欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12): 2053-2058.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同耐盐性小麦胚芽鞘伸长对NaCl胁迫的响应

王芳;段迪;段培;王宝山*   

  1. 山东师范大学生命科学学院, 山东济南250014
  • 收稿日期:2006-11-21 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-12-12 网络出版日期:2007-12-12
  • 通讯作者: 王宝山

Coleoptile Elongation Response of Different Salt-Tolerant Wheat Cultivars to NaCl Stress

WANG Fang,DUAN Pei,WANG Bao-Shan*   

  1. College of Life Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
  • Received:2006-11-21 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-12-12 Published online:2007-12-12
  • Contact: WANG Bao-Shan

摘要: 以100 mmol L-1 NaCl处理耐盐小麦品种德抗961和盐敏感品种鲁麦15各2 d,测定其胚芽鞘相对伸长速率及渗透调节能力。结果表明,NaCl处理抑制小麦胚芽鞘的伸长,其相对伸长速率最大值减小,生长最快的时间推后,但胚芽鞘最终长度没有改变;NaCl胁迫使小麦胚芽鞘渗透势下降,德抗961渗透调节能力强于鲁麦15;NaCl胁迫使小麦胚芽鞘Na+、脯氨酸、总可溶性糖含量明显增加, 德抗961增加幅度大于鲁麦15;NaCl胁迫下,德抗961胚芽鞘伸长明显好于鲁麦15,其具有较强渗透调节能力是原因之一。因此,一定浓度NaCl处理下小麦胚芽鞘的长度可作为耐盐筛选的有用指标。

关键词: 小麦, 胚芽鞘, 盐胁迫, 渗透调节, 耐盐性

Abstract: Soil salinity severely limited crop production worldwide. Breeding and planting salt-tolerant species were the most effective and economic way for utilizing saline soils. However, lacking of reliable, convenient, inexpensive and quick screening techniques was the limiting factor for salt-tolerant breeding program. It has been shown that coleoptile elongation under drought condition could be used as a useful index to screen drought-tolerant wheat cultivars. In the present study, a salt-tolerant wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar DK961 and a salt-sensitive one LM15 treated with 100 mmol L-1 NaCl for two days were used to examine the response of coleoptile elongation to NaCl stress. Several indexes including radicle and coleoptile length, relative elongation rate (RER), fresh and dry weight, osmotic potential and osmotic adjustment ability, and contents of solutes such as proline, soluble sugars, Na+, and K+ were determined. The results showed that NaCl stress inhibited the radicle, coleoptile elongations and 100 mmol L-1 NaCl was the optimal concentration to show the difference between the two cultivars. NaCl postponed the maximal elongation date. Interestingly, compared with controls, NaCl stress did not affect the final coleoptile length of both cultivars. Fresh and dry weights of coleoptile were both decreased and the decrease degree of LM15 was more than that of DK961. Osmotic potentials of coleoptile of both cultivars were decreased by NaCl stress and osmotic adjustment ability of DK961 was stronger than that of LM15; proline, soluble sugar and Na+ contents in coleoptile of both cultivars were increased by NaCl stress, and the increase degrees of DK961 were more than those of LM15. However, K+ content in coleoptile of both cultivars was decreased, and the decrease degree of LM15 was more than that of DK961. These results indicate that the coleoptile of salt-tolerant wheat cultivar (DK961) has a higher ability to maintain K+ in its cells than that of salt-sensitive one (LM15). Coleoptile elongation of salt-tolerant wheat cultivar (DK961) was significantly higher than that of salt-sensitive one (LM15) under the same NaCl stress, which was partly due to having a stronger osmotic adjustment ability in the former than in the latter. Conclusively, the coleoptile length under a certain NaCl stress might be used to screen salt-tolerant wheat cultivars.

Key words: Wheat, Coleoptile, NaCl stress, Osmotic adjustment, Salt tolerance

[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[8] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[9] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[11] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[13] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[14] 宋裕祯, Bheel Chander Kumar, 王跃, 张颖星, 郭娟, Khound Rituraj, Santra Dipak Kumar, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. 糜子AP2亚家族全基因组鉴定及PmAP2-1和PmAP2-9耐盐功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1127-1139.
[15] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!