欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 686-694.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.33031

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

绿洲灌区绿肥还田利用方式对玉米干物质积累、分配及产量的影响

尚永盼(), 于爱忠(), 王玉珑, 王鹏飞, 李悦, 柴健, 吕汉强, 杨学慧, 王凤   

  1. 甘肃农业大学农学院 / 干旱生境作物学国家重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-16 接受日期:2023-09-13 出版日期:2024-03-12 网络出版日期:2023-09-28
  • 通讯作者: *于爱忠, E-mail: yuaizh@gsau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:E-mail: shangyp1111@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFD1900200);国家自然科学基金项目(32160524);甘肃省基础研究创新群体项目(20JR5RA037);甘肃农业大学伏羲杰出人才培育计划项目(GAUfx-04J01)

Effects of green manure application methods on dry matter accumulation, distribution, and yield of maize in oasis irrigation area

SHANG Yong-Pan(), YU Ai-Zhong(), WANG Yu-Long, WANG Peng-Fei, LI Yue, CHAI Jian, LYU Han-Qiang, YANG Xue-Hui, WANG Feng   

  1. College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University / State Key Laboratory of Arid land Crop Science, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
  • Received:2023-05-16 Accepted:2023-09-13 Published:2024-03-12 Published online:2023-09-28
  • Contact: *E-mail: yuaizh@gsau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China(2022YFD1900200);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32160524);Science and Technology Plan of Gansu Province(20JR5RA037);Fuxi Outstanding Talent Cultivation Program of Gansu Agricultural University(GAUfx-04J01)

摘要:

研究绿肥还田利用方式对玉米干物质积累分配规律及产量的影响, 对优化区域玉米种植制度具有重要意义。2020—2021年在甘肃内陆河绿洲灌区进行田间试验, 研究了绿肥全量翻压(tillage with full quantity of green manure incorporated in the soil, TG)、绿肥地表覆盖免耕(no-tillage with full quantity of green manure mulched on soil surface, NTG)、绿肥地上部移除根茬翻压(tillage with root incorporated in the soil and above ground green manure removed, T)、绿肥地上部移除免耕(no-tillage with above ground manure removed, NT)和传统翻耕、休闲(conventional tillage and leisure, CT) 5个处理对玉米干物质积累、分配及产量的影响。结果表明, NTG和TG处理具有明显的干物质积累优势, 在完熟期二者地上部干物质积累量分别较CT处理显著提高20.2%和17.7%, 较T处理显著提高20.2%和7.3%, 较NT处理显著提高15.7%和13.0%; 同时NTG和TG处理促进了干物质向穗部的分配, 分别较CT处理显著提高10.3%和9.0%; 通过Logistic方程拟合发现, NTG、TG处理的玉米干物质最大增长速率(Vmax)和平均增长速率(Vmean)分别较CT处理显著提高36.6%、24.8%和20.2%、17.7%; 且NTG和TG处理增产效果显著, 分别较CT处理增产24.9%和25.7%, 增产主要归因于穗粒数的提高。因此, 绿肥地表覆盖免耕和绿肥全量翻压处理有利于促进玉米干物质积累与分配, 提高产量, 其中绿肥地表覆盖免耕处理效果突出, 可作为该区推荐的绿肥还田利用方式。

关键词: 绿肥, 干物质积累, 干物质分配, 产量

Abstract:

The study of green manure application methods on the accumulation and distribution of maize dry matter and yield has significant implications for optimizing regional maize cropping systems. Field experiments were conducted in the inland river oasis irrigation area of Gansu province, China, from 2020 to 2021 to investigate the effects of five treatments, including tillage with full quantity of green manure incorporated in the soil (TG), no-tillage with full quantity of green manure mulched on soil surface (NTG), tillage with root incorporated in the soil and above ground green manure removed (T), no-tillage with above ground manure removed (NT), and conventional tillage and leisure (CT), on dry matter accumulation, distribution, and yield of maize. The results showed that the NTG and TG treatments had significant advantages in dry matter accumulation, with above-ground dry matter accumulation increasing by 20.2% and 17.7%, respectively, compared with CT treatment at the fully mature stage. The above-ground dry matter accumulations of NTG and TG treatments were also significantly higher than T and NT treatments, with the increases of 20.2% and 7.3%, and 15.7% and 13.0%, respectively. In addition, NTG and TG treatments promoted the distribution of dry matter to the ear, increasing by 10.3% and 9.0%, respectively, compared with CT treatment. By fitting the Logistic equation, we found that the maximum growth rate (Vmax) and average growth rate (Vmean) of maize dry matter in the NTG and TG treatments were significantly higher than CT treatment, with the increase of 36.6%, 24.8%, and 20.2%, 17.7%, respectively. The NTG and TG treatments also significantly increased yield by 24.9% and 25.7%, respectively, compared with CT treatment, mainly attributed to the increase in the number of grains per ear. Therefore, no-tillage with full quantity of green manure mulched on soil surface and tillage with full quantity of green manure incorporated in soil treatments were beneficial for promoting dry matter accumulation and distribution and increasing yield of maize, with the former being the most effective and recommended green manure application method in this area.

Key words: green manure, dry matter accumulation, dry matter distribution, yield

图1

2020-2021年试验站作物生育期内日降雨量及日均温变化"

表1

试验处理及代码"

处理代码
Treatment code
处理
Treatment
TG 春小麦7月收获后复种箭筈豌豆, 10月全量翻压, 翌年4月覆膜平作玉米。
Planting Vicia sativa after spring wheat harvest in July, tillage with full quantity of green manure incorporated in the soil in October, and flat planting maize with film mulching in April of the next year.
NTG 春小麦7月收获后复种箭筈豌豆, 10月地表覆盖免耕, 翌年4月覆膜平作玉米。
Planting Vicia sativa after spring wheat harvest in July, no-tillage with full quantity of green manure mulched on soil surface in October, and flat planting maize with film mulching in April of the next year.
T 春小麦7月收获后复种箭筈豌豆, 10月地上部收获移除根茬翻压, 翌年4月覆膜平作玉米。
Planting Vicia sativa after spring wheat harvest in July, harvesting and removing above ground green manure and tillage with root incorporated in the soil in October, and flat planting maize with film mulching in April of the next year.
NT 春小麦7月收获后复种箭筈豌豆, 10月地上部收获移除免耕, 翌年4月覆膜平作玉米。
Planting Vicia sativa after spring wheat harvest in July, no-tillage with above ground green manure harvested and removed in October, and flat planting maize with film mulching in April of the next year.
CT 春小麦收获后传统翻耕、休闲。
Conventional tillage and leisure without green manure after spring wheat harvest.

图2

不同处理下玉米干物质积累量动态 TG: 绿肥全量翻压; NTG: 绿肥地表覆盖免耕; T: 绿肥地上部移除根茬翻压; NT: 绿肥地上部移除免耕; CT: 传统翻耕、休闲。误差线表示LSD值。"

表2

不同处理下玉米地上部干物质积累的Logistic方程回归分析"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
回归方程
Regression equation
最大增长速率
Maximum increase rate
(Vmax, kg hm-2 d-1)
最大增长速率
出现的时间
Time of Vmax (t50, d)
平均增长速率
Mean increase rate
(Vmean, kg hm-2 d-1)
R2
2020 CT Y=30743/(1+e5.118-0.052t) 399.2 d 98.5 a 186.9 c 0.997
T Y=33142/(1+e5.657-0.058t) 480.7 bc 97.5 a 199.6 b 0.999
NT Y=32742/(1+e5.444-0.054t) 445.2 cd 100.1 a 197.5 c 0.998
NTG Y=35791/(1+e6.580-0.066t) 590.7 a 99.7 a 214.5 a 0.998
TG Y=35657/(1+e5.513-0.056t) 497.3 b 98.8 a 211.6 a 0.999
2021 CT Y=28733/(1+e4.601-0.045t) 323.2 d 102.2 a 159.7 c 0.987
T Y=32584/(1+e4.820-0.049t) 399.2 c 98.4 c 190.8 b 0.997
NT Y=29724/(1+e4.640-0.046t) 341.8 d 100.9 b 168.8 c 0.995
NTG Y=37641/(1+e5.889-0.058t) 545.8 a 101.5 a 219.8 a 0.995
TG Y=36125/(1+e5.116-0.051t) 460.6 b 100.3 bc 209.1 a 0.995

图3

不同处理下玉米各器官干物质分配比率"

图4

不同处理下玉米籽粒产量 处理同图2。不同小写字母表示同一年份各处理在P < 0.05水平差异显著; 误差线表示标准差(n = 3)。"

表3

不同处理玉米籽粒产量与产量因素的相关系数和通径系数"

指标
Index
与籽粒产量的简单相关系数
Correlation coefficient with yield
直接通径系数
Direct path coefficient
间接通径系数Indirect path coefficient
X1 X2 X3
X1 0.771** 0.099 0.698 -0.027
X2 0.856** 0.809 0.085 -0.038
X3 0.638** -0.049 0.054 0.633
[1] Dordas C. Variation in dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and remobilization in barley as affected by fertilization, cultivar, and source-sink relations. Eur J Agron, 2012, 37: 31-42.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2011.10.002
[2] 杨吉顺, 高辉远, 刘鹏, 李耕, 董树亭, 张吉旺, 王敬锋. 种植密度和行距配置对超高产夏玉米群体光合特性的影响. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 1226-1233.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01226
Yang J S, Gao H Y, Liu P, Li G, Dong S T, Zhang J W, Wang J F. Effects of planting density and row spacing on canopy apparent photosynthesis of high-yield summer corn. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 1226-1233 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01226
[3] 魏文良, 刘路, 仇恒浩. 有机无机肥配施对我国主要粮食作物产量和氮肥利用效率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26: 1384-1394.
Wei W L, Liu L, Qiu H H. Effects of different organic resources application combined with chemical fertilizer on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of main grain crops in China. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2020, 26: 1384-1394 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 王鹏飞, 于爱忠, 王玉珑, 苏向向, 李悦, 吕汉强, 柴健, 杨宏伟. 绿肥还田结合减量施氮对玉米干物质积累分配及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56: 1283-1294.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.07.007
Wang P F, Yu A Z, Wang Y L, Su X X, Li Y, Lyu H Q, Chai J, Yang H W. Effects of returning green manure to field combined with reducing nitrogen application on the dry matter accumulation, distribution and yield of maize. Sci Agric Sin, 2023, 56: 1283-1294 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.07.007
[5] Syamsiyah J, Herdiansyah G, Aisyah N, Mentari F C, Larasati I. Combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizer on Alfisol soil fertility and maize growth. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ Sci, 2021, 824: 12025.
[6] 杨明达, 关小康, 刘影, 崔静宇, 丁超明, 王静丽, 韩静丽, 王怀苹, 康海平, 王同朝. 滴灌模式和水分调控对夏玉米干物质和氮素积累与分配及水分利用的影响. 作物学报, 2019, 45: 443-459.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.83026
Yang M D, Guan X K, Liu Y, Cui J Y, Ding C M, Wang J L, Han J L, Wang H P, Kang H P, Wang T C. Effects of drip irrigation pattern and water regulation on the accumulation and allocation of dry matter and nitrogen, and water use efficiency in summer maize. Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45: 443-459 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.83026
[7] 谢志坚, 周春火, 贺亚琴, 宋涛, 于洋, 吴佳. 21世纪我国稻区种植紫云英的研究现状及展望. 草业学报, 2018, 27(8): 185-196.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2017360
Xie Z J, Zhou C H, He Y Q, Song T, Yu Y, Wu J. A review of Astragalus sinicus in paddy fields in south China since 2000s. Acta Pratac Sin, 2018, 27(8): 185-196 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] Kopila S C, Shikha S, Brianna R W, Sandeep K, Juan D P G, Shannon L O, Thandiwe N, Jose G, Jai S R. Cover crops and returning residue impact on soil organic carbon, bulk density, penetration resistance, water retention, infiltration, and soybean yield. Agron J, 2019, 111: 99-108.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2018.03.0213
[9] Gang S, Rui Z, Yi Z W, An Y Y, Xi D W, Jin L W, Jun Z G. Green manure return strategies to improve soil properties and spring maize productivity under nitrogen reduction in the north China plain. Agronomy, 2022, 12: 2734-2734.
doi: 10.3390/agronomy12112734
[10] Osvaldo S, Liliana B, Kiri P, Michel R, Manuel C, Yasna T, Ranvir S, Miguel Q. Effect of cover crops on leaching of dissolved organic nitrogen and carbon in a maize-cover crop rotation in Mediterranean Central Chile. Agric Water Manag, 2019, 212: 399-406.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.031
[11] Ortiz-Salgado D A, García-Oliva F, Alarcón A, Larsen J. Soil physical disturbance reduces maize growth, nutrition, and mycorrhiza formation in a green manure rotation with vetch. Rhizosphere, 2021, 19: 156-167.
[12] Ma D, Yin L, Ju W, Li X, Liu X, Deng X, Wang S. Meta-analysis of green manure effects on soil properties and crop yield in northern China. Field Crops Res, 2021, 266: 339-345.
[13] 罗跃, 张久东, 周国朋, 常单娜, 高嵩涓, 包兴国, 车宗贤, 朱青, 曹卫东. 河西绿洲灌区间作绿肥及其不同利用方式对玉米产量及土壤肥力的提升效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28: 402-413.
Luo Y, Zhang J D, Zhou G P, Chang D N, Gao S J, Bao X G, Che Z X, Zhu Q, Cao W D. Intercropping maize with green manure crops at various utilization patterns improves maize yield and soil fertility in Hexi Oasis irrigated area. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2022, 28: 402-413 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 苏向向, 于爱忠, 吕汉强, 王玉珑. 绿洲灌区小麦复种绿肥并翻压还田对翌年玉米产量形成及氮素吸收利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28: 1208-1218.
Su X X, Yu A Z, Lyu H Q, Wang Y L. Effects of wheat multiple cropping with green manure on grain yield formation and nitrogen absorption and utilization of maize in oasis irrigation area in Northwest China. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2022, 28: 1208-1218 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 汪顺义, 刘庆, 史衍玺, 李欢. 氮钾配施对甘薯光合产物积累及分配的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50: 2706-2716.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.14.007
Wang S Y, Liu Q, Shi Y X, Li H. Interactive effects of nitrogen and potassium on photosynthesis product distribution and accumulation of sweet potato. Sci Agric Sin, 2017, 50: 2706-2716 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.14.007
[16] 王国璀, 张松茂, 胡发龙, 殷文, 樊志龙, 范虹, 于爱忠, 赵财, 柴强. 绿洲灌区春小麦产量和氮素利用率对绿肥还田量的响应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27: 1164-1172.
Wang G C, Zhang S M, Hu F L, Yin W, Fan Z L, Fan H, Yu A Z, Zhao C, Chai Q. Response of grain yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of spring wheat to green manure incorporation amount in oasis irrigation district. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2021, 27: 1164-1172 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 张明发, 田峰, 田茂成, 陈前锋, 邓小华. 绿肥不同还田量对烤烟产质量的影响. 作物研究, 2013, 27: 442-444.
Zhang M F, Tian F, Tian M C, Chen Q F, Deng X H. Effects of different amount of green manure returned to field on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco. Crop Res, 2013, 27: 442-444 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] Jianling F, Brian G M, Mervin S L, Kelsey B. Rotational benefit of pulse crop with no-till increase over time in a semiarid climate. Eur J Agron, 2020, 121: 239-256.
[19] Mette K A, Henrik H N, Jacob W, Erik S J. Competitive dynamics in two- and three-component intercrops. J Appl Ecol, 2007, 44: 545-551.
doi: 10.1111/jpe.2007.44.issue-3
[20] 李向岭, 赵明, 李从锋, 葛均筑, 侯海鹏, 李琦, 侯立白. 播期和密度对玉米干物质积累动态的影响及其模型的建立. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 2143-2153.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.02143
Li X L, Zhao M, Li C F, Ge J Z, Hou H P, Li Q, Hou L B. Effect of sowing-date and planting density on dry matter accumulation dynamic and establishment of its simulated model in maize. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 2143-2153 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.02143
[21] Yao Z Y, Zhang D B, Yao P W, Zhao N, Li Y Y, Zhang S Q, Zhai B N, Huang D L, Ma A S, Zuo Y J, Cao W D, Gao Y J. Optimizing the synthetic nitrogen rate to balance residual nitrate and crop yield in a leguminous green-manured wheat cropping system. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 631-632: 1234-1242.
[22] 姚致远, 王峥, 李婧, 鱼昌为, 曹群虎, 曹卫东, 高亚军. 轮作及绿肥不同利用方式对作物产量和土壤肥力的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26: 2329-2336.
Yao Z Y, Wang Z, Li J, Yu C W, Cao Q H, Cao W D, Gao Y J. Effects of rotations and different green manure utilizations on crop yield and soil fertility. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2015, 26: 2329-2336 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 张济世, 张琳, 丁丽, 刘春增, 吕玉虎, 郑春风, 张成兰, 聂良鹏, 曹卫东, 张玉亭. 紫云英还田与化肥减量配施对土壤氮素供应和水稻生长的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28: 1793-1803.
Zhang J S, Zhang L, Ding L, Liu C Z, Lyu Y H, Zheng C F, Zhang C L, Nie L P, Cao W D, Zhang Y T. Effects of Chinese milk vetch incorporation and chemical fertilizer reduction on soil nitrogen supply and rice growth. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2022, 28: 1793-1803 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 吕汉强, 于爱忠, 王玉珑, 苏向向, 吕奕彤, 柴强. 干旱绿洲灌区玉米氮素吸收利用对绿肥还田利用方式的响应. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 93-103.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020020
Lyu H Q, Yu A Z, Wang Y L, Su X X, Lyu Y T, Chai Q. Effect of green manure retention practices on nitrogen absorption and utilization by maize crops in the arid oasis irrigation area. Acta Pratac Sin, 2020, 29(8): 93-103 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] Couëdel A, Alletto L, Tribouillois H, Justes É. Cover crop crucifer-legume mixtures provide effective nitrate catch crop and nitrogen green manure ecosystem services. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2018, 254: 50-59.
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.11.017
[26] Elfstrand S, Hedlund K, Martensson A. Soil enzyme activities, microbial community composition and function after 47 years of continuous green manuring. Appl Soil Ecol, 2007, 35: 610-621.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2006.09.011
[27] 顾炽明, 李越, 李银水, 谢立华, 沈欣杰, 李小勇, 秦璐, 廖星. 绿肥腐解液中有机酸组成对铝磷和铁磷活化能力的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27: 1627-1635.
Gu C M, Li Y, Li Y S, Xie L H, Shen X J, Li X Y, Qin L, Liao X. Effects of organic acid composition in the decomposed liquid of green manure crops on the activation level of AlPO4 and FePO4·2H2O. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2021, 27: 1627-1635 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 赵德强, 李彤, 侯玉婷, 元晋川, 廖允成. 玉米大豆间作模式下干物质积累和产量的边际效应及其系统效益. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53: 1971-1985.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.10.005
Zhao D Q, Li T, Hou Y T, Yuan J C, Liao Y C. Benefits and marginal effect of dry matter accumulation and yield in maize and soybean intercropping patterns. Sci Agric Sin, 2020, 53: 1971-1985 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.10.005
[29] Wen Y, Ai Z Y, Yao G, Hong F, Fa L H, Zhi L F, Cai Z, Qiang C, Jeffrey A C. Growth trajectories of wheat-maize intercropping with straw and plastic management in arid conditions. Agron J, 2020, 112: 2777-2790.
doi: 10.1002/agj2.v112.4
[30] 赵姣, 郑志芳, 方艳茹, 周顺利, 廖树华, 王璞. 基于动态模拟模型分析冬小麦干物质积累特征对产量的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 300-308.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00300
Zhao J, Zheng Z F, Fang Y R, Zhou S L, Liao S H, Wang P. Effect of dry matter accumulation characteristics on yield of winter wheat analyzed by dynamic simulation model. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 300-308 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00300
[31] 侯玉虹, 陈传永, 郭志强, 侯立白, 董志强, 赵明. 作物高产群体干物质积累动态模型的构建及生长特性分析. 玉米科学, 2008, 16(6): 90-95.
Hou Y H, Chen C Y, Guo Z Q, Hou L B, Dong Z Q, Zhao M. Establishment of dry matter accumulation dynamic simulation model and analysis of growth characteristic for high-yielding population of spring maize. Maize Sci, 2008, 16(6): 90-95 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32] 尹嘉德, 侯慧芝, 张绪成, 于显枫, 王红丽, 方彦杰, 张国平, 雷康宁, 马一凡. 化肥与有机肥结合对旱地覆膜春小麦产量形成和土壤碱解氮累积影响. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(2): 279-287.
Yin J D, Hou H Z, Zhang X C, Yu X F, Wang H L, Fang Y J, Zhang G P, Lei K N, Ma Y F. Effects of the combination of chemical and organic fertilizer on spring wheat grain yield formation and soil available nitrogen accumulation under plastic mulched rain-fed area. Res Soil Water Conserv, 2021, 35(2): 279-287 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] 李利利, 张吉旺, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 赵斌, 杨今胜. 不同株高夏玉米品种同化物积累转运与分配特性. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 1080-1087.
Li L L, Zhang J W, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhao B, Yang J S. Characteristics of accumulation, transition and distribution of assimilate in summer maize varieties with different plant height. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 1080-1087 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01080
[34] Ruxangul A, Wei K L, Jiu D Z, Hai N G, Yi M Z, Miao M C, Xue Q M, Li Z A, Yong C. Altering microbial community for improving soil properties and agricultural sustainability during a 10-year maize-green manure intercropping in northwest China. J Environ Manag, 2022, 321: 115859.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115859
[35] 李虹桥, 李梦颖, 杨云飞, 刘士山, 吴永成. 豆科绿肥覆盖还田对春玉米产量和氮素吸收利用的影响. 湖南农业大学学报, 2019, 45: 243-247.
Li H Q, Li M Y, Yang Y F, Liu S S, Wu Y C. Effect of legume green manure mulching on the yield and the nitrogen absorption and utilization on spring maize. J Hunan Agric Univ, 2019, 45: 243-247 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[36] 王玉珑, 于爱忠, 吕汉强, 吕奕彤, 苏向向, 王鹏飞, 柴健. 绿洲灌区麦后复种绿肥并还田对翌年玉米根系性状及水分利用效率的影响. 作物学报, 2023, 49: 1350-1362.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.23036
Wang Y L, Yu A Z, Lyu H Q, Lyu Y T, Su X X, Wang P F, Chai J. Effects of green manure replanting and returning after wheat on following year’s maize root traits and water use efficiency in oasis irrigation area. Acta Agron Sin, 2023, 49: 1350-1362 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.23036
[37] 刘佳, 曹卫东, 荣向农, 金强, 梁金凤. 华北冬绿肥作物二月兰的营养特征研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2012, (1): 78-82.
Liu J, Cao W D, Rong X N, Jin Q, Liang J F. Nutritional characteristics of Orychophragmus violaceus in north China. Soils Fert Sci China, 2012, (1): 78-82 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[38] 吴科生, 车宗贤, 包兴国, 张久东, 曹卫东, 卢秉林, 杨新强, 杨蕊菊, 崔恒. 长期翻压绿肥对提高灌漠土土壤肥力和作物产量的贡献. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28: 1134-1144.
Wu K S, Che Z X, Bao X G, Zhang J D, Cao W D, Lu B L, Yang X Q, Yang R J, Cui H. Contribution of long-term application of green manure to soil fertility and crop yield in irrigated desert soil. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2022, 28: 1134-1144 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[39] 成欣, 王一帆, 刘帮艳, 戴伊莎, 何鲜, 廖洪波, 武海燕, 吴进红, 李茜, 王龙昌. 秸秆和紫云英覆盖还田对玉米光合生理特性的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2021, 39(6): 126-135.
Cheng X, Wang Y F, Liu B Y, Dai Y S, He X, Liao H B, Wu H Y, Wu J H, Li Q, Wang L C. Effects of straw and milk vetch mulching and returning to the field on maize photosynthetic physiological characteristics. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2021, 39(6): 126-135 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[40] 申丽霞, 王璞, 兰林旺, 孙西欢. 施氮对夏玉米碳氮代谢及穗粒形成的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13: 1074-1079.
Shen L X, Wang P, Lan L W, Sun X H. Effect of nitrogen supply on carbon-nitrogen metabolism and kernel set in summer maize. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2007, 13: 1074-1079 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[41] Ann M M, Clain A J, Perry R M, Macdonald H B, Catherine A Z. Nitrogen fixation by pea and lentil green manures in a semi-arid agroecoregion: effect of planting and termination timing. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst, 2012, 92: 305-314.
doi: 10.1007/s10705-012-9491-3
[1] 张振, 赵俊晔, 石玉, 张永丽, 于振文. 不同播幅对小麦花后叶片光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 981-990.
[2] 刘成敏, 门雅琦, 秦都林, 闫晓宇, 张乐, 孟浩, 苏寻雅, 孙学振, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田下施氮量对棉花产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 1043-1052.
[3] 邹佳琪, 王仲林, 谭先明, 陈燎原, 杨文钰, 杨峰. 基于连续小波变换估测干旱胁迫下玉米籽粒产量[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 1030-1042.
[4] 吴霞玉, 李盼, 韦金贵, 范虹, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量灌水及有机无机肥配施对西北灌区玉米光合生理、籽粒产量及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 1065-1079.
[5] 娄菲, 左怿平, 李萌, 代鑫萌, 王健, 韩金玲, 吴舒, 李向岭, 段会军. 有机肥替代部分化肥氮对糯玉米产量、品质及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 1053-1064.
[6] 韦还和, 张翔, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 马唯一, 左博源, 孟天瑶, 高平磊, 陈英龙, 许轲, 戴其根. 盐胁迫对水稻籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 734-746.
[7] 王吕, 吴玉红, 秦宇航, 淡亚彬, 陈浩, 郝兴顺, 田霄鸿. 紫云英稻秸秆协同还田与氮肥减量配施对水稻干物质积累、氮素转运及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 756-770.
[8] 贺佳奇, 白羿雄, 姚晓华, 姚有华, 安立昆, 王玉琴, 王小萍, 李新, 崔永梅, 吴昆仑. 刈割对青稞恢复特性及籽粒和秸秆产量品质特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 747-755.
[9] 李博洋, 叶茵, 楚睿雯, 井苗, 张岁岐, 严加坤. 施加生物炭对谷子干物质积累、转运、分配和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 695-708.
[10] 谢炜, 贺鹏, 马宏亮, 雷芳, 黄秀兰, 樊高琼, 杨洪坤. 秋闲期秸秆覆盖与施磷对冬小麦氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 440-450.
[11] 吴昊, 张瑛, 王琛, 顾汉柱, 周天阳, 张伟杨, 顾骏飞, 刘立军, 杨建昌, 张耗. 栽培优化对长江下游水稻灌浆期根系特征和稻米淀粉特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 478-492.
[12] 柯会锋, 苏红梅, 孙正文, 谷淇深, 杨君, 王国宁, 徐东永, 王洪这, 吴立强, 张艳, 张桂寅, 马峙英, 王省芬. 棉花现代品种资源产量与纤维品质性状鉴定及分子标记评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 280-293.
[13] 李志坤, 贾文华, 朱伟, 刘伟, 马宗斌. 氮肥和缩节胺对棉花纤维产量及品质时间分布的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 514-528.
[14] 徐冉, 杨文叶, 朱均林, 陈松, 徐春梅, 刘元辉, 章秀福, 王丹英, 褚光. 不同灌溉模式对籼粳杂交稻甬优1540产量与水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 425-439.
[15] 杨立达, 任俊波, 彭新月, 杨雪丽, 罗凯, 陈平, 袁晓婷, 蒲甜, 雍太文, 杨文钰. 施氮与种间距离下大豆/玉米带状套作作物生长特性及其对产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 251-264.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李绍清, 李阳生, 吴福顺, 廖江林, 李达模. 水稻孕穗期在淹涝胁迫下施肥的优化选择及其作用机理[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(01): 115 -120 .
[2] 王兰珍;米国华;陈范骏;张福锁. 不同产量结构小麦品种对缺磷反应的分析[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(06): 867 -870 .
[3] 杨建昌;张亚洁;张建华;王志琴;朱庆森. 水分胁迫下水稻剑叶中多胺含量的变化及其与抗旱性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(11): 1069 -1075 .
[4] 袁美;杨光圣;傅廷栋;严红艳. 甘蓝型油菜生态型细胞质雄性不育两用系的研究Ⅲ. 8-8112AB的温度敏感性及其遗传[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(03): 330 -335 .
[5] 王永胜;王景;段静雅;王金发;刘良式. 水稻极度分蘖突变体的分离和遗传学初步研究[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(02): 235 -239 .
[6] 王丽燕;赵可夫. 玉米幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(02): 264 -268 .
[7] 田孟良;黄玉碧;谭功燮;刘永建;荣廷昭. 西南糯玉米地方品种waxy基因序列多态性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(05): 729 -736 .
[8] 胡希远;李建平;宋喜芳. 空间统计分析在作物育种品系选择中的效果[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 412 -417 .
[9] 王艳;邱立明;谢文娟;黄薇;叶锋;张富春;马纪. 昆虫抗冻蛋白基因转化烟草的抗寒性[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 397 -402 .
[10] 郑希;吴建国;楼向阳;徐海明;石春海. 不同环境条件下稻米组氨酸和精氨酸的胚乳和母体植株QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 369 -375 .