欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 958-961.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00958

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米简单重复序列不对等交换的热点区域定位

汤继华12，马西青1，滕文涛1，严建兵1，戴景瑞1，李建生1*   

  1. 1中国农业大学国家玉米改良中心，北京100193；2河南农业大学农学院，河南郑州450002
  • 收稿日期:2008-09-19 修回日期:2008-12-15 出版日期:2009-05-12 网络出版日期:2009-02-16
  • 通讯作者: 李建生
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家高技术研究发展计划（863计划）重大专项（2006AA100103）资助。

Mapping Unequal Crossing Over Hotspot Region of Simple sequence Repeat in Maize

TANG Ji-Hua12,MA Xi-Qing1,TENG Wen-Tao1,YAN Jian-Bing1,DAI Jing-Rui1,LI Jian-Sheng1*   

  1. 1National Maize Improvement Center of China,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193,China;2College of Agronmy.Hernan Agricultural University,Zhengzhou 450002,China
  • Received:2008-09-19 Revised:2008-12-15 Published:2009-05-12 Published online:2009-02-16
  • Contact: LI Jian-Sheng

PDF

1844

被引次数

3

摘要：

生物基因组中简单重复序列的多态性是同源染色体不对等交换的结果之一，因此明确不对等交换的热点区域具有重要的理论意义。利用来源于优良玉米杂交种豫玉22的一套重组近交系(RIL)群体，对其遗传组成进行了SSR标记分析，发现40个不对等交换的SSR标记，不对等交换在群体间发生的概率介于0.34%~14.63%之间，每世代发生的频率为10-2~10-1，其中(AG)n重复的标记占发生不对等交换总标记的58.3%。有31个不对等交换标记分布于染色体上的11个热点区域，位于第9染色体以外的其它染色体上，其中第3和第5染色体上各分布2个不对等交换的热点区域。

关键词: 玉米, 简单重复序列（SSR）, 不对等交换, 热点区域

Abstract:

The polymorphism of simple sequence repeat (SSR) in biological genome is one result of unequal crossing over for homologous chromosomes; therefore it has theoretical importance in clarifying the hotspot regions of unequal crossing over. A set of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) population that derived form an elite hybrid Yuyu 22 was used in this study, its genetic components of the population was analyzed by means of SSR analysis, and 40 unequal crossing over SSR markers were found. The frequency of the unequal crossing over in the RIL population was 0.34–14.63%, with 10-2–10-1 frequency per generation, and the (AG)n repeat SSR markers accounted for 58.3%. There were 31 unequal crossing over markers locating on 11 chromosomal hotspot regions, distributing on 10 chromosomes except for chromosome 9, including two unequal crossing over hotspot regions each in chromosomes 3 and 5.

Key words: Maize, Simple sequence repeat(SSR), Unequal crossing over, Hotspot region

[1] Civardi L, Xia Y, Edwards K J, Schnable P S, Nikolau B J. The relationship between genetic and physical distances in the cloned a1-sh2 interval of the Zea mays L. genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994, 91: 8268–8272
[2] Sturtevant A H. The effects of unequal crossing over at the bar locus in Drosophila. Genetics, 1925, 10: 117–147
[3] Sturtevant A H, Morgan T H. Reverse mutation of the bar gene correlated with crossing over. Science, 1923, 57: 746–747
[4] Tusié-Luna M T, White P C. Gene conversions and unequal crossovers between CYP21 (steroid 21-hydroxylase gene) and CYP21P involve different mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1995, 92: 10796–10800
[5] Baumer A, Dutly F, Balmer D, Riegel M, Tükel T, Krajewska-Walasek M, Schinzel A A. High level of unequal meiotic crossovers at the origin of the 22q11.2 and 7q11.23 deletions. Human Mol Genet, 1998, 7: 887–894
[6] Webb C A, Richter T E, Collins N C, Nicolas M, Trick H N, Pryor T, Hulbert. Genetic and molecular characterization of the maize rp3 rust resistance locus. Genetics, 2002, 162: 381–394
[7] Collins N, Drake J, Ayliffe M, Sun Q, Ellis J, Hulbert S, Pryor T. Molecular characterization of the maize Rp1-D rust resistance haplotype and its mutants. Plant Cell, 1999, 11: 1365–1376
[8] Silver L M, White M, Artzt K. Evidence for unequal crossing over within the mouse T/t complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1980, 77: 6077–6080
[9] Adams K L, Wendel J F. Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2005, 8: 135–141
[10] Lockton S, Gaut B S. Plant conserved non-coding sequences and paralogue evolution. Trends Genet, 2005, 21: 60–65
[11] Zhang L, Gaut B S. Does recombination shape the distribution and evolution of tandemly arrayed genes (TAGs) in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome? Genome Res, 2003, 13: 2533–2540
[12] Goodfellow P N. Variation in now the theme. Nature, 1992, 359: 777–778
[13] Powell W, Machray G C, Provan J. Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends Plant Sci, 1996, 1: 215–222
[14] Jeffreys A J, Wilson V, Thein S L. Hypervariable “minisatellite” regions in human DNA. Nature, 1985, 314: 67–73
[15] Crow J F, William F D. Anecdotal, historical and critical commentaries on genetics: unequal crossing over then and now. Genetics, 1988, 120: 1–6
[16] Walsh J B. Persistence of tandem arrays: implications for satellite and simple-sequence DNAs. Genetics, 1987, 115: 553–567
[17] Sia E A, Jinks-Robertson S, Petes T. Genetic control of microsatellite stability. Mutat Res, 1997, 383: 61–70
[18] Saghai-Maroof M A, Soliman K M, Jorgensen R A, Allard R W. Ribosomal DNA spacer length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1984, 81: 8014–8018
[19] Lincoln S, Daly M, Lander E. Mapping genetic mapping with MAPMAKER/EXP3.0. Cambridge: Whitehead Institute Technical Report, 1992
[20] Yan J-B(严建兵), Tang H(汤华), Huang Y-Q(黄益勤), Zheng Y-L(郑用琏), Li J-S(李建生). Genetic analysis of segregation distortion of molecular markers in maize F2 population. Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 2003, 30(10): 913–918 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] Tang J H, Ma X Q, Yan J B, Teng W T, Wu W R, Dai J R, Li J S. The QTL and heterotic detection loci for plant height using an immortalized F2 population in maize. Chin Sci Bull, 2007, 51(24): 2864–2869
[22] Udupa S M, Robertson L D, Weigand F, Baum M, Kahl G. Allelic variation at (TAA)n microsatellite loci in a world collection of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm. Mol Gen Genet, 1999, 261: 354–363
[23] Schug M D, Mackay T F C, Aquadro C F. Low mutation rates of microsatellite loci in Drosophila lanogaster. Nat Genet, 1997, 15: 99–102
[24] Xu X, Peng M, Fang Z, Xu X. The direction of microsatellite mutations is dependent upon the allele length. Nat Genet, 2000, 24: 396–399
[25] Eisen J A. Mechanistic basis for microsatellite instability. In: Goldstein D B, Schl?tterer C, eds. Microsatellites—evolution and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. pp 34–48
[26] Kermicle J K, Eggleston W B, Alleman M. Organization of paramutagenicity in R-stipples maize. Genetics, 1995, 141: 361–372
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[6] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[7] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[8] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[9] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[10] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[11] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[12] 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
[13] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
[14] 李新浩, 邢梦柯, 周梓惠, 李思烨, 任昊, 王洪章, 赖华江. 外源褪黑素通过协调光反应与暗反应增强玉米苗期的耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 839-856.
[15] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2