盐胁迫下棉花基因组DNA表观遗传变化的MSAP分析

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00588

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

盐胁迫是非生物逆境中对作物危害比较严重的自然灾害之一, 严重影响和制约作物的产量和种植面积。本研究以陆地棉品系YZ1为材料, 调查不同NaCl浓度下棉花幼苗生长及根基因组DNA的甲基化水平和变化模式。结果表明，对棉花幼苗的株高和根长生长100 mmol L^-1 NaCl有促进作用, 200 mmol L^-1NaCl有显著抑制作用；100~200 mmol L^-1 NaCl胁迫严重抑制棉花幼苗的侧根数量。甲基化敏感扩增多态性(methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism, MSAP)分析表明, 经100、150和200 mmol L^-1 NaCl处理后根基因组DNA甲基化比率分别为38.1%、35.2和34.5%, 均低于对照(41.2%), 同时棉花幼苗根DNA的甲基化水平与NaCl处理浓度呈显著负相关(r = –0.986)。与对照相比, 100、150和200 mmol L^-1 NaCl胁迫下棉花幼苗根基因组DNA的甲基化和去甲基化分别为6.4%、7.6%、11.3%和12.7%、11.1%、8.2%。此外, 序列和RT-PCR分析表明, 与MSAP差异片段高度同源的基因的表达在处理与对照间差异显著。

关键词: 棉花, 盐胁迫, DNA甲基化, 甲基化敏感扩增多态性, RT-PCR

Abstract:

Salinity is one of the important limiting factors in plant production worldwide. The objectives of the study were to assess the effect of salt stress on the plant growth and to determine if DNA can be methylated in cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum) by methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) technique. The results showed that 100 mmol L^-1NaCl obviously promoted plant height and root length of cotton seedlings, but 200 mmol L^-1 NaCl significantly inhibited plant growth; 100–200 mmol L^-1 NaCl inhibited the number of lateral root considerably. The analysis of MSAP showed that the level of global DNA methylation decreased from 41.2% to 34.5% as the salt concentrations increased; there was a significantly negative correlation (r = –0.986) between NaCl concentrations and the level of DNA methylation in cotton roots. Under stresses of 100, 150 and 200 mmol L^-1 NaCl, methylation and demethylation of DNA were 6.4%, 7.6%, 11.3% and 12.7%, 11.1%, 8.2%, respectively. In addition, the analyses of sequences and RT-PCR showed that expressions of genes homologous to MSAP fragments in roots were different between control and treated plants under salt stress, suggesting that these genes would play an important role in the cotton adaptation of salt stress.

Key words: Cotton, Salt stress, DNA methylation, MSAP, RT-PCR

李雪林，林忠旭，聂以春，郭小平，张献龙. 盐胁迫下棉花基因组DNA表观遗传变化的MSAP分析[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(4): 588-596.

LI Xue-Lin,LIN Zhong-Xu,NIE Yi-Chun,GUO Xiao-Ping,ZHANG Xian-Long. MSAP Analysis of Epigenetic Changes in Cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.) under Salt Stress[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35(4): 588-596.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00588

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2009/V35/I4/588

参考文献

[1]Saze H, Mittelsten Scheid O, Paszkowski J. Maintenance of CpG methylation is essential for epigenetic inheritance during plant gametogenesis. Nat Genet, 2003, 34: 65–69
[2]Chan S W L, Henderson I R, Jacobsen S E. Gardening the genome DNA methylation Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Rev Genet, 2005, 6: 351–360
[3]Razin A, Cedar H. DNA methylation and gene expression. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 1991, 55: 451–458
[4]Li E. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development, Nat Rev Genet, 2002, 3: 662–673
[5]Jablonka E, Goiten R, Marcus M, Cedar H. DNA hypomethylation causes an increase in DNase I sensitivity and an advance in the timing of replication of the entire X chromosome. Chromosoma, 1985, 93: 152–156
[6]Jullien P E, Kinoshita T, Ohad N, Berger F. Maintenance of DNA methylation during the Arabidopsis life cycle is essential for parental imprinting. Plant Cell, 2006, 18: 1360–1372
[7]Adams K L, Percifield R, Wendel J F. Organ-specific silencing of duplicated genes in a newly synthesized cotton allotetraploid. Genetics, 2004, 168: 2217–2226
[8]Zluvova J, Janousek B, Vyskot B. Immuno-histchemical study of DNA methylation dynamics during plant development. J Exp Bot, 2001, 52: 2263–2273
[9]Jaligot E, Beule T, Rival A. Methylation-sensitive RFLPs: Characterization of two oil palm markers showing somaclonal variation-associated polymorphism. Theor Appl Genet, 2002, 104: 1263–1269
[10]Mcclelland M, Nelson M, Raschke E. Effect of site-specific modification on restriction endonuclease and DNA modification methyltransferases. Nucl Acids Res, 1994, 17: 3640–3659
[11]Ashikawa I. Surveying CpG methylation at 5'-CCGG in the genomes of rice cultivars. Plant Mol Biol, 2001, 45: 31–39
[12]Cervera M T, Ruiz-Garcia L, Martinez-Zapater J M. Analysis of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana based on methylation-sensitive AFLP markers. Mol Genet Genom, 2002, 268: 543–552
[13]Hao Y J, Deng X X. Stress treatments and DNA methylation affected the somatic embryogenesis of Citrus callus. Acta Bot Sin, 2002, 44: 673–677
[14]Portis E, Acquadro A, Comino C, Lanteri S. Analysis of DNA methylation during germination pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) seeds using methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP). Plant Sci, 2004, 166: 169–178
[15]Xiong L M, Karen S S, Zhu J K. Cell signaling during cold, drought, and salt stress. Plant Cell, 2002, 14(suppl): 165–183
[16]Richards E J, Peacock W J, Dennis E S. DNA methylation, a key regulator of plant development and other processes. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 2000, 10: 217–223
[17]Xiao W, Custard K D, Brown R C, Lemmon B E, Harada J J, Goldberg R B, Fischer R L. DNA methylation is critical for Arabidopsis embryogenesis and seed viability. Plant Cell, 2006, 18: 805–814
[18]Finnegan E J, Genger R K, Kovac K, Kovac K, Peacock W J, Dennis E S. DNA methylation and the promotion of flowering by vernalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998, 95: 5824–5829
[19]Wassenegger M, Pelissier T. A model for RNA-mediated gene silencing in higher plants. Plant Mol Biol, 1998, 37: 349–362
[20]Edward K, Catherine A, Jim H, Mark A, Marc R. Cell-type-specific calcium responses to drought, salt and cold in the Arabidopsis root. Plant J, 2000, 23: 267–278
[21]Hu H H, Dai M Q, Yao J L, Xiao B Z, Li X H, Zhang Q F, Xiong L Z. Overexpressing a NAM, ATAF, and CUC (NAC) transcription factor enhances drought resistance and salt tolerance in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006, 103: 12987–12992
[22]He X J, Mu R L, Cao W H, Zhang Z G, Zhang J S, Chen S Y. AtNAC2, a transcription factor downstream of ethylene and auxin signaling pathways, is involved in salt stress response and lateral root development. Plant J, 2005, 44: 903–916
[23]Lin Z X, Zhang X L, Nie Y C, He D H, Wu M Q. Construction of a genetic linkage map for cotton based on SRAP. Chin Sci Bull, 2003, 48: 2063–2067
[24]Zhu L-F(朱龙付), Tu L-L(涂礼丽), Zeng F-C(曾范昌), Liu D-Q(刘迪秋), Zhang X-L(张献龙). An improved simple protocol for isolation of high quality RNA from Gossypium spp. suitable for cDNA library construction. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(12): 1657–1659 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]Zhao Y, Yu S, Xing C, Fan S, Song M. Analysis of DNA methylation in cotton hybrids and their parents. Mol Biol, 2008, 42: 169–178
[26]Ye W-W(叶武威), Pang N-C(庞念厂), Wang J-J(王俊娟), Fan B-X(樊宝相). Characteristics of absorbing, accumulating and distribution of Na+ under the salinity stress on cotton. Cotton Sci (棉花学报). 2006, 18(5): 279–283(in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]Richards E J. DNA methylation and plant development. Trends Genet, 1997, 13: 319–323
[28]Yoder J A, Walsh C P, Bester T H. Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. Trends Genet, 1997, 13: 335–340
[29]Khan M A. Experimental assessment of salinity tolerance of Ceriops tagal seedlings and saplings from the Indus delta. Pakistan. Aquatic Bot, 2001, 70: 259–268
[30]Lu G Y, Wu X M, Chen B Y, Gao G Z, Xu K. Evaluation of genetic and epigenetic modification in rapeseed (Brassica napus) induced by salt stress. J Integr Plant Biol, 2007, 49: 1599–1607
[31]Parida A K, Das A B. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: A review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2005, 60: 324–349
[32]Spollen W G, Sharp R E, Saab I N, Wu Y. Regulation of Cell Expansion in Roots and Shoots at Low Water Potentials. In: Smith J A C, Griffiths H, eds. Water Deficits: Plant Responses from Cell to Community. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers, 1993. pp 37–52
[33]Van der Weele C M, Spollen W G, Sharp R E, Baskin T I. Growth of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings under water deficit studied by control of water potential in nutrient-agar media. J Exp Bot, 2000, 51: 1555–1562
[34]Deak K I, Malamy J. Osmotic regulation of root system architecture. Plant J, 2005, 43: 17–28
[35]Cervera M T, Ruiz-Garcia L, Martinez-Zapater J M. Analysis of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana based on methylation-sensitive AFLP markers. Mol Genet Genom, 2002, 268: 543–552
[36]Ge C-L(葛才林), Yang X-Y(杨小勇), Liu X-N(刘向农), Sun J-H(孙锦荷), Luo S-S(罗时石), Wang Z-G(王泽港). Effect of heavy metal on levels of methylation in DNA of rice and wheat. J Plant Physiol Mol Biol (植物生理与生物学学报), 2002, 28: 363–368 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]Labra M, Ghiani A, Citterio S, Sgorbati S, Sala F, Vannini C, Ruffini-Castiglione M, Bracale M. Analysis of cytosine methylaion pattern in response to water deficit in pea root tips. Plant Biol, 2002, 4: 694–699
[38]Aina R, Sgorbati S, Santagostino A, Labra A, Ghiani A, Citterio S. Specific hypomethylation of DNA is induced by heavy metals in white clover and industrial hemp. Physiol Plant, 2004, 121: 472–480
[39]Kovalchuk O, Burke P, Arkhipov A, Kuchma N, Jill James S, Kovalchuk I, Pogribny I. Genome hypermethylation in Pinus silvestris of Chernobyl—A mechanism for radiation adaptation? Mutation Res, 2003, 529: 13–20
[40]Kumar A, Bennetzen J L. Plant retrotransposons. Annu Rev Genet, 1999, 33: 479–532
[41]Feschotte C, Jiang N, Wessler R S. Plant retrotransposable elements: Where genetics meets genomics. Nat Rev Genet, 2002, 3: 329–341
[42]Cheng C, Daigen M, Hirochika H. Epigenetic regulation of the rice retrotransposon Tos17. Mol Genet Genom, 2006, 276: 378–390
[43]Kashkush K, Feldman M, Levy A A. Transcriptional activation of retrotransposons alters the expression of adjacent genes in wheat. Nat Genet, 2003, 33: 102–106

相关文章 15

[1]	邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[2]	张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[3]	赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[4]	宋裕祯, Bheel Chander Kumar, 王跃, 张颖星, 郭娟, Khound Rituraj, Santra Dipak Kumar, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. 糜子AP2亚家族全基因组鉴定及PmAP2-1和PmAP2-9耐盐功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1127-1139.
[5]	覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[6]	周琦翔, 朱艳, 汪楚博, 朱柏林, 李俊博, 宋利兵. 基于DSSAT模型模拟气候变化对新疆棉花物候期及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 590-602.
[7]	张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[8]	刘吉昌, 李思烨, 李雪婷, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型夏玉米品种根系生长及养分吸收效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 565-577.
[9]	郭栋财, 吕涛, 蔡永生, 买吾鲁达·艾合买提, 全家, 曲延英, 郑凯. 棉花纤维品质相关性状QTL元分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1445-1466.
[10]	王亚雯, 戚正阳, 尤佳琦, 聂新辉, 曹娟, 杨细燕, 涂礼莉, 张献龙, 王茂军. 棉花60K功能位点基因芯片的制备及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1178-1188.
[11]	李雪婷, 任昊, 王洪章, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘莹, 姚海燕, 刘鹏. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型玉米品种叶片光合性能和干物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1091-1101.
[12]	潘炬忠, 韦萍, 朱德平, 邵胜雪, 陈珊珊, 韦雅倩, 高维维. 水稻转录因子OsERF104的克隆和功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 900-913.
[13]	霍如雪, 葛祥菡, 石嘉, 李雪蕊, 戴圣杰, 刘振宁, 李宗芸. 甘薯组氨酸激酶蛋白IbHK5响应干旱和盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 650-666.
[14]	丁俊沣, 许映飞, 张祥, 陈媛, 陈德华. 生长调节剂吲哚丁酸对移栽棉苗成活及生长发育的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3331-3341.
[15]	哈丽哈什·依巴提, 张炎, 李青军, 徐新朋, 何萍. 基于产量反应和农学效率的棉花智能化推荐施肥方法研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3052-3064.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed