欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 1260-1269.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.81083

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦产量对中后期氮素胁迫的响应及品种间差异

李朝苏1,吴晓丽1,汤永禄1,*(),李俊1,马孝玲1,李式昭1,黄明波2,刘淼1   

  1. 1 四川省农业科学院作物研究所/作物生理生态及栽培四川省重点实验室, 四川成都 610066
    2 四川省广汉市生产力促进中心, 四川广汉 618300
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-20 接受日期:2019-04-15 出版日期:2019-08-12 网络出版日期:2019-07-16
  • 通讯作者: 汤永禄
  • 作者简介:E-mail: xiaoli1755@163.com, Tel: 028-84504560
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31571590);国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0300406);四川省农作物育种攻关项目资助(2016NYZ0051)

Response of yield and associated physiological characteristics for different wheat cultivars to nitrogen stress at mid-late growth stage

LI Chao-Su1,WU Xiao-Li1,TANG Yong-Lu1,*(),LI Jun1,MA Xiao-Ling1,LI Shi-Zhao1,HUANG Ming-Bo2,LIU Miao1   

  1. 1 Crop Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Crop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610066, Sichuan, China
    2 Guanghan Productivity Promotion Center, Guanghan 618300, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2018-11-20 Accepted:2019-04-15 Published:2019-08-12 Published online:2019-07-16
  • Contact: Yong-Lu TANG
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31571590);the National Key R&D Program of China(2016YFD0300406);the Crops Breeding Project in Sichuan Province(2016NYZ0051)

RichHTML

9

PDF

832

摘要：

生育中后期土壤供氮不足是导致小麦减产的重要原因之一。2015—2017年连续2个生长季, 选择人工合成六倍体小麦衍生品种(synthetic hexaploid wheat-derived cultivar, SDC)和非人工合成小麦衍生品种(Non-synthetic hexaploid wheat-derived cultivar, NSC)各3个, 设置2个施氮水平, 研究其产量及相关生理参数对中后期氮素胁迫的响应。SDC包括川麦42、川麦104和绵麦367, NSC包括绵麦37、川农16和川麦30。2个施氮水平为正常施氮处理(Nn, 150 kg N hm -2, 底肥40%、拔节肥60%)和中后期氮胁迫处理(Ns, 60 kg N hm -2, 全部作底肥)。结果表明, 氮胁迫下, 两类品种产量均值降幅接近(SDC 19.6%, NSC 20.4%), 但正常供氮下SDC产量高于NSC (高14.4%), 其氮胁迫下的产量也较高(高15.9%)。氮胁迫下, SDC的生物产量、单位面积粒数均高于NSC。开花期, 两类品种在2个氮素水平下的叶面积指数(LAI)接近, 但在灌浆中后期的降幅SDC小于NSC, 花后22 d, SDC在高、低施氮水平下的LAI较NSC分别高25.1%和16.0%。开花灌浆阶段, 2个施氮水平下SDC旗叶和倒二叶SPAD始终高于NSC, 氮胁迫下二者的差距增大。两类品种的净光合速率(NPR)和群体光合速率(CAP)的差异也主要出现在灌浆中后期, 氮胁迫下SDC以上2个参数较NSC均有优势。氮胁迫下, 花后功能叶片的硝态氮、铵态氮、可溶性糖含量SDC也高于NSC。SDC较NSC有更高的氮素利用效率(NUtE), 氮胁迫下, 二者NUtE的差距增加。以上结果表明, 低氮胁迫下SDC的生产力高于NSC, 这与其较高的库容、较长叶片功能期有关。

关键词: 人工合成小麦衍生品种, 氮胁迫, 产量, 光合特性, 氮素利用效率

Abstract:

Soil nitrogen (N) deficiency at mid-late growth stage is one of the serious factors leading to lowered grain yield of wheat. The high yield potential of synthetic hexaploid wheat-derived cultivar (SDC) has been well documented, however, its responses to N deficiency at mid-late growth stage need further study. Six cultivars were grown under two fertilizer-N applied conditions over two consecutive growing seasons (2015-2017). The cultivars consisted of three typical SDC (Chuanmai 42, Chuanmai 104 and Mianmai 367) and three non-synthetic hexaploid wheat-derived cultivar (NSC; Mianmai 37, Chuannong 16, and Chuanmai 30). Two N treatments consisted of normal N application (Nn, 150 kg hm -2, basal fertilizer 40%, top dressing 60%) and N stress (Ns, 60 kg hm -2, basal fertilizer only), and grain yield and associated physiological traits of these wheat cultivars in response to N deficiency at mid-late growth stage were studied. It turned out that the mean yield reduction of SDC (19.6%) and NSC (20.4%) was close under N stress, while SDC showed 14.4% (Nn) and 15.9% (Ns) advantages on yield than NSC at both N treatments. Besides, the biomass and grain number per unit area of SDC were higher than those of NSC. At anthesis, SDC and NSC had roughly the same leaf area index (LAI) values, whereas the LAI decline in SDC was less than that in NSC at mid-late grain-filling stage. Compared with NSC, the LAI of SDC was 25.1% (Nn) and 16.0% (Ns) higher at 22 days after anthesis, respectively. The SPAD values of flag and penultimate leaves in SDC were always higher than those in NSC at both N treatments during grain filling period, and the gap between them was increased under N stress. The differences in net photosynthetic rate (NPR) and canopy photosynthetic rate (CAP) between the two types of wheat also mainly appeared at mid-late grain-filling stage, and SDC still had advantages compared with NSC under Ns. In addition, the nitrate N, ammonium N and soluble sugar content in flag and penultimate leaves in SDC were higher than those in NSC under N stress condition. At last, SDC had higher N utilization efficiency (NUtE) than NSC, which difference between SDC and NSC was further increased by N stress. Overall, the above results indicate that the productivity of SDC is stronger than that of NSC at low N condition, which might be related to the higher sink capacity and longer leaf function period in SDC.

Key words: synthetic hexaploid wheat-derived cultivar, nitrogen stress, grain yield, photosynthetic characteristics, nitrogen utilization efficiency

图1

小麦生育期间(11月至翌年5月)的日最高温和最低温"

表1

参试品种相关信息"

类别
Type		 品种
Cultivar		 系谱
Pedigree		 审定年份
Year of release		 区试产量
YD? (kg hm-2)		 区试增产率
Increase rate of yield (%)
SDC 川麦42 Chuanmai 42 Syn 769/Chuanmai 30//Chuan 6415 2004 6130 16.4
川麦104 Chuanmai 104 Chuanmai 42/Chuannong 16 2012 6120 14.1
绵麦367 Mianmai 367 Mianmai 37/Chuanmai 43 2010 5690 14.0
NSC 绵麦37 Mianmai 37 96EW37/Mianyang 90-100 2004 5110 12.6
川农16 Chuannong 16 Chuanyu 12/7-429 2002 4819 13.0
川麦30 Chuanmai 30 77//YAA/ALD‘S’/3/YSZ//ST2022/983 1998 4481 8.58

表2

不同小麦品种产量、产量构成及生物产量对中后期氮胁迫的响应"

年份
Year		 处理Treatment 品种
Cultivar		 产量
Yield
(kg hm-2)		 粒数
Grain number (×104 hm-2)		 千粒重
1000-kernel weight (g)		 生物产量
Biomass
(kg hm-2)		 收获指数
Harvest index
2016 Nn 川麦42 Chuanmai 42 9627 a 17851 a 48.3 a 18989 a 0.44 a
川麦104 Chuanmai 104 9263 a 17190 a 45.6 b 18296 ab 0.44 a
绵麦367 Mianmai 367 9556 a 18518 a 44.6 c 18702 a 0.45 a
绵麦37 Mianmai 37 7284 b 15203 a 45.8 b 14861 c 0.43 a
川农16 Chuannong 16 9119 a 16413 a 42.7 d 18937 a 0.42 a
川麦30 Chuanmai 30 7540 b 16397 a 40.4 e 15430 c 0.43 a
平均 Mean 8732 16929 44.6 17536 0.43
SDC 9482 17853* 46.2 18663 0.44**
NSC 7981 16004 43.0 16409 0.43
Ns 川麦42 Chuanmai 42 7696 a 12744 b 49.7 a 15493 a 0.43 ab
川麦104 Chuanmai 104 7335 a 12705 b 46.9 b 14973 ab 0.43 ab
绵麦367 Mianmai 367 7991 a 15275 a 48.5 ab 15527 a 0.45 a
绵麦37 Mianmai 37 6447 b 11231 b 48.1 b 13442 bc 0.42 bc
川农16 Chuannong 16 6509 b 11960 b 44.0 c 13170 bc 0.43 ab
川麦30 Chuanmai 30 5512 c 12303 b 40.8 d 12082 c 0.40 c
平均 Mean 6915 12703 46.3 14115 0.43
SDC 7674* 13575 48.4 15331** 0.44
NSC 6156 11831 44.3 12898 0.42
2017 Nn 川麦42 Chuanmai 42 8355 d 12893 c 59.7 a 18647 a 0.39 c
川麦104 Chuanmai 104 10332 a 16922 a 53.9 bc 18615 a 0.48 a
绵麦367 Mianmai 367 9815 b 15559 ab 56.0 b 18507 a 0.46 ab
绵麦37 Mianmai 37 8766 c 15218 ab 55.6 b 17188 b 0.44 b
川农16 Chuannong 16 8837 c 15346 ab 52.4 c 16426 b 0.47 ab
川麦30 Chuanmai 30 8297 d 14443 bc 53.8 bc 16222 b 0.45 b
平均 Mean 9067 15063 55.2 17601 0.46
SDC 9501 15125 56.5 18590* 0.45
NSC 8634 15002 54.0 16612 0.45
Ns 川麦42 Chuanmai 42 6352 bc 8735 b 60.4 a 14798 a 0.37 b
川麦104 Chuanmai 104 8213 a 11480 ab 56.8 abc 15350 a 0.46 a
绵麦367 Mianmai 367 8229 a 14154 a 53.3 c 15343 a 0.47 a
绵麦37 Mianmai 37 7397 abc 10912 ab 59.3 a 15170 a 0.42 ab
川农16 Chuannong 16 7643 ab 12346 ab 55.3 bc 15112 a 0.44 a
川麦30 Chuanmai 30 6232 c 9202 b 58.0 ab 14838 a 0.37 b
平均 Mean 7344 11138 57.2 15102 0.42
SDC 7598 11456 56.9 15164 0.43
NSC 7091 10820 57.5 15040 0.41

图2

SDC和NSC叶面积指数对中后期氮胁迫的响应(2017) Nn: 正常施氮处理; Ns: 氮胁迫处理。误差线为标准差。图中数据为同一施氮水平下的同一类3个品种的平均值。其他缩写同表1。"

图3

SDC和NSC上三叶SPAD值对中后期氮胁迫的响应 Nn: 正常施氮处理; Ns: 氮胁迫处理。图中数据为同一施氮水平下的同一类3个品种的平均值。其他缩写同表1。"

图4

SDC和NSC旗叶净光合速率(NPR)对中后期氮胁迫的响应 缩写同表1和图2。误差线为标准差。图中数据为同一施氮水平下的同一类3个品种的平均值。"

图5

SDC和NSC群体光合速率(CAP)对中后期氮胁迫的响应(2017) 缩写同表1和图2。误差线为标准差。图中数据为同一施氮水平下的同一类3个品种的平均值。"

表3

SDC和NSC旗叶和倒2叶硝态氮、铵态氮和可溶性糖含量对中后期氮胁迫的响应"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 花后天数
Days after
anthesis (d)		 品种
Cultivar		 硝态氮含量
NO3--N content
(mg g-1 FW)		 铵态氮含量
NH4+-N content
(mg g-1 FW)		 可溶性糖含量
Soluble sugar content
(mg g-1 FW)
2016 Nn 0 SDC 0.25 0.27 29.6
NSC 0.30 0.21 42.4**
22 SDC 0.21 0.14 26.2
NSC 0.26 0.11 38.8**
Ns 0 SDC 0.37 0.19 45.3
NSC 0.32 0.13 32.7
22 SDC 0.31 0.10 41.4
NSC 0.26 0.11 30.4
年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 花后天数
Days after
anthesis (d)		 品种
Cultivar		 硝态氮含量
NO3--N content
(mg g-1 FW)		 铵态氮含量
NH4+-N content
(mg g-1 FW)		 可溶性糖含量
Soluble sugar content
(mg g-1 FW)
2017 Nn 0 SDC 0.08 0.12 30.6
NSC 0.09 0.11 31.9
22 SDC 0.10 0.18** 21.1
NSC 0.10 0.11 24.2
Ns 0 SDC 0.11* 0.10 38.5*
NSC 0.09 0.11 29.5
22 SDC 0.10 0.12 31.9
NSC 0.10 0.09 32.7

图6

SDC和NSC氮素利用效率(NUtE)对中后期氮胁迫的响应 缩写同表1和图2。误差线为标准差。图中数据为同一施氮水平下的同一类3个品种的平均值。"

[1] Zörb C, Ludewig U, Hawkesford M J . Perspective on wheat yield and quality with reduced nitrogen supply. Trends Plant Sci, 2018,23:1029-1037.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.08.012
[2] 吴晓丽, 李朝苏, 汤永禄, 刘于斌, 李伯群, 樊高琼, 熊涛 . 氮肥运筹对小麦产量、氮素利用效率和光能利用率的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017,28:1889-1898.
Wu X L, Li C S, Tang Y L, Liu Y B, Li B Q, Fan G Q, Xiong T . Effect of nitrogen management modes on grain yield, nitrogen use efficiency and light use efficiency of wheat. China J Appl Ecol, 2017,28:1889-1898 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] Tian Z W, Liu X X, Gu S L, Yu J H, Zhang L, Zhang W W, Jiang D, Cao W X, Dai T B . Postponed and reduced basal nitrogen application improves nitrogen use efficiency and plant growth of winter wheat. J Integr Agric, 2018,17:2648-2661.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62086-6
[4] 张士昌, 史占良, 李孟军, 李亚青, 底瑞耀, 李雁鸣 . 长期定位氮胁迫对小麦碳氮代谢氮素利用及产量的影响. 河南农业科学, 2016,45(12):13-19.
Zhang S C, Shi Z L, Li M J, Li Y Q, Di R Y, Li Y M . Effect of long-term nitrogen stress on carbon and nitrogen metabolism nitrogen use efficiency and yield of wheat. J Henan Agric Sci, 2016,45(12):13-19 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] Papakosta D K, Gagianas A A . Nitrogen and dry matter accumulation, remobilization, and losses for Mediterranean wheat during grain filling. Agron J, 1991,83:864-870.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300050018x
[6] Prystupa P, Savin R, Slafer G A . Grain number and its relationship with dry matter, N and P in the spikes at heading in response to N×P fertilization in barley. Field Crops Res, 2004,90:245-254.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.03.001
[7] Madani A, Shirani-Rad A, Pazoki A, Nourmohammadi G, Zarghami R, Mokhtassi-Bidgol A . The impact of source or sink limitations on yield formation of winter wheat(Triticum aestivum L.) due to post-anthesis water and nitrogen deficiencies. Plant Soil Environ, 2010,56:218-227.
[8] 杨慧勇, 林凡云, 陆琼娴, 徐剑宏, 史建荣 . 中国冬、春性小麦品种遗传多样性的微卫星标记分析. 麦类作物学报, 2007,27:555-559.
Yang H Y, Lin F Y, Lu Q X, Xu J H, Shi J R . Genetic diversity of Chinese winter and spring wheat varieties detected by microsatellite markers. J Triticeae Crops, 2007,27:555-559 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] Li A L, Liu D C, Yang W Y, Kishii M, Mao L . Synthetic hexaploid wheat: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Engineering, 2018,4:552-558.
doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.07.001
[10] Tang Y L, Rosemarne G M, Li C S, Wu X L, Yang W Y, Wu C . Physiological factors under pinning grain yield improvement of synthetic derived wheat in southeastern China. Crop Sci, 2015,55:98-112.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.02.0124
[11] 李俊, 魏会廷, 胡晓蓉, 李朝苏, 汤永禄, 刘登才, 杨武云 . 川麦42中源于人工合成小麦的一个高产位点鉴定. 作物学报, 2011,37:255-262.
Li J, Wei H T, Hu X R, Li C S, Tang Y L, Liu D C, Yang W Y . Identification of a high-yield introgression locus from synthetic hexaploid wheat in Chuanmai 42. Acta Agron Sin, 2011,37:255-262 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 汤永禄, 李朝苏, 吴晓丽, 吴春, 杨武云, 黄钢, 马孝玲 . 人工合成小麦衍生品种的物质积累、冠层结构及群体光合特性. 中国农业科学, 2014,47:844-855.
Tang Y L, Li C S, Wu X L, Wu C, Yang W Y, Huang G, Ma X L . Accumulation of dry matter, canopy structure and photosynthesis of synthetic hexaploid wheat-derived high-yielding varieties grown in Sichuan Basin, China. Sci Agric Sin, 2014,47:844-855 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 李朝苏, 汤永禄, 吴春, 吴晓丽, 黄钢, 何刚, 郭大明 . 施氮量对四川盆地小麦生长及灌浆的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015,21:873-883.
Li C S, Tang Y L, Wu C, Wu X L, Huang G, He G, Guo D M . Effect of N rate on growth and grain filling of wheat in Sichuan Basin. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2015,21:873-883 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 汤永禄, 吴晓丽, 吴元奇, 李朝苏, 吴春, 郭大明 . 小麦籽粒灌浆参数的基因型差异及其稳定性分析. 中国农业大学学报, 2014,19(1):9-20.
Tang Y L, Wu X L, Wu Y Q, Li C S, Wu C, Guo D M . Analysis of the genotypic variation and stability of grain filling parameters of wheat. J China Agric Univ, 2014,19(1):9-20 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 李俊, 魏会廷, 杨粟洁, 李朝苏, 汤永禄, 胡晓蓉, 杨武云 . 川麦42的1BS染色体臂对小麦主要农艺性状的遗传效应. 作物学报, 2009,35:2167-2173.
Li J, Wei H T, Yang S J, Li C S, Tang Y L, Hu X R, Yang W Y . Genetic effects of 1BS chromosome arm on the main agronomic traits in Chuanmai 42. Acta Agron Sin, 2009,35:2167-2173 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] Hawkesford M J, Araus J L, Park R, Calderini D, Miralles D, Shen T M, Zhang J P, Parry M A J . Prospects of doubling global wheat yields. Food Energy Security, 2013,2:34-48.
doi: 10.1002/fes3.15
[17] Nehe A S, Misra S, Murchie E H, Chinnathambi K, Foulkes M J . Genetic variation in N-use efficiency and associated traits in Indian wheat cultivars. Field Crops Res, 2018,225:152-162.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.06.002
[18] 剧成欣, 周著彪, 赵步洪, 王志琴, 杨建昌 . 不同氮敏感性粳稻品种的氮代谢与光合特性比较. 作物学报, 2018,44:405-413.
Ju C X, Zhou Z B, Zhao B H, Wang Z Q, Yang J C . Comparison in nitrogen metabolism and photosynthetic characteristics between japonica rice varieties differing in nitrogen sensitivity. Acta Agron Sin, 2018,44:405-413 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 韩胜芳, 李淑文, 文宏达, 李雁鸣, 肖凯 . 不同氮效率小麦品种的光合碳同化特性. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006,12:797-804.
Han S F, Li S W, Wen H D, Li Y M, Xiao K . Characterization of photosynthetic carbon assimilation in wheat varieties with different N efficiency. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2006,12:797-804 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 郭文善, 封超年, 严六零, 彭永欣, 朱新开, 宗爱国 . 小麦开花后源库关系分析. 作物学报, 1995,21:334-340.
Guo W S, Feng C N, Yan L L, Peng Y X, Zhu X K, Zong A G . Analysis of source-sink relationship after anthesis in wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 1995,21:334-340 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 曹蓓蓓, 王仕稳, 齐凌云, 陈道钳, 殷俐娜, 邓西平 . 小麦苗期叶片碳氮平衡与低氮诱导的叶片衰老之间的关系. 麦类作物学报, 2017,37:673-679.
Cao B B, Wang S W, Qi L Y, Chen D Q, Yin L N, Deng X P . Carbon/nitrogen balance involved in nitrogen deficiency induced leaf senescence in wheat seedling. J Triticeae Crops, 2017,37:673-679 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 李春燕, 陈思思, 徐雯, 李东升, 顾骁, 朱新开, 郭文善, 封超年 . 苗期低温胁迫对扬麦16叶片抗氧化酶和渗透调节物质的影响. 作物学报, 2011,37:2293-2298.
Li C Y, Chen S S, Xu W, Li D S G X, Zhu X K, Guo W S, Feng C N . Effect of low temperature at seedling stage on antioxidation enzymes and cytoplasmic osmoticum of leaves in wheat cultivar Yangmai 16. Acta Agron Sin, 2011,37:2293-2298 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 龚月桦 . 持绿小麦的筛选及同化物的积累与转运. 西北农林科技大学硕士论文, 陕西杨凌, 2008. pp 12-22.
Gong Y H . The Filtration of Stay Green Wheat and Study on the Accumulation and Transportation of Assimilates in Stay Green Wheat. MS Thesis of Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China, 2008. pp 12-22 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[6] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[7] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[8] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[9] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[10] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[11] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[12] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[13] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2