不同氮肥和密度对油菜机械收获损失率的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01109

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以华油杂62为材料，采用机械直播的方式，设置不同氮肥和密度处理，在油菜籽粒含水量10.86%~13.17%时研究油菜机械收获各部分损失率及损失组成的差异。结果表明，机械收获总损失率在不同处理间存在差异，变幅在6.13%~7.82%之间。不同部分的损失占总损失比例差异较大，其中，自然脱落损失比例最小，各处理占总损失的比例在2.41%~3.90%之间；其次是割台损失，各处理占总损失的比例为17.99%~21.99%；清选和脱粒损失比例最大，占总损失的74.15%~79.52%，其中主要是夹带损失，占总损失的65.51%~69.05%，而未脱粒角果比例损失较小，占8.64%~10.47%。随着氮肥用量和密度的增加，产量增加；总损失率与产量、氮肥用量及密度的相关系数分别为0.970^**、0.918^**和0.358。本研究表明，在油菜机械化生产过程中首先要确定适宜的施氮量和种植密度以获得高产，在高产的基础上再降低收获损失率。

关键词: 油菜, 机械化收获, 损失率氮肥, 密度

Abstract:

In this study, Huayouza 62 was planted by direct-seeding with three nitrogen (N) fertilizer levels (120 kg N ha^–1, 180 kg N ha^–1, and 240 kg N ha^–1) and three planting densities (15´10⁴ plant ha^–1, 30´10⁴ plant ha^–1 and 45´10⁴ plant ha^–1). The yield loss percentages of mechanical harvesting were investigated when the moisture contents in seeds ranged from 10.86% to13.17%. The results showed the total yield loss percentage was from 6.13% to 7.82% in different treatments. There existed differences in the ratio of the yield loss in different parts to the total yield loss. The ratio of the yield loss caused by shattering (SL) to the total yield loss was the least in different treatments, ranging from 2.41% to 3.90%. The ratio of the yield loss caused by combine header (CHL) to the total yield loss ranged from 17.99% to 21.99%. The ratio of the yield loss caused by cleaning and threshing (CTL) to the total yield loss ranged from 74.15% to 79.52%, among which the yield loss caused by mixed straw and shell (ML) was the main part (from 65.51% to 69.05%), and the yield loss caused by non-threshing pod (NTPL) was low with the range from 8.64% to 10.47%. The plot yield increased with increasing N application rates and planting densities. The total yield loss percentage had extremely significant positive correlation with plot yield (r = 0.970^**) and N fertilizer (r = 0.918^**), and no significant correction with planting density (r = 0.358). The results of this study indicated that in the rapeseed mechanical production, appropriate N fertilizer and planting density should be applied for high yield, and then the yield loss percentage should be reduced on the basis of high yield.

Key words: Rapeseed, Mechanical harvesting, Yield loss percentage, Nitrogen fertilizer, Planting density

左青松,曹石,杨士芬,黄海东,廖庆喜,冷锁虎,吴江生,周广生. 不同氮肥和密度对油菜机械收获损失率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(06): 1109-1116.

ZUO Qing-Song,CAO Shi,YANG Shi-Fen,HUANG Hai-Dong,LIAO Qing-Xi,LENG Suo-Hu,WU Jiang-Sheng,ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Planting Density on Yield Loss Percentage of Mechanical Harvesting in Rapeseed[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(06): 1109-1116.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01109

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2014/V40/I06/1109

参考文献

[1]王汉中. 我国油菜产需形势分析及产业发展对策. 中国油料作物学报, 2007, 29: 101–105

Wang H Z. Strategy for rapeseed industry development based on the analysis of rapeseed production and demand in China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2007, 29: 101–105 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2]吴崇友, 易中懿. 我国油菜全程机械化技术路线的选择. 中国农机化, 2009, (2): 3–6

Wu C Y, Yi Z Y. Selection of technology route of oilseed rape mechanization in entire production proceeding in China. Chin Agric Mech, 2009, (2): 3–6 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3]连银娟, 罗玉莲. 上海2BGKF-230U型油菜直播机的研制与试验研究. 中国农机化, 2002, (5): 53–54

Lian Y J, Luo Y L. Development and test research on Shanghai 2BGKF-230U type rape direct seeder. Chin Agric Mech, 2002, (5): 53–54 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[4]张宇文, 邹剑, 张文超, 李秋孝. 油菜机械精量播种技术及多功能精量排种器的研制. 中国农机化, 2003, (2): 28–30

Zhang Y W, Zou J, Zhang W C, Li Q X. Precise seeding technology for rape and development of multi-functional precise seeding apparatus. Chin Agric Mech, 2003, (2): 28–30 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5]吴明亮, 汤楚宙, 谢方平, 赵进辉, 张岚. 免耕悬挂式油菜籽条播机的设计. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 30: 371–373

Wu M L, Tang C Z, Xie F P, Zhao J H, Zhang L. The structure design of mounted sower for line seeding of rape in till-less paddy field. J Hunan Agric Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2004, 30: 371–373 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]周广生, 左青松, 廖庆喜, 吴江生, 傅廷栋. 我国油菜机械化生产现状、存在问题及对策. 湖北农业科学, 2013, 52: 2153–2156

Zhou G S, Zuo Q S, Liao Q X, Wu J S, Fu T D. Mechanical production status, existing problems and strategy discussion of rapeseed in China. Hubei Agric Sci, 2013, 52: 2153–2156 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]许绮川, 周勇. 关于加快发展油菜收获机械化的思考. 中国农机化, 2008, (2): 54–56

Xu Q C, Zhou Y. Consideration on accelerating the development of rape harvesting mechanization. Chin Agric Mech, 2008, (2): 54–56 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Squices T M, Gruwel M L H, Zhou R, Sokhansanj S, Abrams S R, Cutler A J. Dehydration and dehiscence in siliques of Brassica napus and Brassica rapa. Can J Bot, 2003, 81: 248–254

[9]小力, 张洁夫, 杨莉, 张志燕, 周佳, 姜松, 戚存扣. 油菜角果裂角力的定量测定. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(11): 40–43

Tan X L, Zhang J F, Yang L, Zhang Z Y, Zhou J, Jiang S, Qi C K. Quantitive determination of the strength of rapeseed pod dehiscence. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2006, 22(11): 40–43 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]文雁成, 傅廷栋, 涂金星, 马朝芝, 沈金雄, 张书芬. 甘蓝型油菜抗裂角品种(系)的筛选与分析. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 163–166

Wen Y C, Fu T D, Tu J X, Ma C Z, Shen J X, Zhang S F. Screening and analysis of resistance to silique shattering in rape (Brassica napus L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 163–166 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11]Gan Y, Malhi S S, Brandt S A, McDonald C L. Assessment of seed shattering resistance and yield loss in five oilseed crops. Can J Plant Sci, 2008, 88: 267–270

[12]张建, 陈金城, 唐章林, 王瑞. 油菜茎秆理化性质与倒伏关系的研究. 西南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 28: 763–765

Zhang J, Chen J C, Tang Z L, Wang R. Study on the physico-chemical properties of stem as related to lodging in rape. J Southwest Agric Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2006, 28: 763–765 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13]陈新军, 戚存扣, 浦惠明, 张洁夫, 高建芹, 傅寿仲. 甘蓝型油菜抗倒性评价及抗倒性与株型结构的关系. 中国油料作物学报, 2007, 29: 54–57

Chen X J, Qi C C, Pu H M, Zhang J F, Gao J Q, Fu S Z. Evaluation of lodging resistance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) and relationship between plant architecture and lodging resistance. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2007, 29: 54–57 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]刘唐兴, 官春云. 油菜倒伏指数和茎秆生化成分及农艺性状的灰色关联分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2008, 30: 152–161

Liu T X, Guan C Y. Grey relational analysis between lodging index and biochemistry components of stem, agronomic characteristics in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2008, 30: 152–161 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]李耀明, 周金芝, 徐立章, 邓玲黎. 油菜联合收割机脱粒分离装置的试验. 江苏大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 26(4): 281–284

Li Y M, Zhou J Z, Xu L Z, Deng L L. Experimental study on threshing and separating un it of rape combine. J Jiangsu Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2005, 26(4): 281–284 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]杜文勇, 黄海东, 樊啟洲. ANSYS在油菜联合收割机清选机构气流场中的应用. 农机化研究, 2007, (10): 174–175

Du W Y, Huang H D, Fan Q Z. Application of ANSYS in the flow field in the cleaning device of a rape's combine harvester. J Agric Mech Res, 2007, (10): 174–175 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17]金诚谦, 吴崇友. 油菜收获技术基础研究现状与展望. 农机化研究, 2010, (1): 5–9

Jin C Q, Wu C Y. Review and perspectives of research status on rape harvest technique. J Agric Mech Res, 2010, (1): 5–9 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]董月亮, 李耀明, 徐立章. 油菜联合收割机割台损失影响因素的试验研究. 农机化研究, 2008, (5): 109–112

Dong Y L, Li Y M, Xu L Z. Experimental research on header losses for rape combine harvester. J Agric Mech Res, 2008, (5): 109–112 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]石剑飞, 冷锁虎, 左青松, 唐瑶, 杨光. 油菜机械收获配套农艺技术研究: I. 不同油菜品种机械收获损失的差异. 中国油料作物学报, 2009, 31: 470–473

Shi J F, Leng S H, Zuo Q S, Tang Y, Yang G. Mechanical harvesting technique in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): I. Harvesting loss of different rapeseed cultivars. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2009, 31: 470–473 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20]王翠翠, 陈爱武, 王积军, 张冬晓, 汤松, 周广生, 胡立勇, 吴江生, 傅廷栋. 湖北双季稻区免耕直播油菜生长及产量形成. 作物学报, 2011, 37: 694–702

Wang C C, Chen A W, Wang J J, Zhang D X, Tang S, Zhou G S, Hu L Y, Wu J S, Fu T D. Growth and yield formation of no-tillage direct-seeding rapeseed in Hubei double cropping rice area. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 694–702 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[21]雷海霞, 陈爱武, 张长生, 罗凯世, 陈新国, 夏起昕, 周广生, 吴江生, 田新初. 共生期与播种量对水稻套播油菜生长及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2011, 37: 1449–1456

Lei H X, Chen A W, Zhang C S, Luo K S, Chen X G, Xia Q X, Zhou G S, Wu J S, Tian X C. Effect of symbiosis period and seeding amount on growth and yield of rapeseed undersowing rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 1449–1456 (in Chinese with English abstract)

相关文章 15

[1]	韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[2]	任依涵, 赵曼利, 代晶, 李银水, 顾炽明, 杨璐, 杜雪竹, 胡文诗, 秦璐. 油菜叶片功能氮动态变化对光合速率及光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471.
[3]	蒯婕, 娄洪祥, 谭晓强, 郜耿东, 邵东李, 肖胜男, 赵杰, 徐正华, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生. 直播油菜单产提升的生理基础及实践途径[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 982-992.
[4]	张全军, 吴东丽, 刘聪, 朱永超, 杨大生, 孔祥胜. 1981—2024年长江中下游油菜发育期时空格局演变特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1140-1152.
[5]	杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
[6]	谭文清, 惠荣奎, 张凡丽, 覃磊, 毛舒香, 邓力超, 郭一鸣, 曲亮, 严明理. 油菜耐渍性快速鉴定及耐渍种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1035-1045.
[7]	马海会, 张国平, 杨思存, 王红丽. 不同密度下氮肥运筹对半干旱区青贮玉米碳氮积累与转运特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1193-1207.
[8]	王楚锐, 李开祥, 赵志, 肖麓, 唐国永, 赵志刚, 徐亮, 杜德志, 柳海东. 甘蓝型春油菜早花基因BnCRY2功能位点KASP标记的开发及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 708-721.
[9]	马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362.
[10]	娄洪祥, 幸仁鹏, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 蒯婕, 周广生. 播种期对长江中游甘蓝型油菜光温资源利用效率和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 539-551.
[11]	李瑞, 余意雯, 王敦亮, 田婷, 孙灵湘, 陶玥玥, 孙华. 长江中下游油菜薹油兼用模式菜籽产量特征比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 620-630.
[12]	杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 基于北纬30°分界的长江中游油菜增产策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 99-117.
[13]	朱家宝, 王先领, 樊友众, 王宗铠, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜茎秆质量和抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 233-248.
[14]	王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110.
[15]	樊友众, 王先领, 王宗铠, 王春云, 王天尧, 谢捷, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2139-2151.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed