欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (02): 307-314.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00307

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

播插方式对超级粳稻宁粳3号产量及群体均衡性的影响

王端飞1，李刚华1，耿春苗1，杜永林2，黎泉1，丁艳锋1,*   

  1. 1 南京农业大学农业部南方作物生理生态重点开放实验室, 江苏南京210095；2 江苏省作物栽培指导站，江苏南京210036
  • 收稿日期:2011-06-01 修回日期:2011-09-09 出版日期:2012-02-12 网络出版日期:2011-11-07
  • 通讯作者: 丁艳锋, E-mail: dingyf@njau.edu.cn, Tel: 025-84395033
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家星火计划(2010GA690010)，国家农业科技成果转化资金项目(2010GB23600670)和国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD16B14)资助。

Effect of Seeding and Transplanting Methods on Yield and Uniformity of Population Indices of Super Japonica Rice Ningjing 3

WANG Duan-Fei,LI Gang-Hua,GENG Chun-Miao,DU Yong-Lin,LI Quan,DING Yan-Feng*   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; 2 Jiangsu Agro Technical Extension Center, Nanjing 210036, China
  • Received:2011-06-01 Revised:2011-09-09 Published:2012-02-12 Published online:2011-11-07
  • Contact: 丁艳锋, E-mail: dingyf@njau.edu.cn, Tel: 025-84395033

PDF

1177

被引次数

14

摘要： 2009—2010年以超级稻宁粳3号为材料，设置小苗机插(MT)、手工撒播(BS)、条播(DS)、穴播(HS)、精量手栽(PT)、循环手栽(CT)和等距手栽(ET) 7种种植方式，研究不同种植方式对水稻群体均衡性的影响，并分析水稻群体均衡性与产量的关系。结果表明，产量高低依次为精量手栽、机插、等距手栽、撒播、循环手栽、穴播、条播。宁粳3号穗粒数、一二次枝梗数和穗层分布整齐度与产量呈显著或极显著的正相关关系，表明群体均衡性差异是造成不同栽培方式产量差异的原因之一，群体均衡性越高产量越高。营养生长期的差异是造成宁粳3号机插、手栽和直播3种栽培方式间群体均衡性差异的主要原因。精量手栽方式分蘖营养生长时间长，穗层分布均匀、群体均衡。直播方式可利用分蘖叶位少，且各叶位发生的分蘖营养生长时间短，穗型小，群体均衡性较差。机插方式群体均衡性介于精量手栽与直播方式之间。

关键词: 超级稻, 栽培方式, 均衡性, 产量

Abstract: To study the influence of different cultivation methods on rice yield and uniformity of populationindices, We conducted a field experiment with seven treatments including machine transplanting (MT), broadcast seeding (BS), drill seeding (DS) and hole seeding (HS), precision hand transplanting (PT), cycle hand transplanting (CT), and equidistance hand transplanting (ET) in 2009 and 2010, using super-rice Ningjing 3 as material. The results showed that the grain yield of PT was the highest, followed by MT, ET, BS, CT, HS, and DS. Uniformity of population indices was the main influence factor of yield, the coefficient of variation (CV) of spikelets per panicle, primary and secondary branch number and panicle position distribution of Ningjing 3 were significantly positively correlated with grain yield. The difference of population uniformity of Ningjing 3 between machine transplanting, hand transplanting and direct-seeding was mainly due to the different durations of vegetative growth period. PT treatment had longer vegetative growth duration of tillers in all leaf ages, bigger panicle and more uniformity. In DS treatment, uniformity of population indices of Ningjing 3 was poor with the less tiller number, short vegetative growth period and small panicle, thus the yield was the lowest.

Key words: Super japonica rice, Cultivation methods, Uniformity of population indices, Grain yield

[1]Liu W D, Tollenaar M, Stewart G, Deen W. Response of corn grain yield to spatial and temporal variability in emergence. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 847–854
[2]Turner M, Rabiaowltz D R. Factors affecting frequency distribution of plant mass: the absence of dominance and suppression in Fistula paradoxa. Ecology, 1983, 64: 469–475
[3]Weiner J. Size hierarchies in experimental populations of annual plants. Ecology, 1985, 66: 743–755
[4]Martin K L, Hodgen P J, Freeman K W, Ricardo M, Arnall D B, Teal R K, Mullen R W, Desta K, Phillips S B, Solie J B, Stone M L, Octavio C, Fernando S, Agustin B, Francis D D, Schepers J S, Hatfield J, Raun W R. Plant-to-plant variability in corn production. Agron J, 2005, 97: 1603–1611
[5]Gu W-L(顾慰连), Dai J-Y(戴俊英), Liu J-M(刘俊明). Relationship between maize field uniformity and grain yield. Liaoning Agric Sci (辽宁农业科学), 1984, (4): 9–13 (in Chinese)
[6]Hou A-M(侯爱民), Meng C-X(孟长先), Yang X-W(杨先文), Wang X-Q(王新勤). Study on uniformity of corn main agronomic traits and yield. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2003, 11(2): 62–65 (in Chinese)
[7]Arnall D B, Raun W R, Solie J B, Stone M L, Johnson G V, Girma K, Freeman K W, Teal R K, Martin K L. Relationship between coefficient of variation measured by spectral reflectance and plant density at early growth stages in winter wheat. J Plant Nutr, 2006, 29: 1983–1997
[8]Ling Q-H(凌启鸿), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Ding Y-F(丁艳锋), Zhang Y-B(张益斌). Advances in high-yielding techniques in rice-precise and quantitative cultivation. China Rice (中国稻米), 2005, (1): 3–7 (in Chinese)
[9]Peng C-Q(彭长青), Li S-F(李世峰), Bian X-M(卞新民), Wu J-L(吴九林), Zhou Y(周宇), Liu R-R(刘蓉蓉). Appropriate parameters for high-yielding cultivation of machine-transplanted rice. Chin J App Ecol (应用生态学报), 2006, 17(9): 1619–1623 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]He R-Y(何瑞银), Luo H-Y(罗汉亚), Li Y-T(李玉同), Wang X-H(汪小函), Zhang L(张璐). Comparison and analysis of different rice planting methods in China. Tran CSAE (农业工程学报), 2008, 24(1): 167–171 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Luo X-W(罗锡文), Xie F-P(谢方平), Qu Y-G(区颖刚), Li B-X(李佰祥), Zheng D-K(郑丁科). Experimental investigation of different transplanting methods in paddy production. Tran CSAE (农业工程学报), 2004, 20(1): 136–139 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Qiao J(乔晶), Wang Q-S(王强盛), Wang S-H(王绍华), Liu Z-H(刘正辉), Hao J-H(郝建华), Ding Y-F(丁艳锋). Effects of basic seedlings on tiller emerging and ear-bearing of machine-transplanted hybrid japonica rice. J Nanjing Agric Univ (南京农业大学学报), 2010, 33(1): 6–10 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Sun Z-G(孙政国), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Li J-L(李建龙), Qian W-D(钱伟东), Wang K-F(王科峰). Comparison different planting methods about direct sowing rice after wheat no tillage. J Jiangsu Agric Sci (江苏农业科学), 2010, (5): 88–90 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Li W-K(李维科), Lan B-X(蓝碧秀), Huang S-M(黄绍民). Comparison of no tillage direct sowing rice with tradition cultivation methods of Teyou 649. China Rice (中国稻米), 2007, (4): 58–59 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Yan C(闫川), Ding Y-F(丁艳锋), Wang Q-S(王强盛), Li G-H(李刚华), Huang P-S(黄丕生), Wang S-H(王绍华). Effects of row-spacing on morphological and eco-physiological characteristics in rice. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2007, 21(5): 530–536 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Wang J-L(王建林), Xu Z-J(徐正进). Effects of panicle type and row spacing on light distribution of rice canopy. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2005, 19(5): 422–426 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]Ling Q-H(凌启鸿), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Cheng G-L(程庚令), Zhu J(朱佶), Lu W-R(陆文瑞). Cultivation techniques of IR24 in large area high yield –discussion by small group but strong individual cultivation patterns. J Jiangsu Agric Sci (江苏农业科学), 1982, (9): 1–10 (in Chinese)
[18]Dai Q-G(戴其根), Huo Z-Y(霍中洋), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Su B-L(苏宝林), Xu K(许轲), Qiu F(邱枫). The eco-physiological mechanism of growth, development and yield formation of broadcasted rice seedlings: II. The characteristics of spatial distribution of plant on perpendicular and its eco-physiological effect. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2001, 27(5): 600–611 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]Lei H-S(雷宏俶), Xi B-H(奚鼎保), Yan R-H(严荣华). The study of uniformity in rice field. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1963, 2(2): 131–146 (in Chinese )
[20]Zhang J-G(张俊国), Li C(李彻), Zhang S-Y(张三元), Shi Y-H(石玉海),Yang G-L(杨桂兰), Zhao J-S(赵劲松). The comparison analysis for the uniformity of the population in different round grained rice varieties: I .The difference among different varieties of uniformity and the influence to the yield. J Jilin Agric Sci (吉林农业科学), 1998, (2): 23–27 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Ling Q-H(凌启鸿), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Su Z-F(苏祖芳), Ling L(凌励). Leaf Age Model of Rice (水稻叶龄模式). Beijing: Science Press, 1994. pp 243−327 (in Chinese)
[22]Li J(李杰), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Gong J-L(龚金龙), Chang R(常勇), Wu G-C(吴桂成), Guo Z-H(郭振华), Dai Q-G(戴其根), Huo Z-Y(霍中洋), Xu K(许轲), Wei H-Y(魏海燕). Tillering characteristics and its relationships with population productivity of super rice under different cultivation methods in rice-wheat cropping areas. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2011, 37(2): 309–320 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]Counce P A, Siebenmorgen T J, Poag M A, Holloway G E, Kocher M F, Lu R. Panicle emergence of tiller types and grain yield of tiller order for direct-seeded rice cultivars. Field Crops Res, 1996, 47: 235–242
[24]Cao W-X(曹卫星). Theory of Crops Cultivation (作物栽培总论). Beijing: Science Press, 2006. pp 34–43 (in Chinese)
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[9] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[10] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[11] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[12] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[13] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[14] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[15] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2