作物学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (11): 3232-3247.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2026.64073
王玉娇1,**,王永乐1,**,路献勇1,许大凤1,付瑜华2,朱加保1,*
Wang Yu-Jiao1,**,Wang Yong-Le1,**,Lu Xian-Yong1,Xu Da-Feng1,Fu Yu-Hua2,Zhu Jia-Bao1,*
摘要: WRKY转录因子家族广泛参与植物干旱胁迫应答调控。薏苡作为一种重要的药食兼用杂粮作物,其抗旱分子机制研究相对薄弱。本研究旨在从薏苡中克隆ClWRKY46基因并解析其序列特征和表达模式,进而通过异源表达系统鉴定该基因在干旱胁迫下的应激响应与耐受功能,为薏苡耐旱遗传改良提供候选基因与理论依据。本研究采用RT-PCR技术克隆获得ClWRKY46基因,并分析其在不同组织中及干旱、盐等胁迫条件下的表达模式;通过亚细胞定位及酵母转录激活试验明确其编码蛋白的细胞定位与转录活性;同时利用酵母和拟南芥异源表达系统,对转基因酵母和转基因拟南芥进行抗旱性表型与生理指标鉴定。结果表明,ClWRKY46蛋白含有典型WRKY结构域,属于第III类WRKY亚家族,与水稻OsWRKY45同源性最高。该蛋白定位于细胞核中,且酵母转录激活试验证实其在酵母系统中无转录自激活活性。干旱胁迫可显著诱导ClWRKY46的转录上调。在酵母中异源表达ClWRKY46可显著提高菌株在干旱胁迫下的存活率。同时,转基因拟南芥在干旱胁迫下表现出更高的萌发率和更优的生长态势,其体内超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)和过氧化氢酶(CAT)等抗氧化酶活性显著升高,丙二醛(MDA)含量显著降低。综上所述,薏苡ClWRKY46是定位于细胞核的WRKY转录因子,无转录自激活活性,在植物响应干旱胁迫中发挥正向调控作用,异源表达证明该编码基因能够显著增强酵母和拟南芥的耐旱能力。
| [1] Rushton P J, Somssich I E, Ringler P, et al. WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci, 2010, 15: 247–258. [2] Banerjee A, Roychoudhury A. WRKY proteins: signaling and regulation of expression during abiotic stress responses. Sci World J, 2015, 2015: 807560. [3] Ishiguro S, Nakamura K. Characterization of a cDNA encoding a novel DNA-binding protein, SPF1 that recognizes SP8 sequences in the 5' upstream regions of genes coding for sporamin and β-amylase from sweet potato. Mol Gen Genet, 1994, 244: 563–571. [4] Zhou J, Wang J, Zheng Z Y, et al. Characterization of the promoter and extended C-terminal domain of Arabidopsis WRKY33 and functional analysis of tomato WRKY33 homologues in plant stress responses. J Exp Bot, 2015, 66: 4567–4583. [5] Zhang Y J, Wang L J. The WRKY transcription factor superfamily: its origin in eukaryotes and expansion in plants. BMC Evol Biol, 2005, 5: 1. [6] Jiang Y J, Liang G, Yu D Q. Activated expression of WRKY57 confers drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant, 2012, 5: 1375–1388. [7] Lee H, Cha J, Choi C, et al. Rice WRKY11 plays a role in pathogen defense and drought tolerance. Rice, 2018, 11: 5. [8] Chen H T, Shi Y, An L, et al. Overexpression of SlWRKY6 enhances drought tolerance by strengthening antioxidant defense and stomatal closure via ABA signaling in Solanum lycopersicum L. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2024, 213: 108855. [9] Song H, Cao Y P, Zhao L G, et al. Review: WRKY transcription factors: Understanding the functional divergence. Plant Sci, 2023, 334: 111770. [10] Ren X Z, Chen Z Z, Liu Y, et al. ABO3, a WRKY transcription factor, mediates plant responses to abscisic acid and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 2010, 63: 417–429. [11] Lyu M C, Luo W, Ge M M, et al. A group I WRKY gene, TaWRKY133, negatively regulates drought resistance in transgenic plants. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23: 12026. [12] Ye H, Qiao L Y, Guo H Y, et al. Genome-wide identification of wheat WRKY gene family reveals that TaWRKY75-a is referred to drought and salt resistances. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 663118. [13] Jia C P, Wang J, Guo B, et al. A group III WRKY transcription factor, SlWRKY52, positively regulates drought tolerance in tomato. Environ Exp Bot, 2023, 215: 105513. [14] Ahammed G J, Li X, Yang Y X, et al. Tomato WRKY81 acts as a negative regulator for drought tolerance by modulating guard cell H2O2-mediated stomatal closure. Environ Exp Bot, 2020, 171: 103960. [15] Zhang L L, Cheng J, Sun X M, et al. Overexpression of VaWRKY14 increases drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by modulating the expression of stress-related genes. Plant Cell Rep, 2018, 37: 1159–1172.
[16] 陈杜. 干旱对薏苡生长影响的研究进展. 农技服务, 2022, 39(6): 73–76. [17] Hua Y G, Liu Q, Zhai Y F, et al. Genome-wide analysis of the HSP20 gene family and its response to heat and drought stress in Coix (Coix lacryma-jobi L.). BMC Genomics, 2023, 24: 478.
[18] 周宇, 陈传敏, 王健, 等. 薏苡bZIP基因家族全基因组鉴定与非生物胁迫表达分析. 热带作物学报, 2022, 43: 2006–2020.
[19] 雷静, 班秀文, 刘荣, 等. 薏苡(Coix Lacryma-jobi L.) TCP家族全基因组鉴定及响应非生物胁迫的表达规律. 分子植物育种, 网络首发[2023-05-11], https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20230510.1438.004. [20] Wang Y L, Wang H J, Lu X Y, et al. Comprehensive identification of HD-zip family genes in Coix Lacryma-jobi L. and their potential roles in response to abiotic stress. Plants, 2025, 14: 1318. [21] Wang Y J, Lu X Y, Fu Y H, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of VQ gene family under abiotic stress in Coix lacryma-jobi L. BMC Plant Biol, 2023, 23: 327.
[22] 王永乐, 路献勇, 王红娟, 等. 薏苡ClVQ12的表达模式、抗旱功能及互作蛋白分析. 江西农业大学学报, 2025, 47: 865–877. [23] Miao G D, Qin Y, Guo J H, et al. Transcriptome characterization and expression profile of Coix lacryma-jobi L. in response to drought. PLoS One, 2021, 16: e0256875.
[24] 龙佩霖, 雷静, 杨小雨, 等. 干旱胁迫对薏苡生长和产量形成的影响. 乡村科技, 2025, 16(22): 96–99. [25] Jiang J J, Ma S H, Ye N H, et al. WRKY transcription factors in plant responses to stresses. J Integr Plant Biol, 2017, 59: 86–101.
[26] 郑浩杰, 杭烨, 王晓红, 等. 药用植物WRKY转录因子家族研究进展. 植物生理学报, 2022, 58: 1055–1067. [27] Xu X H, Wang H, Liu J Q, et al. OsWRKY62 and OsWRKY76 interact with importin α1s for negative regulation of defensive responses in rice nucleus. Rice, 2022, 15: 12. [28] Wang L, Liu F, Zhang X, et al. Expression characteristics and functional analysis of the ScWRKY3 gene from sugarcane. Int J Mol Sci, 2018, 19: 4059. [29] Negi N, Khurana P. A salicylic acid inducible mulberry WRKY transcription factor, MiWRKY53 is involved in plant defence response. Plant Cell Rep, 2021, 40: 2151–2171. [30] Liu S Y, Zhang C B, Guo F, et al. A systematical genome-wide analysis and screening of WRKY transcription factor family engaged in abiotic stress response in sweetpotato. BMC Plant Biol, 2022, 22: 616. [31] Hussain R M F, Sheikh A H, Haider I, et al. Arabidopsis WRKY50 and TGA transcription factors synergistically activate expression of PR1. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9: 930. [32] Chi Y J, Yang Y, Zhou Y, et al. Protein–protein interactions in the regulation of WRKY transcription factors. Mol Plant, 2013, 6: 287–300. [33] Zhou X G, Lei Z J, An P T. Post-translational modification of WRKY transcription factors. Plants, 2024, 13: 2040. [34] Ishihama N, Yamada R, Yoshioka M, et al. Phosphorylation of the Nicotiana benthamiana WRKY8 transcription factor by MAPK functions in the defense response. Plant Cell, 2011, 23: 1153–1170. [35] Zhou J G, Wang X Y, He Y X, et al. Differential phosphorylation of the transcription factor WRKY33 by the protein kinases CPK5/CPK6 and MPK3/MPK6 cooperatively regulates camalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2020, 32: 2621–2638. [36] Tao Z, Kou Y J, Liu H B, et al. OsWRKY45 alleles play different roles in abscisic acid signalling and salt stress tolerance but similar roles in drought and cold tolerance in rice. J Exp Bot, 2011, 62: 4863–4874.
[37] 张璐, 杨学乐, 何世才, 等. 湖南薏苡种质资源调查及表型评价. 植物遗传资源学报, 2025, 26: 2118–2130. [38] Gentile I, Santo Domingo M, Zebell S G, et al. Pan-angiosperm analysis of the CLE signaling peptide gene family unveils paths, patterns, and predictions of paralog diversification. Mol Biol Evol, 2025, 42: msaf294. [39] Lehti-Shiu M D, Uygun S, Moghe G D, et al. Molecular evidence for functional divergence and decay of a transcription factor derived from whole-genome duplication in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol, 2015, 168: 1717–1734. [40] El-Esawi M A, Al-Ghamdi A A, Ali H M, et al. Overexpression of AtWRKY30 transcription factor enhances heat and drought stress tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genes, 2019, 10: 163. [41] Sun Y D, Yu D Q. Activated expression of AtWRKY53 negatively regulates drought tolerance by mediating stomatal movement. Plant Cell Rep, 2015, 34: 1295–1306. [42] Yang Z, Chi X Y, Guo F F, et al. SbWRKY30 enhances the drought tolerance of plants and regulates a drought stress-responsive gene, SbRD19, in sorghum. J Plant Physiol, 2020, 246: 153142.
[43] 陈晨. OsWRKY95调控水稻抗旱性的功能研究. 吉林大学硕士学位论文, 吉林长春, 2024. [44] Shi G F, Liu G L, Liu H J, et al. Wrky transcriptional factor IlWRKY70 from Iris laevigata enhances drought and salinity tolerances in Nicotiana tabacum. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24: 16174. [45] Maiti R, Satya P. Research advances in major cereal crops for adaptation to abiotic stresses. GM Crops Food, 2014, 5: 259–279. [46] Gulzar F, Fu J Y, Zhu C Y, et al. Maize WRKY transcription factor ZmWRKY79 positively regulates drought tolerance through elevating ABA biosynthesis. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22: 10080. [47] Lim C, Kang K, Shim Y, et al. Inactivating transcription factor OsWRKY5 enhances drought tolerance through abscisic acid signaling pathways. Plant Physiol, 2022, 188: 1900–1916. |
| [1] | 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812. |
| [2] | 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493. |
| [3] | 杨飚, 杜帅康, 张继旺, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 马铃薯III类POD基因家族的全基因组鉴定及其表达谱分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 405-420. |
| [4] | 余开航, 周洪斌, 罗亮扎, 王玫郦, 姜瑞梅, 董陈文华, 李仕金, 毛孝强, 陈升位. 大麦亮氨酸富集重复型类受体激酶基因HvLRR-RLK-510的克隆和表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 421-432. |
| [5] | 魏瑾, 廖春梅, 高丽诗, 张莹, 杨慧, 岳琳, 刘宝辉, 陈丽玉. 大豆GmbHLH119和GmbHLH120基因生物信息学及表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(10): 3023-3036. |
| [6] | 崔一凡, 孙晓彤, 石瑛. 马铃薯MDH基因家族的全基因组鉴定及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(10): 2875-2885. |
| [7] | 李祥栋, 郑传奇, 陆秀娟, 郭超, 魏心元, 刘敏轩. 薏苡种间杂种F1表型和脂肪酸含量遗传特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(10): 2927-2938. |
| [8] | 景秀清, 蔡永朵, 邓宁, 赵晓东, 翟飞红, 曾群. 藜麦RopGEF家族基因的鉴定及表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 28-43. |
| [9] | 尹雨萌, 王雁楠, 康志河, 乔守晨, 卞倩倩, 李亚蔚, 曹郭郑, 赵国瑞, 徐丹丹, 杨育峰. 甘薯谷胱甘肽S-转移酶基因IbGSTU7的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1736-1746. |
| [10] | 闫知兰, 赵芹, 常甜达, 王一鸣, 王碧辉, 王鹏, 黄春国, 张会, 王利祥, 郝晓鹏, 赵波. 豆科作物AOX基因鉴定及其在普通菜豆响应非生物胁迫中的表达模式研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1769-1783. |
| [11] | 潘炬忠, 韦萍, 朱德平, 邵胜雪, 陈珊珊, 韦雅倩, 高维维. 水稻转录因子OsERF104的克隆和功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 900-913. |
| [12] | 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 李玉荣, 王瑾. 冀花系列高油酸花生抗旱性鉴定与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 797-811. |
| [13] | 郭冰, 秦家范, 李娜, 宋梦瑶, 王黎明, 李君霞, 马小倩. 谷子SHMT基因家族全基因组鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 586-5897. |
| [14] | 王语新, 陈天羽, 翟红, 张欢, 高少培, 何绍贞, 赵宁, 刘庆昌. 甘薯激酶基因IbHT1的克隆及抗旱性功能鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 301-311. |
| [15] | 许睿, 何妙华, 王昊, 李卫, 任杰, 夏志强. 基于空间转录组技术解析大豆种胚对X射线辐射的响应机制[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3121-3132. |
|