欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (05): 790-794.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00790

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

稻米淀粉RVA谱特征及其与理化品质性状相关性的研究

贾良1;丁雪云3;王平荣1;邓晓建1,2,*   

  1. 1 四川农业大学水稻研究所, 四川成都611130; 2 四川农业大学 / 西南作物基因资源与遗传改良教育部重点实验室, 四川雅安625014; 3 福建农林大学, 福建福州350002
  • 收稿日期:2007-10-08 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-05-12 网络出版日期:2008-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 邓晓建

Rice RVA Profile Characteristics and Correlation with the Physical/ Chemical Quality

JIA Liang1,DING Xue-Yun3,WANG Ping-Rong1,DENG Xiao-Jian12*   

  1. 1 Rice Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan; 2 Key Laboratory of Southwest Crop Genetic Resources and
    Improvement, Ministry of Education / Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, Sichuan; 3 Fujian agriculture And Forestry University, Fuzhou
    350002, Fujian, China
  • Received:2007-10-08 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-05-12 Published online:2008-05-12
  • Contact: DENG Xiao-Jian

PDF

3660

被引次数

110

摘要： 测定了四川地区种植的124个水稻品种的RVA谱特征值及各项理化品质指标, 分析了RVA谱各特征值间, 及其与各项理化品质指标间的相关性, 并分析了不同直链淀粉含量(AC)品种的RVA谱特征值差异, 结果表明, RVA谱6个特征值之间, 最高黏度(PKV)与冷胶黏度(CPV)、回复值(CSV)相关不显著, 热浆黏度(HPV)与崩解值(BDV)相关显著, 其余均相关极显著。AC、胶稠度(GC)与RVA谱6个特征值均极显著相关, 而碱消值(ASV)与RVA谱6个特征值相关均不显著, 说明AC和GC是影响RVA谱特征值的两个重要理化品质指标。不同AC品种间的RVA谱不尽相同, 一般而言, AC越高的品种崩解值越小, 而消减值和回复值越大。

关键词: 水稻, 稻米品质, 稻米淀粉RVA谱, 理化品质指标

Abstract: In this paper, we determined rice RVA profile characteristics and their physical/chemical quality indicators of 124 varieties grown in Sichuan Province, and studied the relationship among RVA profile characteristics and between RVA profile characteristics and physical/chemical indicators. To study the differences of RVA profile characteristics of rice varieties with different amylose contents (AC), we divided these varieties into six groups, including waxy rice, low AC, moderate lower AC, moderate AC, moderate higher AC, high AC, and analyzed the differences of RVA profile characteristics between the latter five groups of no-waxy varieties, and the influence of AC on RVA profile characteristics. There were no significant correlation between peak viscosity (PKV) and cool paste viscosity (CPV), and between PKV and consistence (CSV), but significant correlations among other RVA profile characteristics with each other at P = 0.01 except hot paste viscosity (HPV) with breakdown (BDV) at P = 0.05. CPV significantly positive correlated to CSV, with the correlation coefficients of 0.94. Six RVA profile characteristics had signifi-cant correlations with AC and gel consistency (GC) at P = 0.01, AC significantly positively correlated to GC, with the correlation coefficients of -0.82 at P = 0.01; alkali-spreading value (ASV) had no significant correlation with AC, GC, and six RVA profile characteristics. Varieties with different AC had different RVA profile characteristics, when AC was higher, setback (SBV) and CSV were higher and BDV lower.

Key words: Rice, Rice quality, Rice RVA profile characteristics, Physical/chemical quality indicator

[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[8] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[9] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[10] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[11] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[14] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] 王琰, 陈志雄, 姜大刚, 张灿奎, 查满荣. 增强叶片氮素输出对水稻分蘖和碳代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 739-746.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2