欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 1443-1448.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

水、旱栽培条件下稻米主要品质性状的比较研究

郭咏梅;穆平;刘家富;卢义宣;李自超   

  1. 中国农业大学农业部作物基因组学与遗传改良重点实验室,北京市作物遗传改良实验室,北京 100094
  • 收稿日期:2004-11-16 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2005-11-12 网络出版日期:2005-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 李自超

Comparative Studies on Quality Characters under Water- and Dry-cultivation in Rice

GUO Yong-Mei; MU Ping; LIU Jia-Fu; LU Yi-Xuan; LI Zi-Chao   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genomics and Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement in Beijing, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094
  • Received:2004-11-16 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2005-11-12 Published online:2005-11-12
  • Contact: LI Zi-Chao

摘要:

以旱稻品种IRAT109的116个株系与水稻品种越富杂交构建的DH群体及其亲本,在水、旱2种栽培条件下种植,研究了稻米加工、外观、蒸煮和营养等品质性状的变化规律及其各品质性状间的相关性。结果表明,在11个稻米品质性状中,蛋白质含量、整精米率、胶稠度和碱消值等4个性状水、旱2种不同栽培条件下差异较大,说明这些性状受水分条件影响较大;粒长、粒宽、直链淀粉含量和垩白率也有一定的差异,一定程度受土壤水分环境影响。旱栽条件下稻米蛋白质含量、整精米率、胶稠度、碱消值等均有不同程度的升高,其中蛋白质含量平均提高37.9%,平均增加3.02个含量百分点,而垩白率下降,稻米米粒变小,总体上旱栽稻米品质有变优趋势。糙米率、精米率和长宽比在2种栽培条件下没有差异,基本上不受土壤水分环境影响。此外,对同一品质性状在水、旱2种不同栽培条件下相关性分析,表明加工品质性状的基因与环境互作较大,外观、蒸煮和营养等品质性状比较稳定。因此,通过水稻和旱稻相互杂交,可将旱稻的抗旱基因导入外观品质、蒸煮、食用品质以及营养品质优良的目标水稻亲本中,选育出抗旱、优质的水稻或旱稻品种。

关键词: 水稻, 水、旱种植, 品质性状, 双单倍体(DH)群体, 相关分析

Abstract:

Rice is one of the main staple food crops in the world, but rice production almost occupies 70 percent of the total water consumption of agriculture in China. To save water resources, improving rice drought resistance is a major goal in rice breeding, and water-saving rice culture (dry-cultivation) is also with a great potential. Most of the rice quality characteristics are controlled by quantitative genes and also affected by environment. Rice grain quality is different under water- and dry-cultivation environments on which comparative studies are very important for rice breeding and cultivation.
A doubled haploid (DH) population consisting of 116 DH lines developed through anther culture of the F1 hybrid between an upland rice cultivar ‘IRAT109’ and a lowland rice cultivar ‘Yuefu’ was used in this study. The parents and the 116 DH lines were planted in water- and dry-cultivation systems, on the experiment farm of China Agricultural University in 2002. Seeds of parents and 116 DH lines were harvested at maturity, and used to measure the content of crude protein, brown rice percentage, milled rice percentage, head milled rice percentage, amylose content, gel consistency, alkali value, chalkiness, grain length, grain width, and grain length/grain width. All data were analyzed by SPSS software.
The correlation analyses were conducted between quality characteristics in the two cultivated systems. The results indicated that the content of crude protein, head milled rice percentage, gel consistency and alkali value were higher, and chalkiness, grain length and grain width lower in dry-cultivation than in water-cultivation (Table 1). In general, most of characters of rice grain quality were improved in dry-cultivation compared with that in water-cultivation. The content of crude protein, head milled rice percentage, gel consistency and alkali value were more sensitive to water-stress, as compared with amylose content, grain length, grain width and chalkiness. Especially, the content of crude protein was increased by 37.9% or 3.02 percentile in dry-cultivation than in water-cultivation (Fig.1). But brown rice percentage, milled rice percentage and the ratio of grain length/grain width were not influenced by cultural environment. In addition, milling quality characters were affected by the interaction of gene and environment (culture system), but the appearance, cooking and nutrition quality characters mainly controlled by genetic factor. Therefore, the grain quality of the lowland or upland rice cultivars with drought-resistance could be improved under upland condition or dry-cultivation by the cross between lowland rice cultivar with elite grain quality and drought-resistant upland rice cultivar.

Key words: Rice, Water- and Dry-cultivation, Quality characteristics, Doubled haploid (DH) population, Correlation analysis

中图分类号: 

  • S511
[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[8] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[9] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[10] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[11] 刘嘉欣, 兰玉, 徐倩玉, 李红叶, 周新宇, 赵璇, 甘毅, 刘宏波, 郑月萍, 詹仪花, 张刚, 郑志富. 耐三唑并嘧啶类除草剂花生种质创制与鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1027-1034.
[12] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[13] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[14] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[15] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!