欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 1818-1825.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01818

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

人工模拟盐、碱环境对向日葵种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响

刘杰1;张美丽1;张义2;石德成1,*   

  1. 1 东北师范大学教育部植被生态重点实验室, 吉林长春 130024; 2 吉林省向日葵研究所, 吉林白城 137000
  • 收稿日期:2007-12-21 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-10-12 网络出版日期:2008-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 石德成

Effects of Simulated Salt and Alkali Conditions on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

LIU Jie1,ZHANG Mei-Li1,ZHANG Yi2,SHI De-Cheng1*   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, Jilin; 2 Sunflower Institute, Baicheng 137000, Jilin, China
  • Received:2007-12-21 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-10-12 Published online:2008-10-12
  • Contact: SHI De-Cheng

摘要: 以向日葵品种白葵杂6号为试验材料, 中性盐NaCl和Na2SO4混合模拟盐胁迫、碱性盐NaHCO3和Na2CO3混合模拟碱胁迫(两者摩尔比均为9∶1), 设计各6种处理。研究盐、碱胁迫下种子萌发及幼苗形成的相关生理表现。结果表明, 种子能够萌发并成苗的最高盐胁迫强度是pH 6.98, 电导率为1.311 dS m-1(培养介质的pH和电导率); 碱胁迫强度是pH 9.71, 电导率为0.360 dS m-1。在能够成苗的盐碱条件下, 随着盐胁迫强度的增强出苗率、成苗率下降, 出苗时间明显延迟; 而随着碱胁迫强度的增加, 成苗率下降, 出苗时间并不延迟。同时随着盐碱胁迫强度的增强, 幼苗的各项生理指标均下降, 下降幅度以碱胁迫明显大于盐胁迫。试验结果证明, 盐胁迫和碱胁迫对白葵杂6号种子萌发及幼苗形成的影响机制不同, 向日葵在这两个阶段对盐碱两种胁迫的耐受能力及响应特点也不同。这一结论进一步证实了盐、碱胁迫是两种性质不同的胁迫。

关键词: 向日葵, 盐胁迫, 碱胁迫

Abstract: Salinization and alkalization of soil are a widespread environmental problem, including salt-stress and alkali-stress in terms of the salt characteristics. In fact, the destructive effects caused by alkali-stress are more serious than that by salt-stress. The resistance to salt- and alkali-stress of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is stronger than that of the other crops, as some sunflowers are able to grow on alkalinized soil. The stress conditions of 6 salinities and 6 alkalinities were simulated by mixing two neutral salts (NaCl and Na2SO4) and two alkaline salts (NaHCO3 and Na2CO3) both in the molar ratio of 9:1 respectively. The concentration range of treatments was from 40 to 240 mmol L-1 for the salt-stress, and 10 to 60 mmol L-1 for the alkali-stress. A sunflower cultivar Baikuiza 6 with higher resistance to salt-alkaline stresses, was used to determine emergence time, emergence rate, survival seedling rate, and physiological indexes including leaf area, water content, biomass of seedlings, and content of Na+ and K+ under salt- and alkali-stresses. The results showed that the maximum intensity of salt-stress for baikuiza 6 germination and seedling growth was pH 6.98 and electric conductivity of 1.311 dS m-1 in the culture medium, and alkali-stress was pH 9.71 and electric conductivity of 0.360 dS m-1. Under the salt or alkali conditions that seedlings could be able to grow, not only the emergence rate and survival seedling rate decreased, but also the time of emergence delayed significantly with the increasing intensity of salt-stress. Whereas the survival seedling rate decreased and the emergence time didn’t delay with the increasing of alkali-stress intensity. Moreover, various growth indexes of seedling decreased with increasing intensity of salt- or alkali-stress, and the extent of decrease was greater under alkali-stress than under salt-stress. In conclusion, the mechanisms of salt- and alkali-stresses effects on germination and seedling growth of sunflower are different, and the tolerance and response of sunflower to the both stresses are different during the two growing stages, proving that salt-stress and alkali-stress are two kinds of stresses.

Key words: Sunflower, Salt-stress, Alkali-stress

[1] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[2] 宋裕祯, Bheel Chander Kumar, 王跃, 张颖星, 郭娟, Khound Rituraj, Santra Dipak Kumar, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. 糜子AP2亚家族全基因组鉴定及PmAP2-1PmAP2-9耐盐功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1127-1139.
[3] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[4] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[5] 刘吉昌, 李思烨, 李雪婷, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型夏玉米品种根系生长及养分吸收效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 565-577.
[6] 王佳婕, 王正楠, BATOOL Maria, 王旺年, 文静, 任长忠, 何峰, 武优悠, 徐正华, 王晶, 蒯婕, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 油菜和小麦响应盐碱胁迫的生理特性比较[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1215-1229.
[7] 李雪婷, 任昊, 王洪章, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘莹, 姚海燕, 刘鹏. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型玉米品种叶片光合性能和干物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1091-1101.
[8] 潘炬忠, 韦萍, 朱德平, 邵胜雪, 陈珊珊, 韦雅倩, 高维维. 水稻转录因子OsERF104的克隆和功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 900-913.
[9] 霍如雪, 葛祥菡, 石嘉, 李雪蕊, 戴圣杰, 刘振宁, 李宗芸. 甘薯组氨酸激酶蛋白IbHK5响应干旱和盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 650-666.
[10] 赵慧霞, 郭彦丽, 郑渝泠, 何棱, 陈锐, 王珊珊, 曾长立, 邹珺, 沈金雄, 傅廷栋, 刘小云, 万何平. 甘蓝型油菜响应碱胁迫的基因表达差异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3105-3118.
[11] 孟凡花, 刘敏, 沈傲, 刘炜. 脂质转移蛋白SiLTP1基因参与谷子耐盐响应初探[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 58-67.
[12] 李闻娟, 王利民, 齐燕妮, 赵玮, 谢亚萍, 党照, 赵丽蓉, 李雯, 徐晨梦, 王琰, 张建平. 亚麻LuWRI1a在旱盐胁迫响应中的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1750-1761.
[13] 折萌, 郑登俞, 柯照, 吴忠义, 邹华文, 张中保. 玉米ZmGRAS13基因的克隆及功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1420-1434.
[14] 王龙, 李静, 钱晨, 林国冰, 李亦扬, 杨光, 左青松. 盐胁迫对油菜生理特征和菜籽产量品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1597-1607.
[15] 韦还和, 张翔, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 马唯一, 左博源, 孟天瑶, 高平磊, 陈英龙, 许轲, 戴其根. 盐胁迫对水稻籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 734-746.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!