欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (03): 464-470.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.00464

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    

中国北部藜麦品质性状的多样性和相关性分析

胡一波,杨修仕,陆平*,任贵兴*   

  1. 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 / 国家杂粮加工技术研发分中心,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-10 修回日期:2016-11-02 出版日期:2017-03-12 网络出版日期:2016-11-18
  • 通讯作者: 任贵兴, E-mail: renguixing@caas.cn, Tel: 010-62156596; 陆平, E-mail: luping@caas.cn, Tel: 010-62186625
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由科技部科技伙伴计划项目(KY201402023)和中国农业科学院科技创新工程的资助。

Diversity and Correlation of Quality Traits in Quinoa Germplasms from North China

HU Yi-Bo,YANG Xiu-Shi,LU Ping*,REN Gui-Xing*   

  1. Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / National R&D Center For Coarse Cereal Processing, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2016-08-10 Revised:2016-11-02 Published:2017-03-12 Published online:2016-11-18
  • Contact: 任贵兴, E-mail: renguixing@caas.cn, Tel: 010-62156596; 陆平, E-mail: luping@caas.cn, Tel: 010-62186625
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by Science and Technology Partnership Program, Ministry of Science and Technology of China (KY201402023), and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of CAAS.

摘要:

藜麦(Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)是美洲大陆最古老的作物之一,为全世界公认的全营养谷物。为了解国内不同藜麦种质资源营养性状的相关性和差异性,本研究测定国内25份藜麦种质资源的13个品质性状指标,并对其进行相关性分析、主成分分析和聚类分析。结果表明,脂肪与总黄酮呈极显著正相关(0.55),而与赖氨酸和组氨酸呈极显著负相关(–0.52和–0.54);总多酚、总黄酮和总皂苷之间均具有极显著相关性。13个品质性状分别隶属于5个主成分,累计贡献率为92.6%。25份种质材料可以聚类为4组,在品质和遗传距离方面各组群之间差异较大。利用主成分分析和聚类分析对藜麦品质进行综合评价,可避免单一指标的片面性和不稳定性,为藜麦的利用和品质育种提供重要的科学依据。

关键词: 藜麦, 品质性状, 相关性, 主成分分析, 聚类分析

Abstract:

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) is one of the oldest crops in the American continent. It has been recognized as a nutritious grain all over the world. In this experiment, thirteen indicators of quality in 25 quinoa germplasms were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis. The fat had significantly positive correlation with total flavonoids (0.55), and remarkably negative correlation with lysine and histidine (–0.52 and –0.54); and the correlation among total flavonoids, polyphenols and saponins was positively significant. Thirteen traits belonged in five principal components, with a total contribution rate of 92.6%. Twenty-five quinoa germplasms were divided into four categories through cluster analysis, and there were larger different in genetic distance and quality between categories. It is an effective way to comprehensively evaluate the quinoa quality by PCA and cluster analysis, which could not only avoid the bias and the instability of single factor analysis, but also provide an important scientific basis for quinoa application and quality breeding.

Key words: Quinoa, Quality traits, Correlation, Principal component analysis, Cluster analysis

[1] Stikic R, Glamoclija D, Demin M, Vucelic-Radovic B, Jovanovic Z, Milojkovic-Opsenica D, Milovanovic M. Agronomical and nutritional evaluation of quinoa seeds (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as an ingredient in bread formulations. J Cereal Sci, 2012, 55: 132–138
[2] James L E A. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): composition, chemistry, nutritional, and functional properties. Adv Food Nutr Res, 2009, 58: 1–31
[3] Vega-Gálvez A, Miranda M, Vergara J, Uribe E, Puente L, Martínez E A. Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), an ancient Andean grain: a review. J Sci Food Agric, 2010, 90: 2541–2547
[4] Valencia-Chamorro S A. Quinoa. Encyclopedia of Food Science and Nutrition. Waltham, US: Academic Press, 2003. pp 4895–4902
[5] Kehrer J P, Smith C V. Free Radicals in Biology: Sources, Reactivities, and Roles in the Etiology of Human Diseases. Natural Antioxidants in Human Health and Disease. Oregon, US: Academic Press, 1994. pp 25–62
[6] Scalbert A, Manach C, Morand C, Rémésy C, Jiménez L. Dietary polyphenols and the prevention of diseases. Crit Rev Food Sci, 2005, 45: 287–306
[7] Woldemichael G M, Wink M. Identification and biological activities of triterpenoid saponins from Chenopodium quinoa. J Agric Food Chem, 2001, 49: 2327–2332
[8] Estrada A, Li B, Laarveld B. Adjuvant action of Chenopodium quinoa saponins on the induction of antibody responses to intragastric and intranasal administered antigens in mice. Comp Immunol Micro, 1998, 21: 225–236
[9] Repo-Carrasco-Valencia R A, Encina C R, Binaghi M J, Greco C B, Ronayne de Ferrer P A. Effects of roasting and boiling of quinoa, kiwicha and kañiwa on composition and availability of minerals in vitro. J Sci Food Agric, 2010, 90: 2068–2073
[10] Miranda M, Vega-Gálvez A, Martínez E A, López J, Marín R, Aranda M, Fuentes F. Influence of contrasting environments on seed composition of two quinoa genotypes: nutritional and functional properties. Chil J Agric Res, 2013, 73: 108–116
[11] Tang Y, Li X, Chen P X, Zhang B, Hernandez M, Zhang H, Tsao R. Characterisation of fatty acid, carotenoid, tocopherol/tocotrienol compositions and antioxidant activities in seeds of three Chenopodium quinoa Willd. genotypes. Food Chem, 2015, 174: 502–508
[12] 刘浩, 胡一波, 任贵兴. 杂粮黄酒的氨基酸组成评价及抗氧化研究. 食品工业科技, 2015, 36: 343–346
Liu H, Hu Y B, Ren G X. Amino acid composition analysis and antioxidant research of Chinese coarse cereal wine. Sci Technol Food Ind, 2015, 36: 343–346 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] Abderrahim F, Huanatico E, Repo-Carrasco-Valencia R, Arribas S M, Gonzalez M C, Condezo-Hoyos L. Effect of germination on total phenolic compounds, total antioxidant capacity, Maillard reaction products and oxidative stress markers in canihua (Chenopodium pallidicaule). J Cereal Sci, 2012, 56: 410–417
[14] 张文杰, 孙永敢, 申瑞玲, 董吉林. 藜麦的主要营养成分, 矿物元素及植物化学物质含量测定. 郑州轻工业学院学报(自然科学版), 2015, 30: 17–21
Zhang W J, Sun Y G, Shen R L, Dong J L. Determination of main nutritional component, mineral element and phytochemical in Chenopodium quinoa Willd. J Zhengzhou Univ Light Ind (Nat Sci Edn), 2015, 30(5): 17–21 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] Tártara S C, Manifesto M M, Bramardi S J, Bertero H D. Genetic structure in cultivated quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), a reflection of landscape structure in Northwest Argentina. Conserv Genet, 2012, 13: 1027–1038
[16] Curti R N, Andrade A J, Bramardi S, Velásquez B, Daniel Bertero H. Ecogeographic structure of phenotypic diversity in cultivated populations of quinoa from Northwest Argentina. Ann Appl Biol, 2012, 160: 114–125
[17] Vega-Gálvez A, Miranda M, Vergara J, Uribe E, Puente L, Martínez E A. Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.), an ancient Andean grain: a review. J Sci Food Agric, 2010, 90: 2541–2547
[18] Repo-Carrasco-Valencia R, Hellström J K, Pihlava J M, Mattila P H. Flavonoids and other phenolic compounds in Andean indigenous grains: Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa), kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule) and kiwicha (Amaranthus caudatus). Food Chem, 2010, 120: 128–133
[19] Mastebroek H D, Limburg H, Gilles T, Marvin H J P. Occurrence of sapogenins in leaves and seeds of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). J Sci Food Agric, 2000, 80: 152–156
[20] 杨雪峰, 齐宁, 林红, 刘广阳, 张晓波, 吴岩, 金海涛. 不同类型大豆蛋白质, 脂肪含量与异黄酮含量的相关性研究. 大豆科学, 2007, 26: 705–708
Yang X F, Qi N, Lin H, Liu G Y, Zhang X B, Wu Y, Jin H T. Correlation between isoflavones content and protein and oil content in different soybean germplasms. Soybean Sci, 2007, 26: 705–708 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 黄明伟, 于寒松, 刘瑞雪, 李松, 姜丽冬, 胡耀辉. 中国北方地区大豆主栽品种五种成分检测与分析. 中国食物与营养, 2015, 21(8): 31–34
Huang M W, Yu H S, Liu R X, Li S, Jiang L D, Hu Y H. Research and thinking of boosting development of “three brands and one Sigh” cause in China. Food Nutr China, 2015, 21(8): 31–34 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] Qin P, Song W, Yang X, Sun S, Zhou X, Yang R, Ren G. Regional distribution of protein and oil compositions of soybean cultivars in China. Crop Sci, 2014, 54: 1139–1146
[23] Souza J N, Silva E M, Loir A, Rees J F, Rogez H, Larondelle Y. Antioxidant capacity of four polyphenol-rich Amazonian plant extracts: A correlation study using chemical and biological in vitro assays. Food Chem, 2008, 106: 331–339
[24] 韩立德, 盖钧镒, 邱家驯, 喻德跃. 菜用大豆感官品质性状遗传变异及品质育种目标性状分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2003, 4: 16–20
Han L D, Gai J Y, Qiu J X, Yu D Y. Genetic variation and breeding objective of sensory quality traits of vegetable soybean. J Plant Genet Resour, 2003, 4: 16–20 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 殷冬梅, 张幸果, 王允, 崔党群. 花生主要品质性状的主成分分析与综合评价. 植物遗传资源学报, 2011, 12: 507–512
Yin D M, Zhang X G, Wang Y, Cui D Q. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation on quality traits of peanut parents. J Plant Genet Resour, 2011, 12: 507–512 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[2] 蒋嘉卉, 江炳志, 刘冠明, 王章英, 唐朝臣. 紫肉甘薯品质性状的近红外光谱预测模型构建与优化[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1088-1102.
[3] 黄丽霞, 张卫卫, 甄一越, 王秋宝, 田洪岭, 李国栋, 刘龙龙, 张丽君. 盐胁迫下苦荞萌发期耐盐碱性评价及种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 459-479.
[4] 马婷婷, 郭晓江, 李豪, 邓梅, 蒲至恩, 李伟, 张亚洲, 王凤涛, 崔凤娟, 魏育明, 王际睿, 蒋云峰, 陈国跃. 利用小麦农家种孝感麦协同改良蜀麦753产量与抗病耐逆性的育种实践[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 56-71.
[5] 景秀清, 蔡永朵, 邓宁, 赵晓东, 翟飞红, 曾群. 藜麦RopGEF家族基因的鉴定及表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 28-43.
[6] 王菲菲, 张胜忠, 杨贵华, 苗华荣, 胡晓辉, 张则林, 刘莎莎, 乔利仙, 单世华, 陈静. 331份花生种质苗期耐盐性综合评价和强耐盐种质鉴选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 279-294.
[7] 尹丽娜, 张锐, 陈国欢, 白磊, 李俊, 郭华春, 杨芳. 不同马铃薯品种块茎创伤愈合能力的比较[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2399-2411.
[8] 文璇, 钟秀丽, 王尚文, 金涛, 彭君, 刘恩科. 基于耐性指数的青稞苗期耐低氮种质筛选及不同氮效率类型综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1949-1958.
[9] 王天译, 杨绣娟, 赵佳佳, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 李晓华, 郝水源, 郑军. 山西小麦醇溶蛋白多样性及其对面粉品质效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1784-1800.
[10] 蒋优, 马雪融, 张博, 李陈建. 苏丹草种子萌发期耐盐性评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 835-844.
[11] 蒋昂辰, 李琰, 李雨晨, 张晶, 陈爱萍. 21份无芒雀麦种质农艺性状及种子产量的综合评价与优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2958-2970.
[12] 姜骁, 赵健鑫, 毕竞男, 许静, 殷祥贞, 赵旭红, 潘丽娟, 陈娜, 马俊卿, 韩鹏, 杨珍, 迟晓元. 中国北方主产区主要地理和气候因子对花生农艺性状和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2805-2820.
[13] 胡亮亮, 周洪妹, 王晓磊, 王素华, 李彩菊, 魏云山, 王丽侠, 程须珍, 陈红霖. 小豆产量相关性状的基因型与环境互作效应及稳定性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2581-2594.
[14] 聂波涛, 刘德泉, 陈健, 崔正果, 侯云龙, 陈亮, 邱红梅, 王跃强. 北方春大豆品种农艺和品质性状分析与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2248-2266.
[15] 闫锋, 董扬, 李清泉, 赵富阳, 侯晓敏, 刘洋, 李青超, 赵蕾, 范国权, 刘凯. 谷子育成品种萌芽期耐冷性综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2207-2218.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!