欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (02): 268-276.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00268

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

结实期土壤水分和灌溉方式对水稻产量与品质的影响及其生理原因

刘凯;张耗;张慎凤;王志琴;杨建昌*   

  1. 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室, 江苏扬州 225009

  • 收稿日期:2007-05-24 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-02-12 网络出版日期:2008-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 杨建昌

Effects of Soil Moisture and Irrigation Patterns during Grain Filling on Grain Yield and Quality of Rice and Their Physiological Mechanism

LIU Kai,ZHANG Hao,ZHANG Shen-Feng,WANG Zhi-Qin,YANG Jian-Chang*

  

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China

  • Received:2007-05-24 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-02-12 Published online:2008-02-12
  • Contact: YANG Jian-Chang

摘要:

以水稻品种武育粳3号(粳稻)和扬稻6号(籼稻)为材料, 研究了结实期土壤水分和灌溉方式对产量、米质、籽粒中淀粉合成关键酶活性和内源乙烯释放速率的影响及它们之间的关系。结果表明, 与WW(保持水层, well-watered)或CI(常规灌溉, conventional irrigation)相比, 土壤轻度落干(MD, moderate soil-drying, 土壤水势保持在–10 ~ –30 kPa)和轻干湿交替灌溉(W-MD, alternate wetting and moderate-drying irrigation, 土壤落干至土水势为–25 kPa时复水)显著提高了千粒重、稻米的最高黏度和崩解值, 显著降低了垩白度和消减值; 土壤干旱(SD, severe soil-drying, 土壤水势保持在– 40~ – 60 kPa)和重干湿交替灌溉(W-SD, alternate wetting and severe-drying irrigation, 土壤落干至土水势为– 50 kPa时复水)则使稻米品质变劣。MD和W-MD处理显著降低了籽粒乙烯释放速率, 增加了灌浆中后期籽粒中蔗糖合酶(SuS)、腺苷二磷酸葡萄糖焦磷酸化酶(AGP)、淀粉合酶(StS)和淀粉分支酶(SBE)活性, SD和W-SD处理则提高了籽粒内源乙烯释放速率, 降低了上述各酶的活性。说明结实期土壤轻度落干或轻干-湿交替灌溉可以改善稻米品质, 籽粒SuS、AGP、StS和SBE活性的增强和内源乙烯水平的降低是稻米品质改善的重要生理原因。

关键词:

水稻, 土壤水分, 品质, 淀粉合成关键酶, 乙烯

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to investigate whether a moderate soil-drying or an alternate wetting and moderate-drying irrigation during the grain filling period could improve the grain quality and increase yield in rice. Two rice cultivars, Wuyujing 3 (japonica) and Yangdao 6 (indica), were grown in pots and cement tanks. Three soil moisture treatments and three irrigation patterns, well-watered (WW, well-watered) and conventional irrigation (CI, continuous flooding), moderate soil-drying (MD, soil water potential at – 10 ~ – 30 kPa) and alternate wetting and moderate-drying irrigation (W-MD, re-watered when soil water potential reached at – 25 kPa), and severe soil-drying (SD, soil water potential at – 40 ~ – 60 kPa) and alternate wetting and severe-drying irrigation (W-SD, re-watered when soil water potential reached at – 50 kPa), were imposed during grain-filing. Compared with WW or CI, MD or W-MD significantly increased grain weight, peak viscosity, and breakdown values, and re-duced chalkiness and setback values. The results were reversed for SD or W-SD treatments. Activities of sucrose synthase (SuS), adenine diphosphoglucose pyrophosphorylase (AGP), starch synthase (StS), and starch branching enzyme (SBE) in grains in mid-dle and late grain-filling stages were significantly enhanced, whereas ethylene revolution rate of grains decreased, under MD or W-MD. The SD or W-SD had the opposite effects. The results indicate that both MD and W-MD can improve rice quality, resulting from the physiological mechanism of enhancing activities of SuS, AGP, StS, and SBE and decreasing ethylene production in grains.

Key words:

Rice, Soil moisture, Rice quality, Key enzymes in starch synthesis, Ethylene

[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1Pod-D1Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[4] 蒋嘉卉, 江炳志, 刘冠明, 王章英, 唐朝臣. 紫肉甘薯品质性状的近红外光谱预测模型构建与优化[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1088-1102.
[5] 于天一, 王春晓, 肖丽, 钟召迪, 王宣仓, 赵勇, 路亚, 吴月, 吴正锋. 不同结瘤特性花生品种氮素累积、产量及品质特性对氮肥用量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 881-894.
[6] 朱金娟, 王慧萍, 杨国栋, 王宇诚, 杨晨, 王斌, Agustiani Nurwulan, 涂军明, 毕俊国, 崔克辉, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 水分管理和品种类型对再生稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 295-315.
[7] 迟晓元, 刘庆, 张君, 赵旭红, 李美, 于天一, 潘丽娟, 许静, 姜骁, 殷祥贞, 马俊卿, 陈娜. 不同花生品种(系)耐盐碱性田间鉴定及各性状指标相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 85-98.
[8] 付江鹏, 柳发财, 闫宝琴, 王永栋, 李利利, 魏玮, 周英霞. 控释肥替代普通尿素对旱作高粱干物质积累分配、产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2501-2513.
[9] 张海燕, 解备涛, 董顺旭, 张立明, 段文学. 滴灌条件下不同水溶肥种类和配比对鲜食甘薯产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2485-2500.
[10] 王曜阔, 王文政, 张敏, 刘希伟, 杨敏, 李昊昱, 张灵鑫, 闫彦菲, 蔡瑞国. 水氮运筹对冬小麦籽粒GMP合成和面粉加工品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2176-2189.
[11] 霍建喆, 于爱忠, 王玉珑, 王鹏飞, 尹波, 刘亚龙, 张冬玲, 姜科强, 庞小能, 王凤. 有机肥替代化肥对绿洲灌区甜玉米产量、品质及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1887-1900.
[12] 董伟进, 张亚封, 李启云, 路杨, 张正坤, 隋丽. CO2浓度升高条件下球孢白僵菌定殖对玉米生长及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1874-1886.
[13] 王天译, 杨绣娟, 赵佳佳, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 李晓华, 郝水源, 郑军. 山西小麦醇溶蛋白多样性及其对面粉品质效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1784-1800.
[14] 吴柳格, 陈坚, 张鑫, 邓艾兴, 宋振伟, 郑成岩, 张卫建. 近二十年国审冬小麦品种的产量与品质性状变化趋势研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1814-1826.
[15] 李秋云, 李世贵, 范军亮, 刘昊天, 赵晓斌, 吕硕, 王艳浩, 岳云, 张宁, 司怀军. 离子锌和纳米锌对马铃薯生理特性、产量及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1838-1849.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!