欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 1322-1327.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同耐低磷水稻基因型秧苗对难溶性磷的吸收利用

郭再华;贺立源;徐才国   

  1. 华中农业大学资源环境学院
  • 收稿日期:2004-09-09 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2005-10-12 网络出版日期:2005-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 贺立源

Uptake and Use of Sparingly Soluble Phosphorus by Rice Genotypes with Different P-efficiency

GUO Zai-Hua;HE Li-Yuan;XU Cai-Guo   

  1. 1Resource and Environment College of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei
  • Received:2004-09-09 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2005-10-12 Published online:2005-10-12
  • Contact: HE Li-Yuan

摘要:

选取4个典型耐低磷水稻基因型99011、508、580和99112,并以2个磷敏感基因型99012和99056为参照,采用营养液培养和砂培的方法,研究不同磷处理对秧苗生长的影响以及不同耐低磷基因型对3种难溶性磷源(有机磷、铝磷和磷矿粉)吸收利用能力的差异。结果表明,不同无机磷处理,6个基因型生物量和根干重基本上均为全磷处理(P)>对照+铝磷(CK+Al-P)>对照+磷矿粉(CK+RP)> 对照(CK);4个耐低磷基因型根干重和根冠比均大于2个磷敏感基因型;对于根冠比,耐低磷基因型580和99011为对照+磷矿粉(CK+RP)>对照+铝磷(CK+Al-P)> 对照(CK)> 全磷处理(P),耐低磷基因型508、99112和磷敏感基因型99012为CK> CK+RP> CK+Al-P > P,磷敏感基因型99056为CK+Al-P > CK+RP > P>CK;缺磷处理,秧苗活化吸收难溶性磷源的能力均为OP> Al-P> RP,且不同基因型的分解吸收能力对OP为99011> 508> 580> 99012> 99112> 99056(表2),对Al-P为580> 99011> 99112> 508> 99056> 99012(表3),对RP为580> 99112> 99011> 508> 99012> 99056(表2)。此外,缺磷即CK处理,508对低浓度的磷吸收最多(表2和表3),而580对磷的利用效率显著高于其他基因型(表3),这些特征可能也是它们耐低磷的重要贡献因子之一。

关键词: 水稻, 磷效率, 磷源, 吸收利用, 耐低磷机制

Abstract:

Four low-P tolerant rice genotypes named 99011, 580, 508 and 99112 were used with two low-P sensitive rice genotypes named 99012 and 99056 as reference, to investigate the genetic differences for growth as influenced by different inorganic phosphorus supply, and availability and uptake ability to three insoluble P named organic P, Al-P and RP, using solution culture and sand quartz culture respectively. The results demonstrated that biomass and root dry weight of rices were reduced by low P, but R/S was affected by both supplied P level and uptake ability of plant to low P. Under the condition of low P, the biomass and root dry weight with different inorganic phosphorus treatments were P> CK+Al-P > CK+RP > CK; root dry weight and root shoot ratio of four low-P tolerant rice genotypes were larger than those of two low-P sensitive rice genotypes; For R/S, 580 and 99011 were CK+RP > CK+Al-P > CK> P, 508, 99112 and 99012 were CK> CK+RP > CK+Al-P > P, but 99056 was CK+Al-P > CK+RP > P> CK. The availability of sparingly soluble phosphates and organic phosphorus absorbed by rice seedlings was OP> Al-P> RP, but different rice cultivars had significant difference in response to three insoluble P compounds. P uptake amount for organic phosphorus was 99011> 508> 580> 99012> 99112> 99056, for Al-P was 580> 99011> 99112> 508> 99056> 99012, and for RP was 580> 99112> 99011> 508> 99012> 99056. Furthermore 508 has highest uptake efficiency to low phosphorus; 580 has highest P utilization efficiency , and absorbed more sparingly soluble phosphorus especially Al-P and RP than others; They are maybe one of the important reasons in 508 and 580 for low-P tolerance in 508 and 580. Low-P tolerant rice genotype 99112, a special material, it has small biomass and achieve high relative grain yield. As for low-P sensitive rice genotype 99056, its utilization efficiency to phosphorus is not low, but it just has small root system, only active and uptake a little sparingly soluble phosphorus, and can not absorb low concentration phosphorus.

Key words: Rice, P efficiency, P sources, Uptake and use, Mechanism of tolerance to low-P stress

中图分类号: 

  • S511
[1] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[2] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[3] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[4] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[5] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[6] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[7] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[8] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[9] 尤根基, 谢昊, 梁毓文, 李龙, 王玉茹, 蒋晨炀, 郭剑, 李广浩, 陆大雷. 氮肥减施措施对江淮春玉米产量和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2152-2163.
[10] 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[11] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[12] 雷松翰, 范骏扬, 车艳奕, 代永东, 郑雨萌, 田维江, 桑贤春, 王晓雯. 水稻内卷叶突变体acl3的鉴定及调控基因的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1467-1479.
[13] 李福媛, 杨奕, 马继琼, 许明辉, 林良斌, 孙一丁. 水稻OsPUB4基因克隆、激素诱导表达分析与互作蛋白筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1690-1700.
[14] 王梦宁, 谢可冉, 高逖, 王飞, 任孝俭, 熊栋梁, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 崔克辉. 水稻幼穗分化期至抽穗期高温对籽粒形态和充实的影响及其与粒重的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1347-1362.
[15] 盛倩男, 方娅婷, 赵剑, 杜思垚, 胡行珍, 余秋华, 朱俊, 任涛, 鲁剑巍. 不同养分管理措施对稻田和旱地油菜产量的影响及其对冻害的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1286-1298.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!