欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 1443-1448.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

水、旱栽培条件下稻米主要品质性状的比较研究

郭咏梅;穆平;刘家富;卢义宣;李自超   

  1. 中国农业大学农业部作物基因组学与遗传改良重点实验室,北京市作物遗传改良实验室,北京 100094
  • 收稿日期:2004-11-16 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2005-11-12 网络出版日期:2005-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 李自超

Comparative Studies on Quality Characters under Water- and Dry-cultivation in Rice

GUO Yong-Mei; MU Ping; LIU Jia-Fu; LU Yi-Xuan; LI Zi-Chao   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genomics and Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement in Beijing, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094
  • Received:2004-11-16 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2005-11-12 Published online:2005-11-12
  • Contact: LI Zi-Chao

摘要:

以旱稻品种IRAT109的116个株系与水稻品种越富杂交构建的DH群体及其亲本,在水、旱2种栽培条件下种植,研究了稻米加工、外观、蒸煮和营养等品质性状的变化规律及其各品质性状间的相关性。结果表明,在11个稻米品质性状中,蛋白质含量、整精米率、胶稠度和碱消值等4个性状水、旱2种不同栽培条件下差异较大,说明这些性状受水分条件影响较大;粒长、粒宽、直链淀粉含量和垩白率也有一定的差异,一定程度受土壤水分环境影响。旱栽条件下稻米蛋白质含量、整精米率、胶稠度、碱消值等均有不同程度的升高,其中蛋白质含量平均提高37.9%,平均增加3.02个含量百分点,而垩白率下降,稻米米粒变小,总体上旱栽稻米品质有变优趋势。糙米率、精米率和长宽比在2种栽培条件下没有差异,基本上不受土壤水分环境影响。此外,对同一品质性状在水、旱2种不同栽培条件下相关性分析,表明加工品质性状的基因与环境互作较大,外观、蒸煮和营养等品质性状比较稳定。因此,通过水稻和旱稻相互杂交,可将旱稻的抗旱基因导入外观品质、蒸煮、食用品质以及营养品质优良的目标水稻亲本中,选育出抗旱、优质的水稻或旱稻品种。

关键词: 水稻, 水、旱种植, 品质性状, 双单倍体(DH)群体, 相关分析

Abstract:

Rice is one of the main staple food crops in the world, but rice production almost occupies 70 percent of the total water consumption of agriculture in China. To save water resources, improving rice drought resistance is a major goal in rice breeding, and water-saving rice culture (dry-cultivation) is also with a great potential. Most of the rice quality characteristics are controlled by quantitative genes and also affected by environment. Rice grain quality is different under water- and dry-cultivation environments on which comparative studies are very important for rice breeding and cultivation.
A doubled haploid (DH) population consisting of 116 DH lines developed through anther culture of the F1 hybrid between an upland rice cultivar ‘IRAT109’ and a lowland rice cultivar ‘Yuefu’ was used in this study. The parents and the 116 DH lines were planted in water- and dry-cultivation systems, on the experiment farm of China Agricultural University in 2002. Seeds of parents and 116 DH lines were harvested at maturity, and used to measure the content of crude protein, brown rice percentage, milled rice percentage, head milled rice percentage, amylose content, gel consistency, alkali value, chalkiness, grain length, grain width, and grain length/grain width. All data were analyzed by SPSS software.
The correlation analyses were conducted between quality characteristics in the two cultivated systems. The results indicated that the content of crude protein, head milled rice percentage, gel consistency and alkali value were higher, and chalkiness, grain length and grain width lower in dry-cultivation than in water-cultivation (Table 1). In general, most of characters of rice grain quality were improved in dry-cultivation compared with that in water-cultivation. The content of crude protein, head milled rice percentage, gel consistency and alkali value were more sensitive to water-stress, as compared with amylose content, grain length, grain width and chalkiness. Especially, the content of crude protein was increased by 37.9% or 3.02 percentile in dry-cultivation than in water-cultivation (Fig.1). But brown rice percentage, milled rice percentage and the ratio of grain length/grain width were not influenced by cultural environment. In addition, milling quality characters were affected by the interaction of gene and environment (culture system), but the appearance, cooking and nutrition quality characters mainly controlled by genetic factor. Therefore, the grain quality of the lowland or upland rice cultivars with drought-resistance could be improved under upland condition or dry-cultivation by the cross between lowland rice cultivar with elite grain quality and drought-resistant upland rice cultivar.

Key words: Rice, Water- and Dry-cultivation, Quality characteristics, Doubled haploid (DH) population, Correlation analysis

中图分类号: 

  • S511
[1] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[2] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[3] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[4] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[5] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[6] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
[7] 蒋嘉卉, 江炳志, 刘冠明, 王章英, 唐朝臣. 紫肉甘薯品质性状的近红外光谱预测模型构建与优化[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1088-1102.
[8] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[9] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[10] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[11] 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[12] 王天译, 杨绣娟, 赵佳佳, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 李晓华, 郝水源, 郑军. 山西小麦醇溶蛋白多样性及其对面粉品质效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1784-1800.
[13] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[14] 雷松翰, 范骏扬, 车艳奕, 代永东, 郑雨萌, 田维江, 桑贤春, 王晓雯. 水稻内卷叶突变体acl3的鉴定及调控基因的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1467-1479.
[15] 李福媛, 杨奕, 马继琼, 许明辉, 林良斌, 孙一丁. 水稻OsPUB4基因克隆、激素诱导表达分析与互作蛋白筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1690-1700.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!