欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (06): 1093-1101.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01093

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦玉米周年生产中耕作对夏玉米产量及抗倒伏能力的影响

李霞,张吉旺*,任佰朝,范霞,董树亭,刘鹏,赵斌   

  1. 作物生物学国家重点实验室 / 山东农业大学农学院,山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-25 修回日期:2014-03-04 出版日期:2014-06-12 网络出版日期:2014-04-08
  • 通讯作者: 张吉旺, E-mail: jwzhang@sdau.edu.cn, Tel: 0538-8245838
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由山东省现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(SDAIT-01-022-05),国家粮食丰产科技工程项目(2011BAD16B09),国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201203100)和山东省玉米育种与栽培技术企业重点实验室开放课题资助。

Yield and Lodging Resistance of Summer Maize under Different Winter Wheat-Summer Maize Tillage Systems

LI Xia,ZHANG Ji-Wang*,REN Bai-Zhao,FAN Xia,DONG Shu-Ting,LIU Peng,ZHAO Bin   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology / Agronomy College of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
  • Received:2013-11-25 Revised:2014-03-04 Published:2014-06-12 Published online:2014-04-08
  • Contact: 张吉旺, E-mail: jwzhang@sdau.edu.cn, Tel: 0538-8245838

摘要:

针对黄淮海平原冬小麦夏玉米周年生产的特点,将冬小麦夏玉米播前耕作统筹结合,以期为冬小麦夏玉米周年生产体系耕作方式的改良提供依据。以郑单958为验材,设冬小麦播前旋耕夏玉米播前免耕(RN)、冬小麦播前翻耕夏玉米播前免耕(MN)、冬小麦播前翻耕夏玉米播前旋耕(MR) 3个处理,探讨冬小麦夏玉米周年生产条件下不同耕作方式对夏玉米抗倒伏能力及产量的影响。2年研究结果表明,MR处理夏玉米的株高、穗位高增加,MN与MR处理的地上第3茎节变粗,MN处理的地上第3节间茎粗系数最大。MR与MN处理间抽雄期的基部茎节穿刺强度无显著差异,但较RN均显著增强,茎秆皮层厚度和维管束密度及维管束鞘面积较RN也显著增大,茎秆伤流速率较RN分别提高60.60%和46.70%,茎秆质量显著提高。此外,MN与MR的根重和根冠比较RN显著提高,地上节根根条数与干重也显著提高。MN与MR较RN处理分别增产26.33%与39.21%。冬小麦播前翻耕可显著提高夏玉米产量及抗倒伏能力。

关键词: 夏玉米, 小麦玉米周年耕作, 茎秆形态与结构, 倒伏, 产量

Abstract:

The objective of his study was to explore the effects of different tillage systems in winter wheat-summer maize cropping on yield and lodging resistance of summer maize. Maize hybrid Zhengdan958 was used as experimental material. Three tillage treatments were designed, including rotary tillage before winter wheat seeding and no-tillage before maize seeding (RN), moldboard tillage before winter wheat seeding and no-tillage before maize seeding (MN), and moldboard tillage before winter wheat seeding and rotary tillage before maize seeding (MR). The results showed that plant height and ear height were higher in MR than in RN, the third internode diameter of MN and MR was greater than that of RN, and the ratio of length to diameter in MN was the lowest and the stem diameter coefficients of MN was the highest. Rind penetrometer resistance of summer maize enhanced at the tasselling stage (VT) and reduced at the milk stage (R3) in the treatment of moldboard tillage before winter wheat seeding, density of the vascular and area of the vascular bundle were increased, and bleeding sap in stalk increased under MR and MN. Bleeding sap of stalks under MR and MN was 60.62% and 46.70% greater than under RN respectively. Root and shoot dry matter, the ratio of root and shoot dry matter, and brace root numbers of summer maize in MN and MR were higher than these in RN. Grain yield of MR and MN was 26.33% and 39.21% greater than that of RN, respectively. In conclusion, moldboard tillage before winter wheat seeding has good effects on yield and lodging-resistant capability in summer maize.

Key words: Summer maize, Tillage systems, Stalk quality, Lodging, Grain yield

[1]韩宾, 孔凡磊, 张海林, 陈阜. 耕作方式转变对小麦/玉米两熟农田土壤固碳能力的影响. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21: 91–98



Han B, Kun F L, Zhang H L, Chen F. Effects of tillage conversion on carbon sequestration capability of farmland soil doubled cropped with wheat and corn. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2010, 21: 91-98 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[2]Zuber M S, GroganC O. A new technique for measuring stalk strength in corn. Crop Sci, 1961, 1: 378–380



穆春华, 孟昭东, 张发军, 汪黎明, 李文才, 孙琦, 丁照华. 玉米常用自交系茎节抗折强度分析. 玉米科学, 2009, 17(2): 34-37



[3]Mu C H, Meng S D, Zhang F J, Wang L M, Li W C, Sun Q, Ding Z H. Stem section flexural strength analysis about maize inbred lines. J Maize Sci, 2009, 17(2): 34–37 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]Sasal M C, Andriulo A E, Taboada M A. Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas. Soil Till Res, 2006, 87: 9–18



[5]Xu D, Mermoud A. Topsoil properties as affected by tillage practices in North China. Soil Till Res, 2001, 60: 11–19



[6]Motavalli P P, Stevens W E, Hartwig G. Remediation of subsoil compaction and compaction effects on corn N availability by deep tillage and application of poultry manure in a sandy-textured soil. Soil Till Res, 2003, 71: 121–131



[7]王立新, 郭强, 苏青. 玉米抗倒性与茎秆显微结构的关系. 植物学通报, 1990, 7(8): 34–36



Wang L X, Guo Q, Su Q. The relative correlation between the anti-lodging property and the microstructure in corn. Chin Bull Bot, 1990, 7(8): 34–36 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]贾志森, 白永新. 玉米自交系抗倒伏鉴定研究. 作物品种资源, 1992, (3): 30–33



Jia Z S, Bai Y X. Research about maize inbred line lodging resistance appraisal. Crop Genet Resour, 1992, (3): 30–33 (in Chinese)



[9]王群瑛, 胡昌浩. 玉米茎秆抗倒特性的解剖研究. 作物学报, 1991, 17: 70–77



Wang Q Y, Hu C H. Anatomic study of corn stalks down resistance characteristics. Acta Agron Sin, 1991, 17: 70–77 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]Martin S A, Darrah L L, Hibbard B E. Divergent selection for rind penetrometer resistance and its effects on European corn borer damage and stalk traits in corn. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 711–717



[11]丰光, 刘志芳, 李妍妍, 邢锦丰, 黄长玲. 玉米茎秆耐穿刺强度的倒伏遗传研究. 作物学报, 2009, 35: 2133–2138



Feng G, Liu Z F, Li Y Y, Xing J F, Huang C L. Genetic research about maize stem lodging of durable thorn strength. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35: 2133–2138 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]勾玲, 黄建军, 孙锐, 丁在松, 董志强, 赵明. 玉米不同耐密植品种茎秆穿刺强度的变化特征. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(11): 156–161



Gou L, Huang J J, Sun R, Ding Z S, Dong Z Q, Zhao M. Variation characteristic of stalk penetration strength of maize with different density-tolerance varieties. Trans CSAE, 2010, 26(11): 156–161 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]张洪生, 赵明, 吴沛波, 翟延举, 姜雯. 种植密度对玉米茎秆和穗部性状的影响. 玉米科学, 2009, 17(5): 130–133



Zhang H S, Zhao M, Wu P B, Zhai Y J, Jiang W. Effects of planting density on corn stalks and panicle traits . J Maize Sci, 2009, 17(5): 130–133 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]刘明, 齐华, 张卫建, 张振平, 李雪霏, 宋振伟, 于吉琳, 吴亚男. 深松方式与施氮量对玉米茎秆解剖结构及倒伏的影响. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(1): 57–63



Liu M, Qi H, Zhang W J, Zhang Z P, Li X F, Song Z W, Yu J L, Wu Y N. Effects of deep loosening and nitrogen application on anatomical structures of stalk and logging in maize. J Maize Sci, 2013, 21(1): 57–63 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]沈学善, 李金才, 屈会娟, 魏凤珍, 张一, 武文明. 砂姜黑土区小麦玉米秸秆全量还田对玉米抗倒性能的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 2005–2012



Shen X S, Li Q C, Qu H J, Wei F Z, Zhang Y, Wu W M. Effects of wheat and maize straw returned to the field on lodging resistance of maize in lime concretion black soil region. Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44: 2005–2012 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]崔海岩, 靳立斌, 李波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 董树亭, 刘鹏. 遮阴对夏玉米茎秆形态结构和倒伏的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45: 3497–3505



Cui H Y, Jin L B, Li B, Zhang J W, Zhao B, Dong S T, Liu P. Effects of shading on morphology, structure and lodging of summer maize in field. Sci Agric Sin, 2012, 45: 3497–3505 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]何启平, 董树亭, 高荣岐. 不同类型玉米品种果穗维管束的比较研究. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 1187–1196



He Q P, Dong S T, Gao R Q. Comparison of ear vascular bundles in different maize cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 1187–1196 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]李波, 张吉旺, 崔海岩, 靳立斌, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 赵斌. 施钾量对高产夏玉米抗倒伏能力的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 2093–2099



Li B, Zhang J W, Cui H Y, Jin L B, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhao B. Effects of potassium application rate on stem lodging resistance of summer maize under high yield conditions. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 2093–2099 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]勾玲, 黄建军, 张宾, 李涛, 孙悦, 赵明. 群体密度对玉米茎秆抗倒力学和农艺性状影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 1688–1695



Gou L, Huang J J, Zhang B, Li T, Sun R, Zhao M. Effects of population density on stalk lodging resistant mechanism and agronomic characteristics of maize. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 1688–1695 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]Wang X B, Wu H J, Dai K, Zhang D C, Feng Z H, Zhao Q S, Wu X P, Jin K, Cai D X, Oenema O, Hoogmoed W B. Tillage and crop residue effects on rainfed wheat and maize production in Northern China. Field Crops Res, 2011, 5569: 1–11



[21]Kang M S, Din A K, Zhang Y D, Magari R. Combining ability for rind puncture resistance in maize. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 368–371



[22]孙世贤, 戴俊英, 顾慰连. 氮磷钾肥对玉米倒伏及其产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 1989, 22(3): 28–33



Sun S X, Dai J Y, Gu W L. Effects of nitrogen, phosphate and potash fertilizers on lodging and yield in maize. Sci Agric Sin, 1989, 22(3): 28–33 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]史忠强, 江晓东, 王芸, 宁堂原, 韩宾, 李增嘉. 少免耕对夏玉米灌浆过程和产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2007, (1): 51-52



Shi Z Q, Jiang X D, Wang Y, Ning T Y, Han B, Li Z J. Effects of minimum and no-tillage on seed filling and yield of summer maize. Shandong Agric Sci, 2007, (1): 51–52 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[24]李明德, 刘琼峰, 吴海勇, 汤睿. 不同耕作方式对红壤旱地土壤理化性状及玉米产量的影响. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18: 1522–1526



Li M D, Liu Q F, Wu L Y, Tang R. Effects of different tillages on soil property and yield of maize. Ecol Environ Sci, 2009, 18: 1522–1526 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[25]梁金凤, 齐庆振, 贾小红, 宫少俊, 黄元仿. 不同耕作方式对土壤性质与玉米生长的影响研究. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19: 945–950



Liang J F, Qi Q Z, Jia X H, Gong S J, Huang Y F. Effects of different tillages on soil property and corn growth. Ecol Environ Sci, 2010, 19: 945–950 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[6] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[7] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[8] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[9] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[10] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[11] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[12] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[13] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[14] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[15] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!