欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 285-295.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00276

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

覆盖旱种对水稻产量与品质的影响

张自常,孙小淋,陈婷婷,刘立军,杨建昌*   

  1. 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室,江苏扬州 225009
  • 收稿日期:2009-07-21 修回日期:2009-10-03 出版日期:2010-02-10 网络出版日期:2009-12-21
  • 通讯作者: 杨建昌,E-mail: jcyang@yzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30771274),国家科技攻关计划项目(2006BAD02A13-3-2),2008年中央级科研院所基本科研业务费专项基金项目(农业)(200803030),江苏省自然科学基金-创新学者攀登项目(BK2009005)和教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(200811170002)资助。

Effects of Non-flooded Mulching Cultivation on the Yield and Quality of Rice

ZHANG Zi-Chang,SUN Xiao-Lin,CHEN Ting-Ting,LIU Li-Jun,YANG Jian-Chang   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
  • Received:2009-07-21 Revised:2009-10-03 Published:2010-02-10 Published online:2009-12-21
  • Contact: YANG jian-chang,E-mail: jcyang@yzu.edu.cn

摘要:

以超级稻武粳15 (粳稻)和两优培九(籼稻)为材料,从移栽至成熟进行覆膜旱种(PM)、覆草旱种(SM)和裸地旱种(NM)处理,以水种(TF)为对照。结果表明,与TF相比,旱种水稻产量都有不同程度的降低,NM、PM和SM的减产率分别为38.7%~46.5%,9.8%~17.4%和1.7%~7.0%,NM和PM的产量与TF有显著差异,SM的产量与TF差异不显著。SM改善了稻米的加工品质、外观品质和蒸煮品质,NM和PM则降低了稻米这些品质;SM还提高了稻米的最高黏度和崩解值,降低了消减值,NM和PM的结果则相反。两品种的结果趋势一致。SM提高了灌浆期的根系氧化力、叶片光合速率和籽粒中蔗糖-淀粉代谢途径关键酶活性,NM和PM则降低了上述生理指标值。在SM条件下,结实期较高的根系活力、叶片光合速率和籽粒中蔗糖-淀粉代谢途径关键酶活性是获取较高产量和较好稻米品质的重要生理原因。

关键词: 水稻, 腹膜旱种, 覆草旱种, 产量, 品质

Abstract:

Plastic film or straw mulching cultivation under non-flooded condition has been considered as a new water-saving technique in rice production. This study aimed to investigate the yield performance in terms of quality and quantity under such practices. Two super rice cultivars, Wujing 15 (a japonica cultivar) and Liangyoupeijiu (an indica hybrid cultivar) were used with four cultivation treatments from transplanting to maturity: traditional flooding as control (TF), no-flooded plastic film mulching (PM), non-flooded wheat straw mulching (SM), and no flooding and no mulching (NM). Compared with that under TF, grain yield showed some reduction under all the non-flooded cultivations but differed largely among the treatments. The reduction in yield was 38.7–46.5% under NM, 9.8–17.4% under PM, and 1.7–7.0% under SM. The difference in grain yield was significant between NM and TF or between PM and TF, and was not significant between SM and TF. SM significantly improved milling, appearance, and cooking qualities, whereas PM or NM decreased these qualities. SM also significantly increased the peak viscosity and breakdown value, and reduced setback value, and PM or NM had the opposite effect. The two cultivars showed similar trends in quality and quantity of rice yield. SM significantly increased root oxidation activity, leaf photosynthetic rate, and activities of key enzymes in sucrose-to-starch conversion in grains during the grain filling period, whereas PM and NM significantly reduced these parameters. The results indicate that SM could not only maintain a high grain yield, but also improve quality of rice. Increases in leaf photosynthetic rate, root activity, and activities of the key enzymes involved in the sucrose-starch metabolic pathway in grains under SM contributed to a higher grain yield and better quality of rice.

Key words: Rice, Non-flooded plastic film mulching cultivation, Non-flooded wheat straw mulching cultivation, Grain yield, Grain quality


[1]    
Fageria N K. Plant tissue test for determination of optimum concentration and uptake of nitrogen at different growth stages in low land rice. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 2003, 34: 259–270


[2]    
Fageria N K. Yield physiology of rice. J Plant Nutr, 2007, 30: 843–879


[3]    
Belder P, Bouman B A M, Cabangon R, Guoan L, Quilang E J P, Li Y, Spiertz J H J, Tuong T P. Effect of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and water use in typical lowland conditions in Asia. Agric Water Manage, 2004, 65: 193–210


[4]    
Belder P, Spiertz J H J, Bouman B A M, Lu G, Tuong T P. Nitrogen economy and water productivity of lowland rice under water-saving irrigation. Field Crops Res, 2005, 93: 169–185


[5]    
Borrell A, Garside A, Fukai S. Improving efficiency of water use for irrigated rice in a semi-arid tropical environment. Field Crops Res, 1997, 52: 231–248


[6]    
Liu X J, Wang J C, Lu S H, Zhang F S, Zeng X Z, Ai Y W, Peng S B, Christie P. Effects of non-flooded mulching cultivation on crop yield, nutrient uptake and nutrient balance in rice-wheat cropping systems. Field Crops Res, 2003, 83: 297–311


[7]    
Huang Y-D(黄义德), Zhang Z-L(张自立), Wei F-Z(魏凤珍), Li J-C(李金才). Ecophysiological effect of dry-cultivated and plastic film-mulched rice planting. Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 1999, 10(3): 305–308 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[8]    
Liang Y-C(梁永超), Hu F(胡锋), Yang M-C(杨茂成), Zhu X-L(朱遐亮), Wang G-P(王广平), Wang Y-L(王永乐). Mechanisms of high yield and irragation water use efficiency of rice in plastic film muched dryland. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1999, 32(1): 26–32 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[9]    
Fan M S, Liu X J, Jiang R F, Zhang F S, Lu S H, Zeng X Z, Christie P. Crop yields, internal nutrient efficiency, and changes in soil properties in rice-wheat rotations under non-flooded mulching cultivation. Plant Soil, 2005, 277: 265–276


[10] 
Lu X H, Wu L H, Pang L J, Li Y S, Wu J G, Shi C H, Zhang F S. Effects of plastic film mulching cultivation under non-flooded condition on rice quality. J Sci Food Agric, 2007, 87: 334–339


[11] 
Liu T-X(刘天学), Ji X-E(纪秀娥). Effects of crop straw burning on oil organic matter and soil microbes. Soil (土壤), 2003, 35(4): 347–348 (in Chinese)


[12] 
Miura Y, Kanna T. Emissions of trace gases (CO2, CO, CH4, and N2O) resulting from rice straw burning. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 1997, 43: 849–854


[13] 
Liu X J, Ai Y W, Zhang F S, Lu S H, Zeng X Z, Fan M S. Crop production, nitrogen recovery and water use efficiency in rice-wheat rotation as affected by non-flooded mulching cultivation (NFMC). Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst, 2005, 71: 289–299


[14] 
Zhang J-D(章骏德), Liu G-P(刘国屏), Shi Y-N(施永宁). Experimental Method for Plant Physiology (植物生理实验法). Nanchang: Jiangxi People’s Publisher, 1982. pp 52–57 (in Chinese)


[15] 
Supervising Department of Quality and Technology of China (国家质量技术监督局). The National Standard of the People’s Republic of China (中华人民共和国国家标准). Good Quality of Rice Grain (优质稻谷). GB/T17891-1999, 1999 (in Chinese)


[16] 
Ministry of Agriculture, The People’s Republic of China (中华人民共和国农业部). Good Quality and Edible Rice Grains (优质食用稻米). NY147-88, 1988 (in Chinese)


[17] 
Han Y P, Xu M L, Liu X Y, Yan C J, Korban S S, Chen X L, Gu M H. Genes coding for starch branching enzymes are major contributors to starch viscosity characteristics in waxy rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Sci, 2004, 166: 357–364


[18] 
Yang J-C(杨建昌), Wang Z-Q(王志琴), Chen Y-F(陈义芳), Cai Y-X(蔡一霞), Liu L-J(刘立军), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森). Preliminary studies of grain yield and quality of dry-cultivated rice. Jiangsu Agric Res (江苏农业研究), 2000, 21(3): 1–5 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[19] 
Hasegawa T, Fujimura S, Shimono H, Iwama K, Jiteuyama Y. Rice growth and developing limited by root zone temperature. In: Morita S, ed. Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium of the International Society for Root Research. Nagoya, Japan: Published by Japanese Society for Root Research (JSRR), 2001. pp 520–521


[20] 
Funaba M, Ishibashi Y, Molla A H, Iwanami K, Iwaya-Inoue M. Influence of low/high temperature on water status in developing and maturing rice grains. Plant Prod, 2006, 9: 347–354


[21] 
Liu L-J(刘立军), Yuan L-M(袁莉民), Wang Z-Q(王志琴), Xu G-W(徐国伟), Chen Y(陈云). Preliminary studies on physiological reason and countermeasure of lodging in dry-cultivated rice. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2002, 16(3): 225–230 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[22] 
 Cheng F-M(程方民), Jiang D-A(蒋德安), Wu P(吴平), Shi C-H(石春海). The dynamic change of starch synthesis enzymes during the grain filling stage and effects of temperature upon on it. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2001, 27(2): 201–206 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[23] 
Cheng F-M(程方民), Zhong L-J(钟连进), Sun Z-X(孙宗修). Effect of temperature at grain filling stage on starch biosynthetic metabolism in developing rice grains of early-indica. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2003, 36(5): 492–501 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[24] 
Zhong X-H(钟旭华), Huang N-R(黄农荣). Preliminary study on the relationship between rice grain chalkiness and root activity at grain-filling stage. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2005, 19(5): 471–474 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[25] 
Dong M-H(董明辉), Sang D-Z(桑大志), Wang P(王朋), Zhang W-J(张文杰), Yang J-C(杨建昌). Difference in chalky characters of the grains at different positions within a rice panicle. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(1): 101–111 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[26] 
Li Y S, Wu L H, Lu X H, Zhao L M, Fan Q L, Zhang F S. Soil microbial biomass as affected by non-flooded plastic mulching cultivation in rice. Biol Fert Soils , 2006, 43: 107–111


[27] 
Kato T. Change of sucrose synthase activity in developing endosperm of rice cultivars. Crop Sci, 1995, 35: 827–831


[28] 
Ahmadi A, Baker D A. The effect of water stress on the activities of key regulatory enzymes of the sucrose to starch pathway in wheat. Plant Growth Regul, 2001, 35: 81–91
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[4] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[5] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[6] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[7] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[8] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[9] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[11] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[13] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[14] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[15] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!