欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (02): 242-249.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

CIMMYT新型人工合成小麦Pina和Pinb基因等位变异

李根英1,2,3;夏先春2;张明2;张勇2;何中虎2,4,*;孙其信1   

  1. 1中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,北京100094;2中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,国家小麦改良中心/国家农作物基因资源与基因改良重大科学工程,北京100081;3山东省农业科学院作物研究所,山东济南250001;4国际玉米小麦改良中心CIMMYT中国办事处,北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2006-04-30 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-02-12 网络出版日期:2007-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 何中虎

Allelic Variations of Puroindoline a and Puroindoline b Genes in New Type of Synthetic Hexaploid Wheats from CIMMYT

LI Gen-Ying123,XIA Xian-Chun2,ZHANG Ming2,ZHANG Yong2,HE Zhong-Hu24*,SUN Qi-Xin1   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094; 2National Wheat Improvement Center/Institute of Crop Sciences/The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081; 3 Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, Shandong; 4CIMMYT China Office, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2006-04-30 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-02-12 Published online:2007-02-12
  • Contact: HE Zhong-Hu

摘要: 六倍体人工合成小麦由硬粒小麦(Triticum turgidum subsp. durum)与粗山羊草(Aegilops tauschii Coss.)杂交产生,是研究小麦进化过程中基因变异的重要材料。以国际玉米小麦改良中心(CIMMYT)提供的57份由野生二粒小麦(T. turgidum subsp. dicoccoides)与粗山羊草杂交产生的新型人工合成六倍体小麦为材料,用单籽粒特性测定仪和PinaPinb特异性PCR引物对其籽粒硬度变异以及控制籽粒硬度的主效基因Pina和Pinb的分布情况进行了研究。结果表明,这些材料的SKCS硬度值变异较大,从10.5到42.6,其中15~30的占78%。共有Pina-D1aPina-D1cPinb-D1hPinb-D1j 4种等位变异型,基因型为Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1j的8个,占14%;基因型为Pina-D1c/Pinb-D1h的49个,占86%。方差分析表明,基因型Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1jPina-D1c/Pinb-D1h对籽粒硬度的影响差异不显著,但父本粗山羊草和母本野生二粒小麦以及二者间的互作对籽粒硬度有显著影响,说明除PinaPinb外,还有其他微效基因影响籽粒硬度的形成。

关键词: 野生二粒小麦, 粗山羊草, 人工合成小麦, Pina和Pinb, 籽粒硬度

Abstract:

Triticum dicoccoides and Aegilops tauschii are important germplasm resources of rich genetic variability for improvement of hexaploid wheat (T. aestivum). This variability can be accessed by utilizing synthetic hexaploid wheat lines with genomes from Ae. tauschii and T. dicoccoides. Two methods can be employed to incorporate Triticum dicoccoides and Aegilops tauschii genes into a hexaploid wheat. One is the direct cross method of hybridization between Ae. tauschii and hexaploid wheat, another is an indirect method of synthetic hexaploids by crossing tetraploid wheat with Ae. tauschii. Genes from tetraploid wheat and Aegilops tauschii are then available via direct crossing of synthetic hexaploids to T. aestivum. The CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center) has produced two types of synthetic hexaploids. One is the progeny of T. turgidum ssp. durum crossing with Ae. tauschii, another is the new type synthetic wheat which produced by crossing Triticum dicoccoides with Aegilops tauschii.
Grain hardness is a major factor influencing the end-use quality. Genes for grain hardness in common wheat reside on Ha locus of chromosome 5DS. The wild-type alleles (Pina-D1a, Pinb-D1a) determine soft endosperm, while the hard phenotypes result from mutations in either Pina or Pinb. In order to understand the evolution of genes for grain hardness, studies have focused on the wild relatives of common wheat, particularly on Ae. tauschii, the supposed donor of the D genome in common wheat. Puroindoline a in Ae. tauschii contained 99.3% amino acid sequence homology to the wheat cultivar ‘Penawawa’ and 90.5% amino acid sequence homology in puroindoline b. Among 50 Ae. tauschii accessions, four alleles of puroindoline a and four alleles of puroindoline b were identified, encoding two and three different proteins, respectively. However, the effect that these sequence polymorphisms may have on kernel texture is unknown, as no test method of texture has been developed for Ae. tauschii. The incorporation of Ae. tauschii into synthetic hexaploid facilitates the analysis of puroindoline sequence polymorphism and other genetic effects on kernel texture, using testing methods designed for hexaploid wheat, such as the Perten single kernel characterization system (SKCS). Analysis of synthetic hexaploid can also facilitate the analysis of the effect of the A and B genomes, contributed by the tetraploid wheat parent on kernel texture. Studies on Ae. tauschii and synthetic hexaploid wheat derived from hybridization of T. turgidum ssp. durum with Ae. tauschii demonstrated a number of novel Pina and Pinb sequences. However, none of these Pina and Pinb mutations produced a hard endosperm texture in synthetic wheat. To further understand the mechanism of grain hardness formation in Ae. tauschii and synthetic wheat, a total of 57 new type synthetic hexaploid lines derived from the crosses T. dicoccoides×Ae.tauschii were employed to evaluate the SKCS hardness and detect puroindoline alleles using gene specific PCR primers. Four allelic variations of Pina and Pinb were identified, i.e., Pina-D1a, Pina-D1c, Pinb-D1h, and Pinb-D1j. Eight lines were Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1j types, accounting for 14%, and 49 were Pina-D1c/Pinb-D1h types, accounting for 86%. Kernel texture differed significantly among the synthetic hexaploid lines, ranging from 10.5 to 42.6, with significant difference among the parental types, T. dicoccoides or Ae. tauschii. The interactions between parental genotypes had also a significant influence on kernel texture. These results indicated that there might be some genes besides Ha locus associated with the kernel texture.

Key words: Triticum dicoccoides, Aegilops tauschii, Synthetic hexaploid wheat, Pina and Pinb alleles, Kernel texture

[1] 刘培勋,马小飞,万洪深,郑建敏,罗江陶,蒲宗君. 两个不同籽粒硬度小麦的比较蛋白组学分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(8): 1275-1282.
[2] 李朝苏,吴晓丽,汤永禄,李俊,马孝玲,李式昭,黄明波,刘淼. 小麦产量对中后期氮素胁迫的响应及品种间差异[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(8): 1260-1269.
[3] 寇春兰,赵来宾,刘梦,郝明,甯顺腙,袁中伟,刘登才,张连全*. 小麦未减数配子基因的连锁标记及染色体区段检测[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(07): 984-989.
[4] 李朝苏,吴晓丽,汤永禄,杨武云,吴元奇,吴春,马孝玲,李式昭. 四川近十年小麦主栽品种的品质状况[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(06): 803-812.
[5] 乔麟轶,李欣,畅志坚,张晓军,詹海仙,郭慧娟,李建波,常建忠,郑军. 粗山羊草全基因组Aux/IAA基因家族的分离、染色体定位及序列分析[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(12): 2059-2069.
[6] 陈锋,李欢欢,张福彦,尚晓丽,许海霞,崔党群. 小麦籽粒硬度基因型鉴定及其与吹泡仪和混合仪参数关系分析[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(05): 928-933.
[7] 薛飞,王长有,张丽华,张宏,李浩,王亚娟,刘新伦,吉万全. 来自野生二粒小麦的抗白粉病基因PmAS846及其染色体定位和分子标记分析[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(04): 589-595.
[8] 王变银, 翟军, 郝元峰, 李安飞, 孔令让. 对人工合成小麦的微卫星变异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(08): 1491-1496.
[9] 李俊, 魏会廷, 胡晓蓉, 李朝苏, 汤永禄, 刘登才, 杨武云. 川麦42中源于人工合成小麦的一个高产位点鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(02): 255-262.
[10] 朱西平,李鑫,李雅轩,晏月明. 普通小麦及近缘粗山羊草α-醇溶蛋白基因的克降、定位与进化分析[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(4): 580-589.
[11] 苏亚蕊,张大乐,张明,李锁平. 黄河中游粗山羊草三种y-型高分子量谷蛋白亚基的鉴定、克隆及系统进化分析[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(7): 1244-1252.
[12] 张连松,华为,关海英,李根桥,张宏涛,解超杰,杨作民,孙其信,刘志勇. 野生二粒小麦导入普通小麦的抗白粉病基因MlWE29分子标记定位[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(6): 998-1005.
[13] 李根桥,房体麟**,张宏涛,解超杰,杨作民,孙其信,刘志勇*. 来自野生二粒小麦IW3和IW10的两个白粉病基因的鉴定及SSR标记定位[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(5): 761-767.
[14] 李俊,魏会廷,杨粟洁,李朝苏,汤永禄,胡晓蓉,杨武云. 川麦42的1BS染色体臂对小麦主要农艺性状的遗传效应[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(12): 2167-2173.
[15] 师桂英,尚勋武,王化俊,马小乐,胡秉芬,李昌盛. 麦长管蚜(Sitobion avenae F.)危害对春小麦面粉品质性状及面团流变学特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(12): 2273-2279.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!