欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 1871-1879.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01871

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同生育时期遮阴对大豆形态性状和产量的影响

王一,杨文钰*,张霞,雍太文,刘卫国,苏本营   

  1. 四川农业大学农学院 / 农业部西南作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,四川雅安625014
  • 收稿日期:2013-02-08 修回日期:2013-06-10 出版日期:2013-10-12 网络出版日期:2013-08-01
  • 通讯作者: 杨文钰, E-mail: wenyu.yang@263.net
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2011CB100400)和大豆产业技术体系专项(CARS-04-PS19)资助。

Effects of Shading at Different Growth Stages on Different Traits and Yield of Soybean

WANG Yi,YANG Wen-Yu,ZHANG Xia,YONG Tai-Wen,LIU Wei-Guo,SHU Ben-Ying   

  1. College of Agriculture, Sichuan Agriculture University/Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Ya’an, 625014, China
  • Received:2013-02-08 Revised:2013-06-10 Published:2013-10-12 Published online:2013-08-01
  • Contact: 杨文钰, E-mail: wenyu.yang@263.net

摘要:

间套作是提高土地利用率,促进农作物高产的重要技术,而遮阴限制间套作大豆产量,且间作和套作大豆被遮阴的生育时期不同。为明确不同生育时期遮阴对大豆形态性状和产量的影响,2010—2012年用透光率50%的遮阳网对桂夏2号、南豆12、南冬抗22E61C103遮阴处理,结果表明,不同生育时期遮阴对各形态指标影响程度不同,前期遮阴(VER1VER2)对主茎长、主茎长/茎粗等主茎形态性状有()显著影响,主茎长、主茎长/茎粗比值平均比对照分别高45.75%93.64%;后期遮阴(R1R8R2R8)对分枝数和底荚高度等形态性状有()显著影响,分枝数平均比对照低29.97%,底荚高度平均比对照高28.59%;各品种产量受前后期遮阴影响程度不同,R/V比值低于1.4的品种产量受前期遮阴影响更大,R/V比值大于等于1.5的品种产量受后期遮阴影响更大;相关分析和通径分析结果表明,主茎长、第一节间长、分枝高、主茎长/茎粗比值和主茎长/分枝数比值与单株产量呈极显著负相关,分枝数与单株产量呈极显著正相关,主茎长/茎粗比值和主茎长/分枝数比值是间接反映大豆产量高低的重要指标。

关键词: 大豆, 遮阴, 形态, 产量, 生育时期

Abstract:

Intercropping and relay-intercropping are important technologies to improve land utilization rate and crop yield, but their yields are limited by shading, which is different for intercropped soybean and relay-intercropped soybean at different growth stages. To clear the effect of shading at different growth stages on morphology and yield of soybean, we treated Guixia 2, Nandou 12, Nandongkang 22, E61, and C103 with the 50% transmittance shading net using the natural light as control. The results showed that effects of shading on different morphological characters were different at different growth stages, showing a significant influence on length of main stem and main stem length/stem diameter during the early growth period (VER1 and VER2). Compared with control, the main stem length and main stem length/stem diameter were increased by 45.75% and 93.64% respectively. Shading had significant influence on the number of branches and the height of lowest pod at the late growth stage (R1R8 and R2R8). Compared with control, the number of branches was decreased by 29.97% and the height of lowest pod was increased by 28.59%. The effects of shading on yield of cultivars with different growth periods were different, the cultivars with R/V below 1.4 was affected significantly by the early growth period shading, the cultivars with R/V equal to or greater than 1.5 was easily affected by the late growth stage shading. Results of correlation analysis and path analysis showed main stem length, first internode length, branch height, stem length/stem diameter and stem length/branch number were negatively correlated with yield per plant significantly, branch number was positively and significantly correlated with yield per plant, main stem length/stem diameter and main stem length/branch numbercould be key indexes for yield per plant.

Key words: Soybean, Shading, Morphological, Yield, Growth Stage

[1]Yin Z-L(尹宗伦). Undertaking the task for revitalization of our soybean. J Chin Inst Food Sci Tech (中国食品学报), 2006, 6(4): 1–5 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[2]Yang W-Y(杨文钰), Yong T-W(雍太文), Ren W-J(任万军), Fan G-Q(樊高琼), Mou J-Y(牟锦毅), Lu X-L(卢学兰). Develop relay-planting soybean, revitalize soybean industry. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2008, 27(1): 1–7 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]Wu X(吴迅), Zhang M-R(张明荣), Wu H-Y(吴海英), Huang Y-B(黄玉碧), Liu G-L(刘国林), Yang K-X(杨克相). The status and prospects of soybean with great tolerance to shading in southern of China. Heilongjiang Agric Sci (黑龙江农业科学), 2009, (5): 148–150 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]Liu G-C(刘广才). Difference and Its Mechanism of Interspecific Nutrition Competition in Different Intercropping Systems. PhD Dissertation of Gansu Agricultural University, 2005 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]Li P(李萍), Zhang Y-C(张永成), Tian F(田丰). Research progress on the physiology and ecology and benefit evaluation of potato/faba bean intercropping system. J Anhui Agric Sci (安徽农业科学), 2012, 40(27): 13313–13314 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]Liu C-H(李彩虹), Wu B-Z(吴伯志). Summary of planting patterns on intercropping maize. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2005, 13(2): 85–89 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]Xiao J-X(肖靖秀), Zheng Y(郑毅). Nutrients uptake and pests and diseases control of crops in intercropping system. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2005, 21(3): 150–154 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Dong Z(董钻). Yield Physiology of Soybean. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. pp 55–56 (in Chinese)



[9]Li C-Y(李初英), Sun Z-D(孙祖东), Chen H-Z(陈怀珠), Yang S-Z(杨守臻). Study of the influence of shading stress to the development stages and the form characters of soybean. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2006, 22(9): 170–173 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]Huang Q-C(黄其椿), Li C-Y(李初英), Wu J-M(吴建明), Zhao Y-H(赵艳红), Yang S-Z(杨守臻), Zhao H-T(赵洪涛), Chen H-Z(陈怀珠), Sun Z-D(孙祖东). Influence of shading stress on yield and yield traits of vegetable soybean. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2012, 1(31): 81–91 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]Josephine C H, William B. Light and shade effects on abscission and 14C-photoassimilate partitioning among reproductive structures in soybean. Plant Physiol, 1983, 73: 434–439



[12]Egli D B. Cultivar maturity and response of soybean to shade stress during seed filling. Field Crops Res, 1997, 52: 1–8



[13]Wu Q-L(吴其林), Wang Z(王竹), Yang W-Y(杨文钰). Seeding shading affects morphogenesis and substance accumulation of stem in soybean. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2007, 6(26): 865–872 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Liang Z-L(梁镇林). Studies on variation and difference of characters of stem and leaf between shade-enduring and shade-non-enduring soybeans. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2007, 1(19): 34–41 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Chen H-Z(陈怀珠), Sun Z-D(孙祖东), Yang S-Z(杨守臻), Li C-Y(李初英). Effect of shading on major characters of soybean and preliminary study on the identification method of soybean shade endurance. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2003, 25(4): 76–82 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Huang Q-C(黄其椿), Li C-Y(李初英), Zhao H-T(赵洪涛), Wu J-M(吴建明), Zhao Y-H(赵艳红), Yang S-Z(杨守臻), Chen H-Z(陈怀珠), Sun Z-D(孙祖东). Research of shading-tolerant on vegetable soybean germplasm resources under shading stress. Southwest China J Agric Sci (西南农业学报), 2012, 25(6): 2212–2217 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Sun Z-Q(孙志强), Tian P-Z(田佩占), Wang J-A(王继安). Preliminary study on the growth period structure of soybean varieties in the northeast of China. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1990, 3(9): 198–204 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Fehr W R, Caviness C E. Stages of Soybean Development: Special Report. Iowa State University Press: Ames, Iowa 1977. p 11



[19]Wang Z(王竹), Yang W-Y(杨文钰), Wu Q-L(吴其林). Effects of shading in maize/soybean relay-cropping system on the photosynthetic characteristics and yield of soybean. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(9): 1502–1507 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]Cai K-Z(蔡昆争), Luo S-M(骆世明). Effect of shading on growth, development and yield formation of rice, Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 1999, 2(10): 193–196 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]Liu X-Z(刘贤赵), Kang S-Z(康绍忠). Effects of shading on photosynthesis and yield of tomato plants at different growth stages. Acta Hortic Sin (园艺学报), 2002, 29(5): 427–432 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[22]Lang Y-Z(郎有忠), Dou Y-X(窦永秀), Wang M-E(王美娥), Zhang Z-J(张祖建), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森). Effects of growth duration on grain yield and quality in rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2012, 38(3): 528–534 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]Hou X-L(侯兴亮), Li J-F(李景富), Xu X-Y(许向阳). Effect of low light on morphological and physiological indexes of tomato at different growth stages. Acta Hortic Sin (园艺学报), 2002, 29(2): 123–127 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 陈玲玲, 李战, 刘亭萱, 谷勇哲, 宋健, 王俊, 邱丽娟. 基于783份大豆种质资源的叶柄夹角全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1333-1345.
[2] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[3] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[4] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[5] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[6] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[7] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[8] 王炫栋, 杨孙玉悦, 高润杰, 余俊杰, 郑丹沛, 倪峰, 蒋冬花. 拮抗大豆斑疹病菌放线菌菌株的筛选和促生作用及防效研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1546-1557.
[9] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[10] 于春淼, 张勇, 王好让, 杨兴勇, 董全中, 薛红, 张明明, 李微微, 王磊, 胡凯凤, 谷勇哲, 邱丽娟. 栽培大豆×半野生大豆高密度遗传图谱构建及株高QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102.
[11] 李阿立, 冯雅楠, 李萍, 张东升, 宗毓铮, 林文, 郝兴宇. 大豆叶片响应CO2浓度升高、干旱及其交互作用的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1103-1118.
[12] 彭西红, 陈平, 杜青, 杨雪丽, 任俊波, 郑本川, 罗凯, 谢琛, 雷鹿, 雍太文, 杨文钰. 减量施氮对带状套作大豆土壤通气环境及结瘤固氮的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1199-1209.
[13] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[14] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[15] 王好让, 张勇, 于春淼, 董全中, 李微微, 胡凯凤, 张明明, 薛红, 杨梦平, 宋继玲, 王磊, 杨兴勇, 邱丽娟. 大豆突变体ygl2黄绿叶基因的精细定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 791-800.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!