欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (02): 307-314.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00307

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

播插方式对超级粳稻宁粳3号产量及群体均衡性的影响

王端飞1，李刚华1，耿春苗1，杜永林2，黎泉1，丁艳锋1,*   

  1. 1 南京农业大学农业部南方作物生理生态重点开放实验室, 江苏南京210095；2 江苏省作物栽培指导站，江苏南京210036
  • 收稿日期:2011-06-01 修回日期:2011-09-09 出版日期:2012-02-12 网络出版日期:2011-11-07
  • 通讯作者: 丁艳锋, E-mail: dingyf@njau.edu.cn, Tel: 025-84395033
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家星火计划(2010GA690010)，国家农业科技成果转化资金项目(2010GB23600670)和国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD16B14)资助。

Effect of Seeding and Transplanting Methods on Yield and Uniformity of Population Indices of Super Japonica Rice Ningjing 3

WANG Duan-Fei,LI Gang-Hua,GENG Chun-Miao,DU Yong-Lin,LI Quan,DING Yan-Feng*   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; 2 Jiangsu Agro Technical Extension Center, Nanjing 210036, China
  • Received:2011-06-01 Revised:2011-09-09 Published:2012-02-12 Published online:2011-11-07
  • Contact: 丁艳锋, E-mail: dingyf@njau.edu.cn, Tel: 025-84395033

PDF

1737

被引次数

14

摘要： 2009—2010年以超级稻宁粳3号为材料，设置小苗机插(MT)、手工撒播(BS)、条播(DS)、穴播(HS)、精量手栽(PT)、循环手栽(CT)和等距手栽(ET) 7种种植方式，研究不同种植方式对水稻群体均衡性的影响，并分析水稻群体均衡性与产量的关系。结果表明，产量高低依次为精量手栽、机插、等距手栽、撒播、循环手栽、穴播、条播。宁粳3号穗粒数、一二次枝梗数和穗层分布整齐度与产量呈显著或极显著的正相关关系，表明群体均衡性差异是造成不同栽培方式产量差异的原因之一，群体均衡性越高产量越高。营养生长期的差异是造成宁粳3号机插、手栽和直播3种栽培方式间群体均衡性差异的主要原因。精量手栽方式分蘖营养生长时间长，穗层分布均匀、群体均衡。直播方式可利用分蘖叶位少，且各叶位发生的分蘖营养生长时间短，穗型小，群体均衡性较差。机插方式群体均衡性介于精量手栽与直播方式之间。

关键词: 超级稻, 栽培方式, 均衡性, 产量

Abstract: To study the influence of different cultivation methods on rice yield and uniformity of populationindices, We conducted a field experiment with seven treatments including machine transplanting (MT), broadcast seeding (BS), drill seeding (DS) and hole seeding (HS), precision hand transplanting (PT), cycle hand transplanting (CT), and equidistance hand transplanting (ET) in 2009 and 2010, using super-rice Ningjing 3 as material. The results showed that the grain yield of PT was the highest, followed by MT, ET, BS, CT, HS, and DS. Uniformity of population indices was the main influence factor of yield, the coefficient of variation (CV) of spikelets per panicle, primary and secondary branch number and panicle position distribution of Ningjing 3 were significantly positively correlated with grain yield. The difference of population uniformity of Ningjing 3 between machine transplanting, hand transplanting and direct-seeding was mainly due to the different durations of vegetative growth period. PT treatment had longer vegetative growth duration of tillers in all leaf ages, bigger panicle and more uniformity. In DS treatment, uniformity of population indices of Ningjing 3 was poor with the less tiller number, short vegetative growth period and small panicle, thus the yield was the lowest.

Key words: Super japonica rice, Cultivation methods, Uniformity of population indices, Grain yield

[1]Liu W D, Tollenaar M, Stewart G, Deen W. Response of corn grain yield to spatial and temporal variability in emergence. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 847–854
[2]Turner M, Rabiaowltz D R. Factors affecting frequency distribution of plant mass: the absence of dominance and suppression in Fistula paradoxa. Ecology, 1983, 64: 469–475
[3]Weiner J. Size hierarchies in experimental populations of annual plants. Ecology, 1985, 66: 743–755
[4]Martin K L, Hodgen P J, Freeman K W, Ricardo M, Arnall D B, Teal R K, Mullen R W, Desta K, Phillips S B, Solie J B, Stone M L, Octavio C, Fernando S, Agustin B, Francis D D, Schepers J S, Hatfield J, Raun W R. Plant-to-plant variability in corn production. Agron J, 2005, 97: 1603–1611
[5]Gu W-L(顾慰连), Dai J-Y(戴俊英), Liu J-M(刘俊明). Relationship between maize field uniformity and grain yield. Liaoning Agric Sci (辽宁农业科学), 1984, (4): 9–13 (in Chinese)
[6]Hou A-M(侯爱民), Meng C-X(孟长先), Yang X-W(杨先文), Wang X-Q(王新勤). Study on uniformity of corn main agronomic traits and yield. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2003, 11(2): 62–65 (in Chinese)
[7]Arnall D B, Raun W R, Solie J B, Stone M L, Johnson G V, Girma K, Freeman K W, Teal R K, Martin K L. Relationship between coefficient of variation measured by spectral reflectance and plant density at early growth stages in winter wheat. J Plant Nutr, 2006, 29: 1983–1997
[8]Ling Q-H(凌启鸿), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Ding Y-F(丁艳锋), Zhang Y-B(张益斌). Advances in high-yielding techniques in rice-precise and quantitative cultivation. China Rice (中国稻米), 2005, (1): 3–7 (in Chinese)
[9]Peng C-Q(彭长青), Li S-F(李世峰), Bian X-M(卞新民), Wu J-L(吴九林), Zhou Y(周宇), Liu R-R(刘蓉蓉). Appropriate parameters for high-yielding cultivation of machine-transplanted rice. Chin J App Ecol (应用生态学报), 2006, 17(9): 1619–1623 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]He R-Y(何瑞银), Luo H-Y(罗汉亚), Li Y-T(李玉同), Wang X-H(汪小函), Zhang L(张璐). Comparison and analysis of different rice planting methods in China. Tran CSAE (农业工程学报), 2008, 24(1): 167–171 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Luo X-W(罗锡文), Xie F-P(谢方平), Qu Y-G(区颖刚), Li B-X(李佰祥), Zheng D-K(郑丁科). Experimental investigation of different transplanting methods in paddy production. Tran CSAE (农业工程学报), 2004, 20(1): 136–139 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Qiao J(乔晶), Wang Q-S(王强盛), Wang S-H(王绍华), Liu Z-H(刘正辉), Hao J-H(郝建华), Ding Y-F(丁艳锋). Effects of basic seedlings on tiller emerging and ear-bearing of machine-transplanted hybrid japonica rice. J Nanjing Agric Univ (南京农业大学学报), 2010, 33(1): 6–10 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Sun Z-G(孙政国), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Li J-L(李建龙), Qian W-D(钱伟东), Wang K-F(王科峰). Comparison different planting methods about direct sowing rice after wheat no tillage. J Jiangsu Agric Sci (江苏农业科学), 2010, (5): 88–90 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Li W-K(李维科), Lan B-X(蓝碧秀), Huang S-M(黄绍民). Comparison of no tillage direct sowing rice with tradition cultivation methods of Teyou 649. China Rice (中国稻米), 2007, (4): 58–59 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Yan C(闫川), Ding Y-F(丁艳锋), Wang Q-S(王强盛), Li G-H(李刚华), Huang P-S(黄丕生), Wang S-H(王绍华). Effects of row-spacing on morphological and eco-physiological characteristics in rice. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2007, 21(5): 530–536 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Wang J-L(王建林), Xu Z-J(徐正进). Effects of panicle type and row spacing on light distribution of rice canopy. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2005, 19(5): 422–426 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]Ling Q-H(凌启鸿), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Cheng G-L(程庚令), Zhu J(朱佶), Lu W-R(陆文瑞). Cultivation techniques of IR24 in large area high yield –discussion by small group but strong individual cultivation patterns. J Jiangsu Agric Sci (江苏农业科学), 1982, (9): 1–10 (in Chinese)
[18]Dai Q-G(戴其根), Huo Z-Y(霍中洋), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Su B-L(苏宝林), Xu K(许轲), Qiu F(邱枫). The eco-physiological mechanism of growth, development and yield formation of broadcasted rice seedlings: II. The characteristics of spatial distribution of plant on perpendicular and its eco-physiological effect. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2001, 27(5): 600–611 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]Lei H-S(雷宏俶), Xi B-H(奚鼎保), Yan R-H(严荣华). The study of uniformity in rice field. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1963, 2(2): 131–146 (in Chinese )
[20]Zhang J-G(张俊国), Li C(李彻), Zhang S-Y(张三元), Shi Y-H(石玉海),Yang G-L(杨桂兰), Zhao J-S(赵劲松). The comparison analysis for the uniformity of the population in different round grained rice varieties: I .The difference among different varieties of uniformity and the influence to the yield. J Jilin Agric Sci (吉林农业科学), 1998, (2): 23–27 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Ling Q-H(凌启鸿), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Su Z-F(苏祖芳), Ling L(凌励). Leaf Age Model of Rice (水稻叶龄模式). Beijing: Science Press, 1994. pp 243−327 (in Chinese)
[22]Li J(李杰), Zhang H-C(张洪程), Gong J-L(龚金龙), Chang R(常勇), Wu G-C(吴桂成), Guo Z-H(郭振华), Dai Q-G(戴其根), Huo Z-Y(霍中洋), Xu K(许轲), Wei H-Y(魏海燕). Tillering characteristics and its relationships with population productivity of super rice under different cultivation methods in rice-wheat cropping areas. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2011, 37(2): 309–320 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]Counce P A, Siebenmorgen T J, Poag M A, Holloway G E, Kocher M F, Lu R. Panicle emergence of tiller types and grain yield of tiller order for direct-seeded rice cultivars. Field Crops Res, 1996, 47: 235–242
[24]Cao W-X(曹卫星). Theory of Crops Cultivation (作物栽培总论). Beijing: Science Press, 2006. pp 34–43 (in Chinese)
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[6] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[7] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[8] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[9] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[10] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[11] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[12] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[13] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[14] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[15] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2