欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 745-748.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00745

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于图像处理的玉米分形维数及其种植密度效应评价

梁淑敏1,杨锦忠2*,李娜娜1,郝建平1,杜天庆1,崔福柱1,程丽娟1   

  1. 1山西农业大学,山西太谷030801;2青岛农业大学,山东青岛266109
  • 收稿日期:2008-09-09 修回日期:2008-12-29 出版日期:2009-04-12 网络出版日期:2009-02-16
  • 通讯作者: 杨锦忠
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由山西省资源回国留学人员科研项目(203049),青岛农业大学人才基金项目(630746)资助。

Effects of Plant Population Density on Fractal Dimension of Corn Based on Image Processing

LIANG Shu-Min1,YANG Jin-Zhong2*,LI Na-Na1,Hao Jian-Ping1,DU Tian-qing1,CUI Fu-Zhu1,CHENG Li-Juan1   

  1. 1Shanxi Agricultural University,Taigu 030801,China;2Qingdao Agricultural University,Qingdao 266109,China
  • Received:2008-09-09 Revised:2008-12-29 Published:2009-04-12 Published online:2009-02-16
  • Contact: YANG Jin-Zhong

摘要:

以玉米品种强盛49为试材,采用数字图像处理技术和计盒维数方法,研究了种植密度对株型的影响。结果表明,随着种植密度增加(2.4~7.8 m-2),植株的分形维数(FD)1.192逐渐下降至1.163。随着生育进程的推进,所有种植密度下FD值都呈现出先上升后下降的趋势。分形维数与株高、光合叶源和生物产量有一定的相关性。FD值是定量描述玉米株型的一种重要新性状,在作物长势与长相等生长诊断研究中有广泛的应用前景。

关键词: 玉米, 图像处理, 分形维数, 种植密度, 株型

Abstract:

Using fractal analysis method and image process, for corn cultivar Qiangsheng 49 was analyzed the effects of plant population density on fractal dimension (FD) of plant skeletal images. When the population density increased from 2.4 to 7.8 plants per square meters by 1.2 increment, the FD value decreased gradually from 1.192 to 1.163. Under all population density conditions, the FD values increased till early kernel filling and then decreased. The FD value was correlated with plant height, photosynthetic leaf sources and biomass to some extents. FD can be used widely in describing corn plant architecture as a new meaningful indicator.

Key words: Corn, Image process, Fractal dimension, Plant population density, Plant architecture

[1]Li S-K(李少昆), Wang C-T(王崇桃). The methods of obtaining and expressing information of crop plant shape and population structure. J Shihezi Univ (石河子大学学报), 1997, 1(3): 250–256 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]Li Z-C(李志臣), Ji C-Y(姬长英). Calculation of weed fractal dimension based on image analysis. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2006, 22(11): 175–178 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Frontier S. Application of fractal theory to ecology In: Legendre P, Legendre L, eds. Developments in Numerical Ecology. New York: NATO Scientific Affairs Division,. 1987. pp 335–377
[4]Eghball B, Settimi J R, Maranville J W, Parkhurst A M. Fractal analysis for morphological description of corn roots under nitrogen stress. Agron J, 1993, 85: 287–289
[5]Li X-H(李谢辉), Tashpolat Tiyip(塔西甫拉提·特依拜), Ren F-W(任福文). Dynamic changes of cropland based on fractal theory and its driving forces in aridoasis. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2007, 23(2): 65–70 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Fournier C, Andrieu B. A 3D architectural and process-based model of maize development. Ann Bot, 1998, 81: 233–250
[7]Foroutan-Pour K, Dutilleul P, Smith J D L. Effects of plant population density and intercropping with soybean on the fractal dimension of corn plant skeletal images. Agron Crop Sci, 2000, 184: 89–100
[8]Li S-K(李少昆), Zhang X(张弦), Zhao M(赵明), Wang S-A(王树安). Studies on the technique of multi-media image processing for plant shape information of crop. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1998, 24(3): 265–271 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]Guan C-H(关彩虹), Yang J-Z(杨锦忠). Plant similarity studies within different summer corn populations. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin (西北植物学报), 2000, 20(2): 238–242 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]Xiao S-H(肖世和), Chen X(陈孝), Wu Z-S(吴兆苏). Dynamic Analysis of Biomass Yield and Its components after Anthesis in Wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1995, 21(2): 155–160 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Lü L-H(吕丽华), Tao H-B(陶洪斌), Xia L-K(夏来坤), Zhang Y-J(张雅杰), Zhao-M(赵明), Zhao J-R (赵久然), Wang-P(王璞). Canopy structure and photosynthesis traits of summer maize under different planting densities. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(3): 447?455(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Zhang L-X(章履孝), Chen-J(陈静). The maize plant type of standards and analysis. Jiangsu Agric Sci (江苏农业科学), 1991, (5): 30–31(in Chinese)
[13]Pei X-D(裴鑫德). The discriminant model of maize plant type. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin (华北农学报), 1994, 9(2): 1–8(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Zhang X(张弦), Yan Y-L(严衍录). Gain crop shape information with image processing technique. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1996, 29(5): 89–93(in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[6] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[7] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[8] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[9] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[10] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[11] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[12] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[13] 郭向阳, 涂亮, 王栋, 刘鹏飞, 王安贵, 易强, 任洪, 李刚, 祝云芳, 吴迅, 蒋喻林, 田丰, 陈泽辉. 热带Suwan种质在我国玉米种质改良中的创新与利用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 655-664.
[14] 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
[15] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!