欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12): 1858-1866.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01858

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

氮肥分期运筹对套作甘薯产量、品质及氮素效率的影响

安建刚,敬夫,丁祎,肖怡,尚浩浩,李宏利,杨晓璐,唐道彬,王季春()   

  1. 西南大学农学与生物科技学院, 重庆400716
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-04 接受日期:2018-07-20 出版日期:2018-12-12 网络出版日期:2018-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 王季春
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由“十三五”重庆市薯类主题专项重大项目资助(CSTC2015shms-ztzx80002);本研究由“十三五”重庆市薯类主题专项重大项目资助(CSTC2015shms-ztzx80003);本研究由“十三五”重庆市薯类主题专项重大项目资助(CSTC2015shms-ztzx80004)

Effects of Split Application of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sweet Potato

Jian-Gang AN,Fu JING,Yi DING,Yi XIAO,Hao-Hao SHANG,Hong-Li LI,Xiao-Lu YANG,Dao-Bin TANG,Ji-Chun WANG()   

  1. College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China
  • Received:2018-03-04 Accepted:2018-07-20 Published:2018-12-12 Published online:2018-07-20
  • Contact: Ji-Chun WANG
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the “13th Five-Year” Potato Theme Project of Chongqing(CSTC2015shms-ztzx80002);This study was supported by the “13th Five-Year” Potato Theme Project of Chongqing(CSTC2015shms-ztzx80003);This study was supported by the “13th Five-Year” Potato Theme Project of Chongqing(CSTC2015shms-ztzx80004)

摘要:

为了探寻套作甘薯高产优质的氮肥运筹方式, 以甘薯套作及单作为主区, 定量氮肥全部基施、分2期和分3期运筹为副区, 于2015—2016两年度探讨了不同处理对2个甘薯品种(渝紫7号和万薯10号)块根产量、品质及氮肥利用效率的影响。结果表明, 2个品种无论单作或套作, 定量氮肥分2期或分3期运筹显著提高甘薯块根产量、单薯重、可溶性蛋白含量、可溶性糖含量、氮肥表观利用率和氮肥偏生产力; 套作中定量氮肥不同运筹方式对2个甘薯品种商品薯率影响不显著, 但单作中分3期运筹时最高; 万薯10号块根β-胡萝卜素含量以定量氮肥分3期运筹最高, 渝紫7号块根花青素含量以分2期和3期运筹最高, 2个品种块根淀粉含量以氮肥全部基施最高。套作降低了除甘薯块根可溶性糖含量外的其他营养品质以及产量和氮肥利用效率, 但套作定量氮肥分2期或3期运筹, 可使这些指标达到或优于单作氮肥全部基施水平。为提高块根淀粉含量, 定量的氮肥宜采用全部基施, 为同时优化其他营养品质、提高甘薯产量和氮肥利用效率, 定量的氮肥宜采用分2期或分3期运筹。

关键词: 套作甘薯, 氮肥分期运筹, 产量, 营养品质, 氮素利用效率

Abstract:

To explore the optimal split nitrogen fertilizer application methods for high yield and quality sweet potato production in intercropping, we conducted a field experiment using two sweet potato cultivars Yuzi 7 and Wanshu 10 with single N application, 2-split and 3-split N application, and measured the yield, quality, and nitrogen use efficiency in monocropping and interplanting in 2015-2016. The yield, single storage root weight, soluble protein content, soluble sugar content of storage root, apparent nitrogen use efficiency and partial nitrogen productivity were significantly increased in the two tested cultivars under 2-split and 3-split N application in monocropping and interplanting. Under interplanting, commodity rate was not significantly different in the two cultivars among the three N application treatments, however, the highest commodity rate was obtained under 3-split N application in monocropping. The highest content of β-carotene in the storage root was obtained when 3-split N application was used in Wanshu 10, and the highest content of anthocyanin in the storage root was obtained when 2-split N application was used in Yuzi 7, but the highest starch content of storage root was obtained when non-split N application was used in the two cultivars. All of the quality traits except soluble protein content of storage root, and yield and nitrogen use efficiency reduced in intercropping, but these traits were equal or better in 2 or 3-split N application when compared to those in monocropping. In conclusion, non-split N application could be used to increase the starch content of storage root, and 2 or 3-split N application could be used to increase other quality traits, yield and nitrogen efficiency of sweet potato.

Key words: sweet potato-maize interplanting, split application of nitrogen fertilizer, yield, quality, nitrogen use efficiency

表1

不同试验年份移栽前土壤肥力状况"

年份
Year
有机质
Organic matter
(g kg-1)
全N
Total N
(g kg-1)
碱解氮
Available nitrogen
(mg kg-1)
有效磷
Available phosphorus
(mg kg-1)
速效钾
Available potassium
(mg kg-1)
2015 11.356 0.427 54.17 54.84 204.83
2016 10.442 0.546 81.99 19.24 175.60

表2

甘薯产量性状及氮肥利用效率"

图1

万薯10号β-胡萝卜素含量 A: 甘薯单作; B: 玉米/甘薯; NOA: 定量氮肥全部基施; NSA: 定量氮肥分2期运筹; NTA: 定量氮肥分3期运筹。图柱顶端不同字母表示处理间差异达到0.05显著水平。"

图2

渝紫7号花青素含量 图柱顶端不同字母表示处理间差异达到0.05显著水平。缩写同图1。"

图3

甘薯块根可溶性蛋白含量 图柱顶端不同字母表示处理间差异达到0.05显著水平。缩写同图1。"

图4

甘薯块根淀粉含 图柱顶端不同字母表示处理间差异达到0.05显著水平。缩写同图1。"

图5

甘薯块根可溶性糖含量 图柱顶端不同字母表示处理间差异达到0.05显著水平。缩写同图1。"

[1] 宁堂原, 焦念元, 张民, 郑延海, 赵春, 安艳艳, 李增嘉 . 不同品种组合方式下春夏玉米套作的氮素利用特征研究. 作物学报, 2007,33:1896-1901
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.11.026
Ning T Y, Jiao N Y, Zhang M, Zheng Y H, Zhao C, An Y Y, Li Z J . Nitrogen use characteristic in maize relay-cropping system of different cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2007,33:1896-1901 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.11.026
[2] 苏本营, 陈圣宾, 李永庚, 杨文钰 . 间套作种植提升农田生态系统服务功能. 生态学报, 2013,33:4505-4514
doi: 10.5846/stxb201204200574
Su B Y, Chen S B, Li Y G, Yang W Y . Intercropping enhances the farmland ecosystem services. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013,33:4505-4514 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.5846/stxb201204200574
[3] 雍太文, 杨文钰, 向达兵, 陈小容, 万燕 . 小麦/玉米/大豆套作的产量、氮营养表现及其种间竞争力的评定. 草业学报, 2012,21(1):50-58
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20120107
Yong T W, Yang W Y, Xiang D B, Chen X R, Wan Y . Production and N nutrient performance of wheat-maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system and evaluation of interspecies competition. Acta Pratac Sin, 2012,21(1):50-58 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20120107
[4] 赵亚妮, 王科, 王佳锐, 陈远学, 杨昱 . 施氮对单作和套作小麦产量和氮素利用特征的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2016,24:845-852
Zhao Y N, Wang K, Wang J R, Chen Y X, Yang Y . Wheat grain yield and nitrogen use characteristics under monoculture and intercropping with different nitrogen fertilization rates. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2016,24:845-852 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 陈平, 杜青, 周丽, 杨欢, 董茜, 宋春, 杨文钰, 雍太文 . 减量施氮及施肥距离对玉米/大豆套作系统增产节肥的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016,27:3247-3256
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201610.031
Chen P, Du Q, Zhou L, Yang H, Dong Q, Song C, Yang W Y, Yong T W . Effects of N application reduction and fertilizing distance on saving fertilizer and improving yield in maize/soybean intercropping system. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2016,27:3247-3256 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201610.031
[6] 温日宇, 郭耀东, 郑联寿, 姜庆国, 樊丽生 . 马铃薯套种玉米模式下种植密度和氮肥施用量对马铃薯产量的影响. 山西农业科学, 2016,44:981-983
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2016.07.21
Wen R Y, Guo Y D, Zheng L S, Jiang Q G, Fan L S . Effect of planting density and nitrogen application rate on yield of potato in potato/maize intercropping mode. J Shanxi Agric Sci, 2016,44:981-983 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2016.07.21
[7] Li S X, Wang Z H, Hu T T, Gao Y J, Stewart B A . Nitrogen in dryland soils of China and its management. Adv Agron, 2009: 123-181
doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)00803-1
[8] McDonald G K . Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer on the growth, grain yield and grain protein concentration of wheat. Crop Pasture Sci, 1992,43:949-967
doi: 10.1071/ar9920949
[9] 苏伟, 鲁剑巍, 李云春, 李小坤, 马常宝, 高祥照 . 氮肥运筹方式对油菜产量、氮肥利用率及氮素淋失的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2010,32:558-562
Su W, Lu J W, Li Y C, Li X K, Ma C B, Gao X Z . Effect of nitrogen management mode on yield, nitrogen using efficiency and nitrogen leaching of rapeseed. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2010,32:558-562 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 陈源, 王永慧, 杨朝华, 肖健, 栾娜, 张祥, 陈德华 . 氮肥运筹对高品质棉棉铃形成及纤维品质的影响. 作物学报, 2009,35:2266-2272
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.02266
Chen Y, Wang Y H, Yang C H, Xiao J, Luan N, Zhang X, Chen D H . Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on development of boll and fiber quality in high fiber quality cotton. Acta Agron Sin, 2009,35:2266-2272 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.02266
[11] 刘向梅, 孙磊, 李功义, 石立航, 王弘, 徐姗姗 . 氮磷钾肥施用量及施用时期对马铃薯养分转运分配的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2013, ( 4):59-65
Liu X M, Sun L, Li G Y, Shi L H, Wang H, Xu S S . Effects of N, P, K fertilizers application rate and time on translocation and distribution of nutrients in potato plant. China Soils Fert, 2013, ( 4):59-65 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 王小晶, 蔡国学, 王洋, 吕慧峰, 陈怡, 王正银 . 氮磷钾分期施用对甘薯产量和品质的影响. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(7):188-192
Wang X J, Cai G X, Wang Y, Lyu H F, Chen Y, Wang Z Y . Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium application by stages on yield and quality of sweet potato. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2011,27(7):188-192 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 董月, 王会方, 汪吉东, 宁运旺, 张永春 . 氮肥运筹对甘薯干物质累积及氮素吸收的影响. 江苏师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,35(2):23-26
Dong Y, Wang H F, Wang J D, Ning Y W, Zhang Y C . Effects of nitrogen application on dry matter accumulation and nitrogen uptake of sweet potato. J Jiangsu Nor Univ( Nat Sci Edn), 2017,35(2):23-26 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 卜容燕, 任涛, 鲁剑巍, 李小坤, 李云春, 汪洋, 鲁君明 . 水稻-油菜轮作条件下氮肥效应及其后效. 中国农业科学, 2012,45:5049-5056
Bu R Y, Ren T, Lu J W, Li X K, Li Y C, Wang Y, Lu J M . Study on N fertilizer efficiency and the residual effect under rice-oilseed rape rotation system. Sci Agric Sin, 2012,45:5049-5056 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 王文质, 以凡, 杜述荣, 魏秀玲, 许莉萍, 曹化林 . 甘薯淀粉含量换算公式及换算表. 作物学报, 1989,15:94-96
Wang W Z, Yi F, Du S R, Wei X L, Xu L P, Cao H L . Conversion table of the starch content in sweet potato. Acta Agron Sin, 1989,15:94-96 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 任昊, 程乙, 刘鹏, 董树亭, 赵杰, 张吉旺, 赵斌 . 不同栽培模式对夏玉米根系性能及产量和氮素利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017,50:2270-2281
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.12.008
Ren H, Cheng Y, Liu P, Dong S T, Zhao J, Zhang J W, Zhao B . Effects of different cultivation patterns on root characteristics, yield formation and nitrogen utilization of summer maize. Sci Agric Sin, 2017,50:2270-2281 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.12.008
[17] 宁运旺, 张永春, 朱绿丹, 陈丹艳, 蔡枫, 汪吉东, 许仙菊, 胡永红 . 甘薯的氮磷钾养分吸收及分配特性. 江苏农业学报, 2011,27:71-74
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2011.01.013
Ning Y W, Zhang Y C, Zhu L D, Chen D Y, Cai F, Wang J D, Xu X J, Hu Y H . Uptake and distribution of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in sweet potato. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2011,27:71-74 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2011.01.013
[18] 陈梦云, 李晓峰, 程金秋, 任红茹, 梁健, 张洪程, 霍中洋 . 秸秆全量还田与氮肥运筹对机插优质食味水稻产量及品质的影响. 作物学报, 2017,43:1802-1816
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.01802
Chen M Y, Li X F, Cheng J Q, Ren H R, Liang J, Zhang H C, Huo Z X . Effects of total straw returning and nitrogen application regime on grain yield and quality in mechanical transplanting japonica rice with good taste quality. Acta Agron Sin, 2017,43:1802-1816 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.01802
[19] 金文林 . 间(套、混)作试验的几种研究方法. 耕作与栽培, 1987, ( 5):36-41
Jin W L . Some research methods of intercropping and mixed cropping experiment. Tillage Cult, 1987, ( 5):36-41 (in Chinese)
[20] 王新华, 郭书亚, 尚赏, 谢幸华, 张艳, 卢广远, 杨爱梅 . 1B8型玉米甘薯套作系统优势分析. 安徽农业科学, 2013,41:13855-13857
Wang X H, Guo S Y, Shang S, Xie X H, Zhang Y, Lu G Y, Yang A M . Type 1B8 of sweet potato, corn interplanting system advantage analysis. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2013,41:13855-13857 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] Ossom E M . Influence of sweet potato/maize association on ecological properties and crop yields in Swaziland, Int J Agric Biol, 2010,12:481-488
doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.03.005
[22] Amede T, Nigatu Y . Interaction of components of sweet potato-maize intercropping under the semi-arid conditions of the Rift-Valley, Ethiopia. Trop Sci, 2001,78:1-7
doi: 10.1117/12.413956
[23] 王庆美, 侯夫云, 汪宝卿, 王振林, 董顺旭, 张海燕, 李爱贤, 张立明, 解备涛 . 遮阴处理对紫甘薯块根品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011,44:192-200
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.01.023
Wang Q M, Hou F Y, Wang B Q, Wang Z L, Dong S X, Zhang H Y, Li A X, Zhang L M, Xie B T . Effects of shading stress on qualities of purple sweet potato storage roots. Sci Agric Sin, 2011,44:192-200 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.01.023
[24] 王庆美, 侯夫云, 汪宝卿, 董顺旭, 王振林, 张海燕, 李爱贤, 解备涛, 张立明 . 大田遮荫对紫心甘薯块根中酶活性的影响. 核农学报, 2012,26:960-966
Wang Q M, Hou F Y, Wang B Q, Dong S X, Wang Z L, Zhang H Y, Li A X, Xie B T, Zhang L M . Enzymatic activity of root qualities in purple-fleshed sweet potato under flied shading stress. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2012,26:960-966 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 林超文, 陈一兵, 黄晶晶 . 中国四川间作地区作物高度、覆盖度和叶面积指数的时间变化. 水土保持研究, 2007,14(2):72-75
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3409.2007.02.024
Lin C W, Chen Y B, Huang J J . Temporal variation of plant height, plant cover and leaf area index in inter-cropped area of Sichuan, Res Soil Water Conserv, 2007,14(2):72-75 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3409.2007.02.024
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[6] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[7] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[8] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[9] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[10] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[11] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[12] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[13] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!