欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (06): 1125-1131.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01125

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦新型化学杂交剂的筛选

宋瑜龙,张鹏飞,张改生*,赵卓军,牛娜,赵新亮,王军卫   

  1. 西北农林科技大学农学院 / 国家杨凌农业生物技术育种中心 / 国家小麦改良中心杨凌分中心 / 小麦育种教育部工程研究中心 / 陕西省作物杂种优势研究与利用重点实验室,陕西杨凌712100
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-06 修回日期:2014-03-04 出版日期:2014-06-12 网络出版日期:2014-03-25
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)重大专项(2011AA10A106), 国家自然科学基金项目(31071477, 31171611, 31371697), 陕西省13115科技创新工程重大科技专项(2010ZDKG-68)资助。

Screening of a New Chemical Hybridizing Agent in Wheat

SONG Yu-Long,ZHANG Peng-Fei,ZHANG Gai-Sheng*,ZHAO Zhuo-Jun,NIU Na,ZHAO Xin-Liang,WANG Jun-Wei   

  1. College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University/ National Yangling Agricultural Biotechnology & Breeding Center / Yangling Branch of State Wheat Improvement Centre /Wheat Breeding Engineering Research Center of Ministry of Education / Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis of Shaanxi Province, Yangling 712100, China
  • Received:2013-11-06 Revised:2014-03-04 Published:2014-06-12 Published online:2014-03-25

摘要:

为拓展小麦化控两系途径的药剂种类,降低化学杂交剂(CHA)成本,利用西农1376检验15种化学药剂、4个浓度、3个施用时期(小麦不同发育时期)的诱导不育效果, 并对花药败育的机制进行了研究。结果表明,各处理诱导小麦花粉败育效果差异较大,Feek’s 7.5和9.5时期,15种药剂各浓度处理诱导植株营养生长发育异常或花粉败育不明显;Feek’s 8.5时期,T6药剂0.24 kg hm-2诱导雄性不育率为93.33%,植株表型及雌蕊发育正常,对其饱和授粉,能获得杂交种子,且饱和授粉结实率较高。石蜡切片观察该处理诱导雄性不育花药的绒毡层细胞降解过程异常,自单核早期绒毡层细胞核明显降解,单核中后期花粉内核也开始降解,直至三核期,绒毡层细胞及花粉内核及营养物质基本消失,仅剩少量花粉壁残留,最终导致花粉败育。因此认为,T6诱导的小麦生理型雄性不育与绒毡层的异常降解直接相关。

关键词: 小麦, 化学杂交剂, 饱和授粉, 不育率, 绒毡层

Abstract:

To expand varieties of chemical hybridization agent and reduce their cost, We selected 15 varieties of chemical hybridization agent for treating wheat cultivar Xi’nong 1376 at three growth stages with four concentrations to survey the infertile effect, phytotoxicity and pollen abortion mechanism. The results showed that there were significant differences among the chemical hybridization agent treatments. At stages Feek’s 7.5 and Feek’s 9.5, abnormal vegetative growth or pollens abortion were not obvious. While at the stage of Feek’s 8.5, the rate of male sterility of Xinong 1376 was 93.33% in 0.24 kg ha-1 T6 treatment, and the pistil and the plant showed normal development, we also achieved a high seed setting rate via crossing the male sterile plants with normal fertile lines by saturate pollination. Paraffin sections indicated that the degradable process of tapetum cells in the male sterile anther treated by T6-C was abnormal. The nucleus of tapetum cells degraded at uninucleate early stage, and then pollen nucleus degraded at uninucleate late stage. Tapetum cells, nucleus of pollen and nutrients were almost disappeared till trinucleate stage. Finally, a little residue of pollen wall left and pollen aborted. Therefore, we hypothesize that the male sterility induced by T6 could be related to the degradation of tapetum cells in anther.

Key words: Wheat, Chemical hybrid agents, Saturate pollination, Sterility ratio, Tapetum

[1]金双义, 范军. 对小麦杂种优势研究方法的探讨. 中国新技术新产品, 2008, 12(上): 156



Jin S Y, Fan J. Study on heterosis of research methods in wheat. China New Technol Prod, 2008, 12(scroller): 156 (in Chinese)



[2]辛金霞, 戎郁萍. 化学杂交剂在植物育种中的应用现状. 草业科学, 2010, 27(3): 124–131



Xin J X, Rong Y P. Application status of chemical hybridizing agent in plant breeding. Pratacul Tural Sci, 2010, 27(3): 124–131 (in Chinese)



[3]魏正平, 刘树人, 翟玉洁, 王岩, 于天峰, 刁艳玲. 化学杂交剂BAU-2诱导春小麦雄性不育的研究. 北京农业大学学报, 1993, 19(增刊): 25–29



Wei Z P, Liu S R, Zhai Y J, Wang Y, Yu T F, Diao Y L. Studies on the male sterility induced by CHA-BAU-2 in spring wheat. Acta Agric Univ Pekinensis, 1993, 19(suppl): 25–29 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]黄铁城, 王明理, 张爱民, 张仲琦. 新型化学杂交剂WL84811诱导普通小麦(Triticum aestivum)雄性不育的研究. 作物学报, 1988, 14(2): 155–162



Huang T C, Wang M L, Zhang A M, Zhang Z Q. Studies on the male sterility in wheat (Triticum aestivum) induced by new gametocide WL84811. Acta Agron Sin, 1988, 14(2): 155–162 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]梁肖青. SC2053诱导小麦雄性不育的效果研究. 山西农业大学学报, 2006, 5(5): 92–94



Liang X Q. Analysis on the male sterility in wheat induced by SC2053. J Shanxi Agric Univ, 2006, 5(5): 92–94 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]高庆荣, 刘保申, 于金凤, 孙兰珍. 化学杂交剂GENESIS对小麦的杀雄效果. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 33(1): 1–6



Gao Q R, Liu B S, Yu J F, Sun L Z. The Effect of CHA-GENESISI on growth and development of winter wheat. J Shandong Agric Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2002, 33(1): 1–6 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]王振华, 刘宏伟, 张改生, 王军卫, 马守才. 3种新型化学杂交剂诱导小麦雄性不育效果比较. 西北农林科技大学(自然科学版), 2003, 31(3): 43–46



Wang Z H, Liu H W, Zhang G S, Wang J W, Ma S C. Effects on male sterility induced by three kinds of chemical hybridization agent in wheat. J Northwest Sci Tech Univ Agric For (Nat Sci Edn), 2003, 31(3): 43–46 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]武计萍, 胡金锁, 李国强, 仇松英, 逯腊虎, 孟兆萍. 化学杂交剂SQ-1诱导小麦雄性不育及与不同小麦品种互作效应的研究. 小麦研究, 2006, 27(3): 12–15



Wu J P, Hu J S, Li G Q, Qiu S Y, Lu L H, Meng Z P. Effect of male sterility on different wheat genotype induced by SQ-1. Wheat Res, 2006, 27(3): 12–15 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]叶景秀, 陈蕊红, 张改生, 王俊生, 王书平, 李莉, 牛娜, 马守才, 李红霞, 朱建楚.杀雄剂CULT诱导小麦雄性不育花药蛋白质组分分析. 农业生物技术学报, 2009, 17: 858–864



Ye J X, Chen R H, Zhang G S, Wang J S, Wang S P, Li L, Niu N, Ma S C, Li H X, Zhu J C. Analysis on anther proteins of wheat male sterile line induced by chemical hybridizing agent SQ-1. J Agric Biotechnol, 2009, 17: 858?864 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]宋瑜龙, 王亮明, 张改生, 盛英, 李亚鑫, 牛娜, 赵卓军. 杀雄剂SQ-1诱导谷子雄性不育研究. 作物学报, 2011, 37: 1695–1700



Song Y L, Wang L M, Zhang G S, Sheng Y, Li Y X, Niu N, Zhao Z J. Male sterility induced by chemical hybridizing agent SQ-1 in Setaria italica Beauv. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 1695–1700 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]盛英, 张改生, 李亚鑫, 张龙雨, 王书平, 赵新亮, 王亮明, 宋瑜龙. 小麦生理型雄性不育花药绒毡层和孢粉素变化与 RAFTIN1表达的关系. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 3937–3944



Sheng Y, Zhang G S, Li Y X, Zhang L Y, Wang S P, Zhao X L, Wang L M, Song Y L. The relationship on anther tapetum, sporopollenin and expression of RAFTIN1 in physiological male sterile wheat. Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44: 3937–3944 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]尹梦回, 董静, 李先碧, 侯磊, 罗明, 李德谋, 裴炎, 肖月华. 烟草绒毡层特异启动子pTA29在棉花中的表达特性. 作物学报, 2008, 34(12): 2092–2098



Yin M H, Dong J, Li X B, Hou L, Luo M, Li D M, Pei Y, Xiao Y H. Expression characteristics of tobacco tapetum-specific promoter pTA29 in cotton. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 2092–2098 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]Li Y Y, Yang Q, Yan J Y, Chen M. Cytoplasmic male-sterility of onion (Allium cepa L.) 63A is associated with premature degeneration of the tapetum. Acta Agron Sin, 2006, 32(03): 369–372



[14]苏少泉. 草甘膦述评. 农药, 2005, 44(4): 145–149



Su S Q. Glyphosate review. Chin J Pesticides, 2005, 44(4): 145–149 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]许海霞, 吕德彬, 程西永, 詹克慧, 陈军营, 姜鸿勋. GENESIS诱导小麦雄性不育的形态学和细胞学观察. 河南农业大学学报, 2003, 9: 205–208



Xu H X, Lü D B, Cheng X Y, Zhan K H, Chen J Y, Jiang H X. Morphological and cytological observations of male sterility induced by CHA GENESIS in wheat. J Henan Agric Univ, 2003, 9: 205–208 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]徐如强, 黄铁城. “BAU-2”诱导普通小麦雄性不育的研究: III. 化学杀雄机制. 北京农业大学学报, 1993, 19(增刊): 19–24



Xu R Q, Huang T C. Studies on BAU-2 induced male sterility in winter wheat (T. aestivum): III. The methanism of BAU-2 inducing male sterility. Acta Agric Univ Pekinesis, 1993, 19(suppl): 19–24 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]范平, 崔党群, 范弘伟. CHA-SC2053诱导普通小麦雄性不育研究. 河南农业大学学报, 1998, 32: 149–153



Fan P, Cui D Q, Fan H W. Studies on the male sterility induced by CHA-SC2053 in common wheat. Acta Agric Univ Henanensis, 1998, 32: 149–153 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]杨武云, 饶世达. 小麦新型化杀剂SC2053诱导花粉败育的机制研究. 北京农业大学学报, 1993, 19(增刊): 88–91



Yang W Y, Rao S D. Cytological study on the new type chemical hybridizing agent SC2053 inducing wheat pollen abortion. Acta Agric Univ Pekinesis, 1993, 19(suppl): 88–91 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[6] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1Pod-D1Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[7] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!