欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (06): 1109-1116.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01109

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同氮肥和密度对油菜机械收获损失率的影响

左青松1,2,曹石1,杨士芬1,黄海东1,廖庆喜1,冷锁虎2,吴江生1,周广生1,*   

  1. 1 华中农业大学植物科学技术学院, 湖北武汉 430070; 2 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室, 江苏扬州 225009
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-19 修回日期:2014-01-12 出版日期:2014-06-12 网络出版日期:2014-03-24
  • 通讯作者: 周广生, E-mail: zhougs@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31000685), 国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目(2010BAD01B09), 国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费项目(201203096)和国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(nycytx-00510)资助。

Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Planting Density on Yield Loss Percentage of Mechanical Harvesting in Rapeseed

ZUO Qing-Song1,2,CAO Shi1,YANG Shi-Fen1,HUANG Hai-Dong1,LIAO Qing-Xi1,LENG Suo-Hu2,WU Jiang-Sheng1,ZHOU Guang-Sheng1,*   

  1. 1 College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; 2 Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
  • Received:2013-08-19 Revised:2014-01-12 Published:2014-06-12 Published online:2014-03-24

摘要:

以华油杂62为材料,采用机械直播的方式,设置不同氮肥和密度处理,在油菜籽粒含水量10.86%~13.17%时研究油菜机械收获各部分损失率及损失组成的差异。结果表明,机械收获总损失率在不同处理间存在差异,变幅在6.13%~7.82%之间。不同部分的损失占总损失比例差异较大,其中,自然脱落损失比例最小,各处理占总损失的比例在2.41%~3.90%之间;其次是割台损失,各处理占总损失的比例为17.99%~21.99%;清选和脱粒损失比例最大,占总损失的74.15%~79.52%,其中主要是夹带损失,占总损失的65.51%~69.05%,而未脱粒角果比例损失较小,占8.64%~10.47%。随着氮肥用量和密度的增加,产量增加;总损失率与产量、氮肥用量及密度的相关系数分别为0.970**0.918**0.358。本研究表明,在油菜机械化生产过程中首先要确定适宜的施氮量和种植密度以获得高产,在高产的基础上再降低收获损失率。

关键词: 油菜, 机械化收获, 损失率氮肥, 密度

Abstract:

In this study, Huayouza 62 was planted by direct-seeding with three nitrogen (N) fertilizer levels (120 kg N ha–1, 180 kg N ha–1, and 240 kg N ha–1) and three planting densities (15´104 plant ha–1, 30´104 plant ha–1 and 45´104 plant ha–1). The yield loss percentages of mechanical harvesting were investigated when the moisture contents in seeds ranged from 10.86% to13.17%. The results showed the total yield loss percentage was from 6.13% to 7.82% in different treatments. There existed differences in the ratio of the yield loss in different parts to the total yield loss. The ratio of the yield loss caused by shattering (SL) to the total yield loss was the least in different treatments, ranging from 2.41% to 3.90%. The ratio of the yield loss caused by combine header (CHL) to the total yield loss ranged from 17.99% to 21.99%. The ratio of the yield loss caused by cleaning and threshing (CTL) to the total yield loss ranged from 74.15% to 79.52%, among which the yield loss caused by mixed straw and shell (ML) was the main part (from 65.51% to 69.05%), and the yield loss caused by non-threshing pod (NTPL) was low with the range from 8.64% to 10.47%. The plot yield increased with increasing N application rates and planting densities. The total yield loss percentage had extremely significant positive correlation with plot yield (r = 0.970**) and N fertilizer (r = 0.918**), and no significant correction with planting density (r = 0.358). The results of this study indicated that in the rapeseed mechanical production, appropriate N fertilizer and planting density should be applied for high yield, and then the yield loss percentage should be reduced on the basis of high yield.

Key words: Rapeseed, Mechanical harvesting, Yield loss percentage, Nitrogen fertilizer, Planting density

[1]王汉中. 我国油菜产需形势分析及产业发展对策. 中国油料作物学报, 2007, 29: 101–105



Wang H Z. Strategy for rapeseed industry development based on the analysis of rapeseed production and demand in China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2007, 29: 101–105 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[2]吴崇友, 易中懿. 我国油菜全程机械化技术路线的选择. 中国农机化, 2009, (2): 3–6



Wu C Y, Yi Z Y. Selection of technology route of oilseed rape mechanization in entire production proceeding in China. Chin Agric Mech, 2009, (2): 3–6 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]连银娟, 罗玉莲. 上海2BGKF-230U型油菜直播机的研制与试验研究. 中国农机化, 2002, (5): 53–54



Lian Y J, Luo Y L. Development and test research on Shanghai 2BGKF-230U type rape direct seeder. Chin Agric Mech, 2002, (5): 53–54 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]张宇文, 邹剑, 张文超, 李秋孝. 油菜机械精量播种技术及多功能精量排种器的研制. 中国农机化, 2003, (2): 28–30



Zhang Y W, Zou J, Zhang W C, Li Q X. Precise seeding technology for rape and development of multi-functional precise seeding apparatus. Chin Agric Mech, 2003, (2): 28–30 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]吴明亮, 汤楚宙, 谢方平, 赵进辉, 张岚. 免耕悬挂式油菜籽条播机的设计. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 30: 371–373



Wu M L, Tang C Z, Xie F P, Zhao J H, Zhang L. The structure design of mounted sower for line seeding of rape in till-less paddy field. J Hunan Agric Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2004, 30: 371–373 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]周广生, 左青松, 廖庆喜, 吴江生, 傅廷栋. 我国油菜机械化生产现状、存在问题及对策. 湖北农业科学, 2013, 52: 2153–2156



Zhou G S, Zuo Q S, Liao Q X, Wu J S, Fu T D. Mechanical production status, existing problems and strategy discussion of rapeseed in China. Hubei Agric Sci, 2013, 52: 2153–2156 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]许绮川, 周勇. 关于加快发展油菜收获机械化的思考. 中国农机化, 2008, (2): 54–56



Xu Q C, Zhou Y. Consideration on accelerating the development of rape harvesting mechanization. Chin Agric Mech, 2008, (2): 54–56 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Squices T M, Gruwel M L H, Zhou R, Sokhansanj S, Abrams S R, Cutler A J. Dehydration and dehiscence in siliques of Brassica napus and Brassica rapa. Can J Bot, 2003, 81: 248–254



[9]小力, 张洁夫, 杨莉, 张志燕, 周佳, 姜松, 戚存扣. 油菜角果裂角力的定量测定. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(11): 40–43



Tan X L, Zhang J F, Yang L, Zhang Z Y, Zhou J, Jiang S, Qi C K. Quantitive determination of the strength of rapeseed pod dehiscence. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2006, 22(11): 40–43 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]文雁成, 傅廷栋, 涂金星, 马朝芝, 沈金雄, 张书芬. 甘蓝型油菜抗裂角品种(系)的筛选与分析. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 163–166



Wen Y C, Fu T D, Tu J X, Ma C Z, Shen J X, Zhang S F. Screening and analysis of resistance to silique shattering in rape (Brassica napus L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 163–166 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]Gan Y, Malhi S S, Brandt S A, McDonald C L. Assessment of seed shattering resistance and yield loss in five oilseed crops. Can J Plant Sci, 2008, 88: 267–270



[12]张建, 陈金城, 唐章林, 王瑞. 油菜茎秆理化性质与倒伏关系的研究. 西南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 28: 763–765



Zhang J, Chen J C, Tang Z L, Wang R. Study on the physico-chemical properties of stem as related to lodging in rape. J Southwest Agric Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2006, 28: 763–765 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]陈新军, 戚存扣, 浦惠明, 张洁夫, 高建芹, 傅寿仲. 甘蓝型油菜抗倒性评价及抗倒性与株型结构的关系. 中国油料作物学报, 2007, 29: 54–57



Chen X J, Qi C C, Pu H M, Zhang J F, Gao J Q, Fu S Z. Evaluation of lodging resistance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) and relationship between plant architecture and lodging resistance. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2007, 29: 54–57 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]刘唐兴, 官春云. 油菜倒伏指数和茎秆生化成分及农艺性状的灰色关联分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2008, 30: 152–161



Liu T X, Guan C Y. Grey relational analysis between lodging index and biochemistry components of stem, agronomic characteristics in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2008, 30: 152–161 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]李耀明, 周金芝, 徐立章, 邓玲黎. 油菜联合收割机脱粒分离装置的试验. 江苏大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 26(4): 281–284



Li Y M, Zhou J Z, Xu L Z, Deng L L. Experimental study on threshing and separating un it of rape combine. J Jiangsu Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2005, 26(4): 281–284 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]杜文勇, 黄海东, 樊啟洲. ANSYS在油菜联合收割机清选机构气流场中的应用. 农机化研究, 2007, (10): 174–175



Du W Y, Huang H D, Fan Q Z. Application of ANSYS in the flow field in the cleaning device of a rape's combine harvester. J Agric Mech Res, 2007, (10): 174–175 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]金诚谦, 吴崇友. 油菜收获技术基础研究现状与展望. 农机化研究, 2010, (1): 5–9



Jin C Q, Wu C Y. Review and perspectives of research status on rape harvest technique. J Agric Mech Res, 2010, (1): 5–9 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]董月亮, 李耀明, 徐立章. 油菜联合收割机割台损失影响因素的试验研究. 农机化研究, 2008, (5): 109–112



Dong Y L, Li Y M, Xu L Z. Experimental research on header losses for rape combine harvester. J Agric Mech Res, 2008, (5): 109–112 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]石剑飞, 冷锁虎, 左青松, 唐瑶, 杨光. 油菜机械收获配套农艺技术研究: I. 不同油菜品种机械收获损失的差异. 中国油料作物学报, 2009, 31: 470–473



Shi J F, Leng S H, Zuo Q S, Tang Y, Yang G. Mechanical harvesting technique in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): I. Harvesting loss of different rapeseed cultivars. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2009, 31: 470–473 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]王翠翠, 陈爱武, 王积军, 张冬晓, 汤松, 周广生, 胡立勇, 吴江生, 傅廷栋. 湖北双季稻区免耕直播油菜生长及产量形成. 作物学报, 2011, 37: 694–702



Wang C C, Chen A W, Wang J J, Zhang D X, Tang S, Zhou G S, Hu L Y, Wu J S, Fu T D. Growth and yield formation of no-tillage direct-seeding rapeseed in Hubei double cropping rice area. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 694–702 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]雷海霞, 陈爱武, 张长生, 罗凯世, 陈新国, 夏起昕, 周广生, 吴江生, 田新初. 共生期与播种量对水稻套播油菜生长及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2011, 37: 1449–1456



Lei H X, Chen A W, Zhang C S, Luo K S, Chen X G, Xia Q X, Zhou G S, Wu J S, Tian X C. Effect of symbiosis period and seeding amount on growth and yield of rapeseed undersowing rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 1449–1456 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 陈松余, 丁一娟, 孙峻溟, 黄登文, 杨楠, 代雨涵, 万华方, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnCNGC基因家族鉴定及其在核盘菌侵染和PEG处理下的表达特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1357-1371.
[2] 秦璐, 韩配配, 常海滨, 顾炽明, 黄威, 李银水, 廖祥生, 谢立华, 廖星. 甘蓝型油菜耐低氮种质筛选及绿肥应用潜力评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1488-1501.
[3] 黄伟, 高国应, 吴金锋, 刘丽莉, 张大为, 周定港, 成洪涛, 张凯旋, 周美亮, 李莓, 严明理. 芥菜型油菜BjA09.TT8BjB08.TT8基因调节类黄酮的合成[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1169-1180.
[4] 雷新慧, 万晨茜, 陶金才, 冷佳俊, 吴怡欣, 王家乐, 王鹏科, 杨清华, 冯佰利, 高金锋. 褪黑素与2,4-表油菜素内酯浸种对盐胁迫下荞麦发芽与幼苗生长的促进效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1210-1221.
[5] 石育钦, 孙梦丹, 陈帆, 成洪涛, 胡学志, 付丽, 胡琼, 梅德圣, 李超. 通过CRISPR/Cas9技术突变BnMLO6基因提高甘蓝型油菜的抗病性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 801-811.
[6] 袁大双, 邓琬玉, 王珍, 彭茜, 张晓莉, 姚梦楠, 缪文杰, 朱冬鸣, 李加纳, 梁颖. 甘蓝型油菜BnMAPK2基因的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 840-850.
[7] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[8] 黄成, 梁晓梅, 戴成, 文静, 易斌, 涂金星, 沈金雄, 傅廷栋, 马朝芝. 甘蓝型油菜BnAPs基因家族成员全基因组鉴定及分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 597-607.
[9] 王瑞, 陈雪, 郭青青, 周蓉, 陈蕾, 李加纳. 甘蓝型油菜白花基因InDel连锁标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 759-769.
[10] 赵改会, 李书宇, 詹杰鹏, 李晏斌, 师家勤, 王新发, 王汉中. 甘蓝型油菜角果数突变体基因的定位及候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 27-39.
[11] 娄洪祥, 姬建利, 蒯婕, 汪波, 徐亮, 李真, 刘芳, 黄威, 刘暑艳, 尹羽丰, 王晶, 周广生. 种植密度对油菜正反交组合产量与倒伏相关性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1724-1740.
[12] 张建, 谢田晋, 尉晓楠, 王宗铠, 刘崇涛, 周广生, 汪波. 无人机多角度成像方式的饲料油菜生物量估算研究[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1816-1823.
[13] 王艳花, 刘景森, 李加纳. 整合GWAS和WGCNA筛选鉴定甘蓝型油菜生物产量候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1491-1510.
[14] 陈云, 刘昆, 张宏路, 李思宇, 张亚军, 韦佳利, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 机插密度和穗肥减量对优质食味水稻品种籽粒淀粉合成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1540-1550.
[15] 李杰华, 端群, 史明涛, 吴潞梅, 柳寒, 林拥军, 吴高兵, 范楚川, 周永明. 新型抗广谱性除草剂草甘膦转基因油菜的创制及其鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 789-798.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!