欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (01): 57-63.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于卫星遥感的区域棉稻与稻棉轮作周期估算模型研究

朱泽生;孙玲   

  1. 江苏省农业科学院,江苏南京210014
  • 收稿日期:2004-11-29 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-01-12 网络出版日期:2006-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 孙玲

Estimation of Regional Cotton-Rice and Rice-Cotton Rotation Periods Based on Satellite Remote Sensing Methodology

ZHU Ze-Sheng and SUN Ling   

  1. 2Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, Jiangsu;
  • Received:2004-11-29 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-01-12 Published online:2006-01-12
  • Contact: SUN Ling

摘要:

根据对2001年到2004年连续4年的卫星遥感影像的解译,研究了江苏省里下河农区兴化市的棉花轮作现状,建立了棉稻和稻棉轮作周期的估算模型,并给出了棉稻和稻棉轮作周期的估算公式。结果表明,在兴化市42个乡镇中,棉稻和稻棉为主要轮作模式,但轮作水平差异较大,在假定该区域的棉稻和稻棉轮作周期为平稳随机过程的情况下,可以推算出棉稻轮作周期为2.81年,稻棉轮作周期为2.89年,两者十分接近,仅相差2.85%,符合轮作的基本规律,说明本文的轮作评估模型和相关的估算公式是合理的,遥感影像解译的精度达到了试验的要求。

关键词: 棉花水稻轮作, 水稻棉花轮作, 周期, 遥感, 模型

Abstract:

The objective of this paper was to estimate rotation periods of cotton-rice and rice-cotton from 2001 to 2004 in forty-two towns of XinHua City of JiangSu province of China, belonging to Lixiahe agriculture region, using satellite-based remote sensing (RS) data and geographic information system (GIS) tools. The vegetation in this region comprises mainly rice, cotton, soybean, sweet potato and vegetables. On an average from 2001 to 2004, the cotton land made up 12 488 ha/year, while the rice land area 83812 ha/year, i.e. 9.61% and 64.47% of total arable land area of XinHua City respectively. On the basis of data availability and accuracy requirements, four Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) satellite images dated on 26/07/2001, 29/07/2002, 24/07/2003 and 26/07/2004 were selected as the data sources for the interpretation of rice and cotton. The satellite data were geographically registered onto the map. By using the knowledge about the temporal growth pattern of various crop types in this region, based on our field observations of various land cover classes, a supervised classification approach was followed to classify the scene into various land cover classes. The rice and cotton of vegetation in the images were classified by using the classification approach. The GIS was then used to integrate large amounts of interpreted image data and other related geographic details about the region to analyze the changes of land covers from cotton to rice or vice versa by the spatial polygon analysis model. The phenomenon of cotton-rice and rice-cotton rotation was found from the interpreted images. The rotation periods of cotton-rice and rice-cotton periods were supposed to obey the stationary stochastic process. The first and second models were built for estimation of cotton-rice and rice-cotton periods of each town, which was derived by cotton and rice coverage data provided by GIS that processed the interpreted images. The third model was built for computing the arithmetic average value of cotton-rice and rice-cotton rotation periods. The data provided by the models were used for analysis of cotton-rice and rice-cotton rotation periods of all the towns (Table 1 and Table 2). The results showed that the cotton-rice and rice-cotton were major rotation styles in this region. Among all the towns in XinHua City, there are obvious differences among the rotation levels or periods. The three average rotation periods of cotton-rice of all the towns from 2001 to 2004 were respectively 2.01, 3.42 and 3.01 years with an average of 2.81 year. The three average rotation periods of rice-cotton of all the towns from 2001 to 2004 were respectively 2.61, 2.70 and 3.35 years with an average of 2.89 year. The difference between the average values was very small or about 2.85%, indicating clearly that the result obeys the basic law that the cotton-rice rotation period should be statistically equal to the rice-cotton one, the models or formulas for estimation of the rotation periods are reasonable. The average rotation period of cotton-rice and rice-cotton rotation of all the towns was 2.85 year. The interpretation precision of remote sensing images arrived at the experimental requirement by validation from observations on the ground. In comparison with the traditional conclusion of 2–5 year in the past more than 400 years, the rotation period of 2.85 year given in the study is more scientific and precision.

Key words: Cotton-rice rotation, rice-cotton rotation, period, satellite remote sensing, model

中图分类号: 

  • S562
[1] 冯子恒, 李晓, 段剑钊, 高飞, 贺利, 杨天聪, 戎亚思, 宋莉, 尹飞, 冯伟. 基于特征波段选择和机器学习的小麦白粉病高光谱遥感监测[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(9): 2300-2314.
[2] 桑国庆, 唐志光, 毛克彪, 邓刚, 王靖文, 李佳. 基于GEE云平台与Sentinel数据的高分辨率水稻种植范围提取——以湖南省为例[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(9): 2409-2420.
[3] 李胜婷, 徐远芳, 常玮, 刘亚俊, 谷嫄, 朱红, 李加纳, 卢坤. Bna.C02SWEET15通过光周期途径正向调控油菜开花时间[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 1938-1947.
[4] 郭楠楠, 刘天策, 史硕, 胡心亭, 牛亚丹, 李亮. 长链非编码RNA (LncRNA)在印度梨形孢促进大麦根部生长发育中的调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(7): 1625-1634.
[5] 王靖天, 张亚雯, 杜应雯, 任文龙, 李宏福, 孙文献, 葛超, 章元明. 数量性状主基因+多基因混合遗传分析R软件包SEA v2.0[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1416-1424.
[6] 徐昕, 秦超, 赵涛, 刘斌, 李宏宇, 刘军. GmELF3s调控大豆开花时间和生物钟节律的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 812-824.
[7] 闫宇婷, 宋秋来, 闫超, 刘爽, 张宇辉, 田静芬, 邓钰璇, 马春梅. 连作秸秆还田下玉米氮素积累与氮肥替代效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 962-974.
[8] 张建, 谢田晋, 尉晓楠, 王宗铠, 刘崇涛, 周广生, 汪波. 无人机多角度成像方式的饲料油菜生物量估算研究[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1816-1823.
[9] 江建华, 张武汉, 党小景, 荣慧, 叶琴, 胡长敏, 张瑛, 何强, 王德正. 水稻核不育系柱头性状的主基因+多基因遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1215-1227.
[10] 李金敏, 陈秀青, 杨琦, 史良胜. 基于高光谱的水稻叶片氮含量估计的深度森林模型研究[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1342-1350.
[11] 黄冰艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 房元瑾, 石磊, 苗利娟, 张毛宁, 张忠信, 徐静, 张梦圆, 董文召, 张新友. 花生巢式群体的脂肪含量遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1100-1108.
[12] 雷永, 王志慧, 淮东欣, 高华援, 晏立英, 李建国, 李威涛, 陈玉宁, 康彦平, 刘海龙, 王欣, 薛晓梦, 姜慧芳, 廖伯寿. 花生籽仁蔗糖含量近红外模型构建及在高糖品种培育中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 332-341.
[13] 张久权, 闫慧峰, 褚继登, 李彩斌. 运用广义线性混合模型分析随机区组重复测量的试验资料[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 294-304.
[14] 竞霞, 邹琴, 白宗璠, 黄文江. 基于反射光谱和叶绿素荧光数据的作物病害遥感监测研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2067-2079.
[15] 李艳大, 曹中盛, 舒时富, 孙滨峰, 叶春, 黄俊宝, 朱艳, 田永超. 基于作物生长监测诊断仪的双季稻叶干重监测模型[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10): 2028-2035.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李绍清, 李阳生, 吴福顺, 廖江林, 李达模. 水稻孕穗期在淹涝胁迫下施肥的优化选择及其作用机理[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(01): 115 -120 .
[2] 王兰珍;米国华;陈范骏;张福锁. 不同产量结构小麦品种对缺磷反应的分析[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(06): 867 -870 .
[3] 王艳;邱立明;谢文娟;黄薇;叶锋;张富春;马纪. 昆虫抗冻蛋白基因转化烟草的抗寒性[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 397 -402 .
[4] 郑希;吴建国;楼向阳;徐海明;石春海. 不同环境条件下稻米组氨酸和精氨酸的胚乳和母体植株QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 369 -375 .
[5] 邢光南, 周斌, 赵团结, 喻德跃, 邢邯, 陈受宜, 盖钧镒. 大豆抗筛豆龟蝽Megacota cribraria (Fabricius)的QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 361 -368 .
[6] 郑永美;丁艳锋;王强盛;李刚华;王惠芝;王绍华. 起身肥对水稻分蘖和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 513 -519 .
[7] 秦恩华;杨兰芳. 烤烟苗期含硒量和根际硒形态的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 506 -512 .
[8] 吕丽华;陶洪斌;夏来坤; 张雅杰; 赵明; 赵久然;王璞. 不同种植密度下的夏玉米冠层结构及光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 447 -455 .
[9] 张书标;杨仁崔. e-杂交稻若干生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(06): 919 -924 .
[10] 邵瑞鑫;上官周平. 外源一氧化氮供体SNP对受旱小麦光合色素含量和PS II光能利用能力的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(05): 818 -822 .