欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 1688-1695.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

群体密度对玉米茎秆抗倒力学和农艺性状的影响

勾玲1,3,黄建军3,张宾1,李涛1,孙锐1,赵明2,*   

  1. 1 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,北京100094;2 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京100081;3 石河子大学新疆兵团绿洲生态农业重点实验室,新疆石河子832003
  • 收稿日期:2007-01-17 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-10-12 网络出版日期:2007-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 赵 明

Effects of Population Density on Stalk Lodging Resistant Mechanism and Agronomic Characteristics of Maize

GOU Ling 1,3, HUANG Jian-Jun3, ZHANG Bin1, LI Tao1, SUN Rui1, ZHAO Ming 2,*   

  1. 1 College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094; 2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081; 3 Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology Agriculture of Xinjiang Construction Corps, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2007-01-17 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-10-12 Published online:2007-10-12
  • Contact: ZHAO Ming

摘要:

适当增加种植密度是提高玉米产量的重要途径之一,而倒伏是玉米增加群体密度的主要限制因素。2005—2006年以茎秆抗倒伏性不同的3个品种(稀植大穗型品种京科519、耐密抗倒型品种登海3719和当地主栽品种农大108)为材料,设3.0、5.25、7.5、9.25、12.0万株 hm-2 5个密度处理,研究了种植密度对茎秆的抗倒力学和农艺性状的影响。结果表明,随着群体密度的增加,茎秆的压碎强度(SCS)和外皮穿刺强度(RPS)以及节间直径、干重(DW)、干物质百分比、单位茎长干物质重(RDWL)显著降低,而节间长度有所增加,以上这些变化在供试品种间存在着明显的差异;茎秆抗倒力学性状随群体密度呈指数曲线(y = aebx)变化。茎秆抗倒力学性状与农艺性状密切相关。节间伸长慢且节间变细可能是耐密品种在高密度群体下的适应性表现,而节间干物质积累、尤其高位节间的干物质积累较高的品种抗倒伏能力强。在玉米抽雄前1周茎秆第4节间以上干物质百分比大于7.5%,单位茎长干物质重(RDWL)高于0.2 g cm-1时较为抗倒。逐步回归分析表明,单位茎长干物质对茎秆压碎强度(SCS)和外皮穿刺强度(RPS)的正向影响最大,可以作为玉米抗倒伏品种选择的重要农艺指标。

关键词: 玉米, 群体密度, 抗倒力学, 农艺性状

Abstract:

Lodging is a major constraint to limit grain yield under increased planting density in modern maize (Zea mays L.) production. Effects of planting density on stalk mechanical and agronomic characteristics were investigated using three maize cultivars differing in lodging resistant ability,i.e. Jingke 519 (with a large spike under thinned planting density), Denghai 3719 (tolerant to high density) and Nongda 108 (a main local cultivar). Five levels of density treatment were imposed, 3.0, 5.25, 7.5, 9.25 and 12.0×104 plants ha-1. Experiments were arranged in a split plot design with four replicates. The irrigation and fertilizer management in the experiment plot was consistent with typical agronomic practices in the local high-yield field. The results indicated that the increase of planting density would cause significant decreases in stalk crushing strength (SCS), rind penetration strength (RPS), internode diameter and dry weight (DW), percentage of dry matter and ratio of dry matter weight to length of internode (RDWL), and dramatic increase in internode length. The relationship between stalk mechanical characteristics and planting density fitted a exponential curve (y = aebx) significantly. The stalk mechanical characteristics were highly correlated with the agronomic characteristics. These characteristics of Jingke 519 were susceptive of the increasing planting density above 75 000 plant ha-1, especially for these above the 4th internode was. The whole plant would have high lodging resistant ability if the dry matter accumulation was high in the 4th and above 4th internods. That the internod length enlarged slowly and diameter of internode decreased significantly with increasing plant density was an adaptability to high planting density for the resistant cultivar. When the percentage of DW of the 4th and above 4th internods was more than 7.5%, and its RDWL was more than 0.2 g cm-1 at a week prior to anthesis, the plants would be resistant to lodging .The stepwise regression analysis revealed that the RDWL contributed positively the most to SCS and RPS. RDWL was definite as an agronomic indicator of maize stalk lodging resistant ability.

Key words: Maize (Zea mays L.), Density, Lodging resistant mechanism, Agronomic characteristics

[1] 肖颖妮, 于永涛, 谢利华, 祁喜涛, 李春艳, 文天祥, 李高科, 胡建广. 基于SNP标记揭示中国鲜食玉米品种的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1301-1311.
[2] 崔连花, 詹为民, 杨陆浩, 王少瓷, 马文奇, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平, 杨青华. 2个玉米ZmCOP1基因的克隆及其转录丰度对不同光质处理的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1312-1324.
[3] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[7] 单露英, 李俊, 李亮, 张丽, 王颢潜, 高佳琪, 吴刚, 武玉花, 张秀杰. 转基因玉米NK603基体标准物质研制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1059-1070.
[8] 许静, 高景阳, 李程成, 宋云霞, 董朝沛, 王昭, 李云梦, 栾一凡, 陈甲法, 周子键, 吴建宇. 过表达ZmCIPKHT基因增强植物耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 851-859.
[9] 刘磊, 詹为民, 丁武思, 刘通, 崔连花, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平. 玉米矮化突变体gad39的遗传分析与分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 886-895.
[10] 闫宇婷, 宋秋来, 闫超, 刘爽, 张宇辉, 田静芬, 邓钰璇, 马春梅. 连作秸秆还田下玉米氮素积累与氮肥替代效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 962-974.
[11] 徐宁坤, 李冰, 陈晓艳, 魏亚康, 刘子龙, 薛永康, 陈洪宇, 王桂凤. 一个新的玉米Bt2基因突变体的遗传分析和分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 572-579.
[12] 宋仕勤, 杨清龙, 王丹, 吕艳杰, 徐文华, 魏雯雯, 刘小丹, 姚凡云, 曹玉军, 王永军, 王立春. 东北主推玉米品种种子形态及贮藏物质与萌发期耐冷性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 726-738.
[13] 渠建洲, 冯文豪, 张兴华, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 基于全基因组关联分析解析玉米籽粒大小的遗传结构[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 304-319.
[14] 张倩, 韩本高, 张博, 盛开, 李岚涛, 王宜伦. 控失尿素减施及不同配比对夏玉米产量及氮肥效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 180-192.
[15] 苏达, 颜晓军, 蔡远扬, 梁恬, 吴良泉, MUHAMMAD AtifMuneer, 叶德练. 磷肥对甜玉米籽粒植酸和锌有效性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 203-214.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!