作物学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 1542-1550.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.24126
杨一丹1(
), 何督1, 刘静2, 张岩1, 陈飞志1, 巫燕飞1, 杜雪竹1,*(
)
YANG Yi-Dan1(
), HE Du1, LIU Jing2, ZHANG Yan1, CHEN Fei-Zhi1, WU Yan-Fei1, DU Xue-Zhu1,*(
)
摘要:
油菜是我国第一大油料作物, 菌核病是我国油菜面临的主要病害之一。本试验利用HIGS技术将核盘菌中关键致病基因SS1G_08218 (OAH)的干扰片段转化到甘蓝型油菜中, 获得含有siRNA的转基因油菜植株, 研究HIGS介导的SsOAH基因沉默对油菜抗菌核病的影响。接种核盘菌后的抗病鉴定结果表明, SS.OAH.RNAi转基因油菜植株对核盘菌抗性增强; R18、R25和R36株系叶片接菌后病斑部位核盘菌菌丝内的OAH基因表达量均低于野生型, 证明siRNA在转基因油菜中成功表达; 在添加了转基因油菜叶片提取物的培养基上培养的核盘菌扩展面积显著小于野生型, 分别降低35.29%、21.98%、31.53%, 且菌丝生长显著迟缓, 扩展长度较短, 分支少, 生长过程中发生断裂, 生长异常, 将其接种于正常的野生型油菜后, 其致病力明显下降; 对转基因油菜叶片接种核盘菌后观察发现, 叶片上的菌丝扩展较为稀疏, 生长受阻, 侵染垫形成受到抑制, 暗示在油菜中表达OAH 基因的干扰片段影响了菌丝生长和扩展; 进一步检测其病斑组织中的草酸含量发现, 接菌36 h、48 h后转基因油菜病斑组织中的草酸含量为391 μg g-1、446 μg g-1, 与野生型相比分别减少54 μg g-1、32 μg g-1。这一研究表明在油菜中表达核盘菌OAH的干扰片段能够降低核盘菌侵染时草酸的积累, 从而增强转基因油菜对核盘菌的抗性水平。本试验利用HIGS技术研究了干扰核盘菌关键致病基因OAH增强油菜对核盘菌的抗性, 为选育油菜抗菌核病品种提供理论基础和种质资源。
| [1] | 李慧, 文李, 刘凯, 官春云. 油菜抗菌核病机制研究进展. 作物研究, 2015, 29(1): 84-90. |
| Li H, Wen L, Liu K, Guan C Y. Research progress on resistance mechanism of Brassica napus to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Crop Res, 2015, 29(1): 84-90. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] |
Liang X, Rollins J A. Mechanisms of broad host range necrotrophic pathogenesis in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Phytopathology, 2018, 108: 1128-1140.
doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-06-18-0197-RVW |
| [3] | 吴健, 周永明, 王幼平. 油菜与核盘菌互作分子机理研究进展. 中国油料作物学报, 2018, 40: 721-729. |
| Wu J, Zhou Y M, Wang Y P. Research progress on molecular mechanisms of Brassica napus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum interaction. Chin Oil Crop Sci, 2018, 40: 721-729. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 杨清坡, 刘万才, 黄冲. 近10年油菜主要病虫害发生危害情况的统计和分析. 植物保护, 2018, 44(3): 24-30. |
| Yang Q P, Liu W C, Huang C. Statistics and analysis of oilseed rape losses caused by main diseases and insect pests in recent 10 years. Plant Prot Sci, 2018, 44(3): 24-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] |
Wu J, Zhao Q, Yang Q, Liu H, Li Q Y, Yi X Q, Cheng Y, Guo L, Fan C C, Zhou Y Z. Comparative transcriptomic analysis uncovers the complexgenetic network for resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Brassica napus. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 19007.
doi: 10.1038/srep19007 |
| [6] |
Adams P B, Ayers W A. Ecology of Sclerotinia species. Phytopathology, 1979, 69: 896-896.
doi: 10.1094/Phyto-69-896 |
| [7] |
Willetts H J, Wong J. The biology of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, S. trifoliorum and S. minor with emphasis on specific nomenclature. Bot Rev, 1980, 46: 101-165.
doi: 10.1007/BF02860868 |
| [8] |
Godoy G, Steadman J R, Dickman M B, Dam R. Use of mutants to demonstrate the role of oxalic acid in pathogenicity of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum on Phaseolus vulgaris. Mol Plant Pathol, 1990, 37: 179-191.
doi: 10.1111/radm.2007.37.issue-3 |
| [9] |
Liang Y, Strelkov S E, Kav N N V. Oxalic acid-mediated stress responses in Brassica napus L. Proteomics, 2010, 9: 3156-3173.
doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800966 |
| [10] | Williams B, Kabbage M, Kim H J, Britt R, Dickman M B. Tipping the balance: Sclerotinia sclerotiorum secreted oxalic acid suppresses host defenses by manipulating the host redox environment. PLoS Pathog, 2011, 7: e1002107. |
| [11] |
Heller A, Witt G T. Oxalic acid has an additional. detoxifying function in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum pathogenesis. PLoS One, 2013, 8: e72292.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072292 |
| [12] |
Riou C, Freyssinet G, Fevre M. Production of cell wall-degrading enzymes by the phytopathogenic fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Appl Environ Microb, 1991, 57:1478-1484.
doi: 10.1128/aem.57.5.1478-1484.1991 pmid: 16348487 |
| [13] |
Evans M V D, Christine S. Oxalate production by fungi: its role in pathogenicity and ecology in the soil environment. Can J Microbiol, 1996, 42: 881-895.
doi: 10.1139/m96-114 |
| [14] |
Derbyshire M, Mbengue M, Barascud M, Navaud O, Raffaele S. Small RNAs from the plant pathogenic fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum highlight host candidate genes associated with quantitative disease resistance. Mol Plant Pathol, 2019, 20: 1279-1297.
doi: 10.1111/mpp.12841 pmid: 31361080 |
| [15] |
Wu J, Zhao Q, Yang Q, Liu H, Li Q, Yi X, Cheng Y, Guo L, Fan C, Zhou Y. Comparative transcriptomic analysis uncovers the complex genetic network for resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Brassica napus. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 19007-19022.
doi: 10.1038/srep19007 |
| [16] |
Xu J, Wang X, Li Y, Zeng J, Wang G, Deng C, Guo W. Host-induced gene silencing of a regulator of G protein signalling gene (VdRGS1) confers resistance to Verticillium wilt in cotton. Plant Biotechnol J, 2018, 16: 1629-1643.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.2018.16.issue-9 |
| [17] |
Nowara D, Gay A, Lacomme C, Shaw J, Ridout C, Douchkov D, Hensel G, Kumlehn J, Schweizer P. HIGS: host-induced gene silencing in the obligate biotrophic fungal pathogen Blumeria graminis. Plant Cell, 2010, 22: 3130-3141.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.077040 |
| [18] |
Yin C, Jurgenson J E, Hulbert S H. Development of a host-induced rnai system in the wheat stripe rust fungus Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2011, 24: 554-561.
doi: 10.1094/MPMI-10-10-0229 |
| [19] |
Zhu L, Zhu J, Liu Z, Wang Z, Zhou C, Wang H. Host-induced gene silencing of rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae pathogenicity genes mediated by the brome mosaic virus. Genes, 2017, 8: 241.
doi: 10.3390/genes8100241 |
| [20] |
McCaghey M, Shao D, Kurcezewski J, Lindstrom A, Ranjan A, Whitham S A, Conley S P, Williams B, Smith D L, Kabbage M. Host-induced gene silencing of a Sclerotinia sclerotiorum oxaloacetate acetylhydrolase using bean pod mottle virus as a vehicle reduces disease on soybean. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 677631.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.677631 |
| [21] |
Rana K, Yuan J, Liao H, Banga S S, Kumar R, Qian W, Ding Y. Host-induced gene silencing reveals the role of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum oxaloacetate acetylhydrolase gene in fungal oxalic acid accumulation and virulence. Microbiol Res, 2022, 258: 126981.
doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2022.126981 |
| [22] |
Nakayashiki H, Nguyen Q B. RNA interference: roles in fungal biology. Curr Opin Microbiol, 2008, 11: 494-502.
doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2008.10.001 pmid: 18955156 |
| [23] |
Spiering M J, Moon C D, Wilkinson H H, Schardl C L. Gene clusters for insecticidal loline alkaloids in the grass-endophytic fungus Neotyphodium uncinatum. Genetics, 2005, 169: 1403-1414.
pmid: 15654104 |
| [1] | 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362. |
| [2] | 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110. |
| [3] | 夏琦, 郭滢, 王坤美, 王思忆, 巨建业, 彭雅雯, 刘忠松, 夏石头. 甘蓝型油菜种子和种皮中水杨酸含量与原花色素积累的关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1189-1197. |
| [4] | 王晓琳, 刘忠松, 康雷, 杨柳. 甘蓝型油菜角果长度和每角粒数基因定位以及角果皮转录组动态分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 888-899. |
| [5] | 张琴, 戴成, 马朝芝. 生长素响应报告基因转化甘蓝型油菜及各组织GUS动态信号分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 667-675. |
| [6] | 孙程明, 周晓婴, 陈锋, 张维, 王晓东, 彭琦, 郭月, 高建芹, 胡茂龙, 付三雄, 张洁夫. 长链非编码RNA (lncRNA)在甘蓝型油菜分枝角度调控中的功能分析与预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 559-567. |
| [7] | 黄绒, 周渠晨, 陈楚铭, 罗倩, 易东, 杜常欢, 黄祥宇, 盛锋, 杜雪竹. 过表达BnNRT2.3-like对油菜氮素吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3184-3197. |
| [8] | 巨建业, 杨柳, 陈浩, 康雷, 夏石头, 刘忠松. 单细胞核转录组分析揭示油菜种皮分化过程和种子颜色差异原因[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2860-2874. |
| [9] | 张雯, 李玉, 王创, 石磊, 丁广大. 甘蓝型油菜磷转运蛋白BnaPT48的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2983-2995. |
| [10] | 胡志康, 舒雨, 王会, 杨莹莹, 廖俊宇, 刘佳, 成洪涛, 郭晨, 张园园, 刘胜毅, 胡琼, 梅德圣, 李超. 甘蓝型油菜苗期耐碱性种质综合鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2681-2692. |
| [11] | 王晨, 贺丹, 姚敏, 邱萍, 何昕, 熊兴华, 康雷, 刘忠松, 钱论文. 基于转录组分析鉴定甘蓝型油菜开花候选基因以及BnaCOR27功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2693-2704. |
| [12] | 徐林珊, 郜耿东, 王宇, 王家星, 杨吉招, 武亚瑞, 张宵寒, 常影, 李真, 谢雄泽, 龚德平, 王晶, 葛贤宏. 甘蓝型油菜漆酶基因家族成员表达模式及与茎秆抗折力的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 134-148. |
| [13] | 李嘉欣, 黄莹, 吴潞梅, 赵伦, 易斌, 马朝芝, 涂金星, 沈金雄, 傅廷栋, 文静. 甘蓝型油菜BnaSLY1基因进化分析及功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 44-57. |
| [14] | 钟元, 朱天宇, 戴成, 马朝芝. 耐亚磷酸盐除草剂转基因油菜的创建和抗性评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1158-1171. |
| [15] | 曹松, 姚敏, 任睿, 贾元, 向星汝, 李文, 何昕, 刘忠松, 官春云, 钱论文, 熊兴华. 转录组结合区域关联分析挖掘油菜含油量积累的候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1136-1146. |
|
||