欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (02): 301-306.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00301

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同氮肥模式对冠层结构及部分生理和农艺性状的影响

徐丽娜，黄收兵，陶洪斌，王云奇，祁利潘，王璞*   

  1. 农业部作物栽培与耕作学重点实验室 / 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院, 北京100193
  • 收稿日期:2011-05-27 修回日期:2011-10-12 出版日期:2012-02-12 网络出版日期:2011-12-01
  • 通讯作者: 王璞, E-mail: wangpu@cau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2009CB118602)和国家玉米产业技术体系项目(CARS-02)资助。

Effects of Different Nitrogen Regimes on Canopy Structure and Partial Phsiological and Agronomic Characters

XU Li-Na,HUANG Shou-Bing,TAO Hong-Bin,WANG Yun-Qi,QI Li-Pan,WANG Pu*   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Farming System, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100093, China
  • Received:2011-05-27 Revised:2011-10-12 Published:2012-02-12 Published online:2011-12-01
  • Contact: 王璞, E-mail: wangpu@cau.edu.cn

PDF

1542

被引次数

30

摘要： 以郑单958为试验材料，设基肥低氮、基肥高氮、第1次氮肥在拔节期施入和不施氮4个处理，研究了施氮模式对冠层结构及部分生理和农艺性状的影响。结果显示，施氮处理各指标均优于不施氮处理。适当减少基肥氮量，具有以下优势，(1)在保证苗期氮肥供给的同时，每公顷节肥90 kg；(2)改善了冠层结构，增加了群体底层的透光率，使穗上叶和整株的茎叶夹角更紧凑，与基肥高氮处理相比分别减少4.33°和4.67°，同时降低了株高和穗位高，缩短了基部节间长度，有效防止茎秆倒伏；(3)与前期高氮处理相比，基肥低氮在灌浆初期叶片的叶绿素相对值和全氮含量均处于较高水平；(4)基肥低氮处理提高了单位面积的株数，并减少了秃尖长度，同时千粒重和穗粒数有所增加，最终获得较高产量。第1次氮肥在拔节期施入，前期控氮时间过长，营养元素失衡，苗期发育不良，不利于产量形成。

关键词: 夏玉米, 氮肥, 冠层, 产量

Abstract: Over-fertilized nitrogen leds to irrational crop canopy in summer maize, and thus negatively affected yield production. Therefore, it is important to study the nitrogen application time and level for the construction of efficient crop canopy. A field experiment was conducted using summer maize Zhengdan 958 with four nitrogen application regimes including low basal nitrogen fertilizer (30 kg ha-1), high basal nitrogen fertilizer (120 kg ha-1), first nitrogen dressing at jointing stage (30 kg ha-1), and zero-nitrogen. The results showed that canopy structure and other indexes were improved by nitrogen input. Slightly reducing of basal nitrogen provided the following advantages: (1) the amount of nitrogen fertilizer was significantly reduced without negative effect to maize seedlings, i.e. 90 kg ha-1 nitrogen saved; (2) the canopy structure was improved with high light transmission rate at the bottom of canopy and more compact leaf structure. Compared with the treatment of high basal nitrogen fertilizer, the leaf angel above ear of canopy and mean leaf angel decreased 4.33° and 4.67° respectively in the treatment oflow basal nitrogen fertilizer. Simultaneously, plant height and ear height were both reduced and the length of the basal stem internodes shortened, which effectively prevented stem from lodging;(3) underlow basal nitrogen fertilizer, canopy SPAD value and nitrogen concentration of the leaf were equivalent with high basal nitrogen treatment; (4) the grain yield was higher under low basal nitrogen fertilizer than under other nitrogen regimes due to the increase of ear number, thousand grain weight, grain number per ear and the decrease of bald tip length of the ear. First nitrogen dressing at jointing stage led to worse nitrogen condition before jointing stage, and thus limited yield formation and crop growth due to runtish seedlings and imbalanced nutrition.

Key words: Summer maize, Nitrogen fertilizer, Canopy, Yield

[1]Zhao B(赵斌), Dong S-T(董树亭), Zhang J-W(张吉旺), Liu P(刘鹏). Effects of controlled-release fertilizer on yield and nitrogen accumulation and distribution in summer maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(10): 1760–1768 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2]Zhu Z-L(朱兆良), Wen Q-X(文启孝). Soil Nitrogen in China (中国土壤氮素). Nanjing: Jiangsu Science and Technology Press, 1992. pp 213–249 (in Chinese)

[3]Baligar V C, Fageria N K, He Z L. Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Cummun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 2001, 32: 921–950

[4]Wang K-J(王空军), Zhang J-W(张吉旺), Dong S-T(董树亭), Jiang G-M(蒋高明). Individual grain yield potential and nitrogen utilization efficiency of Zea mays cultivars widely planted in North China. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2005, 16(5): 879–894 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5]Ma B L, Dwyer L M, Gregorich E G. Soil N amendment, effects on seasonal N mineralization and N cycling in maize production. Agron J, 1999, 91: 1003–1009

[6]Dai J (戴静), Kang Y(康宇). Influence of matching phosphate fertilizer with potash fertilizer on corn’s main property and output. J Shanxi Agric Sci (山西农业科学), 2007, 35(10): 62–64 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Yang Y-S(杨永胜). Effects of nitrogen supply on the growth traits and yield of maize. J Hebei Agric Sci (河北农业科学), 2009, 13(6): 42–43 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Lü L-H(吕丽华), Tao H-B(陶洪斌), Wang P(王璞), Liu M(刘明), Zhao M(赵明), Wang R-Z(王润正). Carbon and nitrogen metabolism and nitrogen use efficiency in summer maize under different planting densities. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(4): 718–723 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]Wei F-Z(魏凤珍), Li J-C(李金才), Wang C-Y(王成雨), Qu H-J(屈会娟), Shen X-S(沈学善). Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer application model on culm lodging resistance in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(6): 1080–1085 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]Mozafar A. Kernel abortion and distribution of mineral elements along the maize ear. Agron J, 1990, 82: 511–514

[11]Walker D A. Regulatory mechanism in photosynthetic carbon mechanism. In: Current Topic in Cellular Regulation. New York: Academic Press, 1976

[12]Guan Y-X(关义新), Lin B(林葆), Ling B-Y(凌碧莹). Interaction effects of light density and nitrogen on maize leaf pigments, chlorophyll fluorescence and energy transition. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2000, 6(2): 152–158 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13]Chen C-Y(陈传永), Hou H-P(侯海鹏), Li Q(李强), Zhu P(朱平), Zhang Z-Y(张振勇), Dong Z-Q(董志强), Zhao M(赵明). Effects of panting density on photosynthetic characteristics and changes of carbon and nitrogen in leaf of different corn hybrids. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(5): 871–878 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]Yu H(鱼欢), Wu H-S(邬华松), Wang Z-J(王之杰). Evaluation of SPAD and Dualex for in-season corn nitrogen status estimation. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(5): 840–847 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]Zhao S-C(赵士诚), Pei X-X(裴雪霞), He P(何萍), Zhang X-Z(张秀芝), Li K-J(李科江), Zhou W(周卫), Liang G-Q(梁国庆), Jin J-Y(金继运). Effects of reducing and postponing nitrogen application on soil N supply, plant N uptake and utilization of summer maize. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2010, 16(2): 492–497 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Ding M-W(丁民伟), Cui Y-H(崔彦宏), Liu M-X(刘梦星), Cui G-M(崔国美), Yang L(杨利). Effect of N application rate time and ratio on dry matter accumulation of summer maize (Zea mays L.). J Agric Univ Hebei (河北农业大学学报), 2007, 30(6): 1–4 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17]Yang G-H(杨国航), Cui Y-H(崔彦宏), Liu S-X(刘树欣). Nitrogen application time on dry matter accumulation and partitioning in summer maize. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2004, 12(suppl): 104–106 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[6] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[7] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[8] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[9] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[10] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[11] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[12] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[13] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[14] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[15] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2