欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 1871-1879.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01871

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同生育时期遮阴对大豆形态性状和产量的影响

王一,杨文钰*,张霞,雍太文,刘卫国,苏本营   

  1. 四川农业大学农学院 / 农业部西南作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,四川雅安625014
  • 收稿日期:2013-02-08 修回日期:2013-06-10 出版日期:2013-10-12 网络出版日期:2013-08-01
  • 通讯作者: 杨文钰, E-mail: wenyu.yang@263.net
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2011CB100400)和大豆产业技术体系专项(CARS-04-PS19)资助。

Effects of Shading at Different Growth Stages on Different Traits and Yield of Soybean

WANG Yi,YANG Wen-Yu,ZHANG Xia,YONG Tai-Wen,LIU Wei-Guo,SHU Ben-Ying   

  1. College of Agriculture, Sichuan Agriculture University/Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Ya’an, 625014, China
  • Received:2013-02-08 Revised:2013-06-10 Published:2013-10-12 Published online:2013-08-01
  • Contact: 杨文钰, E-mail: wenyu.yang@263.net

摘要:

间套作是提高土地利用率,促进农作物高产的重要技术,而遮阴限制间套作大豆产量,且间作和套作大豆被遮阴的生育时期不同。为明确不同生育时期遮阴对大豆形态性状和产量的影响,2010—2012年用透光率50%的遮阳网对桂夏2号、南豆12、南冬抗22E61C103遮阴处理,结果表明,不同生育时期遮阴对各形态指标影响程度不同,前期遮阴(VER1VER2)对主茎长、主茎长/茎粗等主茎形态性状有()显著影响,主茎长、主茎长/茎粗比值平均比对照分别高45.75%93.64%;后期遮阴(R1R8R2R8)对分枝数和底荚高度等形态性状有()显著影响,分枝数平均比对照低29.97%,底荚高度平均比对照高28.59%;各品种产量受前后期遮阴影响程度不同,R/V比值低于1.4的品种产量受前期遮阴影响更大,R/V比值大于等于1.5的品种产量受后期遮阴影响更大;相关分析和通径分析结果表明,主茎长、第一节间长、分枝高、主茎长/茎粗比值和主茎长/分枝数比值与单株产量呈极显著负相关,分枝数与单株产量呈极显著正相关,主茎长/茎粗比值和主茎长/分枝数比值是间接反映大豆产量高低的重要指标。

关键词: 大豆, 遮阴, 形态, 产量, 生育时期

Abstract:

Intercropping and relay-intercropping are important technologies to improve land utilization rate and crop yield, but their yields are limited by shading, which is different for intercropped soybean and relay-intercropped soybean at different growth stages. To clear the effect of shading at different growth stages on morphology and yield of soybean, we treated Guixia 2, Nandou 12, Nandongkang 22, E61, and C103 with the 50% transmittance shading net using the natural light as control. The results showed that effects of shading on different morphological characters were different at different growth stages, showing a significant influence on length of main stem and main stem length/stem diameter during the early growth period (VER1 and VER2). Compared with control, the main stem length and main stem length/stem diameter were increased by 45.75% and 93.64% respectively. Shading had significant influence on the number of branches and the height of lowest pod at the late growth stage (R1R8 and R2R8). Compared with control, the number of branches was decreased by 29.97% and the height of lowest pod was increased by 28.59%. The effects of shading on yield of cultivars with different growth periods were different, the cultivars with R/V below 1.4 was affected significantly by the early growth period shading, the cultivars with R/V equal to or greater than 1.5 was easily affected by the late growth stage shading. Results of correlation analysis and path analysis showed main stem length, first internode length, branch height, stem length/stem diameter and stem length/branch number were negatively correlated with yield per plant significantly, branch number was positively and significantly correlated with yield per plant, main stem length/stem diameter and main stem length/branch numbercould be key indexes for yield per plant.

Key words: Soybean, Shading, Morphological, Yield, Growth Stage

[1]Yin Z-L(尹宗伦). Undertaking the task for revitalization of our soybean. J Chin Inst Food Sci Tech (中国食品学报), 2006, 6(4): 1–5 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[2]Yang W-Y(杨文钰), Yong T-W(雍太文), Ren W-J(任万军), Fan G-Q(樊高琼), Mou J-Y(牟锦毅), Lu X-L(卢学兰). Develop relay-planting soybean, revitalize soybean industry. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2008, 27(1): 1–7 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]Wu X(吴迅), Zhang M-R(张明荣), Wu H-Y(吴海英), Huang Y-B(黄玉碧), Liu G-L(刘国林), Yang K-X(杨克相). The status and prospects of soybean with great tolerance to shading in southern of China. Heilongjiang Agric Sci (黑龙江农业科学), 2009, (5): 148–150 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]Liu G-C(刘广才). Difference and Its Mechanism of Interspecific Nutrition Competition in Different Intercropping Systems. PhD Dissertation of Gansu Agricultural University, 2005 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]Li P(李萍), Zhang Y-C(张永成), Tian F(田丰). Research progress on the physiology and ecology and benefit evaluation of potato/faba bean intercropping system. J Anhui Agric Sci (安徽农业科学), 2012, 40(27): 13313–13314 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]Liu C-H(李彩虹), Wu B-Z(吴伯志). Summary of planting patterns on intercropping maize. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2005, 13(2): 85–89 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]Xiao J-X(肖靖秀), Zheng Y(郑毅). Nutrients uptake and pests and diseases control of crops in intercropping system. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2005, 21(3): 150–154 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Dong Z(董钻). Yield Physiology of Soybean. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. pp 55–56 (in Chinese)



[9]Li C-Y(李初英), Sun Z-D(孙祖东), Chen H-Z(陈怀珠), Yang S-Z(杨守臻). Study of the influence of shading stress to the development stages and the form characters of soybean. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2006, 22(9): 170–173 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]Huang Q-C(黄其椿), Li C-Y(李初英), Wu J-M(吴建明), Zhao Y-H(赵艳红), Yang S-Z(杨守臻), Zhao H-T(赵洪涛), Chen H-Z(陈怀珠), Sun Z-D(孙祖东). Influence of shading stress on yield and yield traits of vegetable soybean. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2012, 1(31): 81–91 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]Josephine C H, William B. Light and shade effects on abscission and 14C-photoassimilate partitioning among reproductive structures in soybean. Plant Physiol, 1983, 73: 434–439



[12]Egli D B. Cultivar maturity and response of soybean to shade stress during seed filling. Field Crops Res, 1997, 52: 1–8



[13]Wu Q-L(吴其林), Wang Z(王竹), Yang W-Y(杨文钰). Seeding shading affects morphogenesis and substance accumulation of stem in soybean. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2007, 6(26): 865–872 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Liang Z-L(梁镇林). Studies on variation and difference of characters of stem and leaf between shade-enduring and shade-non-enduring soybeans. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2007, 1(19): 34–41 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Chen H-Z(陈怀珠), Sun Z-D(孙祖东), Yang S-Z(杨守臻), Li C-Y(李初英). Effect of shading on major characters of soybean and preliminary study on the identification method of soybean shade endurance. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2003, 25(4): 76–82 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Huang Q-C(黄其椿), Li C-Y(李初英), Zhao H-T(赵洪涛), Wu J-M(吴建明), Zhao Y-H(赵艳红), Yang S-Z(杨守臻), Chen H-Z(陈怀珠), Sun Z-D(孙祖东). Research of shading-tolerant on vegetable soybean germplasm resources under shading stress. Southwest China J Agric Sci (西南农业学报), 2012, 25(6): 2212–2217 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Sun Z-Q(孙志强), Tian P-Z(田佩占), Wang J-A(王继安). Preliminary study on the growth period structure of soybean varieties in the northeast of China. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1990, 3(9): 198–204 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Fehr W R, Caviness C E. Stages of Soybean Development: Special Report. Iowa State University Press: Ames, Iowa 1977. p 11



[19]Wang Z(王竹), Yang W-Y(杨文钰), Wu Q-L(吴其林). Effects of shading in maize/soybean relay-cropping system on the photosynthetic characteristics and yield of soybean. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(9): 1502–1507 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]Cai K-Z(蔡昆争), Luo S-M(骆世明). Effect of shading on growth, development and yield formation of rice, Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 1999, 2(10): 193–196 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]Liu X-Z(刘贤赵), Kang S-Z(康绍忠). Effects of shading on photosynthesis and yield of tomato plants at different growth stages. Acta Hortic Sin (园艺学报), 2002, 29(5): 427–432 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[22]Lang Y-Z(郎有忠), Dou Y-X(窦永秀), Wang M-E(王美娥), Zhang Z-J(张祖建), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森). Effects of growth duration on grain yield and quality in rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2012, 38(3): 528–534 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]Hou X-L(侯兴亮), Li J-F(李景富), Xu X-Y(许向阳). Effect of low light on morphological and physiological indexes of tomato at different growth stages. Acta Hortic Sin (园艺学报), 2002, 29(2): 123–127 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[2] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[3] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[4] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[5] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[6] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[7] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[10] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[11] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[12] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[13] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[14] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
[15] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!