作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (07): 1214-1222.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01214
马珍珍1,2,李加纳1,2,Bennjiamin WITTKOP3,Martin FRAUEN4,阎星颖1,2,刘列钊1,2,*,肖阳1,2
MA Zhen-Zhen1,2,LI Jia-Na1,2,Benjiamin WITTKOP3,Martin FRAUEN4,YAN Xing-Ying1,2,LIU Lie-Zhao1,2,*,XIAO Yang1,2
摘要:
以甘蓝型黄籽油菜GH06和甘蓝型黑籽油菜P174为亲本,通过单粒法连续自交8代构建重组自交系群体,应用SSR标记绘制31个连锁群(LGs)的遗传连锁图谱,图谱总长1437.1 cM,相邻标记间的平均距离为3.89 cM。对4个不同环境下RIL8群体中每个株系籽粒含油量、蛋白质、纤维素和半纤维素含量进行了近红外分析,性状相关性表明含油量与其他3个性状均表现负相关,蛋白质含量与纤维素和半纤维素分别表现负相关和正相关。结合构建的遗传图谱采用复合区间作图法分析4个性状QTL,共检测到26个QTL,分布在N2、N3、N8、N9、N11、N13、N16和N17连锁群上,其中8个含油量QTL可解释表型变异的4.96%~21.83%;6个蛋白含量QTL,可解释表型变异的3.12%~14.28%;4个纤维素含量QTL,可解释表型变异的4.60%~17.29%;8个半纤维素含量QTL,可解释表型变异率的6.66%~16.68%。在N8上,发现有含油量QTL与半纤维素含量QTL重叠的区段。在N9上,发现有纤维素含量QTL与半纤维素含量QTL重叠的区段,上述2个区段重叠QTL加性效应方向相反。本研究认为油菜种子含油量、蛋白质、纤维素和半纤维素属于典型的数量性状,受环境影响较大,与这些QTL紧密相关的分子标记可为下一步分子标记辅助育种提供一定技术支撑。
| [1]Wang H-Z(王汉中). Strategy for rapeseed genetic improvement in China in the coming fifteen years. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2004, 26: 98–101 (in Chinese with English abstract)[2]Ecke W, Uzunova M, Weissleder K. Mapping the genome of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): II. Localization of genes controlling erucic acid synthesis and seed oil content. Theor Appl Genet, 1995, 91: 972–977[3]Mahmood T, Rahman M H, Stringam G R, Yeh F, Good A G. Identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for oil and protein contents and their relationships with other seed quality traits in Brassica juncea. Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 113: 1211–1220[4]Gül M, Becker H C, Ecke W. QTL mapping and analysis of QTL× nitrogen interactions for protein and oil contents in Brassica napus L. 11th Int. Rapeseed Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark. 6–10 July, 2003: 91–93[5]Yan X Y, Li J N, Fu F Y, Jin M Y, Chen L, Liu L Z. Co-location of seed oil content, seed hull content and seed coat color QTL in three different environments in Brassica napus L. Euphytica, 2009, 170: 355–364 [6]Mei D-S(梅德圣), Zhang Y(张垚), Li Y-C(李云昌), Hu Q(胡琼), Li Y-D(李英德), Xu Y-S(徐育松). Identification of quantitative trait loci for oil, protein and glucosinolate content in Brassica napus. Chin Bull Bot (植物学报), 2009, 44(5): 536–545 (in Chinese with English abstract) [7]Jin M-Y(金梦阳), Li J-N(李加纳), Fu F-Y(付福友), Zhang Z-S(张正圣), Zhang X-K(张学昆), Liu L-Z(刘列钊). QTL analysis of oil and hull content in Brassica napus L. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2007, 40(4): 677–684 (in Chinese with English abstract) [8]Zhang S F, Ma C Z, Zhu J C, Wang J P, Wen Y C, Fu T D. Genetic analysis of oil content in Brassica napus L. using mixed model of major gene and polygene. Acta Genet Sin, 2006, 33: 171–180[9]Wang D L, Zhu J, Li Z K, Paterson A H. Mapping QTLs with epistatic effects and QTL× environment interactions by mixed linear model approaches. Theor Appl Genet, 1999, 1255–1264[10]Liu H-B(刘宏波), Liu Z-S(刘忠松). Research on distant hybridization compatibility of rape. Crop Res (作物研究), 2006, (5): 456–458 (in Chinese with English abstract)[11]Lister C, and Dean C, Recombinant inbred lines for mapping RFLP and phenotypic markers in Arabidopsis thaliana, Plant J, 1993, 4: 745–750 [12]Wittkop B, Snowdon R J, Friedt W. New NIRS Calibrations for fiber fractions reveal broad genetic variation in Brassica napus Seed Quality. J Agric Food Chem, 2012, 60: 2248–2256[13]Wang S, Basten C J, Zeng Z B. Windows QTL cartographer. Version 2.5 [computer program] department of statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N C. 2006. Available from http://statgen.ncsu.edu/qtlcart/WQTLCart.htm[14]McCouch S R, Cho Y G, Yano M, Paul E, Blinstrub M, Morishima H, Kinoshita T. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genet Newsl, 1997, 14: 11–13[15]Burr B, Burr F A. Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize: theoretical and practical considerations. Trends Genet, 1991, 7: 55–60[16]Ferreira A, Silva M F, da Silva L C, Cruz C D. Estimating the effects of population size and type on the accuracy of genetic maps. Genet Mol Biol, 2006, 29: 187–192 [17]Xu Y, Zhu L, Xiao J, Huang N, McCouch S R. Chromosomal regions associated with segregation distortion of molecular markers in F2 backcross double haploid and recombinant inbred populations in rice (Oryza sativa L). Mol Gen Genet, 1997, 253: 535–545[18]He B, Li J Z, Zheng X W, Shen L S, Lu C F, Chen Y, Zhu L H. Comparison of Molecular Linkage Maps and Agronomic Trait Loci between DH and RIL Populations Derived from the Same Rice Cross. Crop Sci, 2001, 41: 1240–1246[19]Li W M, Tang D Z, WU W R, LU H R, Worland A J. A Molecular map based on an indica/indica recombinant inbred population and its comparison with an existing map derived from indica/japonica cross in rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 2000, 14: 71–78[20]Al-Turki A I, Dick W A. Myrosinase activity in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2003, 67: 139-145[21]Garzon G A. Effect of oil content and pH on the physicochemical of rape oil composites properties. Cereal Chem, 2003, 80: 2–5 [22]Zhang Z-L(张子龙), Wang G-X(王贵学), Tang Z-L(唐章林), Chen L(谌利), Li J-N(李加纳). Optimization of integrated agro-nomic technology for high oil content cultivation of “Yuhuang 1”. J Southwest Agric Univ (Nat Sci) (西南农业大学学报), 2004, 26(4): 401–404 (in Chinese with English abstract) [23]Wu J(武杰), Li B-Z(李宝珍), Chen L(谌利), Tang Z-L(唐章林), Wang Z-Y(王正银), Li J-N(李加纳). Effects of different fertilizer levels on oil content of yellow-coated rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2004, 26(4): 59–62 (in Chinese with English abstract) [24]Shen J X, Fu T D, Yang G S, Ma C Z, Tu J X. Genetic analysis of rapeseed self-incompatibility lines reveals significant heterosis of different patterns for yield and oil content traits. Plant Breed, 2005, 124, 111–116[25]Wu J G, Shi C H, Zhang H Z. Partitioning genetic effects due to embryo, cytoplasm and maternal parent for oil content in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L). Genet Mol Biol, 2006, 29: 533–538[26]Hu Z-L(胡中立), Liu H-L(刘后利). Combining ability analysis for quality characters of Brassica napus and possible approaches of obtaining new germplasms of low glucosinolate content. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1989, 15(3): 221–229 (in Chinese with English abstract)[27]Zhao J, Becker H C, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Ecke W. Oil content in a European × Chinese rapeseed population: QTL with additive and epistatic effects and their genotype environment interactions. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 51–59[28]Dai W(戴维), Niu Y-Z(牛应泽), Guo S-X(郭世星), Jiang J(蒋俊). Analysis of heterosis and combining ability in oil content in Brassica napus L. under different environments. Southwest China J Agric Sci (西南农业学报), 2008, 21(3): 581–585 (in Chinese with English abstract)[29]Si P, Rodney J M, Nick G, David W T. Influence of genotype and environment on oil and protein concentrations of canola (Brassica napus L.) grown across southern Australia. Aus J Agric Res, 2003, 54: 397–407[30]Qiu D, Morgan C, Shi J, Long Y, Liu J, Li R, Zhuang X, Wang Y, Tan X, Dietrich E, Weihmann T, Everett C, Vanstraelen S, Beckett P, Fraser F, Trick M, Barnes S, Wilmer J, Schmidt R, Li J, Li D, Meng J, Bancroft I. A comparative linkage map of oilseed rape and its use for QTL analysis of seed oil and erucic acid content. Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 114: 67–80 [31]Zhang J-F(张洁夫), Qi C-K(戚存扣), Pu H-M(浦惠明), Chen S(陈松), Chen F(陈锋), Gao J-Q(高建芹), Chen X-J(陈新军), Gu H(顾慧), Fu S-Z(傅寿仲). Inheritance and QTL Identification of oil content in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(9): 1495–1501 (in Chinese with English abstract) [32]Burns M J, Barnes S R, Bowman J G, Clarke M H E, Werner C P, Kearsey M J. QTL analysis of an intervarietal set of substitution lines in Brassica napus: I. Seed oil content and fatty acid composition. Heredity, 2003, 90: 39–48 [33]Cao Z Y, Tian F, Wang N, Jiang C C, Lin B, Xia W, Shi J Q, Long Y, Zhang C Y, Meng J L. Analysis of QTLs for erucic acid and oil content in seeds on A8 chromosome and the linkage drag between the alleles for the two traits in Brassica napus. J Genet Genom, 2010, 37: 231–240 |
| [1] | 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657. |
| [2] | 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458. |
| [3] | 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165. |
| [4] | 刘长友, 王珅, 时会影, 沈颖超, 孙蕾, 王彦, 张志肖, 苏秋竹, 田静, 范保杰. 基于饭豆基因资源的小豆远缘杂交群体抗豆象QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 936-944. |
| [5] | 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362. |
| [6] | 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110. |
| [7] | 张飞飞, 何万龙, 焦文娟, 白斌, 耿洪伟, 程宇坤. 小麦抗条锈病相关性状元分析及候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2111-2127. |
| [8] | 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756. |
| [9] | 邵顺伟, 陈卓, 兰振东, 蔡兴奎, 邹华芬, 李晨曦, 唐景华, 朱熙, 张彧, 董建科, 金辉, 宋波涛. 基于BSA-seq技术的块茎芽眼深度QTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1725-1735. |
| [10] | 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724. |
| [11] | 郭栋财, 吕涛, 蔡永生, 买吾鲁达·艾合买提, 全家, 曲延英, 郑凯. 棉花纤维品质相关性状QTL元分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1445-1466. |
| [12] | 张金泽, 周庆国, 肖莉晶, 金海润, 欧阳青静, 龙旭, 晏中彬, 田恩堂. 芥菜型油菜不同组织硫苷含量的QTL定位与候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1166-1177. |
| [13] | 夏琦, 郭滢, 王坤美, 王思忆, 巨建业, 彭雅雯, 刘忠松, 夏石头. 甘蓝型油菜种子和种皮中水杨酸含量与原花色素积累的关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1189-1197. |
| [14] | 林伟津, 郭泽佳, 刘浩, 李海芬, 王润风, 黄璐, 余倩霞, 陈小平, 洪彦彬, 李少雄, 鲁清. 花生荚果产量相关性状QTL定位与候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 969-981. |
| [15] | 王晓琳, 刘忠松, 康雷, 杨柳. 甘蓝型油菜角果长度和每角粒数基因定位以及角果皮转录组动态分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 888-899. |
|
||