欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (05): 761-766.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00761

• 综述 •    下一篇

探讨品种间差异改良作物水分利用效率

梅旭荣,钟秀丽,刘晓英   

  1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所 / 国家作物高效用水与抗灾减损工程实验室 / 农业部旱作节水农业重点开放实验室,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2012-08-23 修回日期:2013-10-16 出版日期:2013-05-12 网络出版日期:2013-02-19
  • 基金资助:

    This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 30871447) and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant number: 2011AA100501).

Improving Water Use Efficiency of Crops by Exploring Variety Differences

MEI Xu-Rong,ZHONG Xiu-Li,LIU Xiao-Ying   

  1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory for Dryland Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2012-08-23 Revised:2013-10-16 Published:2013-05-12 Published online:2013-02-19
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 30871447) and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant number: 2011AA100501).

摘要:

提高水分利用效率是缓解水资源危机实现作物可持续生产的重要策略。本文对叶片尺度的瞬时WUE和单株尺度WUE的品种间差异,瞬时WUE到田间尺度WUE的尺度转换,以及瞬时WUE与产量之间的关系进行了讨论。瞬时WUE具有较大的遗传变异性,在亏水条件下品种间差异更显著。在禾谷类作物上,气孔导度与瞬时WUE密切相关。单株尺度WUE在亏水条件下品种间差异显著,足水条件下差异相对较小。气孔导度是影响单株尺度WUE的重要性状,品种之间气孔对水分亏缺的敏感性差异较大。瞬时WUE向田间尺度WUE的尺度转换不仅受到冠层阻力和边界层阻力的制约,还受土壤蒸发与作物蒸腾比率以及同化物分配模式的影响。瞬时WUE与产量的关系决定于环境的水分条件,在作物生长发育主要依靠土壤中储存水分的干旱条件下,瞬时WUE高对获得高产有利。相反,在水分条件较适宜的地区,高瞬时WUE性状不利于高产。

关键词: 水分利用效率, 产量, 水分亏缺, 品种差异

Abstract:

Improving water use efficiency (WUE) is considered to be an important measure for mitigating the conflict between water resource crisis and sustainable crop production. In this review, variety differences in WUE at different time-space scales, the scaling-up of WUE, and the association between WUE and yield are discussed. WUEintrinsic (WUEi) shows wide genotypic variability, in particular, under water deficit conditions. Variation in WUEi seems to be associated rather with variation in stomatal conductance in cereals. WUEplant (WUEp) differed larger among genotypes under water deficit conditions, in contrast with the smaller difference under well-watered conditions. Stomatal conductance is a determinant trait affecting WUEp based on the studies performed up to date. Genotypes differ largely in stomatal conductance in response to water deficit. Scaling-up of WUE between leaf level and field population level is limited by canopy and boundary layer resistances, partition of water use between soil evaporation and plant transpiration and the internal allocation pattern of biomass. High WUEi associated with low stomatal conductance can result in a considerable yield gain in a dry, stored-moisture, environment but it is likely to be disadvantageous in terms of yield in more favorable growth environments.

Key words: Water use efficiency, Yield, Water deficit, Variety difference

[1]Tanner C B, Sinclair T R. Efficient water use in crop production: research or re-search? In: Taylor H M, Jordan W R, Sinclair T R, eds. Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: American Society of Agronomy, 1983. pp 1–27



[2]Condon A G, Richards R A, Rebetzke G J, Farquhar G D. Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 122–131



[3]Turner N C. Water use efficiency of crop plants: potential for improvement. In: Buxton I D R ed. International Crop Science. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: Crop Science Society of America, 1993. pp 75–82



[4]Wallace J S, Batchelor C H. Managing water resources for crop production. Philos T R Soc B, 1997, 352: 937–947



[5]Shan L, Deng X P, Zhang S Q. Advance in biological water-saving research: challenge and perspectives. Sci Found China, 2006, 2: 66–71



[6]Zhang Z B, Xu P, Shao H B, Liu M J, Fu Z Y, Chu L Y. Advances and prospects: Biotechnologically improving crop water use efficiency. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 2011, 31: 281–293



[7]Zhang X Y, Chen S Y, Liu M Y, Pei D, Sun H Y. Improved water use efficiency associated with cultivars and agronomic management in the North China Plain. Agron J, 2005, 97: 783–790



[8]Polley W H. Implications of atmospheric and climatic change for crop yield and water use efficiency. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 131–140



[9]Morgan J A, LeCain D R. Leaf gas exchange and related leaf traits among 15 winter wheat genotypes. Crop Sci, 1991, 31: 443–448



[10]Johnson R C. Carbon isotope discrimination, water relations, and photosynthesis in tall fescue. Crop Sci, 1993, 33: 169–174



[11]Abbate P E, Dardanelli J L, Cantarero M G, Maturano M, Melchiori R J M, Suero E E. Climatic and water availability effects on water-use efficiency in wheat. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 474–483



[12]Van Den Boogaard R, Alewijnse D, Veneklaas E J, Lambers H. Growth and water-use efficiency of 10 Triticum aestivum cultivars at different availability in relation to allocation of biomass. Plant Cell Environ, 1997, 20: 200–210



[13]Krishnamurthy L, Vadez V, Devi M J, Serraj R, Nigam S N, Sheshshayee M S, Chandra S, Aruna R. Variation in transpiration efficiency and its related traits in a groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) mapping population. Field Crops Res, 2007, 103: 189–197



[14]Hatfield J L, Sauer T J, Prueger J H. Managing soil to achieve great water use efficiency: a review. Agron J, 2001, 93: 271–280



[15]Farquhar G D, Richards R A. Isotope composition of plant carbon correlates with water use efficiency of wheat genotype. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1984, 11: 539–552



[16]Anyia A O, Herzog H. Water use efficiency, leaf area and leaf gas exchange of cowpeas under midseason drought. Eur J Agron, 2004, 20: 327–339



[17]Rao R C N, Wright G C. Stability of the relationship between specific leaf area and carbon isotope discrimination across environments in peanut. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 98–103



[18]Condon A G, Farquhar G D, Richards R A. Genotypic variation in carbon isotope discrimination and transpiration efficiency in wheat. Leaf gas exchange and whole plant studies. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1990, 17: 9–22



[19]Martin B, Kebede H, Rilling C. Photosynthetic differences among Lycopersicon species and Tricum aestivum cultivars. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 113–118



[20]Morgan J A, LeCain D R, McCaig T N, Quick J S. Gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, and productivity in winter wheat. Crop Sci, 1993, 33: 178–186



[21]Ehleringer J R, Klassen S, Clayton C, Sherrill D, Fuller-Holbrook M, Fu Q A, Cooper T A. Carbon isotope discrimination and transpiration efficiency in common bean. Crop Sci, 1991, 31: 1611–1615



[22]Vyas S P, Garg B K, Kathju S, Lahiri A N. Influence of potassium on water relations, photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism and yield of cluster bean under soil moisture stress. Indian J Plant Physiol, 2001, 6: 30–37



[23]Siemens J A, Zwiazek J J. Effect of water deficit stress and recovery on the root water relations of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) seedlings. Plant Sci, 2003, 165: 113–120



[24]Bota J, Flexas J, Medrano H. Genetic variability of photosynthesis and water use in Balearic grapevine cultivar. Ann Appl Biol, 2001, 138: 353–361



[25]Devi M J, Sinclair T R, Vadez V. Genotypic variation in peanut for transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit. Crop Sci, 2010, 50: 191–196



[26]Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Devi M J, Reddy D S, Lavanya M, Vadez V, Serraj R, Shinozaki K Y, Sharma K K. Stress-inducible expression of At DREB1A in transgenic peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) increases transpiration efficiency under water-limiting conditions. Plant Cell Rep, 2007, 26: 2071–2082



[27]Khazaei H, Monneveux P, Shao H, Mohammady S. Variation for stomatal characteristics and water use efficiency among diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid Iranian wheat landraces. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2010, 57: 307–314



[28]Farquhar G D, Ehleringer J R, Hubick K T. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1989, 40: 503–537



[29]Hubick K T, Farquhar G D, Shorter R. Correlation between water use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in diverse peanut (Arachis) germplasm. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1986, 13: 803–816



[30]Nageswara Rao R C, Williams J H, Wadia K D R, Hubick K T, Farquhar G D. Crop growth, water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes under end-of-season drought conditions. Ann Appl Biol, 1993, 122: 357–367



[31]Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Devi M J, Vadez V, Sharma K K. Differential antioxidative responses in transgenic peanut bear no relationship to their superior transpiration efficiency under drought stress. J Plant Physiol, 2009, 166: 1207–1217



[33]Devi M J, Sinclair T R, Vadez V, Krishnamurthy L. Peanut genotypic variation in transpiration efficiency and decreased transpiration during progressive soil drying. Field Crops Res, 2009, 114: 280–285



[34]Devi M J, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Sharma K K, Serraj R, Anwar S Y, Vadez V. Relationships between transpiration efficiency (TE) and its surrogate traits in the rd29A:DREB1A transgenic groundnut). J Agron Crop Sci, 2011, 197: 272–283



[35]Liu F L, Andersen M N, Jacobsen S E, Jensen C R. Stomatal control and water use efficiency of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) during progressive soil drying. Environ Exp Bot, 2005, 54: 33–40



[36]Anyia A O, Slaski J J, Nyachiro J M, Archambault D J, Juskiw P. Relationship of carbon isotope discrimination to water use efficiency and productivity of Barley under field and green house conditions. J Agron Crop Sci, 2007, 193: 313–323



[37]Jaleel C A, Gopi R, Sankar B, Gomathinayagam M, Panneerselvam R. Differential responses in water use efficiency in two varieties of Catharanthus roseus under drought stress. C R Biologies, 2008, 331: 42-47



[38]Ratnakumar P, Vadez V, Nigam S N, Krishnamurthy L. Assessment of transpiration efficiency in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under drought using a lysimeter system. Plant Biol, 2009, 11(suppl-1): 124–130



[39]Vadez V, Rao S, Kholova J, krishnamurthy L, Kashiwagi J, Ratnakumar P, Sharma K K, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Basu P S. Root research for drought tolerance in legumes: Qua vadis? J Food Legumes, 2008, 21: 77–85



[40]Wang H, Zhang L, Dawes W R, Liu C. Improving water use efficiency of irrigated crops in the North China Plain-measurements and modeling. Agric Water Manage, 2001, 48: 151–167



[41]Guo J-X(郭家选), Li Y-Z(李玉中), Yan C-R(严昌荣), Zhao Q-S(赵全胜), Mei X-R(梅旭荣). Evapotranspiration of winter wheat field in the North China Plain. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2006, 17: 2357–2362 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[42]Zhao F, Yu G, Li S, Ren C, Sun X, Mi N, Li J, Ou-Yang Z. Canopy water use efficiency of winter wheat in the North China Plain. Agric Water Manage, 2007, 93: 99–108



[43]Bolger T P, Turner N C. Transpiration efficiency of three Mediterranean annual pasture species and wheat. Oecologia, 1998, 115: 32–38



[44]Jarvis P G, McNaughton K G. Stomatal control of transpiration: Scaling up from leaf to region. Adv Ecol Res, 1986, 15: 1–49



[45]Farquhar G D, O’Leary M H, Berry J A. On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1982, 9: 121–137



[46]Ehdaie B, Hall A E, Farquhar G D, Nguyen H T, Waines J G. Water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in wheat. Crop Sci, 1991, 31: 1282–1288



[47]Hubick K T, Farquhar G D. Carbon isotope discrimination and the ratio of carbon gained to water lost in barley genotypes. Plant Cell Environ, 1989, 12: 795–804



[48]Condon A G, Richards R A, Farquhar G D. Carbon isotope discrimination is positively correlated with grain yield and dry matter production in field-grown wheat. Crop Sci, 1987, 27: 996–1001



[49]Johnson D A, Asay K H, Tieszen L L, Ehleringer J R, Jefferson P G. Carbon isotope discrimination: potential in screening cool-season grasses for water-limited environments. Crop Sci, 1990, 30: 338–343



[50]White J W, Castillo J A, Ehleringer J. Association between productivity, root growth and carbon isotope discrimination in Phaseolus vulgaris under water deficit. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1990, 17: 189–198



[51]Voltas J I, Romagosa I, Lafarga A, Armesto A P, Sombrero A, Araus J L. Genotype by environment interaction for grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination of barley in Mediterranean Spain. Aust J Agric Res, 1999, 50: 1263–1271



[52]Merah O, Deleens E, Souyris I, Nachit M, Monneveux P. Stability of isotope discrimination and grain yield in durum wheat. Crop Sci, 2001, 41: 677–681



[53]Jiang Q, Roche D, Hole D J. Carbon isotope discrimination of two-rowed and six-rowed barley genotypes and under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. Can J Plant Sci, 2006, 86: 433–441



[54]Wright C G, Hubick K T, Farquhar G D. Discrimination in carbon isotopes of leaves correlates with water-use efficiency of field-grown peanut cultivars. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1988, 15: 815–825



[55]Hubick K T. Effects of nitrogen source and water limitation on growth, transpiration efficiency, and carbon isotope discrimination in peanut cultivars. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1990, 17: 413–430



[56]Rebetzke G J, Condon A G, Richards R A, Farquhar G J. Selection for reduced carbon isotope discrimination increases aerial biomass and grain yield of rainfed bread wheat. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 739–745



[57]Lambrides C J, Chapman S C, Shorter R. Surveys of carbon isotope discrimination in sunflower reveal considerable genetic variation, a strong association with transpiration efficiency and evidence of cytoplasmic inheritance. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 1642–1653



[58]Stiller W N, Read J J, Constable G A, Reid P E. Selection for water use efficiency traits in cotton breeding programme: genotype differences. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 1107–1113



[59]Richards R A. Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments. Agric Water Manag, 2006, 80: 197–211

[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[6] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[7] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[8] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[9] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[10] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[11] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[12] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[13] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!