flood disaster phase and the cultivating models for avoiding flood disaster along Huaihe River of Anhui Province. J China Agric Univ (中国农业大学学报), 2007, 12(6): 24–30 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Wu J(武际), Guo X-S(郭熙盛,), Yang X-H(杨晓虎), Huang X-R(黄晓荣). Effects of application time and basal/topdressing ratio of nitrogen fertilizer on the spatiotemporal variation of soil NO3?-N and NH4+-N contents and the grain yield and its quality of wheat. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2008, 19(11): 2382–2387 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Wang X-Y(王晓英), He M-R(贺明荣), Liu Y-H(刘永华), Zhang H-H(张洪华), Li F(李飞), Hua F-X(华芳霞), Meng S-H(孟淑华). Interactive effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen fertilizer recovery and nitrate-N movement across soil profile in a winter wheat field. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2008, 28(2): 685–694 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]Jiang D(姜东), Tao Q-N(陶勤南), Zhang G-P(张国平). Effects of waterlogging on senescence of flag leaf and root of wheat Yunmai 5. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2002, 13(11): 1519–1521 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]Fan X-M(范雪梅), Jiang D(姜东), Dai T-B(戴廷波), Jin Q(荆奇), Cao W-X(曹卫星). Effects of nitrogen supply on nitrogen metabolism and grain protein accumulation of wheat under different water treatments. Chin J Ecol (生态学杂志), 2006, 25(2): 149–154 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]Fan X-M(范雪梅), Jiang D(姜东), Dai T-B(戴廷波), Jin Q(荆奇), Cao W-X(曹卫星). Effects of nitrogen on grain yield and quality in wheat grown under drought of waterlogging stress from anthesis to maturity. Acta Phytoecol Sin (植物生态学报), 2006, 30(1): 71–77 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]Musgrave M E. Waterlogging effects on yield and photosynthesis in eight wheat cultivars. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 1314–1320
[11]Li C-X(李春喜), Shi H-E(石惠恩), Jiang L-N(姜丽娜). Investigation on the grain weight distribution characteristic of wheat in different densities. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin (西北植物学报), 1999, 19(1): 132–137 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Li C-X(李春喜), Jiang L-N(姜丽娜), Shi H-E(石惠恩), Ji S-D(姬生栋). Distribution of grain number and grain weight on tillers in wheat. Gengzuo yu Zaipei (耕作与栽培), 1999, (6): 5–9 (in Chinese)
[13]Pan J(潘洁), Jiang D(姜东), Cao W-X(曹卫星), Sun C-F(孙传范). Effects of spikelet and grain positions on grain number, weight and protein content of wheat spike. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(4): 431–437 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Qu H-J(屈会娟), Li J-C(李金才), Shen X-S(沈学善), Li R-Y(李如意), Wei F-Z(魏凤珍), Zhang Y(张一). Efects of plant density on grain number and grain weight at different spikelets and grain positions in winter wheat cultivars. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(10): 1–9 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Pei X-X(裴雪霞), Wang J-A(王姣爱), Dang J-Y(党建友), Wang X-B(王秀斌), Zhang D-Y(张定一). Effects of spikelet and grain position on fertile spikelet number, grain weight and quality of wheat. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2008, 41(2): 381–390 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Pal M S, Zhang G P, Chen J X. Influence of genotypes and nitrogen fertilization on leaf morphogenesis and tillering behaviors in winter wheat. J Triticeae Crops, 2000, 20: 28–33
[17]Chen Y, Yuan L P, Wang X H, Zhang D Y, Chen J, Deng Q Y, Zhao B R, Xu D Q. Relationship between grain yield and leaf photosynthetic rate in super hybrid rice. J Plant Physiol Mol Biol, 2007, 33: 235–243
[18]Hou Y-Y(侯远玉). Variation of grain weight and grain set between ear sections in different ear-type of wheat genotypes. J Sichuan Agric Univ (四川农业大学学报), 1997, 15(2): 218–222 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] Diez J A, Caballero R, Roman R, Tarquis A. Integrated fertilizer and irrigation management to reduce nitrate leaching in central Spain. J Environ Qual, 2000, 29: 1539–1547
[20]Li N-N(李娜娜), Tian Q-Z(田奇卓), Wang S-L(王树亮), Xie L-J(谢连杰), Pei Y-T(裴艳婷), Li H(李慧). Responses and regulation of canopy microclimate on formation spike from tillers of two types of wheat. Acta Phytoecol Sin (植物生态学报), 2010, 34(3): 289–297 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Fan X-M(范雪梅), Jiang D(姜东), Dai T-B(戴廷波), Jing Q(荆奇), Cao W-X(曹卫星). Effects of nitrogen supply on flag leaf photosynthesis and grain starch accumulation of wheat from its anthesis to maturity under drought or waterlogging Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2005, 16(10): 1883–1888 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[8] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[9] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[10] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[11] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[14] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!