作物学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (12): 2998-3012.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.42023
王颖姮1,2(
), 崔丽丽1,2, 蔡秋华1,2, 林强1,2, 吴方喜1,2, 陈飞鹤1,2, 谢鸿光1,2, 朱永生1,2, 陈丽萍1,2, 谢华安1,2, 张建福1,2,*(
)
WANG Ying-Heng1,2(
), CUI Li-Li1,2, CAI Qiu-Hua1,2, LIN Qiang1,2, WU Fang-Xi1,2, CHEN Fei-He1,2, XIE Hong-Guang1,2, ZHU Yong-Sheng1,2, CHEN Li-Ping1,2, XIE Hua-An1,2, ZHANG Jian-Fu1,2,*(
)
摘要:
干旱是影响农业生产最重要的原因之一。本研究以优质香稻福香占为材料, 对其苗期干旱响应的生理指标、激素代谢物及基因表达调控网络进行分析。干旱处理后, 福香占干旱存活率、抗氧化酶活性高于恢复系明恢63、明恢86和干旱敏感的丽江新团黑谷, 但电导率较低且过氧化物累积较少。IAA、ICA、ABA、cZ和SA等5种激素的代谢物含量上升, tZ、DHZ、GA1、JA等11种激素的代谢物含量下降。6118个差异表达基因(DGEs)中有2615个上调、3503个下调, 涉及了光合作用、能量代谢、转录调控、氧化还原、离子结合等生物学过程和氨基酸、糖、脂肪酸、激素等合成代谢及植物激素信号转导等相关途径。激素代谢组和转录组学分析同时鉴别出植物激素信号转导、玉米素生物合成、类胡萝卜素生物合成和色氨酸代谢4个KEGG代谢通路, 并构建了差异表达基因调控网络。转录因子、抗氧化酶基因、渗透调节等相关的28个干旱应答关键基因在福香占干旱处理后的表达量均上调。福香占受干旱胁迫后, 激素水平发生了变化; 抗逆应答的基因表达量均上调, 包括转录因子、抗氧化系统基因、渗透调节及其他耐旱基因; 抗氧化酶活性相关生理指标发生改变。研究结果有助于进一步挖掘抗旱基因, 服务水稻抗旱育种。
| [1] |
Gupta A, Rico-Medina A, Caño-Delgado A I. The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science, 2020, 368: 266-269.
doi: 10.1126/science.aaz7614 pmid: 32299946 |
| [2] | Zhang C M, Shi S L, Liu Z, Yang F, Yin G L. Drought tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) varieties is associated with enhanced antioxidative protection and declined lipid peroxidation. J Plant Physiol, 2019, 232: 226-240. |
| [3] |
McAdam S A M, Brodribb T J. Mesophyll cells are the main site of abscisic acid biosynthesis in water-stressed leaves. Plant Physiol, 2018, 177: 911-917.
doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01829 pmid: 29735726 |
| [4] |
Kuromori T, Seo M, Shinozaki K. ABA transport and plant water stress responses. Trends Plant Sci, 2018, 23: 513-522.
doi: S1360-1385(18)30085-2 pmid: 29731225 |
| [5] | Takahashi F, Suzuki T, Osakabe Y, Betsuyaku S, Kondo Y, Dohmae N, Fukuda H, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. A small peptide modulates stomatal control via abscisic acid in long-distance signalling. Nature, 2018, 556: 235-238. |
| [6] |
Mega R, Abe F, Kim J S, Tsuboi Y, Tanaka K, Kobayashi H, Sakata Y, Hanada K, Tsujimoto H, Kikuchi J, Cutler S R, Okamoto M. Tuning water-use efficiency and drought tolerance in wheat using abscisic acid receptors. Nat Plants, 2019, 5: 153-159.
doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0361-8 pmid: 30737511 |
| [7] |
Okamoto M, Peterson F C, Defries A, Park S Y, Endo A, Nambara E, Volkman B F, Cutler S R. Activation of dimeric ABA receptors elicits guard cell closure, ABA-regulated gene expression, and drought tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013, 110: 12132-12137.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305919110 pmid: 23818638 |
| [8] | Park S Y, Peterson F C, Mosquna A, Yao J, Volkman B F, Cutler S R. Agrochemical control of plant water use using engineered abscisic acid receptors. Nature, 2015, 520: 545-548. |
| [9] | Chen J N, Yin Y H. WRKY transcription factors are involved in brassinosteroid signaling and mediate the crosstalk between plant growth and drought tolerance. Plant Signal Behav, 2017, 12: e1365212. |
| [10] | Xie Z L, Nolan T, Jiang H, Tang B Y, Zhang M C, Li Z H, Yin Y. The AP2/ERF transcription factor TINY modulates brassinosteroid-regulated plant growth and drought responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2019, 31: 1788-1806. |
| [11] |
Luo L J. Breeding for water-saving and drought-resistance rice (WDR) in China. J Exp Bot, 2010, 61: 3509-3517.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq185 pmid: 20603281 |
| [12] | Sun X, Xiong H, Jiang C, Zhang D, Yang Z, Huang Y, Zhu W, Ma S, Duan J, Wang X, Liu W, Guo H, Li G, Qi J, Liang C, Zhang Z, Li J, Zhang H, Han L, Zhou Y, Peng Y, Li Z. Natural variation of DROT1 confers drought adaptation in upland rice. Nat Commun, 2022, 13: 4265-4281. |
| [13] |
Zhang Q F. Strategies for developing Green Super Rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104: 16402-16409.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708013104 pmid: 17923667 |
| [14] | 吴方喜, 罗翠琴, 王颖姮, 谢云杰, 罗曦, 朱永生, 谢鸿光, 蒋家焕, 蔡秋华, 谢华安, 张建福. 优质、抗病、耐储藏香稻新品种福香占的选育与应用. 福建农业学报, 2022, 37: 683-690. |
| Wu F X, Luo C Q, Wang Y H, Xie Y J, Luo X, Zhu Y S, Xie H G, Jiang J H, Cai Q H, Xie H A, Zhang J F. Breeding and application of high-quality, blast-resistant, long-shelf-life fragrant Fuxiangzhan rice. Fujian J Agric Sci, 2022, 37: 683-690 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [15] |
丁红, 张智猛, 徐扬, 张冠初, 郭庆, 秦斐斐, 戴良香. 氮素缓解花生干旱胁迫的生理和转录调控机制. 作物学报, 2023, 49: 225-238.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.24020 |
|
Ding H, Zhang Z M, Xu Y, Zhang G C, Guo Q, Qin F F, Dai L X. Physiological and transcriptional regulation mechanisms of nitrogen alleviating drought stress in peanut. Acta Agron Sin, 2023, 49: 225-238 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.24020 |
|
| [16] | 陈力, 王靖, 邱晓, 孙海莲, 张文浩, 王天佐. 不同耐旱性紫花苜蓿干旱胁迫下生理响应和转录调控的差异研究. 作物学报, 2022, 49: 2122-2132. |
| Chen L, Wang J, Qiu X, Sun H L, Zhang W H, Wang T Z. Differences of physiological responses and transcriptional regulation of alfalfa with different drought tolerances under drought stresses. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 49: 2122-2132 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [17] | Liu H H, Ma Y, Chen N, Guo S Y, Liu H L, Guo X Y, Chong K, Xu Y Y. Overexpression of stress-inducible OsBURP16, the β subunit of polygalacturonase 1, decreases pectin content and cell adhesion and increases abiotic stress sensitivity in rice. Plant Cell Environ, 2014, 37: 1144-1158. |
| [18] |
Šimura J, Antoniadi I, Široká J, Tarkowská D, Strnad M, Ljung K, Novák O. Plant hormonomics: multiple phytohormone profiling by targeted metabolomics. Plant Physiol, 2018, 177: 476-489.
doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00293 pmid: 29703867 |
| [19] | Kim D, Paggi J M, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg S L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT- genotype. Nat Biotechnol, 2019, 37: 907-915. |
| [20] | Love M I, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol, 2014, 15: 550. |
| [21] | Wu T, Hu E, Xu S, Chen M, Guo P, Dai Z, Feng T, Zhou L, Tang W, Zhan L, Fu X, Liu S, Bo X, Yu G. clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation (Camb), 2021, 2: 100141. |
| [22] | Xie C, Mao X Z, Huang J J, Ding Y, Wu J M, Dong S, Kong L, Gao G, Li C Y, Wei L P. KOBAS 2.0: a web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res, 2011, 39: W316-W322. |
| [23] |
Dinneny J R. Developmental responses to water and salinity in root systems. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 2019, 35: 239-257.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100617-062949 pmid: 31382759 |
| [24] | Lu Y, Yang W, Qi Z, Gao R, Tong J, Gao T, Zhang Y, Sun A, Zhang S, Ge J. Gut microbe-derived metabolite indole-3-carboxaldehyde alleviates atherosclerosis. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2023, 8: 378. |
| [25] | Cao X, Yang H L, Shang C Q, Ma S, Liu L, Cheng J L. The roles of auxin biosynthesis YUCCA gene family in plants. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20: 6343. |
| [26] | Domingo C, Andrés F, Tharreau D, Iglesias D J, Talón M. Constitutive expression of OsGH3.1 reduces auxin content and enhances defense response and resistance to a fungal pathogen in rice. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2009, 22: 201-210. |
| [27] |
Tschaplinski T J, Tuskan G A, Gebre G M, Todd D E. Drought resistance of two hybrid Populus clones grown in a large-scale plantation. Tree Physiol, 1998, 18: 653-658.
pmid: 12651414 |
| [28] |
Chen K, Li G J, Bressan R A, Song C P, Zhu J K, Zhao Y. Abscisic acid dynamics, signaling, and functions in plants. J Integr Plant Biol, 2020, 62: 25-54.
doi: 10.1111/jipb.12899 |
| [29] | Joo J, Lee Y H, Song S I. Overexpression of the rice basic leucine zipper transcription factor OsbZIP12 confers drought tolerance to rice and makes seedlings hypersensitive to ABA. Plant Biotechnol Rep, 2014, 8: 431-441. |
| [30] | Zhang C, Li C, Liu J, Lv Y, Yu C, Li H, Zhao T, Liu B. The OsABF1 transcription factor improves drought tolerance by activating the transcription of COR413-TM1 in rice. J Exp Bot, 2017, 68: 4695-4707. |
| [31] | Hossain M A, Cho J I, Han M, Ahn C H, Jeon J S, An G, Park P B. The ABRE-binding bZIP transcription factor OsABF2 is a positive regulator of abiotic stress and ABA signaling in rice. J Plant Physiol, 2010, 167: 1512-1520. |
| [32] | Mathan J, Singh A, Ranjan A. Sucrose transport in response to drought and salt stress involves ABA-mediated induction of OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET15 in rice. Physiol Plant, 2021, 171: 620-637. |
| [33] | Tang N, Zhang H, Li X, Xiao J, Xiong L. Constitutive activation of transcription factor OsbZIP46 improves drought tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol, 2012, 158: 1755-1768. |
| [34] |
Xiang Y, Tang N, Du H, Ye H Y, Xiong L Z. Characterization of OsbZIP23 as a key player of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family for conferring abscisic acid sensitivity and salinity and drought tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol, 2008, 148: 1938-1952.
doi: 10.1104/pp.108.128199 pmid: 18931143 |
| [35] |
Yuan X, Wang H, Cai J, Bi Y, Li D, Song F. Rice NAC transcription factor ONAC066 functions as a positive regulator of drought and oxidative stress response. BMC Plant Biol, 2019, 19: 278.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1883-y pmid: 31238869 |
| [36] | Lee D K, Chung P J, Jeong J S, Jang G, Bang S W, Jung H, Kim Y S, Ha S H, Choi Y D, Kim J K. The rice OsNAC6 transcription factor orchestrates multiple molecular mechanisms involving root structural adaptions and nicotianamine biosynthesis for drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnol J, 2017, 15: 754-764. |
| [37] | Shen H, Liu C, Zhang Y, Meng X, Zhou X, Chu C, Wang X. OsWRKY30 is activated by MAP kinases to confer drought tolerance in rice. Plant Mol Biol, 2012, 80: 241-253. |
| [38] | Jung H, Chung P J, Park S H, Redillas M C F R, Kim Y S, Suh J W, Kim J K. Overexpression of OsERF48 causes regulation of OsCML16, a calmodulin-like protein gene that enhances root growth and drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnol J, 2017, 15: 1295-1308. |
| [39] | Tang Y, Bao X, Zhi Y, Wu Q, Guo Y, Yin X, Zeng L, Li J, Zhang J, He W, Liu W, Wang Q, Jia C, Li Z, Liu K. Overexpression of a MYB family gene, OsMYB6, increases drought and salinity stress tolerance in transgenic rice. Front Plant Sci, 2019, 10: 168. |
| [40] |
Ahmad I, Devonshire J, Mohamed R, Schultze M, Maathuis F J M. Overexpression of the potassium channel TPKb in small vacuoles confers osmotic and drought tolerance to rice. New Phytol, 2016, 209: 1040-1048.
doi: 10.1111/nph.13708 pmid: 26474307 |
| [1] | 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325. |
| [2] | 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235. |
| [3] | 王雅致, 杨飚, 季香林, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 二倍体马铃薯抗旱资源鉴定及抗旱基因初步筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 72-84. |
| [4] | 朱金娟, 王慧萍, 杨国栋, 王宇诚, 杨晨, 王斌, Agustiani Nurwulan, 涂军明, 毕俊国, 崔克辉, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 水分管理和品种类型对再生稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 295-315. |
| [5] | 李云香, 郭千纤, 侯万伟, 张小娟. 引进ICARDA小麦苗期根系抗旱性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2387-2398. |
| [6] | 胡润慧, 汪军成, 司二静, 张宏, 李兴茂, 马小乐, 孟亚雄, 王化俊, 刘青, 姚立蓉, 李葆春. 小麦苗期耐旱耐盐种质筛选及抗旱耐盐综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2371-2386. |
| [7] | 尹雨萌, 王雁楠, 康志河, 乔守晨, 卞倩倩, 李亚蔚, 曹郭郑, 赵国瑞, 徐丹丹, 杨育峰. 甘薯谷胱甘肽S-转移酶基因IbGSTU7的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1736-1746. |
| [8] | 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 李玉荣, 王瑾. 冀花系列高油酸花生抗旱性鉴定与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 797-811. |
| [9] | 管圣, 廖澳, 王立琦, 李茜, 卢建宁, 荣晶, 崔国贤, 杨瑞芳, 佘玮. 6-BA调控增强苎麻抗旱性的生理机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 823-834. |
| [10] | 王语新, 陈天羽, 翟红, 张欢, 高少培, 何绍贞, 赵宁, 刘庆昌. 甘薯激酶基因IbHT1的克隆及抗旱性功能鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 301-311. |
| [11] | 朱灿灿, 李君霞, 景雅, 付森杰, 秦娜, 王春义, 代书桃, 魏昕, 张程炀. 不同耐荫性谷子对遮阴的生理响应及转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3211-3223. |
| [12] | 何梅, 张佳蕾, 范士凯, 孟静静, 王建国, 郭峰, 李新国, 万书波, 杨莎. 花生抗旱基因AhCPK8及其互作蛋白GAPDH的克隆及分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2713-2726. |
| [13] | 刘波, 池明, 曹梦琦, 唐达, 杨恒照, 张卫华, 薛聪. 过表达马铃薯StuPPO9基因对烟草抗旱能力的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2237-2247. |
| [14] | 刘爽, 李珅, 王东梅, 沙小茜, 何冠华, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 李春辉. 基于大刍草渗入系的玉米抗旱优异等位基因挖掘[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 1896-1906. |
| [15] | 方宇辉, 齐学礼, 李艳, 张煜, 彭超军, 华夏, 陈艳艳, 郭瑞, 胡琳, 许为钢. 强光胁迫对转玉米C4型ZmPEPC+ZmPPDK基因小麦光合和生理特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1647-1657. |
|
||