欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (04): 479-483.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

水稻幼苗耐Al3+胁迫的QTL定位分析

沈圣泉;庄杰云;舒小丽;包劲松;夏英武   

  1. 浙江大学农业与生物技术学院,浙江杭州310029
  • 收稿日期:2005-03-21 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-04-12 网络出版日期:2006-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 沈圣泉

Analysis of QTLs Mapping of Tolerance to High Al3+ Stress at Seedling Stage in Rice

SHEN Sheng-Quan; ZHUANG Jie-Yun; SHU Xiao-Li; BAO Jin-Song; XIA Ying-Wu   

  1. College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, Zhejiang
  • Received:2005-03-21 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-04-12 Published online:2006-04-12
  • Contact: SHEN Sheng-Quan

摘要:

用珍汕97B/密阳46构建RIL群体及其遗传图谱,对其种子采用纸培法育苗和培养,并设2个Al3+浓度(20 mg/L和30 mg/L)胁迫处理,以处理20 d后的幼苗相对根长(%)和相对苗高(%)为耐Al3+胁迫指标,用于QTL定位分析。结果表明,以相对根长为指标,检测到2个耐Al3+胁迫的主效应QTL,即qRAC(r)2qRAC(r)11,其中qRAC(r)2在2个胁迫处理下均被检测到,有效基因来自于珍汕97B,贡献率较大(12.92%和16.15%),表现出较强的耐Al3+胁迫功能。以相对苗高为指标,还检测到qRAC(s)11-2(20 mg/L Al3+)和qRAC(s)11-1(30 mg/L Al3+)2个主效应QTL,它们均位于第11染色体。耐Al3+胁迫的QTL上位性分析还表明,总的QTL上位性互作效应比主效应QTL的作用更大,且显示出相当的复杂性,在不同胁迫浓度下,基因间可以通过不同的互作方式,表现出对高Al3+胁迫的耐性。以相对根长为指标,检测到8对上位性互作,涉及1、2、3、5、6、10等6条染色体的15个QTL位点;以相对苗高为指标,共检测到6对上位性互作,涉及第1、2、3、5、6、7、8、9、12等9条染色体;且几乎所有互作均发生在背景因子的QTL位点间。

关键词: 水稻, RIL群体, QTL定位, 上位性效应, 耐Al3+胁迫

Abstract:

The recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations derived from Zhenshan 97B/Miyang 46(ZS97B/MY46) and their genetic linkage maps were employed to map QTLs controlling tolerance to high Al3+ stress by using paper culture of rice seedlings with two concentrations of Al3+ stress (20 mg/L and 30 mg/L). After 20 days of treatment, the relative root length (%) and relative seedling height (%) were measured as index for tolerance to high Al3+ stress. The results showed that two QTLs with main effects were detected based on relative root length, i.e. qRAC(r)2 and qRAC(r)11. The former detected in both treatments explained 12.92% and 16.15% of the total phenotypic variation. The positive additive effects came from the female parent, Zhengshan 97B, showing high potential tolerance to high Al3+ stress. Two main effect QTLs were also detected on chromosome 11 by relative seedling height, i.e. qRAC(s)11-2(20 mg/L Al3+) and qRAC(s)11-1 (30 mg/L Al3+). Epistasis analysis showed that the variation explained by epistasis QTLs was higher than that explained by the main effect QTLs, indicating that the QTLs displayed their effects through different ways of interaction. Based on relative root length, a total of eight pairs of epistasis including 15 QTLs were detected on six chromosomes (chromosome 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 10). Based on relative seedling height, a total of six pairs of epistasis were detected on 9 chromosomes (chromosome 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 12). All the epistasis QTLs were not located at same loci where the main effect QTLs resided.

Key words: Rice, RIL population, QTLs mapping, Main effect, Epistasis effects, Tolerance to high Al3+ stress

中图分类号: 

  • S511
[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 于春淼, 张勇, 王好让, 杨兴勇, 董全中, 薛红, 张明明, 李微微, 王磊, 胡凯凤, 谷勇哲, 邱丽娟. 栽培大豆×半野生大豆高密度遗传图谱构建及株高QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102.
[8] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[9] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[10] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[11] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[12] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[13] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[14] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[15] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!