欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (11): 3232-3247.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2026.64073

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

薏苡ClWRKY46基因的克隆、表达及抗旱功能研究

王玉娇1,**,王永乐1,**,路献勇1,许大凤1,付瑜华2,朱加保1,*   

  1. 1 安徽省农业科学院经济作物研究所, 安徽合肥 230001; 2 贵州省农业科学院亚热带作物研究所, 贵州贵阳 550025
  • 收稿日期:2026-06-10 修回日期:2026-08-21 接受日期:2026-08-21 出版日期:2026-11-12 网络出版日期:2026-08-25
  • 通讯作者: 朱加保, E-mail: 13955611798@139.com
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(3240151950)和安徽省农业科学院自主创新项目(2026YL023)资助。

Cloning and expression of the ClWRKY46 gene and its function in drought resistance in Coix L.

Wang Yu-Jiao1,**,Wang Yong-Le1,**,Lu Xian-Yong1,Xu Da-Feng1,Fu Yu-Hua2,Zhu Jia-Bao1,*   

  1. 1 Institute of Industrial Crops, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230001, Anhui, China; 2 Guizhou Institute of Subtropical Crops, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China
  • Received:2026-06-10 Revised:2026-08-21 Accepted:2026-08-21 Published:2026-11-12 Published online:2026-08-25
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (3240151950), and the Independent Innovation Project of Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2026YL023).

摘要: WRKY转录因子家族广泛参与植物干旱胁迫应答调控。薏苡作为一种重要的药食兼用杂粮作物,其抗旱分子机制研究相对薄弱。本研究旨在从薏苡中克隆ClWRKY46基因并解析其序列特征和表达模式,进而通过异源表达系统鉴定该基因在干旱胁迫下的应激响应与耐受功能,为薏苡耐旱遗传改良提供候选基因与理论依据。本研究采用RT-PCR技术克隆获得ClWRKY46基因,并分析其在不同组织中及干旱、盐等胁迫条件下的表达模式;通过亚细胞定位及酵母转录激活试验明确其编码蛋白的细胞定位与转录活性;同时利用酵母和拟南芥异源表达系统,对转基因酵母和转基因拟南芥进行抗旱性表型与生理指标鉴定。结果表明,ClWRKY46蛋白含有典型WRKY结构域,属于第III类WRKY亚家族,与水稻OsWRKY45同源性最高。该蛋白定位于细胞核中,且酵母转录激活试验证实其在酵母系统中无转录自激活活性。干旱胁迫可显著诱导ClWRKY46的转录上调。在酵母中异源表达ClWRKY46可显著提高菌株在干旱胁迫下的存活率。同时,转基因拟南芥在干旱胁迫下表现出更高的萌发率和更优的生长态势,其体内超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)和过氧化氢酶(CAT)等抗氧化酶活性显著升高,丙二醛(MDA)含量显著降低。综上所述,薏苡ClWRKY46是定位于细胞核的WRKY转录因子,无转录自激活活性,在植物响应干旱胁迫中发挥正向调控作用,异源表达证明该编码基因能够显著增强酵母和拟南芥的耐旱能力。

关键词: 薏苡, ClWRKY46, 转录激活, 亚细胞定位, 酵母功能验证, 非生物胁迫, 抗旱性

Abstract: The WRKY transcription factor family is widely involved in regulating plant responses to drought stress. Coix (Coix L.) is an important dual-purpose crop used for medicine and food, but its molecular mechanisms of drought tolerance have been relatively understudied. This study aimed to clone the ClWRKY46 gene from coix, analyze its sequence characteristics and expression patterns, and evaluate its stress response and tolerance under drought stress using heterologous expression systems, thereby providing a candidate gene and a theoretical basis for the genetic improvement of drought tolerance in coix. The ClWRKY46 gene was cloned using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and its expression patterns in various tissues and under drought and salt stresses were analyzed. Protein localization and transcriptional activity were determined via subcellular localization and yeast transcriptional activation assays. Furthermore, drought tolerance phenotypes and physiological indicators were evaluated using yeast and Arabidopsis heterologous expression systems. The results showed that the cloned ClWRKY46 encodes a protein containing a typical WRKY domain, belonging to the Group Ⅲ WRKY subfamily, and sharing the highest homology with rice OsWRKY45. The ClWRKY46 protein is localized in the nucleus and lacks transcriptional autoactivation activity in the yeast system. Drought stress significantly induced the upregulation of ClWRKY46 expression. Heterologous expression of ClWRKY46 in yeast significantly improved the survival rate of the strain under drought stress. Meanwhile, transgenic Arabidopsis lines overexpressing ClWRKY46 exhibited higher germination rates and superior growth performance under drought conditions, accompanied by significantly increased activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, CAT) and a significant reduction in malondialdehyde (MDA) content. In conclusion, ClWRKY46 is a nuclear-localized transcription factor lacking autoactivation activity, which plays a positive regulatory role in drought stress responses. Heterologous expression demonstrated that this gene can significantly enhance the drought resistance of yeast and Arabidopsis.

Key words: Coix lacryma-jobi L., ClWRKY46, transcriptional activation, subcellular localization, yeast functional verification, abiotic stress, drought resistance

[1] Rushton P J, Somssich I E, Ringler P, et al. WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci, 2010, 15: 247–258.

[2] Banerjee A, Roychoudhury A. WRKY proteins: signaling and regulation of expression during abiotic stress responses. Sci World J, 2015, 2015: 807560.

[3] Ishiguro S, Nakamura K. Characterization of a cDNA encoding a novel DNA-binding protein, SPF1 that recognizes SP8 sequences in the 5' upstream regions of genes coding for sporamin and β-amylase from sweet potato. Mol Gen Genet, 1994, 244: 563–571.

[4] Zhou J, Wang J, Zheng Z Y, et al. Characterization of the promoter and extended C-terminal domain of Arabidopsis WRKY33 and functional analysis of tomato WRKY33 homologues in plant stress responses. J Exp Bot, 2015, 66: 4567–4583.

[5] Zhang Y J, Wang L J. The WRKY transcription factor superfamily: its origin in eukaryotes and expansion in plants. BMC Evol Biol, 2005, 5: 1.

[6] Jiang Y J, Liang G, Yu D Q. Activated expression of WRKY57 confers drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant, 2012, 5: 1375–1388.

[7] Lee H, Cha J, Choi C, et al. Rice WRKY11 plays a role in pathogen defense and drought tolerance. Rice, 2018, 11: 5.

[8] Chen H T, Shi Y, An L, et al. Overexpression of SlWRKY6 enhances drought tolerance by strengthening antioxidant defense and stomatal closure via ABA signaling in Solanum lycopersicum L. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2024, 213: 108855. 

[9] Song H, Cao Y P, Zhao L G, et al. Review: WRKY transcription factors: Understanding the functional divergence. Plant Sci, 2023, 334: 111770. 

[10] Ren X Z, Chen Z Z, Liu Y, et al. ABO3, a WRKY transcription factor, mediates plant responses to abscisic acid and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 2010, 63: 417–429.

[11] Lyu M C, Luo W, Ge M M, et al. A group I WRKY gene, TaWRKY133, negatively regulates drought resistance in transgenic plants. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23: 12026.

[12] Ye H, Qiao L Y, Guo H Y, et al. Genome-wide identification of wheat WRKY gene family reveals that TaWRKY75-a is referred to drought and salt resistances. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 663118. 

[13] Jia C P, Wang J, Guo B, et al. A group III WRKY transcription factor, SlWRKY52, positively regulates drought tolerance in tomato. Environ Exp Bot, 2023, 215: 105513. 

[14] Ahammed G J, Li X, Yang Y X, et al. Tomato WRKY81 acts as a negative regulator for drought tolerance by modulating guard cell H2O2-mediated stomatal closure. Environ Exp Bot, 2020, 171: 103960. 

[15] Zhang L L, Cheng J, Sun X M, et al. Overexpression of VaWRKY14 increases drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by modulating the expression of stress-related genes. Plant Cell Rep, 2018, 37: 1159–1172. 

[16] 陈杜. 干旱对薏苡生长影响的研究进展. 农技服务, 2022, 39(6): 73–76.
Chen D. Research progress on the effect of drought on the growth of Coix lachryma-jobi. Agric Technol Serv, 2022, 39(6): 73–76 (in Chinese).

[17] Hua Y G, Liu Q, Zhai Y F, et al. Genome-wide analysis of the HSP20 gene family and its response to heat and drought stress in Coix (Coix lacryma-jobi L.). BMC Genomics, 2023, 24: 478.

[18] 周宇, 陈传敏, 王健, 等. 薏苡bZIP基因家族全基因组鉴定与非生物胁迫表达分析. 热带作物学报, 2022, 43: 2006–2020.
Zhou Y, Chen C M, Wang J, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of bZIP gene family under abiotic stress in Coix lacryma-jobi L. Chin J Trop Crops, 2022, 43: 2006–2020 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[19] 雷静, 班秀文, 刘荣, 等. 薏苡(Coix Lacryma-jobi L.) TCP家族全基因组鉴定及响应非生物胁迫的表达规律. 分子植物育种, 网络首发[2023-05-11], https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20230510.1438.004.
Lei J, Ban X W, Liu R, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of TCP gene family under abiotic stress in Coix Lacryma-jobi L. [J]. Mol Plant Breed, Published online [2023-05-11], https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20230510.1438.004. (in Chinese with English abstract).

[20] Wang Y L, Wang H J, Lu X Y, et al. Comprehensive identification of HD-zip family genes in Coix Lacryma-jobi L. and their potential roles in response to abiotic stress. Plants, 2025, 14: 1318.

[21] Wang Y J, Lu X Y, Fu Y H, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of VQ gene family under abiotic stress in Coix lacryma-jobi L. BMC Plant Biol, 2023, 23: 327.

[22] 王永乐, 路献勇, 王红娟, 等. 薏苡ClVQ12的表达模式、抗旱功能及互作蛋白分析. 江西农业大学学报, 2025, 47: 865–877.
Wang Y L, Lu X Y, Wang H J, et al. Expression pattern, drought-resistant function and analysis of interacting proteins of ClVQ12 in Coix lacryma-jobi L. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2025, 47: 865–877 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[23] Miao G D, Qin Y, Guo J H, et al. Transcriptome characterization and expression profile of Coix lacryma-jobi L. in response to drought. PLoS One, 2021, 16: e0256875.

[24] 龙佩霖, 雷静, 杨小雨, 等. 干旱胁迫对薏苡生长和产量形成的影响. 乡村科技, 2025, 16(22): 96–99.
Long P L, Lei J, Yang X Y, et al. Effects of drought stress on the growth and yield formation of Job’s tears (Coix lacryma-jobi L.). Rural Sci Technol, 2025, 16(22): 96–99 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[25] Jiang J J, Ma S H, Ye N H, et al. WRKY transcription factors in plant responses to stresses. J Integr Plant Biol, 2017, 59: 86–101.

[26] 郑浩杰, 杭烨, 王晓红, 等. 药用植物WRKY转录因子家族研究进展. 植物生理学报, 2022, 58: 1055–1067.
Zheng H J, Hang Y, Wang X H, et al. Research progress of WRKY transcription factor family in medicinal plants. Plant Physiol J, 2022, 58: 1055–1067(in Chinese with English abstract).

[27] Xu X H, Wang H, Liu J Q, et al. OsWRKY62 and OsWRKY76 interact with importin α1s for negative regulation of defensive responses in rice nucleus. Rice, 2022, 15: 12.

[28] Wang L, Liu F, Zhang X, et al. Expression characteristics and functional analysis of the ScWRKY3 gene from sugarcane. Int J Mol Sci, 2018, 19: 4059.

[29] Negi N, Khurana P. A salicylic acid inducible mulberry WRKY transcription factor, MiWRKY53 is involved in plant defence response. Plant Cell Rep, 2021, 40: 2151–2171.

[30] Liu S Y, Zhang C B, Guo F, et al. A systematical genome-wide analysis and screening of WRKY transcription factor family engaged in abiotic stress response in sweetpotato. BMC Plant Biol, 2022, 22: 616.

[31] Hussain R M F, Sheikh A H, Haider I, et al. Arabidopsis WRKY50 and TGA transcription factors synergistically activate expression of PR1. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9: 930.

[32] Chi Y J, Yang Y, Zhou Y, et al. Protein–protein interactions in the regulation of WRKY transcription factors. Mol Plant, 2013, 6: 287–300.

[33] Zhou X G, Lei Z J, An P T. Post-translational modification of WRKY transcription factors. Plants, 2024, 13: 2040.

[34] Ishihama N, Yamada R, Yoshioka M, et al. Phosphorylation of the Nicotiana benthamiana WRKY8 transcription factor by MAPK functions in the defense response. Plant Cell, 2011, 23: 1153–1170.

[35] Zhou J G, Wang X Y, He Y X, et al. Differential phosphorylation of the transcription factor WRKY33 by the protein kinases CPK5/CPK6 and MPK3/MPK6 cooperatively regulates camalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2020, 32: 2621–2638.

[36] Tao Z, Kou Y J, Liu H B, et al. OsWRKY45 alleles play different roles in abscisic acid signalling and salt stress tolerance but similar roles in drought and cold tolerance in rice. J Exp Bot, 2011, 62: 4863–4874.

[37] 张璐, 杨学乐, 何世才, 等. 湖南薏苡种质资源调查及表型评价. 植物遗传资源学报, 2025, 26: 2118–2130.
Zhang L, Yang X L, He S C, et al. Investigation and phenotypic evaluation of adlay (Coix L.) germplasm resources in Hunan province. J Plant Genet Resour, 2025, 26: 2118–2130 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[38] Gentile I, Santo Domingo M, Zebell S G, et al. Pan-angiosperm analysis of the CLE signaling peptide gene family unveils paths, patterns, and predictions of paralog diversification. Mol Biol Evol, 2025, 42: msaf294.

[39] Lehti-Shiu M D, Uygun S, Moghe G D, et al. Molecular evidence for functional divergence and decay of a transcription factor derived from whole-genome duplication in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol, 2015, 168: 1717–1734.

[40] El-Esawi M A, Al-Ghamdi A A, Ali H M, et al. Overexpression of AtWRKY30 transcription factor enhances heat and drought stress tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genes, 2019, 10: 163.

[41] Sun Y D, Yu D Q. Activated expression of AtWRKY53 negatively regulates drought tolerance by mediating stomatal movement. Plant Cell Rep, 2015, 34: 1295–1306.

[42] Yang Z, Chi X Y, Guo F F, et al. SbWRKY30 enhances the drought tolerance of plants and regulates a drought stress-responsive gene, SbRD19, in sorghum. J Plant Physiol, 2020, 246: 153142.

[43] 陈晨. OsWRKY95调控水稻抗旱性的功能研究. 吉林大学硕士学位论文, 吉林长春, 2024.
Chen C. Functional Study on the Role of OsWRKY95 in Regulating Rice's Drought Resistance. MS Thesis of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China, 2024 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[44] Shi G F, Liu G L, Liu H J, et al. Wrky transcriptional factor IlWRKY70 from Iris laevigata enhances drought and salinity tolerances in Nicotiana tabacum. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24: 16174.

[45] Maiti R, Satya P. Research advances in major cereal crops for adaptation to abiotic stresses. GM Crops Food, 2014, 5: 259–279.

[46] Gulzar F, Fu J Y, Zhu C Y, et al. Maize WRKY transcription factor ZmWRKY79 positively regulates drought tolerance through elevating ABA biosynthesis. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22: 10080.

[47] Lim C, Kang K, Shim Y, et al. Inactivating transcription factor OsWRKY5 enhances drought tolerance through abscisic acid signaling pathways. Plant Physiol, 2022, 188: 1900–1916.

[1] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[2] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[3] 杨飚, 杜帅康, 张继旺, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 马铃薯III类POD基因家族的全基因组鉴定及其表达谱分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 405-420.
[4] 余开航, 周洪斌, 罗亮扎, 王玫郦, 姜瑞梅, 董陈文华, 李仕金, 毛孝强, 陈升位. 大麦亮氨酸富集重复型类受体激酶基因HvLRR-RLK-510的克隆和表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 421-432.
[5] 魏瑾, 廖春梅, 高丽诗, 张莹, 杨慧, 岳琳, 刘宝辉, 陈丽玉. 大豆GmbHLH119和GmbHLH120基因生物信息学及表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(10): 3023-3036.
[6] 崔一凡, 孙晓彤, 石瑛. 马铃薯MDH基因家族的全基因组鉴定及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(10): 2875-2885.
[7] 李祥栋, 郑传奇, 陆秀娟, 郭超, 魏心元, 刘敏轩. 薏苡种间杂种F1表型和脂肪酸含量遗传特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(10): 2927-2938.
[8] 景秀清, 蔡永朵, 邓宁, 赵晓东, 翟飞红, 曾群. 藜麦RopGEF家族基因的鉴定及表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 28-43.
[9] 尹雨萌, 王雁楠, 康志河, 乔守晨, 卞倩倩, 李亚蔚, 曹郭郑, 赵国瑞, 徐丹丹, 杨育峰. 甘薯谷胱甘肽S-转移酶基因IbGSTU7的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1736-1746.
[10] 闫知兰, 赵芹, 常甜达, 王一鸣, 王碧辉, 王鹏, 黄春国, 张会, 王利祥, 郝晓鹏, 赵波. 豆科作物AOX基因鉴定及其在普通菜豆响应非生物胁迫中的表达模式研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1769-1783.
[11] 潘炬忠, 韦萍, 朱德平, 邵胜雪, 陈珊珊, 韦雅倩, 高维维. 水稻转录因子OsERF104的克隆和功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 900-913.
[12] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 李玉荣, 王瑾. 冀花系列高油酸花生抗旱性鉴定与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 797-811.
[13] 郭冰, 秦家范, 李娜, 宋梦瑶, 王黎明, 李君霞, 马小倩. 谷子SHMT基因家族全基因组鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 586-5897.
[14] 王语新, 陈天羽, 翟红, 张欢, 高少培, 何绍贞, 赵宁, 刘庆昌. 甘薯激酶基因IbHT1的克隆及抗旱性功能鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 301-311.
[15] 许睿, 何妙华, 王昊, 李卫, 任杰, 夏志强. 基于空间转录组技术解析大豆种胚对X射线辐射的响应机制[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3121-3132.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 柯丽萍;郑滔;吴学龙;何海燕;陈锦清. 甘蓝型油菜SLG基因片段的克隆及序列分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(05): 764 -769 .
[2] 吕丽华;陶洪斌;夏来坤; 张雅杰; 赵明; 赵久然;王璞. 不同种植密度下的夏玉米冠层结构及光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 447 -455 .
[3] 田志坚;易蓉;陈建荣;郭清泉;张学文. 苎麻纤维素合成酶基因cDNA的克隆及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(01): 76 -83 .
[4] 邱崇力. 普通小麦与六倍体小黑麦杂交不亲和性的研究 Ⅰ.杂种的胚胎发育[J]. 作物学报, 1986, (01): 49 -56 .
[5] 黄策;王天铎. 水稻群体物质生产过程的计算机模拟[J]. 作物学报, 1986, (01): 1 -8 .
[6] 勾玲;黄建军;张宾;李涛;孙锐;赵明. 群体密度对玉米茎秆抗倒力学和农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(10): 1688 -1695 .
[7] 何亮;李富华;沙莉娜;付凤玲;李晚忱. 玉米2C型丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白磷酸酶(PP2C)活性与耐旱性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(05): 899 -903 .
[8] 孙勇;藏金萍;王韵;朱苓华;Fotokian M H;徐建龙 ;黎志康. 利用回交导入系群体发掘水稻种质资源中的有利耐盐QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(10): 1611 -1617 .
[9] 瞿瑛;刘素红;谢云. 植被覆盖度计算机模拟模型与参数敏感性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(11): 1964 -1969 .
[10] 李金才;魏凤珍;王成雨;尹钧. 孕穗期土壤渍水逆境对冬小麦根系衰老的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(09): 1355 -1360 .