欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (08): 1315-1323.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01315

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 •    下一篇

betA基因增强小麦的干热风抗性

张伟伟1,何春梅2,张举仁1,*   

  1. 1山东大学生命科学学院, 山东济南 250100; 2山东省农业科学院玉米研究所 / 国家玉米改良中心济南分中心, 山东济南 250100
  • 收稿日期:2010-12-17 修回日期:2011-04-26 出版日期:2011-08-12 网络出版日期:2011-06-13
  • 通讯作者: 张举仁, E-mail: jrzhang@sdu.edu.cn, Tel: 0531-88364350
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家转基因生物新品种培育重大专项(2008ZX08003-004)资助。

Introduction of betA Gene Enhancing Tolerance to Hot-Dry Windy Tolerance in Wheat

ZHANG Wei-Wei1,HE Chun-Mei2,ZHANG Ju-Ren1,*   

  1. 1 School of Life Science, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China; 2 Maize Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Jinan Sub-Center of National Maize Improvement, Jinan 250100, China
  • Received:2010-12-17 Revised:2011-04-26 Published:2011-08-12 Published online:2011-06-13
  • Contact: 张举仁, E-mail: jrzhang@sdu.edu.cn, Tel: 0531-88364350

摘要: 甜菜碱是细胞内重要的渗透调节物质,其积累能有效提高植物对非生物逆境的抗性。以转betA基因小麦和未转基因的野生型为材料,在灌浆期模拟干热风胁迫处理植株3 d,研究干热风对植株生长和籽粒产量的影响。胁迫处理后,转基因植株保持较好长势,叶片青枯失水较少,旗叶持绿面积显著大于野生型。各株系植株的光合作用能力和蔗糖磷酸合成酶(SPS)及蔗糖合成酶(SS)活性在胁迫处理后都下降,转基因植株的净光合速率下降到2.3~3.7 μmol CO2 m-2 s-1,而野生型下降到1.2 μmol CO2 m-2 s-1;野生型植株的SPS和SS活性的下降幅度分别为处理前56.8%和53.9%, 而转基因株系的下降幅度分别为62.3%~69.8%和56.5%~64.5%。干热风胁迫使得各株系植株的旗叶甜菜碱含量升高,但转基因株系的叶片甜菜碱含量比野生型的高18%~87%。在甜菜碱保护作用下,转基因植株在胁迫条件下能够维持较高的光合速率,合成较多的碳水化合物,使得百粒重和单株产量均高于野生型。因此,通过转betA基因可显著提高小麦在干热风处理条件下的甜菜碱含量从而增强其抗干热风能力。

关键词: 小麦, betA基因, 甜菜碱, 干热风抗性, 产量

Abstract: Hot-dry windy climate is the weather phenomenon of low humidity, high temperature, and wind stress occurring simultaneously, which causes great reduction of wheat yield in northern China during grain filling. As a compatible solute in cells, glycinebetaine plays an important role in tolerance to environmental stresses of plants. In this study, we used three betA transgenic wheat lines and their wild type (WT) to disclose the effects of glycinebetaine accumulation on the growth and yield components of wheat plants suffering from hot-dry windy stress for three days. After the hot-dry windy treatment, the transgenic plants maintained more vigorous growth compared with the WT and showed slower dehydration rates of flag leaf with significantly larger green blade area than that of WT. Under the hot-dry windy stress, the photosynthetic ability and the activities of sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) and sucrose synthase (SS) in flag leaf were reduced in both transgenic lines and the WT. However, the reductions were smaller in the transgenic lines than in the WT. After 3-day of stress, the net photosynthetic rates of the transgenic lines fell to 2.3–3.7 μmol CO2 m-2 s-1, while that of the WT plant was 1.2 μmol CO2 m-2 s-1. After the 3-day stress, the activities of SPS and SS were decreased to 62.3–69.8% of the levels before stress treatment in the transgenic lines of those before stress, whereas those were decreased to 56.5–64.5% of the levels before treatment in the WT plant. The glycinebetaine contents in flag leaf were increased in all lines, especially in the transgenic lines (18–87% higher than that of WT). Based on these results, we concluded that under the protection of glycinebetaine, the transgenic plants could maintain higher net photosynthetic rate than that of the WT plant, resulting in more accumulation of carbohydrate and higher grain yield per plant and 100-grain weight after the stress of hot-dry windy stress. Therefore, the betA transgenic wheat might be practical in improving tolerance to the hot-dry windy climate in winter wheat.

Key words: Wheat, betA transgene, Glycinebetaine, Resistance to hot-dry windy, Yield

[1]Liu H J, Kang Y H. Regulating field microclimate using sprinkler misting under hot-dry windy conditions. Biosyst Eng, 2006, 95: 349–358
[2]Saneoka H, Nagasaka C, Hahn D T, Yang W J, Premachandra G S, Joly R J, Rhodes D. Salt tolerance of glycinebetaine-deficient and -containing maize lines. Plant Physiol, 1995, 107: 631–638
[3]Jagendorf A T, Takabe T. Inducers of glycinebetaine synthesis in barley. Plant Physiol, 2001, 127: 1827–1835
[4]Park E J, Jekni? Z, Sakamoto A, DeNoma J, Yuwansiri R, Murata N, Chen T H H. Genetic engineering of glycinebetaine synthesis in tomato protects seeds, plants and flowers from chilling damage. Plant J, 2004, 40: 474–487
[5]Naidu B P, Cameron D F, Konduri S V. Improving drought tolerance of cotton by glycinebetaine application and selection. In: Proceedings of the 9th Australian Agronomy Conference, Australia, Wagga, 1998. pp 355–358
[6]Xing W B, Rajashekar C B. Alleviation of water stress in beans by exogenous glycine betaine. Plant Sci, 1999, 148: 185–195
[7]Chen W P, Li P H, Chen T H H. Glycinebetaine increases chilling tolerance and reduces chilling-induced lipid peroxidation in Zea mays L. Plant Cell Environ, 2000, 23: 609–618
[8]Sakamoto A, Murata N. The role of glycine betaine in the protection of plants from stress: clues from transgenic plants. Plant Cell Environ, 2002, 25: 163–171
[9]Chen T H H, Murata N. Enhancement of tolerance to abiotic stress by metabolic engineering of betaines and other compatible solutes. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2002, 5: 250–257
[10]Lü S L, Yang A F, Zhang K W, Wang L, Zhang J R. Increase of glycinebetaine synthesis improves drought tolerance in cotton. Mol Breed, 2007, 20: 233–248
[11]Saneoka H, Moghaieb R E A, Premachandra G S, Fujita K. Nitrogen nutrition and water stress effects on cell membrane stability and leaf water relations in Agrostis palustris Huds. Environ Exp Bot, 2004, 52: 131–138
[12]Quan R D, Shang M, Zhang H, Zhao Y X, Zhang J R. Engineering of enhanced glycinebetaine synthesis improves drought tolerance in maize. Plant Biotechnol J, 2004, 2: 477–486
[13]Ashraf M, Foolad M R. Roles of glycinebetaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot, 2007, 59: 206–216
[14]He C M, Yang A F, Zhang W W, Gao Q, Zhang J R. Improved salt tolerance of transgenic wheat by introducing betA gene for glycinebetaine synthesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 2010, 101: 65–78
[15]He C M, Zhang W W, Gao Q, Yang A F, Hu X R, Zhang J R. Enhancement of drought resistance and biomass by increasing the amount of glycinebetaine in wheat seedlings. Euphytica, 2010, 177: 151–167
[16]Jones G P. Estimates of solutes accumulating in plants by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1986, 13: 649–658
[17]Wang J-Y(王晶英), Ao H(敖红), Zhang J(张杰). Principles and Techniques for Experiments in Plant Physiology and Biochemistry (植物生理生化实验技术与原理). Harbin: Northeast Forestry University Publishers, 2003. pp 11–12 (in Chinese)
[18]Rorem E S, Walker H G Jr, McCready R.M. Biosynthesis of sucrose and sucrosephosphate by sugar beet leaf extracts. Plant Physiol, 1960, 35: 269–272
[19]Arnon D I. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol, 1949, 24: 1–15
[20]Rufty T W, Kerr P S, Huber S C. Characterization of diurnal changes in activities of enzymes involved in sucrose biosynthesis. Plant Physiol, 1983, 73: 428–433
[21]Yang Q-F(杨巧凤), Jiang H(江华), Xu D-Q(许大全). Changes in photosynthetic efficiency of flag leaves of wheat during development. Acta Phytophysiol Sin (植物生理学报), 1999, 25(4): 408–412 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]Yang X H, Liang Z, Lu C M. Genetic engineering of the biosynthesis of glycinebetaine enhances photosynthesis against high temperature stress in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Physiol, 2005, 38: 2299–2309
[23]Yang X, Wen X, Gong H, Lu Q, Yang Z, Tang Y, Liang Z, Lu C. Genetic engineering of the biosynthesis of glycinebetaine enhances thermotolerance of photosystem II in tobacco plants. Planta, 2007, 225: 719–733
[24]Li Y-H(李永华), Wang W(王玮), Yang X-H(杨兴洪), Zou Q(邹琦). Expression of BADH and betaine content in wheat cultivars with different drought resistance under drought stress. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(4): 425–430 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]Wang Z-L(王振林), He M-R(贺明荣), Fu J-M(傅金民), Tian Q-Z(田奇卓), Yin Y-P(尹燕枰), Cao H-M(曹鸿鸣). Effects of source sink manipulation on production and distribution of photosynthate after flowering in irrigated and rainfed wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1999, 25(2): 162–168 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]Guo W-S(郭文善), Shi J-S(施劲松), Peng Y-X(彭永欣), Feng C-N(封超年), Ge C-L(葛才林), Zhu X-K(朱新开). The effect of high temperature to the transfer of the photosynthate in wheat. Acta Agric Nucl Sin (核农学报), 1998, 12(1): 21–27 (in Chinese)
[27]Lei Z-S(雷振生), Lin Z-J(林作楫), Yang H-M(杨会民), Chen Q-G(陈钦高). Studies on the yield structures and associated physiological basis of high-yielding winter wheat cultivars in Huang-Huai wheat region. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin (华北农学报), 1996, 11(1): 70–75 (in Chinese)
[28]Xiong F-S(熊福生), Gao Y-Z(高煜珠), Zhan Y-C(詹勇昌), Li G-F(李国锋). The relationship between the accumulation and the degrading-enzyme activation in plant leaves. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1994, 20(1): 52–58 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]Li Y-G(李永庚), Yu Z-W(于振文), Jiang D(姜东), Yu S-L(余松烈). Studies on the dynamic changes of the synthesis of sucrose in the flag leaf and starch in the grain and related enzymes of high-yielding wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2001, 27(5): 658–664 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1Pod-D1Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[3] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[4] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[5] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[8] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[9] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[10] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[11] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[12] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[13] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[14] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[15] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!