欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (07): 1227-1232.

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

IR64背景耐旱导入系“PD29”分蘖期的抗逆生理特征

赵秀琴1;谢学文1;孙勇1;邓建利1;朱苓华1,*;黎志康1,2   

  1. 1 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 / 农作物基因资源与遗传改良国家重大科学工程, 北京100081; 2 International Rice Research In-stitute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
  • 收稿日期:2008-01-07 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-07-12 网络出版日期:2008-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 朱苓华

Physiological Characteristics Related to Stress-Tolerance in Introgression Line “PD29” with IR64 Genetic Background at the Tillering Stage

ZHAO Xiu-Qin1,XIE Xue-Wen1,SUN Yong1,DENG Jian-Li1,ZHU Ling-Hua1*,LI Zhi-Kang12   

  1. 1 Institute of Crop Sciences / National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 2 International Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
  • Received:2008-01-07 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-07-12 Published online:2008-07-12
  • Contact: ZHU Ling-Hua

摘要: 以轮回亲本IR64(籼稻)及旱稻材料IRAT109为对照, 系统分析了“PD29”在灌溉(对照)与干旱(胁迫)条件下的相关生理性状特征。研究发现, 遭遇干旱胁迫后, “PD29”植株能够维持较高的相对含水量(RWC)且胁迫后复水2 h该株系的RWC迅速恢复到饱和状态, 表明其具有较强的御旱能力。干旱条件下, “PD29”的PS II最大光化学效率(Fv/Fm)、渗透势(Y)、脯氨酸含量(Pro)、活性氧清除系统活性(AOA)均显著高于IR64, 且相对于灌溉处理, 其RWC, Fv/Fm的降低幅度显著低于IR64, 净光合速率(Pn)、蒸腾速率(Tr)、气孔导度(Gs)的降幅, Pro及AOA的增幅均高于IR64。与IRAT109比较, 干旱逆境下“PD29”的Pro含量显著偏高且AOA平均增幅较高。因此认为, “PD29”的优良耐旱性表现与其在逆境下脯氨酸含量及活性氧清除系统活性的显著增强有关。另外, 干旱环境下的Pn、Gs及Tr的显著降低, 表明“PD29”的光合性能可塑性较强, 其光合性能在有利生长环境下能高效表达, 而在土壤水有限的环境下, 能够迅速降低以减少水分的进一步损失。

关键词: 水稻, 耐旱性, 光合生理, 植株水分, 抗氧化酶

Abstract: Drought tolerance (DT) or water-saving is becoming one of the most important target traits in rice breeding community under ever-increasing severe drought situation all over the world. The introgression line “PD29” with IR64 genetic background has promising yield performance under both drought (stress) and irrigation (control) conditions. In the present study, the physiological characteristics related to stress tolerance of the “PD29” were analysised with recurrent parent, IR64, and upland rice variety IRAT109 as control varieties under both drought and irrigation conditions. The results showed that “PD29” not only had higher leaf relative water content (RWC) under stress but also could recover RWC to a fully turgid (hydrated) state 2 h after re-watering which indicated that “PD29” has higher DT ability than control varieties at the tillering stage. Further analysis showed that “PD29” not only had higher maximum photochemical of FPS II efficiency (Fv/Fm), osmotic potential (Y), proline content (Pro), and antioxidants activity (AOA) than IR64 under drought condition but also presented less decrease in the Fv/Fm and RWC and more decrease in net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs) and more increase in Pro and AOA. Furthermore, compared to IRAT109, “PD29” had higher Pro and more increase in the AOA under drought condition. Therefore, it was concluded that the promising DT-performance of “PD29” was related to the significant increase of AOA and proline under the drought. Moreover, the significant decrease of the Pn, Gs, and Tr under the drought condition indicated that “PD29”has strong plasticity in photosynthetic capacity which can keep the higher photosynthesis under the adaptive circumstance and decrease the water loss through transpiration under the stress condition.

Key words: Rice, Drought tolerance, Photosynthesis, Plant water status, Antioxidant enzyme

中图分类号: 

  • 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01227
[1] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[2] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[3] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[4] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[5] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[6] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[7] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[8] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[9] 刘海波, 张蕾, 王立琦, 石晓丽, 周文莹, 崔国贤, 佘玮. 苎麻BnGCL1基因响应干旱胁迫的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 14-27.
[10] 张清怡, 肖义涛, 李秋霞, 张钰石, 张明才, 李召虎. 渗透胁迫下不同玉米品种幼苗ABA合成及生理生化响应差异[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 221-232.
[11] 孔娜, 刘涛, 刘文婷, 陈刚, 文利超, 邓智超, 郭梅, 李伟, 郭永峰. 烟草NtCEP7基因克隆及其编码小肽在苗期抗旱中的作用分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 249-261.
[12] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[13] 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[14] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[15] 雷松翰, 范骏扬, 车艳奕, 代永东, 郑雨萌, 田维江, 桑贤春, 王晓雯. 水稻内卷叶突变体acl3的鉴定及调控基因的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1467-1479.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!