欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (02): 301-306.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00301

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同氮肥模式对冠层结构及部分生理和农艺性状的影响

徐丽娜，黄收兵，陶洪斌，王云奇，祁利潘，王璞*   

  1. 农业部作物栽培与耕作学重点实验室 / 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院, 北京100193
  • 收稿日期:2011-05-27 修回日期:2011-10-12 出版日期:2012-02-12 网络出版日期:2011-12-01
  • 通讯作者: 王璞, E-mail: wangpu@cau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2009CB118602)和国家玉米产业技术体系项目(CARS-02)资助。

Effects of Different Nitrogen Regimes on Canopy Structure and Partial Phsiological and Agronomic Characters

XU Li-Na,HUANG Shou-Bing,TAO Hong-Bin,WANG Yun-Qi,QI Li-Pan,WANG Pu*   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Farming System, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100093, China
  • Received:2011-05-27 Revised:2011-10-12 Published:2012-02-12 Published online:2011-12-01
  • Contact: 王璞, E-mail: wangpu@cau.edu.cn

PDF

1354

被引次数

30

摘要： 以郑单958为试验材料，设基肥低氮、基肥高氮、第1次氮肥在拔节期施入和不施氮4个处理，研究了施氮模式对冠层结构及部分生理和农艺性状的影响。结果显示，施氮处理各指标均优于不施氮处理。适当减少基肥氮量，具有以下优势，(1)在保证苗期氮肥供给的同时，每公顷节肥90 kg；(2)改善了冠层结构，增加了群体底层的透光率，使穗上叶和整株的茎叶夹角更紧凑，与基肥高氮处理相比分别减少4.33°和4.67°，同时降低了株高和穗位高，缩短了基部节间长度，有效防止茎秆倒伏；(3)与前期高氮处理相比，基肥低氮在灌浆初期叶片的叶绿素相对值和全氮含量均处于较高水平；(4)基肥低氮处理提高了单位面积的株数，并减少了秃尖长度，同时千粒重和穗粒数有所增加，最终获得较高产量。第1次氮肥在拔节期施入，前期控氮时间过长，营养元素失衡，苗期发育不良，不利于产量形成。

关键词: 夏玉米, 氮肥, 冠层, 产量

Abstract: Over-fertilized nitrogen leds to irrational crop canopy in summer maize, and thus negatively affected yield production. Therefore, it is important to study the nitrogen application time and level for the construction of efficient crop canopy. A field experiment was conducted using summer maize Zhengdan 958 with four nitrogen application regimes including low basal nitrogen fertilizer (30 kg ha-1), high basal nitrogen fertilizer (120 kg ha-1), first nitrogen dressing at jointing stage (30 kg ha-1), and zero-nitrogen. The results showed that canopy structure and other indexes were improved by nitrogen input. Slightly reducing of basal nitrogen provided the following advantages: (1) the amount of nitrogen fertilizer was significantly reduced without negative effect to maize seedlings, i.e. 90 kg ha-1 nitrogen saved; (2) the canopy structure was improved with high light transmission rate at the bottom of canopy and more compact leaf structure. Compared with the treatment of high basal nitrogen fertilizer, the leaf angel above ear of canopy and mean leaf angel decreased 4.33° and 4.67° respectively in the treatment oflow basal nitrogen fertilizer. Simultaneously, plant height and ear height were both reduced and the length of the basal stem internodes shortened, which effectively prevented stem from lodging;(3) underlow basal nitrogen fertilizer, canopy SPAD value and nitrogen concentration of the leaf were equivalent with high basal nitrogen treatment; (4) the grain yield was higher under low basal nitrogen fertilizer than under other nitrogen regimes due to the increase of ear number, thousand grain weight, grain number per ear and the decrease of bald tip length of the ear. First nitrogen dressing at jointing stage led to worse nitrogen condition before jointing stage, and thus limited yield formation and crop growth due to runtish seedlings and imbalanced nutrition.

Key words: Summer maize, Nitrogen fertilizer, Canopy, Yield

[1]Zhao B(赵斌), Dong S-T(董树亭), Zhang J-W(张吉旺), Liu P(刘鹏). Effects of controlled-release fertilizer on yield and nitrogen accumulation and distribution in summer maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(10): 1760–1768 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2]Zhu Z-L(朱兆良), Wen Q-X(文启孝). Soil Nitrogen in China (中国土壤氮素). Nanjing: Jiangsu Science and Technology Press, 1992. pp 213–249 (in Chinese)

[3]Baligar V C, Fageria N K, He Z L. Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Cummun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 2001, 32: 921–950

[4]Wang K-J(王空军), Zhang J-W(张吉旺), Dong S-T(董树亭), Jiang G-M(蒋高明). Individual grain yield potential and nitrogen utilization efficiency of Zea mays cultivars widely planted in North China. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2005, 16(5): 879–894 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5]Ma B L, Dwyer L M, Gregorich E G. Soil N amendment, effects on seasonal N mineralization and N cycling in maize production. Agron J, 1999, 91: 1003–1009

[6]Dai J (戴静), Kang Y(康宇). Influence of matching phosphate fertilizer with potash fertilizer on corn’s main property and output. J Shanxi Agric Sci (山西农业科学), 2007, 35(10): 62–64 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Yang Y-S(杨永胜). Effects of nitrogen supply on the growth traits and yield of maize. J Hebei Agric Sci (河北农业科学), 2009, 13(6): 42–43 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Lü L-H(吕丽华), Tao H-B(陶洪斌), Wang P(王璞), Liu M(刘明), Zhao M(赵明), Wang R-Z(王润正). Carbon and nitrogen metabolism and nitrogen use efficiency in summer maize under different planting densities. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(4): 718–723 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]Wei F-Z(魏凤珍), Li J-C(李金才), Wang C-Y(王成雨), Qu H-J(屈会娟), Shen X-S(沈学善). Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer application model on culm lodging resistance in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(6): 1080–1085 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]Mozafar A. Kernel abortion and distribution of mineral elements along the maize ear. Agron J, 1990, 82: 511–514

[11]Walker D A. Regulatory mechanism in photosynthetic carbon mechanism. In: Current Topic in Cellular Regulation. New York: Academic Press, 1976

[12]Guan Y-X(关义新), Lin B(林葆), Ling B-Y(凌碧莹). Interaction effects of light density and nitrogen on maize leaf pigments, chlorophyll fluorescence and energy transition. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2000, 6(2): 152–158 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13]Chen C-Y(陈传永), Hou H-P(侯海鹏), Li Q(李强), Zhu P(朱平), Zhang Z-Y(张振勇), Dong Z-Q(董志强), Zhao M(赵明). Effects of panting density on photosynthetic characteristics and changes of carbon and nitrogen in leaf of different corn hybrids. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(5): 871–878 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]Yu H(鱼欢), Wu H-S(邬华松), Wang Z-J(王之杰). Evaluation of SPAD and Dualex for in-season corn nitrogen status estimation. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(5): 840–847 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]Zhao S-C(赵士诚), Pei X-X(裴雪霞), He P(何萍), Zhang X-Z(张秀芝), Li K-J(李科江), Zhou W(周卫), Liang G-Q(梁国庆), Jin J-Y(金继运). Effects of reducing and postponing nitrogen application on soil N supply, plant N uptake and utilization of summer maize. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2010, 16(2): 492–497 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Ding M-W(丁民伟), Cui Y-H(崔彦宏), Liu M-X(刘梦星), Cui G-M(崔国美), Yang L(杨利). Effect of N application rate time and ratio on dry matter accumulation of summer maize (Zea mays L.). J Agric Univ Hebei (河北农业大学学报), 2007, 30(6): 1–4 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17]Yang G-H(杨国航), Cui Y-H(崔彦宏), Liu S-X(刘树欣). Nitrogen application time on dry matter accumulation and partitioning in summer maize. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2004, 12(suppl): 104–106 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[7] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[8] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[9] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[10] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[11] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[12] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[13] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[14] 闫宇婷, 宋秋来, 闫超, 刘爽, 张宇辉, 田静芬, 邓钰璇, 马春梅. 连作秸秆还田下玉米氮素积累与氮肥替代效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 962-974.
[15] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2