欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (01): 126-132.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00126

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

种植方式对陆稻和水稻磷素吸收利用的影响

张亚洁;杨建昌*;杜斌   

  1. 扬州大学/江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室, 江苏扬州 225009

  • 收稿日期:2007-05-24 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-01-12 网络出版日期:2008-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 杨建昌

Effects of Cultivation Methods on the Absorption and Use Efficiency of Phosphorus in Upland Rice and Paddy Rice

ZHANG Ya-Jie,YANG Jian-Chang*,DU Bin   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province/Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China

  • Received:2007-05-24 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-01-12 Published online:2008-01-12
  • Contact: YANG Jian-Chang

PDF

1494

被引次数

36

摘要：

以陆稻中旱3号和水稻武香粳99-8为材料, 设置覆膜旱种和裸地旱种2种方式, 以水层湿润灌溉为对照, 研究了种植方式对磷(P)素吸收利用的影响。结果表明, 与水种(对照)相比, 中旱3号覆膜旱种的产量显著降低, 而武香粳99-8覆膜旱种的产量则无显著差异, 裸地旱种的产量均显著降低。旱种使稻株的含P率和P素累积量下降, 但生育后期含P率下降速度变慢, 并且使P素在叶片中的分配比例下降, 茎鞘中的分配比例陆稻显著增加, 水稻覆膜旱种显著增加, 裸地旱种显著减少。旱种可增加P素物质生产效率, P素籽粒生产效率因覆膜与否而异。与武香粳99-8相比, 中旱3号生育后期稻株含P率低且下降慢, P素累积量少, P素在叶片和穗部的分配比例较高, P素物质生产效率、P素籽粒生产效率和P素收获指数均增加, P素分配比例和P素籽粒生产效率在不同种植方式下变化幅度小。稻株的P素累积量与不定根数、根重和产量呈极显著正相关(r1 = 0.8227**, r2 = 0.7928**, r3 = 0.7344**)。表明旱种对P素吸收利用的影响因旱种方式和品种类型不同而有较大差异, 旱种能增加P素的物质生产效率。

关键词: 陆稻, 水稻, 旱种, P素, 吸收利用

Abstract:

Upland rice and dry-cultivated paddy rice have been attracted more and more attention because of limited water resources in China, however, there is little information available on effect of cultivation methods on P absorption and use efficiency of upland rice and paddy rice. The objective of this study was to evaluate the difference between upland rice cultivar Zhonghan 3 (japonica) and paddy rice cultivar Wuxiangjing 99-8 (japonica) under three cultivation methods of moist cultivation (MC, control), plastic film mulching cultivation (PFMC), and bare cultivation (BC). Compared with the MC, the grain yield was significantly lower under PFMC for upland rice, but no significant difference between PFMC and MC for paddy rice, and significantly reduced under BC for both upland rice and paddy rice. P concentration and the amount of P absorption in plants under PFMC and MC were lower, whereas P concentration decreased more slowly from heading to maturity stage under PFMC and BC. The proportion of P in leaves was lower, whereas significantly higher in culms and sheaths for upland rice, and was significantly higher under PFMC and significantly lower under BC for paddy rice under dry cultivation than under MC. P use efficiency of matter production (PUEp) was significantly greater under dry cultivation than under MC after heading stage and P use efficiency of grain yield production (PUEg) was lower under PFMC and higher under BC than under MC. Compared with Wuxiangjing 99-8, Zhonghan 3 exhibited lower P concentration and slower decrease in P concentration, smaller P accumulation in plants at later growth stage, higher proportion of P in leaves and grains, greater PUEp, higher PUEg and P harvest index (PHI), no difference at maturity and lower change range of the proportion of P in plants and PUEg production under three cultivations. The amount of P absorption was very significantly positively correlated with adventitious root numbers, root weight, and grain yield (r1 = 0.8227**, r2 = 0.7928**, r3 = 0.7344**). The results suggest that the effect of dry cultivation on the absorption and use efficiency of P varies largely with the cultivation methods and variety types, and dry cultivation could increase PUEp.

Key words:

Upland rice, Paddy rice, Dry cultivation, Phosphorus, Absorption and use efficiency

[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[8] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[9] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[10] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[11] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[14] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2