欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12): 2007-2015.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

黑河中游边缘绿洲沙地农田玉米水氮用量配合试验

苏永中;张智慧;杨荣   

  1. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所临泽内陆河流域研究站/寒旱区流域水文与应用生态实验室,甘肃兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2007-03-05 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-12-12 网络出版日期:2007-12-12
  • 通讯作者: 苏永中

Amount of Irrigation and Nitrogen Application for Maize Grown on Sandy Farmland in the Marginal Oasis in the Middle of Heihe River Basin

SU Yong-Zhong,ZHANG Zhi-Hui,YANG Rong   

  1. Linze Inland River Basin Research Station, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences/ Laboratory of Watershed Hydrology and Applied Ecology, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China
  • Received:2007-03-05 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-12-12 Published online:2007-12-12
  • Contact: SU Yong-Zhong

摘要: 研究了黑河中游边缘绿洲沙地农田不同灌溉水平(常规灌溉,12 000 m3 hm-2;节水10%,10 800 m3 hm-2;节水20%,9 600 m3 hm-2)和施氮水平(0、150、225、300和375 kg N hm-2)下玉米产量、氮肥利用率、灌溉水生产力及硝态氮在土壤剖面中的分布。结果表明,常规高量灌溉(12 000 m3 hm-2)和节水10%和20%处理的玉米产量和地上生物量无显著差异;在施有机肥和磷、钾肥的基础上,施氮量150~375 kg N hm-2较不施氮处理增产74.8%~108.6%,施氮量超过225 kg N hm-2时,产量不再显著增加;平均氮肥利用率(NUE)为50.6%~83.7%,随施氮量的增加而下降,超过225 kg N hm-2时显著降低。在施用氮肥时,玉米灌溉水生产力(WP)为0.97~1.35 kg m-3,随灌溉量的增加而下降,施氮量超过225 kg N hm-2时,灌溉水生产力不再显著增加。水肥配合有显著的交互效应,高量的水氮配合可获得较高的产量,但水肥利用效率显著下降。对每次灌溉前土壤剖面水分含量的测定结果表明,3个灌溉水平下0~160 cm土层土壤水分含量无显著差异,表明常规高量灌溉并不能保持较长时间的有效水分供作物吸收利用;高量灌溉下,0~200 cm土壤剖面中NO3--N的积累量低于节水灌溉处理,表明高量灌溉使更多的NO3--N淋溶至更深的土层,对地下水污染风险加大。从水肥高效利用、降低氮污染风险和缓解水资源短缺综合考虑,进行合理的水肥调控、适度降低灌溉量和氮肥投入是沙地农田生态系统管理的合理选择。通过合理的水肥调控,沙地农田仍有很大的节水潜力。

关键词: 灌溉量, 氮肥用量, 玉米, 产量, 水肥利用效率, 沙地农田

Abstract: Irrigation and nitrogen management are perhaps the most important aspects for grain production in the arid oasis agricultural area of Northwest China. A field experiment was conducted on sandy farmland to determine the effects of different irrigation amounts (conventional irrigation, 12 000 mm ha-1; 10% water-saving irrigation, 10 800 mm ha-1; 20% water-saving irrigation, 9 600 mm ha-1) and nitrogen rate (0, 150, 225, 300, and 375 kg ha-1) on maize yield in the marginal oasis in the middle of Heihe River Basin. Also, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), irrigation water productivity (WP) and N accumulation in 0–200 cm soil layer were discussed. There were no significant differences in maize yield and aboveground biomass among different irrigation treatments. Combining nitrogen fertilizer with manure, phosphate and potassium fertilizers, N application with 150–375 kg N ha-1 increased maize yield by 74.8%–108.6% compared with no N applied. However, maize yield did not increase significantly at N rate above 225 kg N ha-1. NUE ranged from 50.6% to 83.7% and decreased with increasing N application rate, with a strong decrease at N rate above 225 kg N ha-1. Under the treatment of N fertilizer application, WP ranged from 0.97 to 1.35 kg m-3 and decreased with increasing irrigation amount. WP did not increase significantly when N rate was above 225 kg N ha-1. There was significant coupling effect between irrigation and nitrogen application. The treatments with conventional irrigation and high nitrogen rates had maximum yield, however, the water and nitrogen use efficiencies decreased significantly. There were no evident differences in water content in the 0–160 cm soil layer measured before each irrigation among the three irrigation treatments, indicating that conventional irrigation treatment can not conserve soil water for a longer period to used in maize growth compared to water-saving irrigation treatment. In conventional irrigation treatment, NO3--N accumulation in the 0–200 cm soil layer was lower than that in the two water-saving irrigation treatments, indicating that more amount of NO3--N was leached to deeper soil layers which increase the risk of N contamination to groundwater.
Based on the comprehensive consideration for high effective use of water and nitrogen, mitigation of water resource shortage and its sustainable use and decrease of the pollution risk of water by N, rational regulation and control of irrigation and fertilization and reducing moderately the inputs of irrigation water and nitrogen fertilizer should be a reasonable alteration for sandy farmland management and expectant water-saving potential can be achieved.

Key words: Irrigation amount, Nitrogen rate, Maize, Yield, Water and nitrogen use efficiency, Sandy farmland

[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[4] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[5] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[6] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[7] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[8] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[9] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[12] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[13] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[14] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[15] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!