作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (06): 988-995.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00988
聂元元1,2,邹桂花3,李瑶4,刘国兰2,蔡耀辉1,毛凌华1,颜龙安1,刘鸿艳2,*,罗利军2,*
NIE Yuan-Yuan1,2,ZOU Gui-Hua3,LI Yao4,LIU Guo-Lan2,CAI Yao-Hui1,MAO Ling-Hua1,YAN Long-An1,LIU Hong-Yan2,*,LUO Li-Jun2,*
摘要: 水资源危机使得水稻抗旱性的遗传与育种研究成为当今的研究热点之一。鉴定与水稻抗旱性直接相关的性状和产量的QTL,可为通过标记辅助选择培育抗旱水稻品种提供标记信息。以从供体IRAT109渗入到珍汕97B背景的269个高代回交渗入系中筛选出覆盖第2染色体目标区段的87个近等基因系为材料,在抗旱鉴定大棚中采用控制式供水,精细定位了水处理(对照)与干旱胁迫条件下影响水稻水分生理及产量相关性状的QTL。共检测到20个影响叶水势(LWP)、冠层温度(CT)、茎基粗(BCT)等性状相关QTL和百粒重(HGW)、每穗颖花数(SN)、着粒密度(SPD)等产量相关QTL。根据在不同环境下的表达情况,将其分为3类,第1类7个QTL,在两种环境下均被检测到;第2类4个,只在对照条件下检测到;第3类2个,分别控制叶水势和颈基粗,受干旱胁迫诱导,只在胁迫条件下被检测到,其中,叶水势定位在RIO02037-RIO02038约8.2 kb的区段上, 其加性效应和贡献率分别为-1.0361和13.03%,增效等位基因来自IRAT109;茎基粗定位在RIO02017-RIO02022约37.7 kb的区段内,加性效应和贡献率分别为0.2682和49.20%,增效等位基因来自珍汕97B。在水、旱2种条件下均检测到的相对稳定的7个QTL及干旱胁迫条件下的2个QTL可能对抗旱性有直接贡献。
| [1]Brown L R, Halweil B. China’s water shortage could shake world food security. World Watch, 1998, 7: 3–4[2]Luo L-J(罗利军), Zhang Q-F(张启发). The status and strategy on drought resistance of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2001, 15(3): 209–214 (in Chinese with English abstract)[3]Teng S(腾胜), Qian Q(钱前), Zeng D-L(曾大力), Kunihiro Y(国广泰史), Fujimoto K(藤本宽), Huang D-N(黄大年), Zhu L-H(朱立煌). Analysis of gene loci and epistasis for drought tolerance in seedling stage of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 2002, 29(3): 235–240 (in Chinese with English abstract)[4]Champoux M C, Wang G, Sarkarung S. Locating genes associated with root morphology and drought avoidance in rice via linkage to molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet, 1995, 90: 969–981[5]Price A H, Tomos A D. Genetic dissection of root growth in rice (Oryza sativa L.): II. Mapping quantitative trait loci using molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet, 1997, 95: 143–152[6]Ray J D, Yu L X, Mccouch S R. Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with root penetration ability in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet, 1996, 92: 627–636[7]Xu J-C(徐吉臣), Li J-Z(李晶昭), Zheng X-W(郑先武), Zou L-X(邹亮星), Zhu L-H(朱立煌). QTL mapping of the root traits in rice seedling. Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 2001, 28(5): 433–438 (in Chinese with English abstract)[8]Zheng B S, Yang L, Zhang W P. Mapping QTLs and candidate genes for rice root traits under different water-supply conditions and comparative analysis across three populations. Theor Appl Genet, 2003, 107: 1505–1515[9]Luo L-J(罗利军), Mei H-W(梅捍卫), Yu X-Q(余新桥), Liu H-Y(刘鸿艳), Feng F-J(冯芳君). Water-saving and drought-resistance rice and its development strategy. Chin Sci Bull (科学通报), 2011, 56(11): 804–811 (in Chinese with English abstract)[10]Lafitte H R, Price A H, Courtois B. Yield response to water deficit in an upland rice mapping population: associations among traits and genetic markers. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 109: 1237–1246[11]Reynolds M P, Trethowan R M, Ginkel M, Rajaram S. General considerations in physiological breeding. In: Reynolds M P, Ortiz-Monasterio J I, McNab A, eds. Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding. Mexico, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), 2001. pp 2–86[12]Liu H-Y(刘鸿艳), Zou G-H(邹桂花), Liu G-L(刘国兰), Hu S-P(胡颂平), Li M-S(李明寿), Yu X-Q(余新桥), Mei H-W(梅捍卫), Luo L-J(罗利军). Correlation analysis and QTL identification for canopy temperature, leaf water potential and spikelet fertility in rice under contrasting moisture regimes. Chin Sci Bull (科学通报) , 2005, 50(2): 130–139 (in Chinese with English abstract)[13]Zou G H, Mei H W, Liu H Y, Liu G L, Hu S P, Yu X Q, Li M S, Wu J H, Luo L J. Grain yield responses to moisture regimes in a rice population: association among traits and genetic markers. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 112: 106–113[14]Garrity D P, O’Toole J C. Selection for reproductive stage drought avoidance in rice, using infrared thermometry. Agron J, 1995, 87: 773–779[15]Wang D L, Zhu J, Li Z K, Paterson A H. Mapping QTLs with epistatic effects and QTL×environment interactions by mixed linear model approaches. Theor Appl Genet, 1999, 99: 1255–1264[16]Zeng H, Luo L, Zhang W, Zhou J, Li Z, Liu H, Zhu T, Feng X, Zhong Y. Plant QTL-GE: a database system for identifying candidate genes in rice and Arabidopsis by gene expression and QTL information. Nucl Acids Res, 2007, 35: D879–D882[17]Bohnert H, Shen J. Transformation and compatible solutes. Sci Hort, 1998, 78: 237–260[18]Hemamalini G S, Shashidhar H E, Hittalmani S. Molecular marker assisted tagging of morphological and physiological traits under two contrasting moisture regimes at peak vegetative stage in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica, 2000, 112: 69–78[19]Yue B, Xue W Y, Xiong L Z, Yu X Q, Luo L J, Cui K H, Jin D M, Xing Y Z, Zhang Q F. Genetic basis of drought resistance at reproductive stage in rice: separation of drought tolerance from drought avoidance. Genetics, 2006, 172: 1213–1228[20]Nguyen T T T, Klueva N, Chamareck V, Aarti A, Magpantay G, Millena A C M, Pathan M, Nguyen H T. Saturation mapping of QTL regions and identification of putative candidate genes for drought tolerance in rice. Mol Gen Genet, 2004, 272: 35–46[21]Lanceras J C, Pantuwan G, Jongdee B, Toojinda T. Quantitative trait Loci associated with drought tolerance at reproductive stage in rice. Plant Physiol, 2004, 35: 384–399[22]Zhang J, Zheng H G, Aarti A, Pantuwan G, Nguyen T T, Tripathy J N, Sarial A K, Robin S, Babu R C, Nguyen B D, Sarkarung S, Blum A, Nguyen H T. Locating genomic regions associated with components of drought resistance in rice: comparative mapping within and across species. Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 103: 19–29[23]Moncada P, Martinez C P, Borrero J, Chatel M, Gauch H, Guimaraes E, Tohme J, McCouch S R. Quantitative trait loci for yield and yield components in an Oryza sativa ? Oryza rufipogon BC2F2 population evaluated in an upland environment. Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 102: 41–42[24]Lafitte R, Blum A, Atlin G. Using secondary traits to help identify drought-tolerant genotypes. In: Fischer K S, Lafitte R, Fukai S, Atlin G, Hardy B, eds. Breeding Rice for Drought-Prone Environments. Los Banos, the Philippines: IRRI, 2003. pp 37–48[25]Hemamalini G S, Shashidhar H E, Hittalmani S. Molecular marker assisted tagging of morphological and physiological traits under two contrasting moisture regimes at peak vegetative stage in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica, 2000, 112: 69–78 |
| [1] | 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912. |
| [2] | 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742. |
| [3] | 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372. |
| [4] | 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325. |
| [5] | 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056. |
| [6] | 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034. |
| [7] | 赵翔, 李佳宜, 李爽, 韩文辉, 黄俊霞, 姚兴东, 张惠君, 王海英, 谢甫绨. 高温对不同大豆品种干物质积累和糖代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 857-865. |
| [8] | 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907. |
| [9] | 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812. |
| [10] | 朱金娟, 王慧萍, 杨国栋, 王宇诚, 杨晨, 王斌, Agustiani Nurwulan, 涂军明, 毕俊国, 崔克辉, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 水分管理和品种类型对再生稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 295-315. |
| [11] | 王雅致, 杨飚, 季香林, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 二倍体马铃薯抗旱资源鉴定及抗旱基因初步筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 72-84. |
| [12] | 李云香, 郭千纤, 侯万伟, 张小娟. 引进ICARDA小麦苗期根系抗旱性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2387-2398. |
| [13] | 胡润慧, 汪军成, 司二静, 张宏, 李兴茂, 马小乐, 孟亚雄, 王化俊, 刘青, 姚立蓉, 李葆春. 小麦苗期耐旱耐盐种质筛选及抗旱耐盐综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2371-2386. |
| [14] | 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556. |
| [15] | 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099. |
|
||