欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 472-484.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.23028

所属专题： 玉米：耕作栽培·生理生化

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同时期化控对密植玉米冠层结构及籽粒灌浆特性的影响

徐彤1,2(), 吕艳杰1,2, 邵玺文1, 耿艳秋1, 王永军1,2,*()   

  1. 1吉林农业大学农学院, 吉林长春 1301182
    2吉林省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所 / 主粮作物国家工程研究中心, 吉林长春 130033
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-15 接受日期:2022-06-07 出版日期:2022-07-08 网络出版日期:2022-07-08
  • 通讯作者: 王永军
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 15075235692@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    吉林省农业科技创新工程(CXGC2017JQ006);国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0300303);国家自然科学基金项目(31701349)

Effect of different times of spraying chemical regulator on the canopy structure and grain filling characteristics of high planting densities

XU Tong1,2(), LYU Yan-Jie1,2, SHAO Xi-Wen1, GENG Yan-Qiu1, WANG Yong-Jun1,2,*()   

  1. 1Agronomy College, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 131182, Jilin, China
    2Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jilin Academy of Agriculture Sciences / State Engineering Research Center of Predominant Food Crops, Changchun 130033, Jilin, China
  • Received:2022-03-15 Accepted:2022-06-07 Published:2022-07-08 Published online:2022-07-08
  • Contact: WANG Yong-Jun
  • Supported by:
    Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of Jilin Province(CXGC2017JQ006);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFD0300303);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31701349)

RichHTML

31

PDF

927

摘要：

合理的冠层结构能够保障作物群体生产功能得到充分发挥, 而喷施化学调控物质是塑造作物冠层的重要措施之一, 其中化控时期的选择至关重要。本研究以先玉335为供试品种, 分别在60,000株hm-2 (D1)和90,000株hm-2 (D2) 2个种植密度下, 设置3个化控处理(化控剂为乙烯利复配剂), T10 (十叶期喷施450 L hm-2化控试剂)、T15 (十五叶期喷施450 L hm-2化控试剂)、CK (喷施清水作对照), 研究了在不同密度下的不同时期化控处理对玉米冠层结构的调控, 分析了冠层结构改变对籽粒灌浆特性和产量的影响。结果表明, 在D1密度下, 化控处理对产量影响不显著, 而在D2密度下, T15较CK两年平均增产7.3%, 穗粒数和千粒重分别增加2.6%和3.6%, T10处理穗粒数和千粒重均降低。T15处理吐丝期上部叶夹角降低17.5%, 十四至十七叶位的叶面积减小, 使穗位层光能截获率增加11.5%, 在乳熟期净光合速率(Pn)仍能维持较高, 完熟期群体叶面积指数(LAI)显著提高51.3%, 延缓了中下部叶片衰老, 增加花后干物质积累及其向籽粒中转移, 延长了籽粒灌浆活跃期(P), 使得达到最大灌浆速率时天数(Tmax)缩短了0.8 d, 灌浆速率最大时生长量(Wmax)和最大灌浆速率(Gmax)分别增加了7.3%和4.0%, 平均灌浆速率(Vmax)提高了6.9%。与D1相比, D2条件下喷施化控剂更加显著改善玉米冠层结构, 提高玉米群体的光能利用率, 增加花后干物质积累量, 促进产量增加。相关分析表明, 在D2密度下, 上部叶片(十四至十七)的叶面积与冠层中部光能截获率、穗粒数、千粒重、产量呈负相关, 同时产量与千粒重、穗粒数、净光合速率、花后干物质积累量、灌浆速率最大时的生长量、灌浆速率均呈正相关。综上所述, 在高密度下十五叶期喷施化控剂能够有效改善玉米群体上部冠层结构, 使其叶面积和叶夹角减小, 优化群体的光照条件, 增强灌浆后期光合能力, 提高籽粒灌浆速率, 实现光资源利用和产量的协同提高。

关键词: 玉米, 化控, 冠层结构, 籽粒灌浆, 产量

Abstract:

A proper canopy structure ensures that the productive functions of the crop community are fully utilized, the spraying chemical regulator is one of the most important measures to shape the crop canopy, among which the selection of chemical control period is very crucial. The maize variety Xianyu 335 was used as the experimental material, field experiments were conducted with three treatments with two planting densities at 60,000 plants hm-2 (D1) and 90,000 plants hm-2 (D2) (chemical regulator made of ethephon), T10 (spray chemical regulator at the 10-leaf), T15 (spray chemical regulator at the 15-leaf), and CK (spray water as control). Therefore, it is important to explore the regulation of maize canopy structure and analyze the effect of changing canopy structure on grain-filling characteristics and yield. The results showed that at D1 density, the chemical regulator treatment had no significant effect on yield; at D2 density, compared with the CK, yield of T15 increased by 7.3% on average in two years, the number of kernel and the 1000-kernel weight increased by 2.6% and 3.3%, respectively, the number of kernels and the 1000-kernel weight decreased in T10. The upper leaf angle was reduced by 17.5% at T15 and the leaf area at the 14-17 leaf position was reduced, increased the light energy interception at the ear position leaf at 11.5%, and maintained a high net photosynthetic rate (Pn) at milk stage, a significant increase of 51.3% in leaf area index (LAI) at the physiological maturity, delayed the senescence of the lower and middle leaves, increased dry matter accumulation of post anthesis and the transfer amount of dry matter, extended active grain filling period (P), reduced the days of maximum grain filling (Tmax) by 0.8 d, increased the weight of maximum grain filling rate (Wmax) and maximum grain-filling rate (Gmax) by 7.3% and 4.0% respectively and increased average grain-filling rate (Vmax) by 6.9%. Compared with D1, D2 significantly improved maize canopy structure, increased light energy utilization in maize populations, increased post-flowering dry matter accumulation, and promoted yield. After the chemical regulator treatment, leaf area of the upper leaves (14-17) was negatively correlated with light energy interception in the middle of the canopy, kernel number, 1000-kernel weight, and yield, and the yield was positively correlated with 1000-kernel weight, kernel number, net photosynthetic rate, post-flowering dry matter accumulation, the weight of maximum grain filling rate and the grain-filling rate. In summary, the spraying of the chemical regulator at the 15-leaf stage of high density was effective in improving the upper canopy structure of the population, resulting in a reduction in leaf area and leaf angle to optimize the light conditions of the population, and enhanced photosynthetic capacity at the late of grain filling, increased grain-filling rate, and it can achieve efficient utilization of light energy and synergistic increase in yield.

Key words: maize, chemical regulator, canopy structure, grain-filling, yield

图1

2019年和2020年玉米生长季降雨量和平均温度"

表1

不同种植密度和不同时期化控对玉米产量及产量构成的影响"

年份
Year		 密度
Density		 化控处理
Treatment		 公顷有效穗数
Productive ears per
hectare		 穗粒数
Kernels per ear		 千粒重
1000-kernel weight (g)		 产量
Yield
(t hm-2)
2019 D1 CK 55,677.7±1268.9 c 569.8±7.6 b 315.1±1.1 ab 11.6±0.2 cd
T10 56,410.3±1268.9 c 561.5±5.3 b 308.3±7.9 ab 11.3±0.1 d
T15 56,410.3±1268.9 c 572.5±13.8 b 316.8±1.7 a 11.9±0.1 bcd
D2 CK 75,457.9±1268.9 b 465.0±3.9 e 295.7±4.4 d 12.1±0.4 bc
T10 84,249.1±1268.9 b 430.1±6.3 f 280.5±6.1 e 11.8±0.4 bcd
T15 76,190.5±1268.9 a 475.0±4.6 e 306.1±2.8 bc 12.9±0.2 a
2020 D1 CK 55,677.7±1268.9 c 588.4±5.9 a 317.0±1.8 a 12.1±0.3 bc
T10 57,875.5±2537.8 c 593.0±5.0 a 299.1±11.7 cd 11.9±0.3 bcd
T15 57,142.9±2197.8 c 593.9±4.8 a 312.4±3.0 ab 12.3±0.3 b
D2 CK 74,725.3±2197.8 b 488.5±6.2 d 282.9±4.4 e 12.0±0.1 bc
T10 82,783.9±1268.9 a 469.6±7.4 e 265.6±0.3 f 12.0±0.1 bc
T15 75,457.9±2537.8 b 502.9±4.4 c 293.4±3.1 d 12.9±0.6 a
变异来源
Source of variation		 年份Year (Y) ns ** ** *
密度Density (D) ** ** ** **
化控处理Treatment (T) ** ** ** **
Y×D ns ns ** ns
Y×T ns * ns ns
D×T ** ** ** *
Y×D×T ns ns ns ns

图2

不同种植密度和不同时期化控对玉米株高和穗位高的影响 处理同表1。不同小写字母在0.05水平差异显著。"

表2

不同种植密度和不同时期化控对玉米叶茎夹角和光能截获率的影响"

年份
Year		 密度
Density		 化控处理
Treatment		 叶夹角Leaf angel (°) 光能截获率Light interception rate (%)
上部
Upper leaf		 中部
Middle leaf		 下部
Lower leaf		 上部
Upper leaf		 中部
Middle leaf		 下部
Lower leaf
2019 D1 CK 30.2±0.6 a 34.8±0.8 ab 39.4±4.5 a 67.4±8.2 b 76.7±1.9 efg 95.6±1.7 abc
T10 27.6±0.3 bc 36.3±0.8 ab 37.8±0.7 ab 57.5±1.1 cd 79.8±2.4 de 95.1±1.7 bcd
T15 26.1±0.6 def 38.1±1.8 a 33.0±4.3 bcde 49.8±2.1 ef 86.7±2.2 bc 95.0±2.5 bcd
D2 CK 28.5±0.6 b 30.1±0.3 c 28.9±0.3 ef 77.0±3.6 a 82.4±4.1 cd 97.1±0.8 ab
T10 25.4±0.9 ef 33.4±0.9 bc 26.5±0.4 f 67.9±0.5 b 85.1±3.3 bc 96.6±1.3 ab
T15 23.7±0.6 g 35.0±0.9 ab 32.3±1.4 cde 55.2±2.8 de 92.1±0.3 a 97.7±0.8 a
2020 D1 CK 28.7±0.5 b 34.7±3.4 ab 36.9±3.9 abc 62.0±0.7 c 72.4±0.6 g 91.3±0.8 de
T10 26.2±0.5 cdf 38.1±3.9 a 37.0±1.6 abc 52.5±0.9 de 74.6±2.2 fg 90.9±2.1 e
T15 25.2±1.4 ef 37.0±3.7 ab 37.0±2.8 abc 46.4±1.4 f 78.0±5.1 def 90.9±0.4 e
D2 CK 27.3±1.0 bcd 30.6±0.5 c 34.9±1.4 abcd 72.2±1.0 ab 79.6±2.0 de 92.8±0.6 de
T10 24.6±0.8 fg 34.8±0.2 ab 31.0±2.2 def 62.0±0.7 c 82.1±2.8 cd 93.3±0.9 cde
T15 22.3±1.2 h 34.7±0.7 ab 36.1±2.7 abc 54.0±2.3 de 88.5±1.2 ab 94.0±0.8 cde
变异来源
Source of variation		 年份Year (Y) ** ns ** ** ** **
密度Density (D) ** ** ** ** ** **
化控处理Treatment (T) ** ** ns ** ** ns
Y×D ns ns * ns ns ns
Y×T ns ns ns ns ns ns
D×T ns ns ** ns ns ns
Y×D×P ns ns ns ns ns ns

图3

不同种植密度和不同时期化控对玉米叶面积指数的影响 处理同表1。V15: 十五叶期, Vt: 吐丝期, R3: 乳熟期, R4: 蜡熟期, R6: 完熟期。**表示在0.01水平上差异显著; *表示在0.05水平上差异显著。"

图4

不同种植密度和不同时期化控对玉米叶面积的影响 处理同表1。"

图5

不同叶位的叶面积与冠层光能截获率、产量及产量构成因素的关系 处理同表1。AL: 上部冠层光能截获率; EL: 中部冠层光能截获率; UL: 下部冠层光能截获率; TKW: 千粒重。**表示在0.01水平上差异显著; *表示在0.05水平上差异显著。"

表3

不同种植密度和不同时期化控对玉米光合特性的影响(2020)"

生育时期Period 密度
Density		 化控处理Treatment 净光合速率
Pn (µmol m-2 s-1)		 气孔导度
Gs (mmol m-2 s-1)		 胞间CO2浓度
Ci (µmol m-2 s-1)		 蒸腾速率
Tr (mmol m-2 s-1)
Vt D1 CK 32.0±0.8 a 0.7±0.1 ab 261.0±11.3 de 6.9±0.8 bc
T10 31.4±1.3 a 0.5±0.1 bcd 274.4±8.9 cde 7.3±0.9 ab
T15 33.3±1.3 a 0.7±0.2 a 288.0±19.7 abc 9.2±1.4 a
D2 CK 24.8±0.8 cd 0.6±0.3 abc 264.1±9.0 de 4.4±1.2 de
T10 23.8±3.0 d 0.3±0.1 de 236.2±13.2 f 4.9±1.7 cde
T15 28.1±1.5 b 0.5±0.1 abcd 229.7±7.3 f 7.7±1.7 ab
R3 D1 CK 27.3±3.0 bc 0.5±0.1 bcd 302.3±9.8 a 6.1±1.1 bcd
T10 27.7±0.8 bc 0.4±0.1 cde 292.5±8.8 abc 6.0±0.7 bcd
T15 28.0±1.9 b 0.6±0.1 abc 299.1±14.8 ab 7.7±1.5 ab
D2 CK 17.9±1.1 e 0.2±0.0 e 279.5±8.1 bcd 3.0±0.3 e
T10 18.4±2.1 e 0.3±0.0 de 262.5±9.5 de 4.3±0.5 de
T15 23.6±1.3 d 0.4±0.1 bcde 257.1±1.3 e 4.7±0.4 de
变异来源
Source of variation		 生育时期Period (P) ** ns ** **
密度Density (D) ** * ** **
化控处理Treatment (T) ** ** ns **
P×D ns ns ns ns
P×T ** ns ns ns
D×T ns ns ** ns
P×D×T ns ** ns ns

表4

不同种植密度和不同时期化控对玉米花后干物质积累与转运的影响"

年份
Year		 密度
Density		 化控处理
Treatment		 花后干物质积累量
Dry matter accumulation post anthesis
(kg hm-2)		 干物质转移量
Transfer amount of dry matter
(kg hm-2)		 干物质转移率
Translocation
efficiency of dry matter (%)		 转移干物质对籽粒贡献率
Contribution rate to the grain of dry matter
transportation (%)
2019 D1 CK 10,627.0±284.8 f 1768.6±104.8 e 19.3±0.9 ef 16.4±1.1 c
T10 10,389.7±230.3 f 1441.3±16.0 f 17.7±0.1 fg 13.8±0.4 e
T15 10,565.7±159.4 f 2024.8±95.7 cd 20.7±0.6 de 18.6±0.7 b
D2 CK 11,224.4±218.8 e 2203.6±18.1 c 20.1±0.4 de 18.7±0.0 b
T10 11,432.9±173.3 de 1964.0±75.1 d 18.1±0.7 fg 17.4±0.5 c
T15 13,194.0±114.7 a 3489.1±230.8 a 30.0±1.9 a 23.8±0.8 a
2020 D1 CK 9638.8±56.5 g 1708.1±115.9 e 17.9±1.3 fg 16.8±1.0 c
T10 10,734.5±468.6 f 1709.0±124.7 e 17.4±1.2 g 15.2±0.4 d
T15 11,942.0±286.8 bc 2449.6±44.2 b 24.6±0.5 c 18.6±0.5 b
D2 CK 11,760.4±423.4 cd 2482.8±53.0 b 21.5±0.2 d 19.8±0.3 b
T10 12,354.5±37.1 b 2195.8±140.6 c 18.5±1.0 fg 16.8±0.9 c
T15 13,571.8±222.2 a 3510.5±42.2 a 26.4±0.4 b 23.2±0.6 a
变异来源
Source of variation		 年份Year (Y) ** ** ns ns
密度Density (D) ** ** ** **
化控处理Treatment (T) ** ** ** **
Y×D * ns * ns
Y×T ** ns ns ns
D×T ** ** ** **
Y×D×T ** ns ** ns

图6

不同种植密度和不同时期化控对玉米百粒重的影响 处理同表1。**表示在0.01水平上差异显著; *表示在0.05水平上差异显著。"

表5

不同时期化控对籽粒灌浆参数的影响"

年份
Year		 密度
Density		 处理
Treatment		 A B C 决定系数
R2		 Tmax
(d)		 Gmax
(g d-1)		 Wmax
(g)		 Vmean
(g d-1)		 P
(d)
2019 D1 CK 34.70 18.99 0.13 0.997 23.05 1.11 17.35 0.58 46.99
T10 34.26 21.33 0.13 0.998 23.42 1.12 17.13 0.58 45.92
T15 36.13 16.32 0.13 0.997 22.10 1.14 18.06 0.61 47.49
D2 CK 32.25 20.75 0.13 0.997 22.79 1.07 16.12 0.56 45.10
T10 30.93 22.32 0.13 0.998 23.08 1.04 15.46 0.53 44.59
T15 34.26 17.77 0.13 0.998 21.68 1.14 17.13 0.60 45.20
2020 D1 CK 33.47 21.40 0.14 0.997 22.38 1.15 16.73 0.59 43.84
T10 33.07 22.99 0.14 0.997 22.72 1.14 16.54 0.58 43.49
T15 34.84 18.19 0.13 0.996 21.85 1.16 17.42 0.61 45.18
D2 CK 31.26 23.96 0.14 0.999 22.37 1.11 15.63 0.57 42.25
T10 30.22 25.99 0.14 0.995 22.64 1.09 15.11 0.55 41.70
T15 33.90 18.40 0.13 0.997 21.80 1.13 16.95 0.60 44.92

图7

产量及产量构成因素与花后干物质积累量、光合特性及灌浆参数的相关性 TKW: 千粒重; KN: 穗粒数; Pn: 净光合速率; DMA: 花后干物质积累量; Gmax: 最大灌浆速率; Tmax: 到达最大灌浆速率时的天数; Wmax: 灌浆速率最大时的生长量; Vmean: 平均灌浆速率; P: 籽粒灌浆活跃期。**表示在0.01水平上差异显著; *表示在0.05水平上差异显著。"

[1] 朴琳, 任红, 展茗, 曹凑贵, 齐华, 赵明, 李从锋. 栽培措施及其互作对北方春玉米产量及耐密性的调控作用. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50: 1982-1994.
Piao L, Ren H, Zhan M, Cao C G, Zhao M, Li C F. Effect of cultivation measures and their interactions on grain yield and density resistance of spring maize. Sci Agric Sin, 2017, 50: 1982-1994. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 王楷, 王克如, 王永宏, 赵健, 赵如浪, 王喜梅, 李健, 梁明晰, 李少昆. 密度对玉米产量(>15000 kg·hm-2)及其产量构成因子的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45: 3437-3445.
Wang K, Wang K R, Wang Y H, Zhao J, Zhao R L, Wang X M, Li J, Liang M X, Li S K. Effects of density on maize yield (>15000 kg·hm-2) and yield components. Sci Agric Sin, 2012, 45: 3437-3445. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 陈传永, 侯玉虹, 孙锐, 朱平, 董志强, 赵明. 密植对不同玉米品种产量性能的影响及其耐密性分析. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 1153-1160.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01153
Chen C Y, Hou Y H, Sun R, Zhu P, Dong Z Q, Zhao M. Effects of planting density on yield performance and density-tolerance analysis for maize hybrids. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 1153-1160. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01153
[4] 柏延文, 杨永红, 朱亚利, 李红杰, 薛吉全, 张仁和. 种植密度对不同株型玉米冠层光能截获和产量的影响. 作物学报, 2019, 45: 1868-1879.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.93011
Bai Y W, Yang Y H, Zhu Y L, Li H J, Xue J Q, Zhang R H. Effect of planting density on light interception within canopy and grain yield of different plant types of maize. Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45: 1868-1879. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.93011
[5] Zhang D S, Sun Z X, Feng L S, Bai W, Yang N, Zhang Z, Du G J, Feng C, Cai Q, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Wang R N, Arshad A, Hao X Y, Su M, Gao Z Q, Zhang L Z. Maize plant density affects yield, growth and source-sink relationship of crops in maize/peanut intercropping. Field Crops Res, 2020, 257: 107926.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107926
[6] 王海永, 张明才, 陈小文, 牛晓雪, 苏贺, 董学会. 乙烯利对夏玉米子粒干物质积累的影响及生理机制探究. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(5): 57-61.
Wang H Y, Zhang M C, Chen X W, Niu X X, Su H, Dong X H. Effects of ethephon on dry matter accumulation in summer corn seeds and related physiological mechanism inquiry. J Maize Sci, 2013, 21(5): 57-61. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] Wang Q, Xue J, Chen J L, Fan Y H, Zhang G Q, Xie R Z, Ming B, Hou P, Wang K R, Li S K. Key indicators affecting maize stalk lodging resistance of different growth periods under different sowing dates. J Integr Agric, 2020, 19: 2419-2428.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63259-2
[8] Gong L S, Qu S J, Huang G M, Guo Y L, Zhang M C, Li Z H, Zhou Y Y, Duan L S. Improving maize grain yield by formulating plant growth regulator strategies in north China. J Integr Agric, 2021, 20: 622-632.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63453-0
[9] Zhang Q, Zhang L Z, Evers J, Werf W V D, Zhang W Q, Duan L S. Maize yield and quality in response to plant density and application of a novel plant growth regulator. Field Crops Res, 2014, 164: 82-89.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.006
[10] 张子学, 朱仕燕, 李文阳, 刘正. 化控剂-乙烯利对玉米植株主要性状和产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(3): 209-213.
Zhang Z X, Zhu S Y, Li W Y, Liu Z. Effect of chemical agent-ethephon on main characters and yield of maize. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2014, 30(3): 209-213 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 刘晓双, 顾万荣, 朴琳, 张立国, 周颖, 李彩凤, 李晶, 魏湜. 噻苯隆-乙烯利复配对春玉米籽粒灌浆特性的影响及其激素调控机理. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36: 3526-3534.
Liu X S, Gu W R, Piao L, Zhang L G, Zhou Y, Li C F, Li J, Wei S. Effects of mixture of thidiazuron and ethephon on grain-filling characteristics and hormone regulation mechanism in spring maize. Chin J Ecol, 2017, 36: 3526-3534. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 聂乐兴, 姜兴印, 吴淑华, 张吉旺, 刘鹏. 胺鲜酯对高产夏玉米产量及叶片光合羧化酶和保护酶活性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21: 2558-2564.
Nie L X, Jiang X Y, Wu S H, Zhang J W, Liu P. Effect of DA-6 on leaf photosynthetic carboxylase and protective enzyme activities and grain yield of high-yielding summer maize. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2010, 21: 2558-2564. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 刘文彬, 冯乃杰, 张盼盼, 李东, 张洪鹏, 何天明, 赵晶晶, 徐延辉, 王畅. 乙烯利和激动素对玉米茎秆抗倒伏和产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25: 1326-1334.
Liu W B, Feng N J, Zhang P P, Li D, Zhang H P, He T M, Zhao J J, Xu Y H, Wang C. Effect of ethephon and kinetin on lodging-resistance and yield of maize. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2017, 25: 1326-1334. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 孟佳佳, 董树亭, 石德杨, 张海燕. 玉米雌穗分化与籽粒发育及败育的关系. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 912-918.
Meng J J, Dong S T, Shi D Y, Zhang H Y. Relationship of ear differentiation with kernel development and barrenness in maize (Zea mays L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 912-918. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00912
[15] 樊海潮, 顾万荣, 杨德光, 尉菊萍, 朴琳, 张倩, 张立国, 杨秀红, 魏湜. 化控剂对东北春玉米茎秆理化特性及抗倒伏的影响. 作物学报, 2018, 44: 909-919.
Fan H C, Gu W R, Yang D G, Yu J P, Piao L, Zhang Q, Zhang G L, Yang X H, Wei T. Effect of chemical regulators on physical and chemical properties and lodging resistance of spring maize stem in Northeast China. Acta Agron Sin, 2018, 44: 909-919. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00909
[16] 杨可攀, 顾万荣, 王悦力, 李文龙, 孟瑶, 孙继, 陈喜昌, 杨德光, 魏湜. 化控剂对玉米光合、激素及茎秆力学特性的影响. 玉米科学, 2017, 25(4): 75-83.
Yang K P, Gu W R, Wang Y L, Li W L, Meng Y, Sun J, Chen C X, Yang D G, Wei T. Effects of plant growth regulator on character of photosynthetic, hormone and stem mechanical properties in maize. J Maize Sci, 2017, 25(4): 75-83. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] Ahmad I, Kamran M, Ali S, Bilegjargal B, Cai T, Ahmad S, Meng X P, Su W N, Liu T N, Han Q F. Uniconazole application strategies to improve lignin biosynthesis, lodging resistance and production of maize in semiarid regions. Field Crops Res, 2018, 222: 66-77.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.03.015
[18] Xu C L, Gao Y B, Tian B J, Ren J H, Meng Q F, Wang P. Effects of EDAH, a novel plant growth regulator, on mechanical strength, stalk vascular bundles and grain yield of summer maize at high densities. Field Crops Res, 2017, 200: 71-79.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.10.011
[19] 李瑞杰, 闫鹏, 王庆燕, 许艳丽, 卢霖, 董志强, 张凤路. 5-氨基乙酰丙酸和乙烯利对东北春玉米功能叶光合生理特性和产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2021, 37(1): 135-142.
Li R J, Yan P, Wang Q Y, Xu Y L, Lu L, Dong Z Q, Zhang F L. Effects of 5-aminolevulinnic acid and ethephon on physiology of leaves and yield of spring maize in northeast China. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 135-142. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 孟祥盟, 孙宁, 边少锋, 方向前, 闫伟平, 彭涛涛, 赵洪祥, 谭国波, 张丽华. 化控技术对春玉米农艺性状及光合性能的影响. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(4): 78-83.
Meng X M, Sun N, Bian S F, Fang X Q, Yan W P, Peng T T, Zhao H X, Tan G B, Zhang L H. Effect of chemical control technology on agronomic characters and photosynthetic capacity of spring maize. J Maize Sci, 2014, 22(4): 78-83. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 李瑞杰, 唐会会, 王庆燕, 许艳丽, 王琦, 卢霖, 闫鹏, 董志强, 张凤路. 5-氨基乙酰丙酸和乙烯利对东北春玉米源库碳平衡的调控效应. 作物学报, 2020, 46: 1063-1075.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.93065
Li R J, Tang H H, Wang Q Y, Xu Y L, Wang Q, Lu L, Yan P, Dong Z Q, Zhang F L. Effects of 5-aminolevulinnic acid and ethephon compound on carbon balance of source-sink of spring in northeast China. Acta Agron Sin, 2020, 46: 1063-1075. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.93065
[22] 戚艺军, 耿延琢, 罗松彪, 刘政群, 丁翔, 张二朋, 王利民, 杨焰华, 齐伟, 佘宁安, 史文娟, 王浩波. 乙烯利不同施用方式对玉米农艺性状和产量的影响. 安徽农业大学学报, 2014, 41: 416-423.
Qi Y J, Geng Y Z, Luo S B, Liu Z Q, Ding X, Zhang E P, Wang L M, Yang Y H, Qi W, Shen N A, Shi W J, Wang H B. Effect of different ethephon applications on agronomic trait and grain yield of maize. J Anhui Agric Univ, 2014, 41: 416-423. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 王海永, 张明才, 陈小文, 牛晓雪, 苏贺, 董学会. 乙烯利对夏玉米子粒干物质积累的影响及生理机制探究. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(5): 57-61.
Wang H Y, Zhang M C, Chen X W, Niu X X, Su H, Dong X H. Effects of ethephon on dry matter accumulation in summer corn seeds and related physiological mechanism inquiry. J Maize Sci, 2013, 21(5): 57-61. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] Xue J, Xie R Z, Zhang W F, Wang K R, Hou P, Ming B, Gou L, Li S K. Research progress on reduced lodging of high-yield and -density maize. J Integr Agric, 2017, 16: 2717-2725.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61785-4
[25] 杨吉顺, 高辉远, 刘鹏, 李耕, 董树亭, 张吉旺, 王敬锋. 种植密度和行距配置对超高产夏玉米群体光合特性的影响. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 1226-1233.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01226
Yang J S, Gao H Y, Liu P, Li G, Dong S T, Zhang J W, Wang J F. Effects of planting density and row spacing on canopy apparent photosynthesis of high-yield summer corn. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 1226-1233. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01226
[26] 丁相鹏, 白晶, 张春雨, 张吉旺, 刘鹏, 任佰朝, 赵斌. 扩行缩株对夏玉米群体冠层结构及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53: 3915-3927.
Ding X P, Bai J, Zhang C Y, Zhang J W, Liu P, Ren B Z, Zhao B. Effects of line-spacing expansion and row-spacing shrinkage on population structure and yield of summer maize. Sci Agric Sin, 2020, 53: 3915-3927. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] 裴文东, 张仁和, 王国兴, 雷文妮, 雷格丽, 高敏, 张宏军. 玉米冠层结构和群体光合特性对增密的响应. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(3): 92-98.
Pei W D, Zhang R H, Wang G X, Lei W N, Lei G G, Gao M, Zhang H J. Responses of canopy structure and population photosynthetic traits on increased planting density of different maize cultivars. J Maize Sci, 2020, 28(3): 92-98. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] 肖万欣, 刘晶, 史磊, 赵海岩, 王延波. 氮密互作对不同株型玉米形态、光合性能及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50: 3690-3701.
Xiao W X, Liu J, Shi L, Zhao H Y, Wang Y B. Effect of nitrogen and density interaction on morphological traits, photosynthetic property and yield of maize hybrid of different plant types. Sci Agric Sin, 2017, 50: 3690-3701. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] 申丽霞, 王璞, 张红芳, 易镇邪. 施氮对夏玉米不同部位籽粒灌浆的影响. 作物学报, 2005, 31: 532-534.
Shen L X, Wang P, Zhang H F, Yi Z X. Effect of nitrogen supply on grain-filling at different ear position in summer maize. Acta Agron Sin, 2005, 31: 532-534. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30] 刘笑鸣, 顾万荣, 李从锋, 张立国, 王明泉, 龚士琛, 陈喜昌, 李彩凤, 魏湜, 李文华. 化学调控和氮肥对高密度下春玉米光热水利用效率和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53: 3083-3094.
Liu X M, Gu W R, Li C F, Zhang G L, Wang M Q, Gong S C, Chen X C, Li C F, Wei D, Li W H. Effects of chemical regulation and nitrogen fertilizer on radiation, heat and water utilization efficiency and yield of spring maize under dense planting condition. Sci Agric Sin, 2020, 53: 3083-3094. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31] 边大红, 张瑞栋, 段留生, 李建民, 李召虎. 局部化控夏玉米冠层结构、荧光特性及产量研究. 华北农学报, 2011, 26(3): 139-145.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2011.03.028
Bian D H, Zhang R D, Duan L S, Li J M, Li Z H. Effects of partial spraying of plant growth regulator on canopy structure, chlorophyll fluorescence characteristic and yield of summer maize (Zea mays L.). Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2011, 26(3): 139-145. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] 杨振芳, 孟瑶, 顾万荣, 王泳超, 李丽杰, 张翯, 曾繁星, 魏湜. 化控和密度措施对东北春玉米叶片衰老及产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2015, 30(4): 117-125.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2015.04.021
Yang Z F, Meng Y, Gu W R, Wang Y C, Li L J, Zhang H, Zeng F X, Wei D. Effect of chemical regulation and density on spring maize leaf senescence and yield in northeast China. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2015, 30(4): 117-125 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] 朴琳, 李波, 陈喜昌, 丁在松, 张宇, 赵明, 李从锋. 优化栽培措施对春玉米密植群体冠层结构及产量形成的调控效应. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53: 3048-3058.
Piao L, Li B, Chen X C, Ding Z S, Zhang Y, Zhao M, Li C F. Regulation effects of improved cultivation measures on canopy structure and yield formation of dense spring maize population. Sci Agric Sin, 2020, 53: 3048-3058. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] 王晓慧, 张磊, 刘双利, 曹玉军, 魏雯雯, 刘春光, 王永军, 边少锋, 王立春. 不同熟期春玉米品种的籽粒灌浆特性. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47: 3557-3565.
Wang X H, Zhang L, Liu S L, Cao Y J, Wei W W, Liu C G, Wang Y J, Bian S F, Wang L C. Grain filling characteristics of maize hybrids differing in maturities. Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47: 3557-3565. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35] 李刘龙, 库旭灿, 李赟, 王小燕. 花后弱光对江汉平原稻茬小麦的产量及碳、氮分配效应的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40: 1364-1374.
Li L L, Ku X C, Li Y, Wang X Y. Effect of shading after anthesis on anthesis on yield and distribution of carbon and nitrogen of rice stubble wheat in Jiangshan plain. J Triticeae Crops, 2020, 40: 1364-1374. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36] 郝梦波, 王空军, 董树亭, 张吉旺, 李登海, 刘鹏, 杨今胜, 柳京国. 高产玉米叶片冗余及其对产量和光合特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21: 344-350.
Hao M B, Wang K J, Dong S T, Zhang J W, Li D H, Liu P, Yang J S, Liu J G. Leaf redundancy of high-yielding maize and its effects on maize yield and photosynthesis. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2010, 21: 344-350. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37] 王海永, 陈小文, 牛晓雪, 苏贺, 申婷婷, 董学会. 乙烯利对夏玉米果穗生长发育影响及生理机制探究. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(5): 64-70.
Wang H Y, Chen X W, Niu X X, Su H, Shen T T, Dong X H. Effects of ethephon on dry matter accumulation in summer corn seeds and related physiological mechanism inquiry. J Maize Sci, 2014, 22(5): 64-70 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[4] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[5] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[6] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[7] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[8] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[9] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[10] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[11] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[12] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[13] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[14] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[15] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2