欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (10): 2833-2844.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.21069

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

匀播和条播小麦产量及干物质积累对春季灌水量的响应

于慧玲1(), 阚茗溪1, 徐哲莉2, 马瑞琦1, 刘阿康1,3, 王德梅1, 王艳杰1, 杨玉双1, 赵广才1, 常旭虹1()   

  1. 1中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 / 农业农业部作物生理生态重点实验室, 北京 100081
    2石家庄市农林科学研究院赵县实验基地, 河北石家庄 051530
    3全国农业技术推广服务中心粮食作物技术处, 北京 100125
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-30 接受日期:2023-04-18 出版日期:2023-10-12 网络出版日期:2023-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 常旭虹, E-mail: changxuhong@caas.cn
  • 作者简介:E-mail: huilingyu123@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(32071952);财政部和农业农村部国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-03-16);中国农业科学院重大任务小麦藏粮于技项目(CAAS-ZDRW202002)

Yield and dry matter accumulation of wheat in response to spring irrigation water in uniform sowing and strip sowing

YU Hui-Ling1(), KAN Ming-Xi1, XU Zhe-Li2, MA Rui-Qi1, LIU A-Kang1,3, WANG De-Mei1, WANG Yan-Jie1, YANG Yu-Shuang1, ZHAO Guang-Cai1, CHANG Xu-Hong1()   

  1. 1Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China
    2Shijiazhuang Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang 051530, Hebei, China
    3National Agro-Tech Extension and Service Center Grain Crop Technology Division, Beijing 100125, China
  • Received:2022-10-30 Accepted:2023-04-18 Published:2023-10-12 Published online:2023-04-28
  • Contact: E-mail: changxuhong@caas.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(32071952);China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA(CARS-03-16);Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program(CAAS-ZDRW202002)

RichHTML

13

PDF

682

摘要：

为明确新型播种方式立体匀播条件下小麦干物质积累及对水分的利用情况, 挖掘播种方式节水潜力。本试验于2020—2021年冬小麦生长季在石家庄和北京2个试点进行同步试验, 以中筋节水型小麦“轮选103”为供试品种, 采用裂区试验设计, 主区设3个灌水量: 600 m3 hm-2 (W1)、900 m3 hm-2 (W2)和1200 m3 hm-2 (W3); 副区为立体匀播(S1)和常规条播(S2)两种播种方式, 从产量构成、物质积累与转运、水分利用角度研究不同播种方式下小麦对春季灌水量的响应差异, 为小麦节水生产提供理论依据和技术支撑。结果表明: 相同灌水量条件下, 立体匀播产量高于常规条播, 主要是其叶面积指数(LAI)较高, 且随着生育进程的推进变化较为稳定; 同时, 匀播小麦功能叶的光合性能优于条播, 利于合成更多的有机物, 使得匀播小麦各器官的干物质积累量和花后光合积累量均高于条播, 提高水分利用效率(WUE)和灌溉水利用效率(IWUE), 表现出较好的产量优势。当灌水量为600 m3 hm-2 (W1)时, 匀播较条播产量增加最多, 为832.0 kg hm-2, 增幅为9.89%, 茎鞘、叶片和穗的干物质量匀播较条播平均增加25.15%、27.64%和18.68%, WUE和IWUE分别显著提高11.16%和9.92%; 播种方式间的最大相对生长速率在灌水量为900 m3 hm-2 (W2)时差异最大, 匀播较条播快0.021~0.025 g 株-1 d-1, 在该灌水量下干物质积累最大相对生长速率出现的时间(tm)提前, 快速生长期持续的天数(Δt)最短, 且石家庄试点出现的时间早于北京试点; 花后光合积累量在灌水量为1200 m3 hm-2 (W3)时匀播显著高于条播, 匀播较条播平均增产4.37%。灰色关联度分析表明, 两试点匀播小麦的穗数、千粒重与产量密切相关, 而条播小麦的净光合速率与产量的关联度较高。总体分析发现, 相同灌水量下, 与常规条播相比, 匀播小麦通过提高LAI延长高值持续期, 或者提高净光合速率, 或者促进干物质积累而提高产量, 尤其在较低的灌水量条件下, 选用匀播播种方式, 可在相同的灌水投入下, 高效利用水量, 从而获得较高的产量, 增加效益。因此, 匀播方式更适合生产中灌水条件不足的地区, 可以充分发挥其高效节水功能。

关键词: 播种方式, 灌水量, 干物质积累, 产量

Abstract:

The objective of this study is to clarify the dry matter accumulation and water use of wheat under the new sowing method of tridimensional uniform sowing and to explore the water saving potential of the sowing method. The experiment was conducted in two pilot sites in Shijiazhuang and Beijing during growing season of winter wheat from 2020 to 2021, using medium gluten and water-saving wheat Lunxuan 103 as the experimental variety. To study the differences of wheat response to spring irrigation under different sowing methods from the perspectives of yield composition, material accumulation and transport, and water utilization, and to provide the theoretical basis and technical support for water-saving wheat, the experiment was conducted with three irrigation rates in the main zone [600 m3 hm-2(W1), 900 m3 hm-2 (W2), and 1200 m3 hm-2 (W3)] and two sowing methods [tridimensional uniform sowing (S1) and conventional strip sowing (S2)] in the secondary zone. The results showed that, under the same irrigation rate, the yield of tridimensional uniform sowing was higher than that of conventional strip sowing, mainly because leaf area index (LAI) was higher and changed more steadily with the advancement of the reproductive process. Meanwhile, the photosynthetic performance of the functional leaves of uniform sowing wheat was better than that of strip sowing, which facilitated the synthesis of more organic matter, resulting in higher dry matter accumulation and post-flowering photosynthetic accumulation of all organs of uniform sowing wheat than that of strip sowing, and improved WUE and IWUE, showing a better yield advantage. When the irrigation rate was 600 m3 hm-2 (W1), compared with the strip sowing, the yield of uniform sowing increased the most by 832.0 kg hm-2 with an increase of 9.89%. The dry matter mass of stem sheath, leaf, and spike increased by 25.15%, 27.64%, and 18.68%, and WUE and IWUE increased by 11.16% and 9.92%, respectively. The maximum relative growth rate of different sowing methods was the highest when the irrigation amount was 900 m3 hm-2 (W2), the maximum relative growth rate of dry matter accumulation (0.021-0.025 g plant-1 day-1) occurred earlier than strip sowing, and the maximum relative growth rate of dry matter accumulation at the irrigation rate appeared earlier (tm), and the duration of the rapid growth period (Δt) was the shortest, and appeared earlier in Shijiazhuang than Beijing. The post-flowering photosynthetic accumulation at 1200 m3 hm-2 (W3) was significantly higher than strip sowing, and the average yield increase was 4.37%. The gray correlation analysis showed that the number of spikes and 1000-grain weight of uniform sowing wheat were closely related to yield, while the net photosynthetic rate of strip sowing wheat was more correlated with yield in both sites. These results revealed that, under the same irrigation amount, compared with the conventional strip sowing, uniformly sown wheat could increase its yield by increasing LAI to prolong the duration of high values, or increasing net photosynthetic rate, or promoting dry matter accumulation. Especially under the condition of lower irrigation amount, the method of uniform sowing could achieve higher yield and increase benefit by efficient water use with the same irrigation input. Therefore, the uniform sowing was more suitable for areas with insufficient irrigation conditions in production, and could give full play to its efficient water-saving function.

Key words: sowing pattern, irrigation, dry matter accumulation, yield

表1

试验地概况"

试点
Experimental site		 经纬度
Latitude and longitude		 海拔
Altitude
(m)		 种植生态区
Ecological area		 全年≥10℃积温
Accumulated temperature (≥10℃) of growth period (℃)		 生育期>0℃积温
Accumulated temperature (>0℃) of growth period (℃)		 无霜期
Frost-free period
(d)
河北石家庄 Shijiazhuang, Hebei 37°27'N, 113°30'E 78 黄淮冬麦区
Huang-Huai winter wheat region		 4844 2206 197
北京
Beijing		 39°57'N, 116°19'E 46 北部冬麦区
Northern winter wheat region		 4777 2330 211

表2

土壤基础养分含量"

试点
Experimental site		 有机质
Organic matter
(g kg-1)		 全氮
Total nitrogen
(g kg-1)		 碱解氮
Alkali-hydrolytic
nitrogen
(mg kg-1)		 速效磷
Available
phosphorus
(mg kg-1)		 速效钾
Available
potassium
(mg kg-1)		 pH
河北石家庄 Shijiazhuang, Hebei 19.2 1.2 109.8 28.8 183.7 8.4
北京Beijing 23.5 1.2 95.3 22.1 206.8 8.3

图1

两个试点小麦生育期内降雨量及温度"

表3

不同处理对产量及产量构成的影响"

试点
Experimental site		 灌水量
Irrigation amount		 播种方式
Sowing
pattern		 产量
Yield
(kg hm-2)		 穗粒数
Grain per spike		 穗数
Spikes
(×104 hm-2)		 千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)		 经济系数
HI
(%)
河北石家庄 Shijiazhuang, Hebei W1 S1 9292.6 c 42.5 b 613.6 a 46.61 c 0.48 b
S2 8556.7 d 46.2 a 480.4 b 46.59 c 0.50 a
W2 S1 9311.8 c 42.3 b 619.2 a 47.65 bc 0.50 a
S2 9264.9 c 46.7 a 487.4 b 47.54 bc 0.50 a
W3 S1 9898.0 a 40.9 c 654.4 a 48.12 b 0.50 a
S2 9500.9 b 46.8 a 509.3 b 49.99 a 0.51 a
北京
Beijing		 W1 S1 9188.2 ab 43.6 c 576.0 b 48.24 ab 0.53 c
S2 8260.1 c 47.5 b 531.0 d 44.87 c 0.55 b
W2 S1 9480.2 a 44.0 c 585.6 b 48.86 ab 0.54 c
S2 8823.9 b 47.8 b 578.1 bcd 46.30 bc 0.56 ab
W3 S1 9679.6 a 44.4 c 629.9 a 49.84 a 0.54 c
S2 9256.3 ab 49.2 a 606.1 cd 47.12 abc 0.56 a

图2

不同处理叶面积指数和净光合速率的变化 JS: 拔节期; AS: 开花期; FS: 灌浆期。处理同表3。"

图3

不同处理各器官干物质积累量的变化 JS: 拔节期; AS: 开花期; FS: 灌浆期: MS: 成熟期。处理同表3。"

图4

成熟期不同处理各器官干物质分配比例 同一试点相同器官不同小写字母表示处理间在0.05概率水平差异显著。处理同表3。"

表4

拔节后冬小麦地上部分干物质积累的Logistic方程模拟及其特征值"

试点
Experimental
site		 处理
Treatment		 Logistic方程
Logistic equation		 Vm
(g plant-1 d-1)		 持续时间Duration (d) R2
t1 t2 tm Δt
河北石家庄 Shijiazhuang, Hebei W1S1 y = 7.7773/[1+e(2.2386−0.110050t)] 0.214 8.4 32.3 20.3 23.9 0.99529
W1S2 y = 7.7246/[1+e(2.3212−0.106414t)] 0.206 9.4 34.2 21.8 24.8 0.99413
W2S1 y = 8.2821/[1+e(2.3029−0.118371t)] 0.245 8.3 30.6 19.5 22.3 0.99686
W2S2 y = 8.1885/[1+e(2.3087−0.109060t)] 0.223 9.1 33.2 21.2 24.2 0.99151
W3S1 y = 8.9725/[1+e(1.8837−0.098018t)] 0.220 5.8 32.7 19.2 26.9 1.00000
W3S2 y = 8.5896/[1+e(1.9501−0.098988t)] 0.213 6.4 33.0 19.7 26.6 0.98269
北京
Beijing		 W1S1 y = 9.4237/[1+e(2.2775 −0.079217t)] 0.187 12.1 45.4 28.8 33.3 0.97068
W1S2 y = 8.9926/[1+e(2.1281−0.074001t)] 0.166 11.0 46.6 28.8 35.6 0.99002
W2S1 y = 9.6812/[1+e(2.1887−0.084410t)] 0.204 10.3 41.5 25.9 31.2 0.99465
W2S2 y = 9.2403/[1+e(2.1876−0.079164t)] 0.183 11.0 44.3 27.6 33.3 0.98808
W3S1 y = 10.2497/[1+e(2.3078−0.087897t)] 0.225 11.3 41.2 26.3 30.0 0.99057
W3S2 y = 9.7650/[1+e(2.3659−0.090817t)] 0.222 11.5 40.6 26.1 29.0 0.98864

表5

不同处理各器官花前干物质转运的差异"

部位
Part		 处理
Treatment		 河北石家庄 Shijiazhuang, Hebei 北京Beijing
T (kg hm-2) TE (%) TC (%) T (kg hm-2) TE (%) TC (%)
茎秆+叶鞘 W1S1 2480.33 b 22.89 b 23.33 cd 1190.14 b 11.45 c 11.16 c
Stem + Leaf sheath W1S2 1830.17 c 22.51 b 21.98 d 1487.92 b 15.66 bc 16.20 bc
W2S1 4009.69 a 31.26 a 35.59 a 3100.64 a 23.27 ab 26.86 a
W2S2 2492.18 b 27.24 ab 27.62 bc 2094.88 b 18.79 abc 20.49 ab
W3S1 3715.23 a 25.79 b 29.08 b 3878.56 a 25.91 a 28.96 a
W3S2 2584.30 b 25.97 b 27.32 bcd 3555.99 a 26.02 a 28.15 a
叶片 W1S1 1440.37 a 38.41 a 13.49 a 1908.97 a 49.97 ab 17.81 a
Leaf W1S2 783.01 a 29.32 a 8.98 a 1850.48 a 55.08 ab 20.25 a
W2S1 1384.25 a 30.96 a 12.02 a 1938.08 a 47.78 ab 16.81 a
W2S2 733.50 a 27.26 a 8.30 a 2101.66 a 55.68 a 19.68 a
W3S1 1236.14 a 28.82 a 9.58 a 2111.02 a 44.10 b 15.78 a
W3S2 869.68 a 28.14 a 9.20 a 2228.60 a 50.30 ab 17.63 a
颖壳+穗轴 W1S1 533.18 a 19.20 a 5.10 a 630.97 ab 24.87 ab 5.90 a
Glume + Spike axis W1S2 391.59 a 19.15 a 4.71 a 237.94 ab 9.60 bc 2.62 ab
W2S1 236.26 a 8.55 a 2.06 a 435.55 ab 16.24 abc 3.73 ab
W2S2 186.01 a 8.83 a 2.12 a 137.04 b 4.61 c 1.32 b
W3S1 349.33 a 12.36 a 2.76 a 437.61 ab 16.09 abc 3.26 ab
W3S2 222.93 a 9.87 a 2.34 a 707.35 a 28.39 a 5.60 ab
总量 W1S1 4453.88 bc 25.78 a 41.92 ab 3730.08 c 20.82 c 34.87 c
Total W1S2 3004.78 d 23.53 a 35.67 b 3576.35 c 22.15 bc 39.07 bc
W2S1 5630.20 a 28.55 a 49.67 a 5474.27 ab 25.81 abc 47.40 ab
W2S2 3411.69 cd 24.53 a 38.03 b 4333.58 bc 23.25 bc 42.36 abc
W3S1 5300.70 ab 24.54 a 41.42 ab 6427.19 a 26.89 ab 48.00 ab
W3S2 3676.91 cd 24.08 a 38.87 b 6491.95 a 29.40 a 51.37 a

表6

不同处理花后干物质积累的差异"

灌水量
Irrigation amount		 播种方式
Sowing
pattern		 河北石家庄 Shijiazhuang, Hebei 北京Beijing
光合积累量
Photosynthetic
accumulation (kg hm-2)		 贡献率
Contribution rate
(%)		 光合积累量
Photosynthetic
accumulation (kg hm-2)		 贡献率
Contribution rate
(%)
W1 S1 6215.76 ab 58.08 ab 6956.28 a 65.14 a
S2 5393.83 b 64.33 a 5570.03 b 60.93 a
W2 S1 5647.64 b 50.33 b 6375.93 ab 55.12 ab
S2 5560.77 b 61.97 a 5910.61 ab 54.77 ab
W3 S1 7512.80 a 58.58 ab 6390.22 ab 48.07 b
S2 5848.15 b 61.13 a 5642.73 ab 44.42 b

图5

2个试点播种前和收获后土壤含水量变化 处理同表3。"

表7

不同处理水分利用特征"

灌水量
Irrigation amount		 播种方式
Sowing pattern		 河北石家庄 Shijiazhuang, Hebei 北京 Beijing
ETa
(mm)		 WUE
(kg hm-2 mm-1)		 IWUE
(kg hm-2 mm-1)		 ETa
(mm)		 WUE
(kg hm-2 mm-1)		 IWUE
(kg hm-2 mm-1)
W1 S1 337.4 c 27.54 a 61.95 a 277.5 c 33.12 a 61.25 a
S2 338.6 c 25.27 c 57.04 b 282.8 c 29.22 bc 55.07 b
W2 S1 361.4 b 25.77 b 51.73 c 311.9 b 30.40 b 52.67 bc
S2 365.6 b 25.34 bc 51.47 c 318.7 b 27.69 c 49.02 cd
W3 S1 396.1 a 24.99 c 47.13 d 339.9 a 28.48 bc 46.09 d
S2 400.7 a 23.71 d 45.24 e 345.2 a 26.87 c 44.08 d

图6

不同播种方式冬小麦水分利用效率与产量的相关分析"

表8

不同播种方式小麦性状与产量间灰色关联度分析"

试点
Experimental
site		 指标
Indicator		 匀播Uniforming 条播Drilling
关联度
Correlation degree		 关联度排序
Relevance ranking		 关联度Correlation degree 关联度排序Relevance ranking
河北石家庄
Shijiazhuang, Hebei		 穗粒数Grain per spike 0.8371 3 0.5790 6
穗数Spikes 0.9796 1 0.6363 4
千粒重1000-grain weight 0.8887 2 0.6680 3
花前干物质转运量Pre-flowering dry matter transfer 0.6150 6 0.6323 5
花后干物质积累量Post-flowering dry matter accumulation 0.6870 5 0.7117 2
净光合速率Photosynthetic rate 0.7640 4 0.7590 1
北京
Beijing		 穗粒数Grain per spike 0.9473 3 0.8841 5
穗数Spikes 0.9500 2 0.9626 1
千粒重1000-grain weight 0.9631 1 0.9122 4
花前干物质转运量Pre-flowering dry matter transfer 0.5893 6 0.6803 6
花后干物质积累量Post-flowering dry matter accumulation 0.8189 5 0.9145 3
净光合速率Photosynthetic rate 0.8901 4 0.9481 2
[1] 赵广才. 小麦立体匀播技术-绿色节本高产高效. 农民科技培训, 2016, (1): 42-44.
Zhao G C. Wheat stereoscopic sowing technology: green, cost-saving and high-yielding. Technol Train Farm, 2016, (1): 42-44. (in Chinese)
[2] 常旭虹, 王艳杰, 陶志强, 王德梅, 马少康, 杨玉双, 徐哲莉, 张燕, 赵广才. 小麦立体匀播栽培技术体系. 作物杂志, 2019, (2): 168-172.
Chang X H, Wang Y J, Tao Z Q, Wang D M, Ma S K, Yang Y S, Xu Z L, Zhang Y, Zhao G C. Tridimensional uniform sowing cultivation system of wheat. Crops, 2019, (2): 168-172. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 徐袁博, 李援农, 银敏华, 任全茂, 王星垚, 陈紫薇. 不同微喷灌灌水量对冬小麦生长、产量和水分利用效率的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(1): 121-125.
Xu Y B, Li Y N, Yin M H, Ren Q M, Wang X Y, Chen Z W. Effect of micro-sprinkler irrigation on growth, yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2018, 36(1): 121-125. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 加孜拉, 张燕, 白云岗. 滴灌下水肥耦合对北疆冬小麦干物质积累和产量的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2014, 33(4): 77-80.
Jia Z L, Zhang Y, Bai Y G. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on dry matter accumulation and yield of winter in northern Xinjiang under drip irrigation. J Irrig Drain, 2014, 33(4): 77-80. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 刘强, 比拉力·艾力, 王冀川, 高振, 李同蕊, 党旭伟, 张利庭. 不同播种方式与密度对滴灌冬小麦干物质积累及光合特性的影响. 塔里木大学学报, 2021, 33(1): 66-76.
Liu Q, Bilali A, Wang J C, Gao Z, Li T R, Dang X W, Zhang L T. Effects of different sowing methods and densities on dry matter accumulation and photosynthetic characteristics of winter wheat under drip irrigation. J Tarim Univ, 2021, 33(1): 66-76. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 谭维娜, 戴廷波, 荆奇, 曹卫星, 姜东. 花后渍水对小麦旗叶光合特性及产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2007, 27: 314-317.
Tan W N, Dai T B, Jing Q, Cao W X, Jiang D. Effect of post-anthesis water logging on flag leaf photosynthetic characteristics and yield in wheat. J Triticeae Crops, 2007, 27: 314-317. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 崔月, 张宏芝, 赵奇, 刘建鹤. 水肥运筹对滴灌冬小麦干物质积累和产量调控效应研究. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55: 618-626.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2018.04.004
Cui Y, Zhang H Z, Zhao Q, Liu J H. Effect of irrigation and fertilization on dry matter accumulation and yield control of drip irrigation winter wheat. Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2018, 55: 618-626. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] Mon J, Bronson K F, Hunsaker D J, Thorp K R, White J W, French A N. Interactive effects of nitrogen fertilization and irrigation on grain. Field Crops Res, 2016, 191: 54-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.011
[9] 张廷龙, 陈建平, 陈桂平, 胡发龙, 殷文, 赵财, 樊志龙. 春小麦耗水特征对播种方式及播种量的响应. 灌溉排水学报, 2021, 40(9): 11-16.
Zhang T L, Chen J P, Chen G P, Hu F L, Yin W, Zhao C, Fan Z L. Planting pattern and seeding rate combine to affect water consumption of spring wheat. J Irrig Drain, 2021, 40(9): 11-16. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 李俊红, 姚宇卿, 丁志强, 吕军杰, 张洁, 吴剑峰, 于新峰. 沟播对冬小麦群体干物质、土壤水分利用效率及土壤温度的影响. 作物研究, 2010, 24(1): 16-18.
Li J H, Yao Y Q, Ding Z Q, Lyu J J, Zhang J, Wu J F, Yu X F. Effect of furrow sowing on dry matter, soil water use efficiency and soil temperature of winter wheat population. Crop Res, 2010, 24(1): 16-18. (in Chinese)
[11] 吴祯, 张保军, 海江波, 董永利, 陈军晓, 马娟娟, 韩雪冰. 不同种植方式对冬小麦花后干物质积累与分配特征及产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37: 1377-1382.
Wu Z, Zhang B J, Hai J B, Dong Y L, Chen J X, Ma J J, Han X B. Effect of different planting patterns on dry matter accumulation and distribution post-anthesis and yield of winter wheat. J Triticeae Crops, 2017, 37: 1377-1382. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 刘阿康. 播期及调控措施对小麦苗期生长的影响. 中国农业科学院硕士学位论文, 北京, 2021.
Liu A K. Effects of Sowing Date and Regulation Measures on Wheat Seedling Growth. MS Thesis of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 李晓航, 杨丽娟, 盛坤, 蒋志凯. 不同灌水处理下小麦干物质分配、转运及其产量的研究. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(30): 33-37.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15050183
Li X H, Yang L J, Sheng K, Jiang Z K. Effects of different irrigation models on yield, distribution and transport of dry-matter of wheat plant. Chinese Agric Sci Bull, 2015, 31(30): 33-37. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 黄彩霞, 柴守玺, 赵德明, 李志贤, 常磊, 王婷. 不同水分处理对冬小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响. 草业学报, 2010, 19(5): 196-203.
Huang C X, Chai S X, Zhao D M, Li Z X, Chang L, Wang T. Effects of irrigation on grain yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat. Acta Pratac Sin, 2010, 19(5): 196-203. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 雷锦雯. 不同播种方式与播量对冬小麦群体质量与产量构成的调控效应. 河南农业大学硕士学位论文, 河南郑州, 2017.
Lei J W. Effects of Different Sowing Methods and Planting Densities on Group Quality and Yield Components of Winter Wheat. MS Thesis of Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 周勋波, 孙淑娟, 陈雨海, 李全起, 杨国敏. 冬小麦不同行距下水分特征与产量构成的初步研究. 土壤学报, 2008, 45: 188-191.
Zhou X B, Sun S J, Chen Y H, Li Q Q, Yang G M. Moisture characteristics and yield composition of winter wheat different in row spacing. Acta Pedol Sin, 2008, 45: 188-191. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] 张金汕, 贾永红, 李鹏, 孙鹏, 蒋文, 石书兵. 立体匀播和密度对冬小麦光合、干物质积累分配及产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41: 438-447.
Zhang J S, Jia Y H, Li P, Sun P, Jiang W, Shi S B. Effect of uniforming sowing pattern and planting density on photosynthesis, dry matter accumulation and distribution and yield of winter wheat. J Triticeae Crops, 2021, 41: 438-447. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] 赵凯男, 常旭虹, 王德梅, 陶志强, 杨玉双, 马瑞琦, 朱英杰, 徐哲莉, 张保军, 赵广才. 立体匀播和施氮量对冬小麦产量构成及旗叶光合性能的影响. 作物杂志, 2019, (1): 103-110.
Zhao K N, Chang X H, Wang D M, Tao Z Q, Yang Y S, Ma R Q, Zhu Y J, Xu Z L, Zhang B J, Zhao G C. Effects of tridimensional uniform sowing and fertilizer on grain and physiological characteristics of winter wheat. Crops, 2019, (1): 103-110. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] Javad H, Jalal S. Deficit irrigation of rapeseed for water-saving: Effects on biomass accumulation, light interception and radiation use efficiency under different N rates. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2012, 155: 153-160.
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.04.003
[20] 石玉华. 不同栽培技术体系对冬小麦产量品质和光能水氮利用效率的影响. 山东农业大学博士学位论文, 山东泰安, 2011.
Shi Y H. Effects of Different Cultivation System on Grain Yield, Quality, LUE, WUE, and NUE of Winter Wheat. PhD Dissertation of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong, China, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 郝艳茹, 赵香莲. 不同播种方式和施氮量对小麦生长发育及产量的影响. 基层农技推广, 2017, 5(10): 13-14.
Hao Y R, Zhao X L. Effects of different sowing methods and N application on growth and yield of wheat. Prim Agric Technol Extens, 2017, 5(10): 13-14. (in Chinese)
[22] 朱元刚, 朱勇, 王运智, 刘慧, 吴儒刚, 肖岩岩, 王士岭, 戴忠民. 立体匀播影响小麦光合生产和产量形成的研究进展. 安徽农学通报, 2021, 27(19): 20-22.
Zhu Y G, Zhu Y, Wang Y Z, Liu H, Wu R G, Xiao Y Y, Wang S L. Dai Z M. Research progress on effects of tridimensional uniform sowing on photosynthetic production and yield formation of wheat. Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2021, 27(19): 20-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 雷钧杰, 张永强, 赛力汗·赛, 薛丽华, 梁玉超, 张宏芝, 陈兴武, 王志敏. 施氮量对滴灌冬小麦干物质积累、分配与转运的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37: 1078-1086.
Lei J J, Zhang Y Q, Sailihan·S, Xue L H, Liang Y C, Zhang H Z, Chen X W, Wang Z M. Effect of nitrogen application rate on dry matter accumulation, distribution and translocation of winter wheat under drip irrigation. J Triticeae Crops, 2017, 37: 1078-1086. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 杨佳佳, 程宏波, 柴守玺, 张博, 李瑞. 不同覆盖栽培方式对冬小麦干物质分配与转运的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41: 745-751.
Yang J J, Cheng H B, Chai S X, Zhang B, Li R. Effect of different mulching cultivation methods on dry matter distribution and translocation in winter wheat. J Triticeae Crops, 2021, 41: 745-751. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 942-951.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14045
Li R D, Yin Y Y, Song W W, Wu T T, Sun S, Han T F, Xu C L, Wu C X, Hu S X. Effects of close planting densities on assimilate accumulation and yield of soybean with different plant branching types. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 942-951. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14045
[26] Zhang X Y, Wang Y Z, Sun H Y, Chen S Y, Shao L W. Optimizing the yield of winter wheat by regulating water consumption during vegetative and reproductive stages under limited water supply. Irrig Sci, 2013, 31: 1103-1112.
doi: 10.1007/s00271-012-0391-8
[27] 王德梅, 于振文, 张永丽, 王东. 灌水对不同小麦品种物质生产及水分利用的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2010, 30: 366-371.
Wang D M, Yu Z W, Zhang Y L, Wang D. Effects of irrigation on dry matter production and water use of different wheat cultivars. J Triticeae Crops, 2010, 30: 366-371. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] 孟凡德, 马林, 石书兵, 郭飞, 刘兴强, 朱军, 毛吉贤, 刘正兴. 不同耕作条件下春小麦干物质积累动态及其相关性状的研究. 麦类作物学报, 2007, 156: 693-698.
Meng F D, Ma L, Shi S B, Guo F, Liu X Q, Zhu J, Mao J X, Liu Z X. Dynamics change of dry matter accumulation and relative characteristics of spring wheat under different tillage. J Triticeae Crops, 2007, 156: 693-698. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] 常磊, 韩凡香, 柴雨葳, 王仕娥, 杨德龙, 程宏波, 黄彩霞, 柴守玺. 秸秆带状覆盖下冬小麦干物质积累及氮磷钾素的吸收利用. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39: 487-494.
Chang L, Han F X, Chai Y W, Wang S E, Yang D L, Cheng H B, Huang C X, Chai S X. Dry matter accumulation and N, P and K absorption and utilization under bundled straw mulching. J Triticeae Crops, 2019, 39: 487-494 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] 仝锦, 孙敏, 任爱霞, 林文, 余少波, 王强, 冯玉, 任婕, 高志强. 高产小麦品种植株干物质积累运转、土壤耗水与产量的关系. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53: 3467-3478.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.17.005
Tong J, Sun M, Ren A X, Lin W, Yu S B, Wang Q, Feng Y, Ren J, Gao Z Q. Relationship between plant dry matter accumulation, translocation, soil water consumption and yield of high-yielding wheat cultivars. Sci Agric Sin, 2020, 53: 3467-3478. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.17.005
[31] 石学萍, 刘伊明, 王九明, 兰印超, 檀海斌. 灌水量对冬小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(11): 51-52.
Shi X P, Liu Y M, Wang J M, Lan Y C, Tan H B. Effects of irrigation amount on the yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2021, 49(11): 51-52. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] 赵炳梓, 徐富安, 周刘宗, 徐梦熊. 水肥(N)双因素下的小麦产量及水分利用率. 土壤, 2003, (2): 122-125.
Zhao B Z, Xu F A, Zhou L Z, Xu M X. Wheat yield and water-use efficiency as influenced by different combinations of irrigation water and nitrogen fertilizer. Soils, 2003, (2): 122-125. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] 梁云娟, 郜庆炉, 薛香. 小麦单株产量、收获指数与主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析. 生物数学学报, 2013, 28: 355-360.
Liang Y J, Gao Q L, Xue X. Grey correlation analysis of harvest index and agronomic traits in wheat. J Biomathem, 2013, 28: 355-360. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] 黄锦, 程加省, 王志伟, 乔祥梅, 杨金华, 程耿, 胡银星, 谭泽林, 李菊湘, 于亚雄. 利用灰色关联度分析云南田麦新品系产量和产量构成因素. 西南农业学报, 2014, 27: 2282-2285.
Huang J, Cheng J S, Wang Z W, Qiao X M, Yang J H, Cheng G, Hu Y X, Tan Z L, Li J X, Yu Y X. Grey correlation degree used to analyze yield and yield component factors of irrigated new wheat line of Yunnan Province. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2014, 27: 2282-2285. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35] 李龙, 李宝强, 孔令国, 王靖, 周忠新, 樊青峰. 鲁南经济带小麦产量与主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析. 陕西农业科学, 2021, 67(3): 5-8.
Li L, Li B Q, Kong L G, Wang J, Zhou Z X, Fan Q F. Grey correlation analysis of wheat yield and main agronomic characters in South Shandong economic belt. Shaanxi J Agric Sci, 2021, 67(3): 5-8. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36] 周青, 范阳, 徐淑霞, 昝凯, 王凤菊, 杨慧凤, 张志民, 陈亚光. 安豆203主要农艺性状与产量的灰色关联度分析. 耕作与栽培, 2020, 40(2): 42-44.
Zhou Q, Fan Y, Xu S X, Zan K, Wang F J, Yang H F, Zhang Z M, Chen Y G. Grey correlation analysis of main agronomic characters and yield of Antu 203. Tillage Culti, 2020, 40(2): 42-44. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37] 窦士树, 马海涛, 朱红彩, 王玲燕, 张素平, 李军利, 郑秋道. 河南省夏大豆新品种产量与主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61: 2535-2538.
Dou S S, Ma H T, Zhu H C, Wang L Y, Zhang S P, Li J L, Zheng Q D. Grey correlation degree analysis between yield and main agronomic traits of new summer soybean varieties in Henan province. J Zhejiang Agric Sci, 2020, 61: 2535-2538. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38] 孟静娇, 张树明, 刘婷婷, 陈国斌. 玉米杂交种主要农艺性状与产量的灰色关联度分析. 农业科技通讯, 2021, (4): 128-129.
Meng J J, Zhang S M, Liu T T, Chen G B. Grey correlation analysis of main agronomic characters and yield of maize hybrids. Bull Agric Sci Technol, 2021, (4): 128-129. (in Chinese)
[39] 杨婷婷, 崔金凤, 吴文革, 杨安中. 21个杂交水稻品种主要农艺性状与产量的灰色关联度分析. 安徽科技学院学报, 2015, 29(3): 1-5.
Yang T T, Cui J F, Wu W G, Yang A Z. Grey correlation analysis on main agronomic characters of 21 rice varieties. J Anhui Sci Technol Univ, 2015, 29(3): 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[6] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[7] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[10] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[11] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[12] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[13] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2