欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (01): 110-117.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00110

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

外源SA影响油菜叶表皮蜡质及菌核病抗性的机制

倪郁1,3,王婧1,宋超1,夏瑞娥1,孙正圆1,郭彦军2,李加纳1,3,*   

  1. 1西南大学农学与生物科技学院; 2 西南大学动物科技学院; 3南方山地农业教育部工程技术中心,重庆400716
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-01 修回日期:2012-10-09 出版日期:2013-01-12 网络出版日期:2012-11-14
  • 通讯作者: 李加纳, E-mail: ljn1950@swu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31000122), 重庆市科委自然科学基金计划(cstc2012jjA80022), 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(XDJK2011C007)和教育部作物资源利用创新引智基地(B12006)资助。

Effects of SA Induction on Leaf Cuticular Wax and Resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorurn in Brassica napus

NI Yu1,3,WANG Jing1,SONG Chao1,XIA Rui-E1,SUN Zheng-Yuan1,GUO Yan-Jun2,LI Jia-Na1,3,*   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University; 2 College of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University; 3 Engineering Research Center of South Upland Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400716, China
  • Received:2012-05-01 Revised:2012-10-09 Published:2013-01-12 Published online:2012-11-14
  • Contact: 李加纳, E-mail: ljn1950@swu.edu.cn

摘要:

处于植物地上部分最外层的表皮蜡质被认为是植物抵御病原物入侵的第一道屏障,但表皮蜡质是否及如何参与油菜菌核病防御机制还不清楚。本试验选用2个抗病性不同的油菜品种中双9(抗性品种)和渝油19 (感病品种),对水杨酸(SA)处理后的油菜幼苗接种核盘菌,分析油菜病情指数、叶表皮蜡质含量和晶体结构特征、抗氧化酶活性的变化规律。结果表明,SA处理使中双9号病情指数显著下降,渝油19无显著变化,SA诱导了油菜抗性品种中双9号对菌核病的抗性。接种核盘菌后,中双9PAL活性显著增加,而渝油19显著下降; SA处理植株叶片PALPOD活性显著高于单纯接种植株。渝油19苗期叶表皮蜡质总量显著高于中双9号。SA诱导中双9号蜡质总量及组分含量增加,柱状晶体结构减少,片状结构增加,扩大了蜡质层覆盖叶表面积。渝油19SA处理后蜡质含量无显著变化,晶体结构发生了与中双9号相似的变化,但渝油19蜡质晶体熔融后覆盖叶表面积小于中双9号。综合分析认为防御酶活性及叶表皮蜡质共同参与SA诱导中双9号抗性增强的过程。

关键词: 油菜, 表皮蜡质, 抗性, 水杨酸(SA), 核盘菌

Abstract:

Cuticular wax on the surfaces of higher plants is believed to be the initial defense system to various pathogens. However, whether or how wax deposition in Brassica napus is involved in the resistant mechanism of infecting Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, is still unclear. In the current experiment, two Brassica napus cultivars with different disease resistances, Zhongshuang 9 (resistant) and Yuyou 19 (susceptible), were selected to analyze the dynamics of disease indices, contents and crystal structure of leaf cuticular wax, activities of defense enzymes, and gas exchange indices under the conditions of SA induction and Sclerotinia sclerotiorurn inoculation. The results showed that SA induction significantly reduced the disease index of Zhongshuang 9, increased its resistance, while SA had no significant influence on disease index of Yuyou 19. When the plants were inoculated with S. sclerotiorurn, the activity of PAL in leaf of Zhongshuang 9 increased while that of Yuyou 19 decreased. The activities of PAL and POD in plants with SA induction were significantly higher than those in plants treated with only S. sclerotiorurn inoculation for both cultivars. The content of total wax in leaf of Zhongshuang 9 was significantly lower than that of Yuyou 19. SA induction increased the contents of total wax and wax constituents for Zhongshuang 9, reduced the amounts of rod crystalloid and increased the amounts of plate crystalloid, and increased the leaf area covered with waxes. The contents of waxes for Yuyou 19 were changed insignificantly by SA induction. However, the changes of the wax crystalloid structure of Yuyou 19 by SA induction were similar with those of Zhongshuang 9, except for a lower leaf area covered with waxes. Conclusion is that both defense enzymes and leaf cuticular waxes are involved in the process of increasing resistance induced by SA for resistant cultivar Zhongshuang 9.

Key words: Brassica napus L, Cuticular wax, Resistance, Salicylic acid, Sclerotinia sclerotiorurn

[1]Jenk M A, Joly R J, Peters P J, Rich P J, Axtell J D, Ashworth E N. Chemically induced cuticle mutation affecting epidermal conductance to water vapor and disease susceptibility in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Plant Physiol, 1994, 105: 1239–1245



[2]Ficke A, Gadoury D M, Godfrey D, Dry I B. Host barriers and responses to Uncinula necator in developing grape berries. Phytopathol, 2004, 94: 438–445



[3]Russin J S, Guo B Z, Tubajika K M, Brown L, Cleveland T E, Widstorm N W. Comparison of kernel wax from corn genotypes resistant or susceptible to Aspergillus flavus. Biochem Cell Biol, 1997, 87: 529–533



[4]Zinsou V, Wydra K, Ahohuendo B, Schreiber L. Leaf waxes of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) in relation to ecozone and resistance to Xanthomonas blight. Euphytica, 2006, 149: 189–198



[5]Chen Z-Y(陈志谊), Wang Y-H(王玉环), Yin S-Z(殷尚智). A study on the mechanism of resistance to sheath blight in rice. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1992, 25(4): 41–46 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]Ashraf M, Zafar Z U. Some physiological characteristics in resistant and susceptible cotton cultivars infected with cotton leaf curl virus. Biol Plant, 1999, 42: 615–620



[7]Li H-Y(李海英), Liu Y-G(刘亚光), Yang Q-K(杨庆凯). Studies on the structural resistance to Cercospora sojina Hara in soybean leaves. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2002, 24(2): 74–76 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Kang L-G(康立功), Qi F-K(齐凤坤), Xu X-Y(许向阳), Li J-F(李景富). Relationship between tomato leaf wax and cutin layers with infection by helminthosporium carposaprum. China Veget (中国蔬菜), 2010, (18): 47–50 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]Luo K(罗宽), Zhou B-W (周必文). Rape Disease and Its Governance (油菜病害及治理). Beijing: China Business Press, 1994 (in Chinese)



[10]Yang B, Rahman M H, Liang Y, Shah S, Kav N N V. Characterization of defense signaling pathways of Brassica napus and Brassica carinata in response to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum challenge. Plant Mol Biol Rep, 2010, 28: 253–263



[11]Guo X M, Stotz H U. Defense against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Arabidopsis is dependent on jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and ethylene signaling. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2007, 20: 1384–1395



[12]Zhang W, Yang X F, Qiu D W, Guo L H, Zeng H M, Mao J J, Gao Q F. Pea T1-induced systemic acquired resistance in tobacco follows salicylic acid-dependent pathway. Mol Biol Rep, 2011, 38: 2549–2556



[13]Kacprzak P, Macioszek V K, Kononowicz A K. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in the protection of plants against pathogenic fungi. Postepy Biol Komorki, 2011, 38: 129–142



[14]Garbay B, Tautu M T, Costaglioli P. Low level of pathogenesis-related protein 1 mRNA expression in 15-day-old Arabidopsis cer6-2 and cer2 eceriferum mutants. Plant Sci, 2007, 172: 299–305



[15]Cajustea J F, González-Candelasa L, Veyrat A, García-Breijo F J, Reig-Arminana J, Lafuentea M T. Epicuticular wax content and morphology as related to ethylene and storage performance of ‘Navelate’ orange fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol, 2010, 55: 29–35



[16]Zhang X-P(臧宪朋), Xu Y-P(徐幼平), Cai X-Z(蔡新忠). Establishment of an inoculation technique system for Sclerotinia sclerotiorum based on mycelial suspensions. J Zhejiang Univ (浙江大学学报), 2010, 36(4): 381–386 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Rosler J, Krekel F, Amrhein N, Schmid J. Maize phenylalanine ammonia-lyase has tyrosine ammonia-lyase activity. Plant Physiol, 1997, 113: 175–179



[18]Olmos E, Piqueras A, Martinez-Solano J R, Hellin E. The subcellular localization of peroxidase and the implication of oxidative stress in hyperhydrated leave of regenerated carnation plants. Plant Sci, 1997, 130: 97–105



[19]Sun N, Song K. Effect of nonthermal treatment on the molecular properties of mushroom polyphenoloxidase. Food Chem Toxicol, 2003, 68: 1639–1643



[20]Kim K S, Park S H, Jenks M A. Changes in leaf cuticular waxes of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) plants exposed to water deficit. J Plant Physiol, 2007, 164: 1134–1143



[21]Mauch-Mani B, Slusarenko A J. Production of salicylic acid precursors is a major function of phenylalanine ammonialyase in the resistance of Arabidopsis to Peronospora parasitica. Plant Cell, 1996, 8: 203–212



[22]Sreedhara H S, Nandini B A, Shetty S A, Shetty H S. Peroxidase activities in the pathogenesis of Sclerospora graminicola in pearl millet seedlings. Int J Trop Plant Dis, 1995, 13: 19–32



[23]Dietrich R A, Delaney T P, Uknes S J, Ward E R, Ryals J A, Dangl J L. Arabidopsis mutants simulating disease resistance response. Cell, 1994, 77: 565–577



[24]Bowling S A, Clarke J D, Liu Y, Klessig D F, Dong X. The cpr5 mutant of Arabidopsis expresses both NPR1-dependent and NPR1-independent resistance. Plant Cell, 1997, 9: 1573–1584



[25]Rate D N, Cuenca J V, Bowman G R, Guttman D S, Greenberg J T. The gain-of-function Arabidopsis acd6 mutant reveals novel regulation and function of the salicylic acid signaling pathway in controlling cell death, defenses, and cell growth. Plant Cell, 1999, 11: 1695–1708



[26]Cao H, Bowling S A, Gordon A S, Dong X. Characterization of an Arabidopsis mutant that is nonresponsive to inducers of systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell, 1994, 6: 1583–1592



[27]Shah J, Kachroo P, Klessig D F. The Arabidopsis ssi1 mutation restores pathogenesis-related gene expression in npr1 plants and renders defense in gene expression salicylic acid dependent. Plant Cell, 1999, 11: 191–206



[28]Rubiales D, Niks R E. Avoidance of rust infection by some genotypes of Hordeum chilensedue to their relative inability to induce the formation of appressoria. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol, 1996, 49: 89–101



[29]Tsuba M, Katagiri G, Takeuchi Y, Yamaoka N. Chemical factors of the leaf surface involved in the morphogenesis of Blumeria graminis. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol, 2002, 60: 51–57



[30]Furtado G Q, Alves S A M, Godoy C V, Salatino M L F, Massola N S. Influence of light and leaf epicuticular wax layer on phakopsora pachyrhizi infection in soybean. Trop Plant Pathol, 2009, 34: 306–312



[31]Shepherd T, Griffiths D W. The effects of stress on plant cuticular waxes. New Phytol, 2006, 171: 469–499



[32]Li J-J(李婧婧), Huang J-H(黄俊华), Xie S-C(谢树成). Plant wax and its response to environmental conditions: an overview. Acta Ecolo Sin (生态学报), 2011, 31(2): 565–574 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[33]Koch K, Hartmann K D, Schreiber L, Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. Influences of air humidity during the cultivation of plants on wax chemical composition, morphology and leaf surface wettability. Environ Exp Bot, 2006, 56: 1–9



[34]Guo Y-J(郭彦军), Ni Y(倪郁), Guo Y-J(郭芸江), Han L(韩龙), Tang H(唐华). Effects of air humidity and soil water deficit on characteristics of leaf cuticular waxes in alfalfa (Medicago staiva).Acta Ecolo Sin (生态学报), 2011, 31(18): 5273–5280 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[35]Smith J A, Blanchette R A, Burnes T A, Gillman J H, David A J. Epicuticular wax and white pine blister rust resistance in resistant and susceptible selections of eastern white pine (pinus strobus). Phytopathol, 2006, 96: 171–177



[36]Raffaele S, Vailleau F, Leger A, Joubes J, Miersch O, Huard C, Blee E, Mongrand S, Domergue F, Roby D. A MYB transcription factor regulates very-long-chain fatty acid biosynthesis for activation of the hypersensitive cell death response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2008, 20: 752–767



[37]José J R, Alexander Y. Surface lipids and plant defenses. Plant Physiol Bioch, 2009, 47: 540–549

[1] 任依涵, 赵曼利, 代晶, 李银水, 顾炽明, 杨璐, 杜雪竹, 胡文诗, 秦璐. 油菜叶片功能氮动态变化对光合速率及光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471.
[2] 蒯婕, 娄洪祥, 谭晓强, 郜耿东, 邵东李, 肖胜男, 赵杰, 徐正华, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生. 直播油菜单产提升的生理基础及实践途径[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 982-992.
[3] 张全军, 吴东丽, 刘聪, 朱永超, 杨大生, 孔祥胜. 1981—2024年长江中下游油菜发育期时空格局演变特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1140-1152.
[4] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
[5] 谭文清, 惠荣奎, 张凡丽, 覃磊, 毛舒香, 邓力超, 郭一鸣, 曲亮, 严明理. 油菜耐渍性快速鉴定及耐渍种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1035-1045.
[6] 王楚锐, 李开祥, 赵志, 肖麓, 唐国永, 赵志刚, 徐亮, 杜德志, 柳海东. 甘蓝型春油菜早花基因BnCRY2功能位点KASP标记的开发及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 708-721.
[7] 鲁雅妮, 丁超杰, 张煜, 杜习军, 齐学礼, 胡琳, 许为钢. 河南省200份小麦品种苗期茎基腐病抗性鉴定与全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 363-375.
[8] 娄洪祥, 幸仁鹏, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 蒯婕, 周广生. 播种期对长江中游甘蓝型油菜光温资源利用效率和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 539-551.
[9] 李瑞, 余意雯, 王敦亮, 田婷, 孙灵湘, 陶玥玥, 孙华. 长江中下游油菜薹油兼用模式菜籽产量特征比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 620-630.
[10] 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362.
[11] 董丽华, 董成艳, 李正楠, 余静, 叶靓, 刘芳, 谭静. 玉米禾谷镰孢穗腐病抗性候选基因的筛选与鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 131-147.
[12] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 基于北纬30°分界的长江中游油菜增产策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 99-117.
[13] 朱家宝, 王先领, 樊友众, 王宗铠, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜茎秆质量和抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 233-248.
[14] 苏爱国, 肖森林, 易红梅, 段赛茹, 王帅帅, 张如养, 邢锦丰, 李春辉, 孙轩, 徐瑞斌, 徐田军, 李志勇, 张勇, 王荣焕, 宋伟, 赵久然. 玉米穗腐病的抗性遗传研究进展与育种应用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 1-13.
[15] 朱锦程, 杨秋华, 程李香, 李文丽, 石明明, 李惠霞, 张峰. 马铃薯抗南方根结线虫种质资源筛选及相关生理反应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2307-2317.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!