欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12): 2007-2015.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

黑河中游边缘绿洲沙地农田玉米水氮用量配合试验

苏永中;张智慧;杨荣   

  1. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所临泽内陆河流域研究站/寒旱区流域水文与应用生态实验室,甘肃兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2007-03-05 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-12-12 网络出版日期:2007-12-12
  • 通讯作者: 苏永中

Amount of Irrigation and Nitrogen Application for Maize Grown on Sandy Farmland in the Marginal Oasis in the Middle of Heihe River Basin

SU Yong-Zhong,ZHANG Zhi-Hui,YANG Rong   

  1. Linze Inland River Basin Research Station, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences/ Laboratory of Watershed Hydrology and Applied Ecology, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China
  • Received:2007-03-05 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-12-12 Published online:2007-12-12
  • Contact: SU Yong-Zhong

摘要: 研究了黑河中游边缘绿洲沙地农田不同灌溉水平(常规灌溉,12 000 m3 hm-2;节水10%,10 800 m3 hm-2;节水20%,9 600 m3 hm-2)和施氮水平(0、150、225、300和375 kg N hm-2)下玉米产量、氮肥利用率、灌溉水生产力及硝态氮在土壤剖面中的分布。结果表明,常规高量灌溉(12 000 m3 hm-2)和节水10%和20%处理的玉米产量和地上生物量无显著差异;在施有机肥和磷、钾肥的基础上,施氮量150~375 kg N hm-2较不施氮处理增产74.8%~108.6%,施氮量超过225 kg N hm-2时,产量不再显著增加;平均氮肥利用率(NUE)为50.6%~83.7%,随施氮量的增加而下降,超过225 kg N hm-2时显著降低。在施用氮肥时,玉米灌溉水生产力(WP)为0.97~1.35 kg m-3,随灌溉量的增加而下降,施氮量超过225 kg N hm-2时,灌溉水生产力不再显著增加。水肥配合有显著的交互效应,高量的水氮配合可获得较高的产量,但水肥利用效率显著下降。对每次灌溉前土壤剖面水分含量的测定结果表明,3个灌溉水平下0~160 cm土层土壤水分含量无显著差异,表明常规高量灌溉并不能保持较长时间的有效水分供作物吸收利用;高量灌溉下,0~200 cm土壤剖面中NO3-N的积累量低于节水灌溉处理,表明高量灌溉使更多的NO3-N淋溶至更深的土层,对地下水污染风险加大。从水肥高效利用、降低氮污染风险和缓解水资源短缺综合考虑,进行合理的水肥调控、适度降低灌溉量和氮肥投入是沙地农田生态系统管理的合理选择。通过合理的水肥调控,沙地农田仍有很大的节水潜力。

关键词: 灌溉量, 氮肥用量, 玉米, 产量, 水肥利用效率, 沙地农田

Abstract: Irrigation and nitrogen management are perhaps the most important aspects for grain production in the arid oasis agricultural area of Northwest China. A field experiment was conducted on sandy farmland to determine the effects of different irrigation amounts (conventional irrigation, 12 000 mm ha-1; 10% water-saving irrigation, 10 800 mm ha-1; 20% water-saving irrigation, 9 600 mm ha-1) and nitrogen rate (0, 150, 225, 300, and 375 kg ha-1) on maize yield in the marginal oasis in the middle of Heihe River Basin. Also, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), irrigation water productivity (WP) and N accumulation in 0–200 cm soil layer were discussed. There were no significant differences in maize yield and aboveground biomass among different irrigation treatments. Combining nitrogen fertilizer with manure, phosphate and potassium fertilizers, N application with 150–375 kg N ha-1 increased maize yield by 74.8%–108.6% compared with no N applied. However, maize yield did not increase significantly at N rate above 225 kg N ha-1. NUE ranged from 50.6% to 83.7% and decreased with increasing N application rate, with a strong decrease at N rate above 225 kg N ha-1. Under the treatment of N fertilizer application, WP ranged from 0.97 to 1.35 kg m-3 and decreased with increasing irrigation amount. WP did not increase significantly when N rate was above 225 kg N ha-1. There was significant coupling effect between irrigation and nitrogen application. The treatments with conventional irrigation and high nitrogen rates had maximum yield, however, the water and nitrogen use efficiencies decreased significantly. There were no evident differences in water content in the 0–160 cm soil layer measured before each irrigation among the three irrigation treatments, indicating that conventional irrigation treatment can not conserve soil water for a longer period to used in maize growth compared to water-saving irrigation treatment. In conventional irrigation treatment, NO3-N accumulation in the 0–200 cm soil layer was lower than that in the two water-saving irrigation treatments, indicating that more amount of NO3-N was leached to deeper soil layers which increase the risk of N contamination to groundwater.
Based on the comprehensive consideration for high effective use of water and nitrogen, mitigation of water resource shortage and its sustainable use and decrease of the pollution risk of water by N, rational regulation and control of irrigation and fertilization and reducing moderately the inputs of irrigation water and nitrogen fertilizer should be a reasonable alteration for sandy farmland management and expectant water-saving potential can be achieved.

Key words: Irrigation amount, Nitrogen rate, Maize, Yield, Water and nitrogen use efficiency, Sandy farmland

[1] 肖颖妮, 于永涛, 谢利华, 祁喜涛, 李春艳, 文天祥, 李高科, 胡建广. 基于SNP标记揭示中国鲜食玉米品种的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1301-1311.
[2] 崔连花, 詹为民, 杨陆浩, 王少瓷, 马文奇, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平, 杨青华. 2个玉米ZmCOP1基因的克隆及其转录丰度对不同光质处理的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1312-1324.
[3] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[4] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[7] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[8] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[9] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[10] 单露英, 李俊, 李亮, 张丽, 王颢潜, 高佳琪, 吴刚, 武玉花, 张秀杰. 转基因玉米NK603基体标准物质研制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1059-1070.
[11] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[12] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[13] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[14] 许静, 高景阳, 李程成, 宋云霞, 董朝沛, 王昭, 李云梦, 栾一凡, 陈甲法, 周子键, 吴建宇. 过表达ZmCIPKHT基因增强植物耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 851-859.
[15] 刘磊, 詹为民, 丁武思, 刘通, 崔连花, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平. 玉米矮化突变体gad39的遗传分析与分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 886-895.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!