欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 1357-1363.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01357

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

大穗型籼稻品种根系性状的基本特点

董桂春，李进前，田昊，于小凤，张彪，张传胜，张岳芳，黄建晔，王余龙*   

  1. 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室/农业部长江中下游作物生理生态与栽培重点开放实验室，江苏扬州225009
  • 收稿日期:2008-10-21 修回日期:2009-02-18 出版日期:2009-07-12 网络出版日期:2009-05-19
  • 通讯作者: 王余龙, Tel: 0514-87979225
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金（30270777和30771275）资助。

Characteristics of Roots Traits in Conventional Indica Rice Cultivars with Large-Panicle

DONG Gui-Chun,LI Jin-Qian,TIAN Hao,YU Xiao-Feng,ZHANG Biao,ZHANG Chuan-Shen,ZHANG Yue-Fang,HUANG Jian-Ye,WANG Yu-Long   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology,Ecology and Cultivation in Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River of Ministry of Agriculture,Yanghzou University,Yangzhou 225009,China
  • Received:2008-10-21 Revised:2009-02-18 Published:2009-07-12 Published online:2009-05-19
  • Contact: WANG Yu-Long, Tel: 0514-87979225

PDF

1318

被引次数

28

摘要：

在群体水培条件下，以国内、外不同年代育成的常规籼稻代表品种(2001年为88个、2002年为122个)为材料，测定干物重(包括根系)、根系性状和根系活性、产量及其构成因素等，采用组内最小平方和的动态聚类方法将供试品种按单穗重从低到高依次分为A、B、C、D、E、F 6类，研究各类品种根系的基本特点。结果表明，供试品种间单穗重的差异很大(两年分别相差493%和764%)，A、B、C、D、E、F类品种的平均单穗重，2001年分别为0.99、1.56、2.00、2.54、3.16、4.08 g，2002年分别为0.82、1.38、1.80、2.38、3.04、4.29 g。大穗型品种每株不定根总长、每株根干重、每株根系总吸收面积显著大于小穗型品种。大穗型品种每穗根数、每穗根重、每穗根长、每穗根系总吸收面积、每穗根系活跃吸收面积、每穗根系活性显著优于小穗型品种。多元回归分析表明，显著影响单穗重的主要根系性状是每穗根长、每穗根重、抽穗期冠根比、每穗根系总活力，决定系数为0.620~0.639。随着每穗根长、每穗根重、抽穗期冠根比、每穗根系总活力提高单穗重显著增加。

关键词: 籼稻, 品种, 穗重, 根系性状, 根系活性

Abstract:

Eighty-eight and one hundred and twenty two conventional indica rice cultivars were solution-cultured in 2001 and 2002, respectively. Dry matter weight (including root system, culm and sheath, leaves, panicle), root traits, root physiological activity, yield and its components were measured. The tested rice cultivars were classified into six types (i.e. A, B, C, D, E, and F, A was the lowest, and F was the highest) based on their panicle weight level by the MinSSw method, to study their differences of root traits, root physiological activity. Difference of panicle weight of the cultivars used in this study was very large (the ratio of the maximal panicle weight to the minimum panicle weight in 2001 and 2002 were 493% and 764%, respectively), the average of panicle weight was 0.99, 1.56, 2.00, 2.54, 3.16, and 4.08 grams per panicle in 2001, and 0.82, 1.38, 1.80, 2.38, 3.04, and 4.29 grams per paniclein 2002, respectively. Root dry weight per plant, total length of adventitious roots per plant, and total root absorption area per plant in large-panicle type cultivars higher than those in small-panicle type cultivars. Number of adventitious roots per panicle, root dry weight per panicle, length of adventitious roots per panicle, total root absorption area per panicle, root active absorption area per panicle, and root activity per panicle in large-panicle type cultivars were higher than those in small-panicle type cultivars. Polynomial regression analysis showed that panicle weight was significantly influenced by length of adventitious roots per panicle, root dry weight per panicle, ratio of shoot to root at heading stage, root activity per panicle, and the determinant coefficient ranged from 0.620 to 0.639. Larger panicle weight could be reached by increasing length of adventitious roots per panicle, root dry weight per panicle, ratio of shoot to root at heading stage, root activity per panicle.

Key words: Conventional indica rice, Cultivars, Panicle weight, Root traits, Root physiological activity


[1] Kawada S(川田信一郎). Root System of Rice (水稻的根). Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1984

[2] Ling Q-H(凌启鸿), Ling L(凌励). Studies on the functions of roots at different nodepositions and their relation to the yield formation in rice plants. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1984, 17(4): 3-11(in Chinese with English abstract)


[3] Ling Q-H(凌启鸿), Lu W-P(陆卫平), Cai J-Z(蔡建中). Study on root activities with leaf-age-progress in different rice varieties. J Jiangsu Agric Coll (江苏农学院学报), 1987, 8(3): 25-28(in Chinese with English abstract)

[4] Shi Q-H(石庆华), Huang Y-J(黄英金), Li M-Y(李木英), Zhang P-L(张佩莲). Preliminary studies on the relationship between the characteristics of roots and shoots in rice. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis (江西农业大学学报), 1995, 17(2): 110-115(in Chinese with English abstract)

[5] Lu D-Z(陆定志). Relationship between physiological heterosis of root and shoot system of hybrid rice Shanyou 6. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 1987, 1(2): 81-94(in Chinese with English abstract)

[6] Wu Y-X(吴岳轩), Wu Z-Q(吴振球). Effect of sowing date on the morphological development and physiological activities of the root system of intersubspecific hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1996, 22(2): 178-184(in Chinese with English abstract)


[7] Wang Y-L(王余龙), Chen L(陈林), Yao Y-L(姚友礼), Li T-Y(李昙云), Jiang J-M(蒋军民), Cai J-Z(蔡建中). The varietal difference in rooting and root activity of rice. J Jiangsu Agric Coll (江苏农学院学报), 1994, 15(1): 11-16(in Chinese with English abstract)

[8] Wang Y-L(王余龙), Cai J-Z(蔡建中), He J-S(何杰升), Chen L(陈林), Xu J-K(徐家宽), Bian Y(卞悦). The relationships between spikelet-root activity and grain filling and ripening in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron Sin(作物学报), 1992, 18(3): 81-89(in Chinese with English abstract)

[9] Wang Y-L(王余龙), Yao Y-L(姚友礼), Liu B-Y(刘宝玉), Lü Z-L(吕贞龙), Huang J-Y(黄建晔), Xu J-K(徐家宽), Cai J-Z(蔡建中). Effect of nitrogen supplying levels and timings on the development of roots in hybrid indica rice. Acta Agron Sin(作物学报), 1997, 23(6): 699-706(in Chinese with English abstract)

[10] Zhu D-F(朱德峰), Lin X-Q(林贤青), Zhao W-X(曹卫星). Effects of deep roots on growth and yield in two rice varieties. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2001, 34(4): 429-432 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11] Liu T-J(刘桃菊), Qi C-H(戚昌瀚), Tang J-J(唐建军). Studies on relationship between the character parameters of root and yield formation in rice. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2002, 35(11): 1416-1419(in Chinese with English abstract)


[12] Dong G-C(董桂春), Wang Y-L(王余龙), Wu H(吴华), Zhou X-D(周小冬), Shan Y-H(单玉华), Wang J-G(王坚钢), Cai H-R(蔡惠荣), Cai J-Z(蔡建中). Varietal differences in response of main root traits to nitrogen application time in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron Sin(作物学报), 2003, 29(6): 871-877 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[13] Dong G-C(董桂春), Wang Y-L(王余龙), Huang J-Y(黄建晔), Wu H(吴华), Yang L-X(杨连新), Shan Y-H(单玉华), Yao Y-L(姚友礼), Cai J-Z(蔡建中). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer applied at different growth stages on root growth and grain yield of Yangdao 6 rice (Oryza sativa L.). Jiangsu Agric Res (江苏农业研究), 2001, 22(3): 13-17 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14] Shi Q-H(石庆华). Studies concerning the effects of root characteristics on the formation of yield in hybrid rice and large-panicle type varieties. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis (江西农业大学学报), 1984, 6(2): 71-79 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15] Tong J-H(童建华), Jie Y-C(揭雨成), Zhao J-R(赵介仁). Studies on the comparison of root systems of seedlings between hybrid rice and conventional rice. Hybrid Rice(杂交水稻), 1995,10(2): 20-22(in Chinese with English abstract)

[16] Zhou H-Q(周汉钦), Lin Q-S(林青山), Chen W-F(陈文丰), Jiang Y-J(江奕君), Chen J-B(程俊彪), Huang Y-X(黄耀祥). Preliminary studies on characteristics of root of super high yielding and top quality rice varieties. J Guangdong Agric Sci (广东农业科学), 1997, 33(6): 11-14 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[17] Chen X-B(陈信波), Liao A-J(廖爱君), Luo Z-M(罗泽民). Physiological properties of the roots and leaves of a high yield rice line at the late growth stage. Life Sci Res(生命科学研究), 1999, 3(3): 250-255 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[18] Dong G-C(董桂春), Wang Y-L(王余龙), Wu H(吴华), Wang J-G(王坚刚), Cai H-R(蔡惠荣), Cai J-Z(蔡建中). Varietal differences in components of panicle weight in rice. J Yangzhou Univ (Agric & Life Sci Edn)(扬州大学学报×农业与生命科学版), 2003, 24(4): 62-66 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[19] Zhou X-D(周晓冬), Dong G-C(董桂春), Zhang Y-F(张岳芳), Chen P-F(陈培峰), Yang L-X(杨连新), Huang J-Y(黄建晔), Gong K-C(龚克成), Wang Y-L(王余龙). Study on relation between roots traits and components of panicle weight. J Jiangsu Agric Sci (江苏农业科学), 2007, 35(4): 5-7 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[20] Gu S-L(顾世梁), Mo H-D(莫惠栋). A new dynamic clustering Method-MinSSw method. J Jiangsu Agric Coll (江苏农学院学报), 1989, 10(4): 1-8 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[21] Chen J(陈健). Comparative study on roots of indica and japonica varieties and their hybrids. J Shenyang Agric Univ (沈阳农业大学学报), 1991, 22(suppl): 99-105

[22] Dong G-C(董桂春), Wang Y-L(王余龙), Wang J-G(王坚钢), Shan Y-H(单玉华), Ma A-J(马爱京), Yang H-J(杨洪建), Zhang C-S(张传胜), Cai H-R(蔡惠荣). Differences of root traits among varietal types in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron Sin(作物学报), 2002, 28(6): 749-755 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23] Zhang C-S(张传胜), Wang Y-L(王余龙), Long Y-C(龙银成), Dong G-C(董桂春), Yang L-X(杨连新), Huang J-Y(黄建晔). Main root traits affecting yield level in conventional indica rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron Sin(作物学报), 2005, 31(2): 137-143 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[24] Zhang Y-F(张岳芳), Wang Y-L(王余龙), Zhang C-S(张传胜), Dong G-C(董桂春), Yang L-X(杨连新), Huang J-Y(黄建晔), Long Y-C(龙银成). Relationship between accumulation and root traits in conventional indica rice varieties (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron Sin(作物学报), 2006, 32(8): 1121-1129 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[25] Long Y-C(龙银成).Study on the Basic Characteristics of Large Panicle Conventional Indica Arieties and Their Effect on Grain Yield (Oryza sativa L.). MS Dissertation of Yangzhou University, 2004. pp 27-36 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[26] Moita S(森田茂紀), Iwabuchi A(岩渊輝),Yamazaki K(山崎耕宇). Relationships between the growth direction of primary roots and yield in rice plants. Jpn J Crop Sci, 1986, 55: 520-525
Shi Q-H(石庆华), Huang Y-J(黄英金), Li M-Y(李木英), Xu Y-Q(徐益群), Tan X-M(谭雪明), Zhang P-L(张佩莲). Studies on the heredity of root characteristics and correlation between the characteristics of roots and upperground parts in rice. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1997, 30(4): 61-67 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[3] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[4] 闫岩, 张钰石, 刘础荣, 任丹阳, 刘洪润, 刘雪晴, 张明才, 李召虎. 冬小麦-夏玉米轮作“双晚”种植模式下的品种匹配与资源效率[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 423-436.
[5] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[6] 许德蓉, 孙超, 毕真真, 秦天元, 王一好, 李成举, 范又方, 刘寅笃, 张俊莲, 白江平. 马铃薯StDRO1基因的多态性鉴定及其与根系性状的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 76-85.
[7] 傅华英, 张婷, 彭文静, 段瑶瑶, 许哲昕, 林艺华, 高三基. 甘蔗新品种(系)苗期白条病人工接种抗性鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1531-1539.
[8] 习玲, 王昱琦, 朱微, 王益, 陈国跃, 蒲宗君, 周永红, 康厚扬. 78份四川小麦育成品种(系)条锈病抗性鉴定与抗条锈病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1309-1323.
[9] 董明辉, 陈培峰, 江贻, 曹鹏辉, 宋云生, 顾俊荣, 谢裕林, 乔中英, 张文地, 黄丽芬. 江苏太湖地区不同生育类型粳稻品种产量对不同播期气候因子的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 952-963.
[10] 许乃银, 赵素琴, 张芳, 付小琼, 杨晓妮, 乔银桃, 孙世贤. 基于GYT双标图对西北内陆棉区国审棉花品种的分类评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 660-671.
[11] 董玉新, 韦炳奇, 吴强, 张永平. 内蒙古平原灌区“春麦冬播”种植效应及品种适应性[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 481-493.
[12] 雷永, 王志慧, 淮东欣, 高华援, 晏立英, 李建国, 李威涛, 陈玉宁, 康彦平, 刘海龙, 王欣, 薛晓梦, 姜慧芳, 廖伯寿. 花生籽仁蔗糖含量近红外模型构建及在高糖品种培育中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 332-341.
[13] 张荣跃, 王晓燕, 杨昆, 单红丽, 仓晓燕, 李婕, 王长秘, 尹炯, 罗志明, 李文凤, 黄应昆. 甘蔗新品种及主栽品种对褐锈病抗性与Bru1基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 376-382.
[14] 刘少荣, 杨扬, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 康定明, 范亚明, 任洁, 江彬, 葛建镕, 成广雷, 王凤格. 基于农艺及品质性状与SSR标记的青贮玉米品种遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2362-2370.
[15] 吕国锋, 别同德, 王慧, 赵仁慧, 范金平, 张伯桥, 吴素兰, 王玲, 汪尊杰, 高德荣. 长江下游麦区新育成品种(系) 3种主要病害的抗性鉴定及抗病基因/ QTL的分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2335-2347.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2